Differential neuroprotective and antiinflammatory effects of estrogen receptor (ER)α and ERβ ligand treatment

  1. Seema Tiwari-Woodruff,
  2. Laurie Beth J. Morales,
  3. Ruri Lee, and
  4. Rhonda R. Voskuhl*
  1. Multiple Sclerosis Program, Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Neuroscience Research Building 1, Room 475D, 635 Charles Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095
  1. Edited by Bruce S. McEwen, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, and approved July 31, 2007 (received for review April 24, 2007)

Abstract

Treatment with either estradiol or an estrogen receptor (ER)α ligand has been shown to be both antiinflammatory and neuroprotective in a variety of neurological disease models, but whether neuroprotective effects could be observed in the absence of an antiinflammatory effect has remained unknown. Here, we have contrasted effects of treatment with an ERα vs. an ERβ ligand in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, the multiple sclerosis model with a known pathogenic role for both inflammation and neurodegeneration. Clinically, ERα ligand treatment abrogated disease at the onset and throughout the disease course. In contrast, ERβ ligand treatment had no effect at disease onset but promoted recovery during the chronic phase of the disease. ERα ligand treatment was antiinflammatory in the systemic immune system, whereas ERβ ligand treatment was not. Also, ERα ligand treatment reduced CNS inflammation, whereas ERβ ligand treatment did not. Interestingly, treatment with either the ERα or the ERβ ligand was neuroprotective, as evidenced by reduced demyelination and preservation of axon numbers in white matter, as well as decreased neuronal abnormalities in gray matter. Thus, by using the ERβ selective ligand, we have dissociated the antiinflammatory effect from the neuroprotective effect of estrogen treatment and have shown that neuroprotective effects of estrogen treatment do not necessarily depend on antiinflammatory properties. Together, these findings suggest that ERβ ligand treatment should be explored as a potential neuroprotective strategy in multiple sclerosis and other neurodegenerative diseases, particularly because estrogen-related toxicities such as breast and uterine cancer are mediated through ERα.

Footnotes

  • *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rvoskuhl{at}ucla.edu
  • Author contributions: S.T.-W. and L.B.J.M. contributed equally to this work; R.R.V. designed research; S.T.-W., L.B.J.M., and R.L. performed research; S.T.-W., L.B.J.M., and R.R.V. analyzed data; and S.T.-W., L.B.J.M., and R.R.V. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0703783104/DC1.

  • Abbreviations:
    EAE,
    experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis;
    MOG,
    myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein;
    DPN,
    diarylpropionitrile;
    MBP,
    myelin basic protein;
    MS,
    multiple sclerosis;
    KO,
    knockout.
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents