Manifold anomalies in gene expression in a vineyard isolate of Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed by DNA microarray analysis

  1. Duccio Cavalieri*,,
  2. Jeffrey P. Townsend*, and
  3. Daniel L. Hartl*,
  1. *Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; and Department of Animal Genetics and Genetics, University of Florence, I-50125 Florence, Italy
  1. Communicated by Douglas A. Melton, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA (received for review July 21, 2000)

Abstract

Genome-wide transcriptional profiling has important applications in evolutionary biology for assaying the extent of heterozygosity for alleles showing quantitative variation in gene expression in natural populations. We have used DNA microarray analysis to study the global pattern of transcription in a homothallic strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolated from wine grapes in a Tuscan vineyard, along with the diploid progeny obtained after sporulation. The parental strain shows 2:2 segregation (heterozygosity) for three unlinked loci. One determines resistance to trifluoroleucine; another, resistance to copper sulfate; and the third is associated with a morphological phenotype observed as colonies with a ridged surface resembling a filigree. Global expression analysis of the progeny with the filigreed and smooth colony phenotypes revealed a greater than 2-fold difference in transcription for 378 genes (6% of the genome). A large number of the overexpressed genes function in pathways of amino acid biosynthesis (particularly methionine) and sulfur or nitrogen assimilation, whereas many of the underexpressed genes are amino acid permeases. These wholesale changes in amino acid metabolism segregate as a suite of traits resulting from a single gene or a small number of genes. We conclude that natural vineyard populations of S. cerevisiae can harbor alleles that cause massive alterations in the global patterns of gene expression. Hence, studies of expression variation in natural populations, without accompanying segregation analysis, may give a false picture of the number of segregating genes underlying the variation.

Footnotes

  • To whom reprint requests should be addressed at: Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138. E-mail: dhartl{at}oeb.harvard.edu.

  • Article published online before print: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 10.1073/pnas.210395297.

  • Article and publication date are at www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.210395297

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents