ChemBridge Corporation Screening Compounds  Sign up for PNAS Online eTocs
Link: Info for AuthorsLink: Editorial BoardLink: AboutLink: SubscribeLink: AdvertiseLink: ContactLink: Sitemap Link: PNAS Home
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Link: Current Issue "" Link: Archives "" Link: Online Submission ""  Link: Advanced Search

Published online on January 7, 2008, 10.1073/pnas.0710615105

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Setlow, R. B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Setlow, R. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg  
What's this?

MEDICAL SCIENCES
Addressing the health benefits and risks, involving vitamin D or skin cancer, of increased sun exposure

Johan Moan*,{dagger},{ddagger}, Alina Carmen Porojnicu*, Arne Dahlback{dagger}, and Richard B. Setlow{ddagger},§

*Department of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway; {dagger}Department of Physics, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway; and §Biology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973-5000

Contributed by Richard B. Setlow, November 13, 2007 (sent for review September 5, 2007)

Abstract

Solar radiation is the main cause of skin cancers. However, it also is a main source of vitamin D for humans. Because the optimal status of vitamin D protects against internal cancers and a number of other diseases, a controversy exists: Will increased sun exposure lead to net health benefits or risks? We calculated the relative yield of vitamin D photosynthesis as a function of latitude with a radiative transfer model and cylinder geometry for the human skin surface. The annual yield of vitamin D is 3.4 and 4.8 times larger below the equator than in the U.K. and Scandinavia, respectively. In populations with similar skin types, there are clear latitude gradients of all major forms of skin cancer, indicating a north–south gradient in real sun exposure. Surprisingly, the incidence rates of major internal cancers also increase from north to south. However, the survival prognosis also improves significantly from north to south. Reasons for these findings are discussed in view of the role of vitamin D. In Norway, melanoma rates increased by a factor of 6 from 1960 to 1990, while the prognosis improved in the same period. After 1990, melanoma rates have remained constant or even decreased in age groups <50 years, whereas the prognosis has not improved further. These data, together with those for internal cancers and the beneficial effects of an optimal vitamin D status, indicate that increased sun exposure may lead to improved cancer prognosis and, possibly, give more positive than adverse health effects.

body mass index | cutaneous malignant melanoma | squamous cell carcinoma | ultraviolet radiation


Footnotes

Author contributions: J.M. designed research; A.C.P. and A.D. performed research; J.M., A.C.P., and A.D. analyzed data; and J.M. and R.B.S. wrote the paper.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

{ddagger}To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: johan.moan{at}fys.uio.no or setlow{at}bnl.gov


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg    What's this?