Conformational gating of the electron transfer reaction QAQB → QAQB in bacterial reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides determined by a driving force assay

  1. M. S. Graige,
  2. G. Feher, and
  3. M. Y. Okamura
  1. Department of Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0319
  1. Contributed by George Feher

Abstract

The mechanism of the electron transfer reaction, QA QB → QAQB , was studied in isolated reaction centers from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides by replacing the native Q10 in the QA binding site with quinones having different redox potentials. These substitutions are expected to change the intrinsic electron transfer rate by changing the redox free energy (i.e., driving force) for electron transfer without affecting other events that may be associated with the electron transfer (e.g., protein dynamics or protonation). The electron transfer from QA to QB was measured by three independent methods: a functional assay involving cytochrome c2 to measure the rate of QA oxidation, optical kinetic spectroscopy to measure changes in semiquinone absorption, and kinetic near-IR spectroscopy to measure electrochromic shifts that occur in response to electron transfer. The results show that the rate of the observed electron transfer from QA to QB does not change as the redox free energy for electron transfer is varied over a range of 150 meV. The strong temperature dependence of the observed rate rules out the possibility that the reaction is activationless. We conclude, therefore, that the independence of the observed rate on the driving force for electron transfer is due to conformational gating, that is, the rate limiting step is a conformational change required before electron transfer. This change is proposed to be the movement, controlled kinetically either by protein dynamics or intermolecular interactions, of QB by ≈5 Å as observed in the x-ray studies of Stowell et al. [Stowell, M. H. B., McPhillips, T. M., Rees, D. C., Soltis, S. M., Abresch, E. & Feher, G. (1997) Science 276, 812–816].

Footnotes

  • To whom reprint requests should be addressed. e-mail: mokamura{at}ucsd.edu.

  • * We assume that the values of λ and T AB remain the same on NQ substitution (11). A driving force dependence similar to the dashed line in Fig. 4 was observed for the second electron reduction of QB (11).

  • ABBREVIATIONS:
    RC,
    bacterial reaction center;
    NQ,
    naphthoquinone;
    Me3NQ,
    2,3,5-trimethyl-1,4-naphthoquinone;
    Me4NQ,
    2,3,6,7-tetramethyl-1,4-naphthoquinone;
    LDAO,
    lauryldimethylamine-N-oxide;
    cyt c2,
    R. sphaeroides cytochrome c2;
    BPhe,
    bacteriopheophytin;
    MQ0,
    menadione;
    MQP,
    vitamin k3;
    MQ4,
    menatetronone
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents