( evolution |
polymorphism |
repeats |
splicing )
*Laboratoire de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Sherbrooke,
Edited by Joan A. Steitz, Yale University, New Haven, CT, and approved November 17, 2006 (received for review June 7, 2006) Despite the widespread occurrence of spliceosomal introns in the genomes of higher eukaryotes, their origin remains controversial. One model proposes that the duplication of small genomic portions could have provided the boundaries for new introns. If this mechanism has occurred recently, the 5' and 3' boundaries of each resulting intron should display distinctive sequence similarity. Here, we report that the human genome contains an excess of introns with perfect matching sequences at boundaries. One-third of these introns interrupt the protein-coding sequences of known genes. Introns with the best-matching boundaries are invariably found in tandem arrays of direct repeats. Sequence analysis of the arrays indicates that many intron-breeding repeats have disseminated in several genes at different times during human evolution. A comparison with orthologous regions in mouse and chimpanzee suggests a young age for the human introns with the most-similar boundaries. Finally, we show that these human introns are alternatively spliced with exceptionally high frequency. Our study indicates that genomic duplication has been an important mode of intron gain in mammals. The alternative splicing of transcripts containing these intron-breeding repeats may provide the plasticity required for the rapid evolution of new human proteins.
Evolution
Modern origin of numerous alternatively spliced human introns from tandem arrays
, 
Département de Microbiologie et d'Infectiologie, Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada J1H 5N4
Author contributions: D.Z. and B.C. designed research; D.Z. and R.M. performed research; D.Z., R.M., S.A.E., and B.C. analyzed data; and D.Z. and B.C. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
To whom correspondence should be addressed.
www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0604777104
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles in HighWire Press-hosted journals:
![]() |
J. Coulombe-Huntington and J. Majewski Intron Loss and Gain in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2007; 24(12): 2842 - 2850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zhang, M. L. Hastings, A. R. Krainer, and M. Q. Zhang Dual-specificity splice sites function alternatively as 5' and 3' splice sites PNAS, September 18, 2007; 104(38): 15028 - 15033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||