( human evolution |
introgression |
admixture )
*Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Departments of
Edited by Henry C. Harpending, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, and approved October 5, 2006 (received for review August 10, 2006) At the center of the debate on the emergence of modern humans and their spread throughout the globe is the question of whether archaic Homo lineages contributed to the modern human gene pool, and more importantly, whether such contributions impacted the evolutionary adaptation of our species. A major obstacle to answering this question is that low levels of admixture with archaic lineages are not expected to leave extensive traces in the modern human gene pool because of genetic drift. Loci that have undergone strong positive selection, however, offer a unique opportunity to identify low-level admixture with archaic lineages, provided that the introgressed archaic allele has risen to high frequency under positive selection. The gene microcephalin (MCPH1) regulates brain size during development and has experienced positive selection in the lineage leading to Homo sapiens. Within modern humans, a group of closely related haplotypes at this locus, known as haplogroup D, rose from a single copy
Evolution
Evidence that the adaptive allele of the brain size gene microcephalin introgressed into Homo sapiens from an archaic Homo lineage

, 
, 
,
,
¶
Human Genetics and
Ecology and Evolution, and
Committee on Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637
37,000 years ago and swept to exceptionally high frequency (
70% worldwide today) because of positive selection. Here, we examine the origin of haplogroup D. By using the interhaplogroup divergence test, we show that haplogroup D likely originated from a lineage separated from modern humans
1.1 million years ago and introgressed into humans by
37,000 years ago. This finding supports the possibility of admixture between modern humans and archaic Homo populations (Neanderthals being one possibility). Furthermore, it buttresses the important notion that, through such adminture, our species has benefited evolutionarily by gaining new advantageous alleles. The interhaplogroup divergence test developed here may be broadly applicable to the detection of introgression at other loci in the human genome or in genomes of other species.
Author contributions: B.T.L. designed research; P.D.E., N.M.-B., and B.T.L. performed research; E.J.V. and R.R.H. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; P.D.E., N.M.-B., E.J.V., R.R.H., and B.T.L. analyzed data; and N.M.-B. and B.T.L. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.
¶To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bruce T. Lahn, E-mail: blahn{at}bsd.uchicago.edu
www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0606966103
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles in HighWire Press-hosted journals:
![]() |
M. P. Cox, F. L. Mendez, T. M. Karafet, M. M. Pilkington, S. B. Kingan, G. Destro-Bisol, B. I. Strassmann, and M. F. Hammer Testing for Archaic Hominin Admixture on the X Chromosome: Model Likelihoods for the Modern Human RRM2P4 Region From Summaries of Genealogical Topology Under the Structured Coalescent Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 427 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. R. Fagundes, N. Ray, M. Beaumont, S. Neuenschwander, F. M. Salzano, S. L. Bonatto, and L. Excoffier Statistical evaluation of alternative models of human evolution PNAS, November 6, 2007; 104(45): 17614 - 17619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Trinkaus European early modern humans and the fate of the Neandertals PNAS, May 1, 2007; 104(18): 7367 - 7372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Shimada, K. Panchapakesan, S. A. Tishkoff, A. Q. Nato Jr, and J. Hey Divergent Haplotypes and Human History as Revealed in a Worldwide Survey of X-Linked DNA Sequence Variation Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2007; 24(3): 687 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||