Previous Article |
Table of Contents
| Next Article
Vol. 95, Issue 16, 9072-9077, August 4, 1998
Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena,
CA 91125
Edited by Masakazu Konishi, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, CA, and approved May 27, 1998 (received for review March 9, 1998)
Recent evidence emerging from several laboratories,
integrated with new data obtained by searching the genome databases,
suggests that the area code hypothesis provides a good heuristic model for explaining the remarkable specificity of cell migration and tissue
assembly that occurs throughout embryogenesis. The area code hypothesis
proposes that cells assemble organisms, including their brains and
nervous systems, with the aid of a molecular-addressing code that
functions much like the country, area, regional, and local portions of
the telephone dialing system. The complexity of the information
required to code cells for the construction of entire organisms is so
enormous that we assume that the code must make combinatorial use of
members of large multigene families. Such a system would reuse the same
receptors as molecular digits in various regions of the embryo, thus
greatly reducing the total number of genes required. We present the
hypothesis that members of the very large families of olfactory
receptors and vomeronasal receptors fulfill the criteria proposed for
area code molecules and could serve as the last digits in such a code.
We discuss our evidence indicating that receptors of these families are
expressed in many parts of developing embryos and suggest that they
play a key functional role in cell recognition and targeting not only in the olfactory system but also throughout the brain and numerous other organs as they are assembled.
Copyright © 1998 by The National Academy of Sciences 0027-8424/98/959072-6$2.00/0
Review
The area code hypothesis revisited: Olfactory receptors and other
related transmembrane receptors may function as the last digits in a
cell surface code for assembling embryos
*
To whom reprint requests should be addressed. e-mail:
dreyer{at}caltech.edu.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles in HighWire Press-hosted journals:
![]() |
A. Volz, A. Ehlers, R. Younger, S. Forbes, J. Trowsdale, D. Schnorr, S. Beck, and A. Ziegler Complex Transcription and Splicing of Odorant Receptor Genes J. Biol. Chem., May 23, 2003; 278(22): 19691 - 19701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Young and B. J. Trask The sense of smell: genomics of vertebrate odorant receptors Hum. Mol. Genet., May 15, 2002; 11(10): 1153 - 1160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Branscomb, J. Seger, and R. L. White Evolution of Odorant Receptors Expressed in Mammalian Testes Genetics, October 1, 2000; 156(2): 785 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Mombaerts Seven-Transmembrane Proteins as Odorant and Chemosensory Receptors Science, October 22, 1999; 286(5440): 707 - 711. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ying, D. S. Robinson, Q. Meng, L. T. Barata, A. R. McEuen, M. G. Buckley, A. F. Walls, P. W. Askenase, and A. B. Kay C-C Chemokines in Allergen-Induced Late-Phase Cutaneous Responses in Atopic Subjects: Association of Eotaxin with Early 6-Hour Eosinophils, and of Eotaxin-2 and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-4 with the Later 24-Hour Tissue Eosinophilia, and Relationship to Basophils and Other C-C Chemokines (Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-3 and RANTES) J. Immunol., October 1, 1999; 163(7): 3976 - 3984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Younger, C. Amadou, G. Bethel, A. Ehlers, K. F. Lindahl, S. Forbes, R. Horton, S. Milne, A. J. Mungall, J. Trowsdale, et al. Characterization of Clustered MHC-Linked Olfactory Receptor Genes in Human and Mouse Genome Res., April 1, 2001; 11(4): 519 - 530. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||