Phylogeny, in situ hybridization service  Sign up for PNAS Online eTocs
Link: Info for AuthorsLink: Editorial BoardLink: AboutLink: SubscribeLink: AdvertiseLink: ContactLink: Sitemap Link: PNAS Home
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Link: Current Issue "" Link: Archives "" Link: Online Submission ""  Link: Advanced Search

Published online on February 26, 2008, 10.1073/pnas.0707881105
PNAS | March 4, 2008 | vol. 105 | no. 9 | 3640-3645


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supporting Information
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Batista, R.
Right arrow Articles by Oliveira, M. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Batista, R.
Right arrow Articles by Oliveira, M. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg  
What's this?

 Previous Article  | Table of Contents |  Next Article 

BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES / PLANT BIOLOGY
Microarray analyses reveal that plant mutagenesis may induce more transcriptomic changes than transgene insertion

Rita Batista*,{dagger},{ddagger}, Nelson Saibo{dagger}, Tiago Lourenço{dagger}, and Maria Margarida Oliveira{dagger},§

*Instituto Nacional de Saúde Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Avenida Padre Cruz, 1649-016 Lisbon, Portugal; {dagger}Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica/Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Quinta do Marquês, 2784-505 Oeiras, Portugal; and §Faculdade de Ciências, Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade de Lisboa, Ed. C2, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal

Edited by Marc C. E. Van Montagu, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, and approved January 2, 2008 (received for review August 21, 2007)

Controversy regarding genetically modified (GM) plants and their potential impact on human health contrasts with the tacit acceptance of other plants that were also modified, but not considered as GM products (e.g., varieties raised through conventional breeding such as mutagenesis). What is beyond the phenotype of these improved plants? Should mutagenized plants be treated differently from transgenics? We have evaluated the extent of transcriptome modification occurring during rice improvement through transgenesis versus mutation breeding. We used oligonucleotide microarrays to analyze gene expression in four different pools of four types of rice plants and respective controls: (i) a {gamma}-irradiated stable mutant, (ii) the M1 generation of a 100-Gy {gamma}-irradiated plant, (iii) a stable transgenic plant obtained for production of an anticancer antibody, and (iv) the T1 generation of a transgenic plant produced aiming for abiotic stress improvement, and all of the unmodified original genotypes as controls. We found that the improvement of a plant variety through the acquisition of a new desired trait, using either mutagenesis or transgenesis, may cause stress and thus lead to an altered expression of untargeted genes. In all of the cases studied, the observed alteration was more extensive in mutagenized than in transgenic plants. We propose that the safety assessment of improved plant varieties should be carried out on a case-by-case basis and not simply restricted to foods obtained through genetic engineering.

food safety evaluation | rice | genetically modified organisms | genetic engineering | {gamma}-irradiation


Author contributions: R.B. and M.M.O. designed research; R.B. performed research; R.B., N.S., T.L., and M.M.O. analyzed data; and R.B. wrote the paper.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0707881105/DC1.

{ddagger}To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rita.batista{at}insa.min-saude.pt

© 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg    What's this?