Discovery of potent pteridine reductase inhibitors to guide antiparasite drug development

  1. Antonio Cavazzuti*,
  2. Giuseppe Paglietti,
  3. William N. Hunter,
  4. Francisco Gamarro§,
  5. Sandra Piras,
  6. Mario Loriga,
  7. Sergio Allecca,
  8. Paola Corona,
  9. Karen McLuskey,
  10. Lindsay Tulloch,
  11. Federica Gibellini*,,
  12. Stefania Ferrari*, and
  13. Maria Paola Costi*,
  1. *Dipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Campi 183, 41100 Modena, Italy;
  2. Dipartimento Farmaco Chimico Tossicologico, Università degli Studi di Sassari, via Muroni 23/a 07100 Sassari, Italy;
  3. Division of Biological Chemistry and Drug Discovery, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 5EH, United Kingdom; and
  4. §Instituto de Parasitologia y Biomedicina “Lopez-Neyra,” Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Parque Tecnológico de Ciencias de la Salud, Avenida del Conocimiento s.n., 18100 Armilla, Granada, Spain
  1. Edited by Robert M. Stroud, University of California, San Francisco, CA, and approved November 26, 2007 (received for review May 10, 2007)

Abstract

Pteridine reductase (PTR1) is essential for salvage of pterins by parasitic trypanosomatids and is a target for the development of improved therapies. To identify inhibitors of Leishmania major and Trypanosoma cruzi PTR1, we combined a rapid-screening strategy using a folate-based library with structure-based design. Assays were carried out against folate-dependent enzymes including PTR1, dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), and thymidylate synthase. Affinity profiling determined selectivity and specificity of a series of quinoxaline and 2,4-diaminopteridine derivatives, and nine compounds showed greater activity against parasite enzymes compared with human enzymes. Compound 6a displayed a K i of 100 nM toward LmPTR1, and the crystal structure of the LmPTR1:NADPH:6a ternary complex revealed a substrate-like binding mode distinct from that previously observed for similar compounds. A second round of design, synthesis, and assay produced a compound (6b) with a significantly improved K i (37 nM) against LmPTR1, and the structure of this complex was also determined. Biological evaluation of selected inhibitors was performed against the extracellular forms of T. cruzi and L. major, both wild-type and overexpressing PTR1 lines, as a model for PTR1-driven antifolate drug resistance and the intracellular form of T. cruzi. An additive profile was observed when PTR1 inhibitors were used in combination with known DHFR inhibitors, and a reduction in toxicity of treatment was observed with respect to administration of a DHFR inhibitor alone. The successful combination of antifolates targeting two enzymes indicates high potential for such an approach in the development of previously undescribed antiparasitic drugs.

Footnotes

  • To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mariapaola.costi{at}unimore.it
  • Author contributions: M.P.C. and S.F. designed research; and G.P., S.P., M.L., S.A., P.C., W.N.H., K.M., L.T., F. Gibellini, F. Gamarro, and A.C. performed research.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • Data deposition: The atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, www.pdb.org (PDB ID codes 2P8K and 2QHX).

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0704384105/DC1.

  • Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents
OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE