An acoustic microscopy technique reveals hidden morphological defenses in Daphnia

  1. Christian Laforsch*,,
  2. Wilfred Ngwa,
  3. Wolfgang Grill, and
  4. Ralph Tollrian*
  1. *Department of Biological Sciences, Institute of Environmental and Natural Sciences, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, United Kingdom; and University of Leipzig, Institute for Experimental Physics II, Linnéstrasse 5, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
  1. Edited by May R. Berenbaum, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL, and approved September 30, 2004 (received for review July 7, 2004)

Abstract

Inducible defenses are common strategies for coping with the selective force of predation in heterogeneous environments. In recent years the conspicuous and often dramatic morphological plasticity of several waterflea species of the genus Daphnia have been found to be inducible defenses activated by chemical cues released by predators. However, the exact defensive mechanisms remained mysterious. Because even some minute morphological alterations proved to be protective against predatory invertebrates, it has been suggested that the visible morphological changes are only the tip of the iceberg of the entire protective mechanisms. Here we applied a method of ultrasonic microscopy with vector contrast at 1.2 GHz to probe hidden morphological defenses. We found that induction with predator kairomones increases the stability of the carapace in two Daphnia species up to 350%. This morphological plasticity provides a major advantage for the induced morphs during predation because predatory invertebrates need to crush or puncture the carapace of their prey to consume them. Our ultrastructural analyses revealed that the internal architecture of the carapace ensures maximal rigidity with minimal material investment. Our results uncover hidden morphological plasticity and suggest a reconsideration of former classification systems in defended and undefended genotypes in Daphnia and possibly in other prey organisms as well.

Footnotes

  • To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: c.laforsch{at}lancaster.ac.uk.

  • Author contributions: C.L. designed research; C.L. and W.N. performed research; W.G. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; C.L., W.N., and W.G. analyzed data; and C.L., W.N., W.G., and R.T. wrote the paper.

  • This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents