This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a colleague Related articles in PNAS Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Google Scholar Articles by Moan, J. Articles by Setlow, R. B. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Moan, J. Articles by Setlow, R. B. Social Bookmarking                What's this?

 Previous Article  | Table of Contents |  Next Article 

From the Cover
BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES / MEDICAL SCIENCES
Addressing the health benefits and risks, involving vitamin D or skin cancer, of increased sun exposure

Johan Moan^*,,, Alina Carmen Porojnicu^*, Arne Dahlback, and Richard B. Setlow^,

*Department of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway; Department of Physics, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway; and Biology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973-5000

Contributed by Richard B. Setlow, November 13, 2007 (received for review September 5, 2007)

Solar radiation is the main cause of skin cancers. However, it also is a main source of vitamin D for humans. Because the optimal status of vitamin D protects against internal cancers and a number of other diseases, a controversy exists: Will increased sun exposure lead to net health benefits or risks? We calculated the relative yield of vitamin D photosynthesis as a function of latitude with a radiative transfer model and cylinder geometry for the human skin surface. The annual yield of vitamin D is 3.4 and 4.8 times larger below the equator than in the U.K. and Scandinavia, respectively. In populations with similar skin types, there are clear latitude gradients of all major forms of skin cancer, indicating a north–south gradient in real sun exposure. Surprisingly, the incidence rates of major internal cancers also increase from north to south. However, the survival prognosis also improves significantly from north to south. Reasons for these findings are discussed in view of the role of vitamin D. In Norway, melanoma rates increased by a factor of 6 from 1960 to 1990, while the prognosis improved in the same period. After 1990, melanoma rates have remained constant or even decreased in age groups <50 years, whereas the prognosis has not improved further. These data, together with those for internal cancers and the beneficial effects of an optimal vitamin D status, indicate that increased sun exposure may lead to improved cancer prognosis and, possibly, give more positive than adverse health effects.

body mass index | cutaneous malignant melanoma | squamous cell carcinoma | ultraviolet radiation

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: johan.moan{at}fys.uio.no or setlow{at}bnl.gov

© 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    What's this?

Related articles in PNAS:

In This Issue

PNAS 2008 105: 401-402. [Full Text]