PeproTech, Our Business is Cytokines! Sign up for PNAS Online eTocs
Link: Info for AuthorsLink: Editorial BoardLink: AboutLink: SubscribeLink: AdvertiseLink: ContactLink: Sitemap Link: PNAS Home
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Link: Current Issue "" Link: Archives "" Link: Online Submission ""  Link: Advanced Search



This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beuning, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Musier-Forsyth, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beuning, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Musier-Forsyth, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg  
What's this?

 Previous Article  | Table of Contents |  Next Article 

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
Vol. 94, pp. 10150-10154, September 1997
Biochemistry

Specific atomic groups and RNA helix geometry in acceptor stem recognition by a tRNA synthetase

Penny J. Beuning*, Fan Yang*, Paul Schimmeldagger , and Karin Musier-Forsyth*,

* Department of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455; and dagger  Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139

Contributed by Paul R. Schimmel, July 16, 1997

Oligonucleotides that recapitulate the acceptor stems of tRNAs are substrates for aminoacylation by many tRNA synthetases in vitro, even though these substrates are missing the anticodon trinucleotides of the genetic code. In the case of tRNAAla a single acceptor stem G·U base pair at position 3·70 is essential, based on experiments where the wobble pair has been replaced by alternatives such as I·U, G·C, and A·U, among others. These experiments led to the conclusion that the minor-groove free 2-amino group (of guanosine) of the G·U wobble pair is essential for charging. Moreover, alanine-inserting tRNAs (amber suppressors) that replace G·U with mismatches such as G·A and C·A are partially active in vivo and can support growth of an Escherichia coli tRNAAla knockout strain, leading to the hypothesis that a helix irregularity and nucleotide functionalities are important for recognition. Herein we investigate the charging in vitro of oligonucleotide and full-length tRNA substrates that contain mismatches at the position of the G·U pair. Although most of these substrates have undetectable activity, G·A and C·A variants retain some activity, which is, nevertheless, reduced by at least 100-fold. Thus, the in vivo assays are much less sensitive to large changes in aminoacylation kinetic efficiency of 3·70 variants than is the in vitro assay system. Although these functional data do not clarify all of the details, it is now clear that specific atomic groups are substantially more important in determining kinetic efficiency than is a helical distortion. By implication, the activity of mutant tRNAs measured in the in vivo assays appears to be more dependent on factors other than aminoacylation kinetic efficiency.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles in HighWire Press-hosted journals:


Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Frugier, R. Giege, and P. Schimmel
RNA recognition by designed peptide fusion creates "artificial" tRNA synthetase
PNAS, June 24, 2003; 100(13): 7471 - 7475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. D. Wolfson and O. C. Uhlenbeck
Modulation of tRNAAla identity by inorganic pyrophosphatase
PNAS, April 30, 2002; 99(9): 5965 - 5970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. W. Chihade and P. Schimmel
Assembly of a catalytic unit for RNA microhelix aminoacylation using nonspecific RNA binding domains
PNAS, October 26, 1999; 96(22): 12316 - 12321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Ibba, H. C. Losey, Y. Kawarabayasi, H. Kikuchi, S. Bunjun, and D. Soll
Substrate recognition by class I lysyl-tRNA synthetases: A molecular basis for gene displacement
PNAS, January 19, 1999; 96(2): 418 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Frugier, M. Helm, B. Felden, R. Giege, and C. Florentz
Sequences Outside Recognition Sets Are Not Neutral for tRNA Aminoacylation. EVIDENCE FOR NONPERMISSIVE COMBINATIONS OF NUCLEOTIDES IN THE ACCEPTOR STEM OF YEAST tRNAPhe
J. Biol. Chem., May 8, 1998; 273(19): 11605 - 11610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Benard, N. Mathy, M. Grunberg-Manago, B. Ehresmann, C. Ehresmann, and C. Portier
Identification in a pseudoknot of a U·G motif essential for the regulation of the expression of ribosomal protein S15
PNAS, March 3, 1998; 95(5): 2564 - 2567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]