Previous Article |
Table of Contents
| Next Article
GENETICS
Evolutionary comparisons suggest many novel cAMP response protein binding sites in Escherichia coli

*Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; and
Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540
Contributed by C. G. Callan, Jr., December 23, 2003
The cAMP response protein (CRP) is a transcription factor known to regulate many genes in Escherichia coli. Computational studies of transcription factor binding to DNA are usually based on a simple matrix model of sequence-dependent binding energy. For CRP, this model predicts many binding sites that are not known to be functional. If they are indeed spurious, the underlying binding model is called into question. We use a species comparison method to assess the functionality of a population of such predicted CRP sites in E. coli. We compare them with orthologous sites in Salmonella typhimurium identified independently by CLUSTALW alignment, and find a dependence of mutation probability on position in the site. This dependence increases with predicted site binding energy. The positions where mutation is most strongly suppressed are those where mutation would have the biggest effect on predicted binding energy. This finding suggests that many of the novel sites are functional, that the matrix model correctly estimates their binding strength, and that calculated CRP binding strength is the quantity that is conserved between species. The analysis also identifies many new E. coli binding sites and genes likely to be functional for CRP.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ccallan{at}princeton.edu.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles in HighWire Press-hosted journals:
![]() |
N. Molina and E. van Nimwegen Universal patterns of purifying selection at noncoding positions in bacteria Genome Res., January 1, 2008; 18(1): 148 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-S. Zhang, R. Garcia-Contreras, and T. K. Wood YcfR (BhsA) Influences Escherichia coli Biofilm Formation through Stress Response and Surface Hydrophobicity J. Bacteriol., April 15, 2007; 189(8): 3051 - 3062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Perez, V. E. Angarica, A. T. R. Vasconcelos, and J. Collado-Vides Tractor_DB (version 2.0): a database of regulatory interactions in gamma-proteobacterial genomes Nucleic Acids Res., January 12, 2007; 35(suppl_1): D132 - D136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. S. Cameron and R. J. Redfield Non-canonical CRP sites control competence regulons in Escherichia coli and many other {gamma}-proteobacteria Nucleic Acids Res., November 6, 2006; 34(20): 6001 - 6014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tanay Extensive low-affinity transcriptional interactions in the yeast genome Genome Res., August 1, 2006; 16(8): 962 - 972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Youn, R. L. Kerby, M. Conrad, and G. P. Roberts Study of Highly Constitutively Active Mutants Suggests How cAMP Activates cAMP Receptor Protein J. Biol. Chem., January 13, 2006; 281(2): 1119 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Bai, L. A. McCue, and K. A. McDonough Characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv3676 (CRPMt), a Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein-Like DNA Binding Protein J. Bacteriol., November 15, 2005; 187(22): 7795 - 7804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Mustonen and M. Lassig Evolutionary population genetics of promoters: Predicting binding sites and functional phylogenies PNAS, November 1, 2005; 102(44): 15936 - 15941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Zhang, G. Gosset, R. Barabote, C. S. Gonzalez, W. A. Cuevas, and M. H. Saier Jr. Functional Interactions between the Carbon and Iron Utilization Regulators, Crp and Fur, in Escherichia coli J. Bacteriol., February 1, 2005; 187(3): 980 - 990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||