PNAS Peer Review  Sign up for PNAS Online eTocs
Link: Info for AuthorsLink: Editorial BoardLink: AboutLink: SubscribeLink: AdvertiseLink: ContactLink: Sitemap Link: PNAS Home
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Link: Current Issue "" Link: Archives "" Link: Online Submission ""  Link: Advanced Search

Published online on October 23, 2006, 10.1073/pnas.0604449103 OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE


This Article
Free via Open Access: OA
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supporting Figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soyer, O. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bonhoeffer, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soyer, O. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bonhoeffer, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg  
What's this?

Evolution
Evolution of complexity in signaling pathways

( robustness | evolutionary simulations | mathematical models | protein pathways | signal transduction )

Orkun S. Soyer {dagger}{ddagger} and Sebastian Bonhoeffer

Theoretical Biology Group, Institute for Integrative Biology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Universitätsstrasse 16, ETH Zentrum, CHN K12.2, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland

Edited by Steven Strogatz, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, and accepted by the Editorial Board September 14, 2006 (received for review May 30, 2006)

It is not clear how biological pathways evolve to mediate a certain physiological response and why they show a level of complexity that is generally above the minimum required to achieve such a response. One possibility is that pathway complexity increases due to the nature of evolutionary mechanisms. Here, we analyze this possibility by using mathematical models of biological pathways and evolutionary simulations. Starting with a population of small pathways of three proteins, we let the population evolve with mutations that affect pathway structure through duplication or deletion of existing proteins, deletion or creation of interactions among them, or addition of new proteins. Our simulations show that such mutational events, coupled with a selective pressure, leads to growth of pathways. These results indicate that pathways could be driven toward complexity via simple evolutionary mechanisms and that complexity can arise without any specific selective pressure for it. Furthermore, we find that the level of complexity that pathways evolve toward depends on the selection criteria. In general, we find that final pathway size tends to be lower when pathways evolve under stringent selection criteria. This leads to the counterintuitive conclusion that simple response requirements on a pathway would facilitate its evolution toward higher complexity.


Author contributions: O.S.S. and S.B. designed research; O.S.S. performed research; O.S.S. analyzed data; and O.S.S. and S.B. wrote the paper.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

{dagger}To whom correspondence should be addressed.

{ddagger}Present address: The Microsoft Research-University of Trento, Centre for Computational and Systems Biology, Piazza Manci 17, 38050 Povo (TN), Italy.

Orkun S. Soyer, E-mail: orkun.soyer{at}msr-unitn.unitn.it

www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0604449103
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg    What's this?