Gamma and beta frequency oscillations in response to novel auditory stimuli: A comparison of human electroencephalogram (EEG) data with in vitro models

  1. Corinna Haenschel*,,
  2. Torsten Baldeweg,
  3. Rodney J. Croft*,
  4. Miles Whittington§, and
  5. John Gruzelier*
  1. *Division of Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine, London W6 8RP, United Kingdom; Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Sick Children, University College London, London WC1N 2AP, United Kingdom; and §School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NL, United Kingdom
  1. Communicated by Nancy J. Kopell, Boston University, Boston, MA (received for review December 15, 1999)

Abstract

Investigations using hippocampal slices maintained in vitro have demonstrated that bursts of oscillatory field potentials in the gamma frequency range (30–80 Hz) are followed by a slower oscillation in the beta 1 range (12–20 Hz). In this study, we demonstrate that a comparable gamma-to-beta transition is seen in the human electroencephalogram (EEG) in response to novel auditory stimuli. Correlations between gamma and beta 1 activity revealed a high degree of interdependence of synchronized oscillations in these bands in the human EEG. Evoked (stimulus-locked) gamma oscillations preceded beta 1 oscillations in response to novel stimuli, suggesting that this may be analogous to the gamma-to-beta shift observed in vitro. Beta 1 oscillations were the earliest discriminatory responses to show enhancement to novel stimuli, preceding changes in the broad-band event-related potential (mismatch negativity). Later peaks of induced beta activity over the parietal cortex were always accompanied by an underlying gamma frequency oscillation as seen in vitro. A further analogy between in vitro and human recordings was that both gamma and beta oscillations habituated markedly after the initial novel stimulus presentation.

Footnotes

  • To whom reprint requests should be addressed at: Cognitive Neuroscience and Behavior, Imperial College School of Medicine, London W6 8RP, UK. E-mail: C.Haenschel{at}ic.ac.uk.

  • Article published online before print: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 10.1073/pnas.120162397.

  • Article and publication date are at www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.120162397

  • Abbreviations:
    EEG,
    electroencephalogram;
    ERP,
    event-related potential;
    GFP,
    global field power;
    MMN,
    mismatch negativity
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents