Transcriptional regulation of protein complexes within and across species

  1. Kai Tan*,
  2. Tomer Shlomi,
  3. Hoda Feizi*,
  4. Trey Ideker*, and
  5. Roded Sharan,
  1. *Department of Bioengineering, University of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093; and
  2. School of Computer Science, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel
  1. Edited by Philip P. Green, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, and approved November 27, 2006 (received for review August 9, 2006)

Abstract

Yeast two-hybrid and coimmunoprecipitation experiments have defined large-scale protein–protein interaction networks for many model species. Separately, systematic chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments have enabled the assembly of large networks of transcriptional regulatory interactions. To investigate the functional interplay between these two interaction types, we combined both within a probabilistic framework that models the cell as a network of transcription factors regulating protein complexes. This framework identified 72 putative coregulated complexes in yeast and allowed the prediction of 120 previously uncharacterized transcriptional interactions. Several predictions were tested by new microarray profiles, yielding a confirmation rate (58%) comparable with that of direct immunoprecipitation experiments. Furthermore, we extended our framework to a cross-species setting, identifying 24 coregulated complexes that were conserved between yeast and fly. Analyses of these conserved complexes revealed different conservation levels of their regulators and provided suggestive evidence that protein–protein interaction networks may evolve more slowly than transcriptional interaction networks. Our results demonstrate how multiple molecular interaction types can be integrated toward a global wiring diagram of the cell, and they provide insights into the evolutionary dynamics of protein complex regulation.

Footnotes

  • To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: roded{at}tau.ac.il
  • Author contributions: K.T., T.I., and R.S. designed research; K.T., H.F., and R.S. performed research; K.T., T.S., T.I., and R.S. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; K.T., T.S., and R.S. analyzed data; and K.T., T.I., and R.S. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS direct submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0606914104/DC1.

  • Abbreviations:
    co-IP,
    coimmunoprecipitation;
    FDR,
    false discovery rate;
    GO,
    gene ontology;
    MIPS,
    Munich Information Center for Protein Sequences;
    PPI,
    protein–protein interaction;
    TF,
    transcription factor;
    TI,
    transcriptional interaction;
    DBD,
    DNA-binding domain.
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents