Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability

  1. David R. Montgomery*
  1. Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 91895
  1. Edited by Pamela A. Matson, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved July 11, 2007 (received for review January 3, 2007)

Abstract

Data drawn from a global compilation of studies quantitatively confirm the long-articulated contention that erosion rates from conventionally plowed agricultural fields average 1–2 orders of magnitude greater than rates of soil production, erosion under native vegetation, and long-term geological erosion. The general equivalence of the latter indicates that, considered globally, hillslope soil production and erosion evolve to balance geologic and climate forcing, whereas conventional plow-based agriculture increases erosion rates enough to prove unsustainable. In contrast to how net soil erosion rates in conventionally plowed fields (≈1 mm/yr) can erode through a typical hillslope soil profile over time scales comparable to the longevity of major civilizations, no-till agriculture produces erosion rates much closer to soil production rates and therefore could provide a foundation for sustainable agriculture.

Footnotes

  • E-mail: dave{at}ess.washington.edu
  • Author contributions: D.R.M. designed research, performed research, analyzed data, and wrote the paper.

  • The author declares no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0611508104/DC1.

  • Abbreviation:
    USDA,
    U.S. Department of Agriculture.
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents