GroES in the asymmetric GroEL14–GroES7 complex exchanges via an associative mechanism

  1. Paul M. Horowitz*,,
  2. George H. Lorimer, and
  3. Jesse Ybarra*
  1. *Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78284; and Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
  1. Contributed by George H. Lorimer

Abstract

The interaction of the chaperonin GroEL14 with its cochaperonin GroES7 is dynamic, involving stable, asymmetric 1:1 complexes (GroES7⋅GroEL7–GroEL7) and transient, metastable symmetric 2:1 complexes [GroES7⋅GroEL7–GroEL7⋅GroES7]. The transient formation of a 2:1 complex permits exchange of free GroES7 for GroES7 bound in the stable 1:1 complex. Electrophoresis in the presence of ADP was used to resolve free GroEL14 from the GroES7–GroEL14 complex. Titration of GroEL14 with radiolabeled GroES7 to molar ratios of 32:1 demonstrated a 1:1 limiting stoichiometry in a stable complex. No stable 2:1 complex was detected. Preincubation of the asymmetric GroES7⋅GroEL7–GroEL7 complex with excess unlabeled GroES7 in the presence of ADP demonstrated GroES7 exchange. The rates of GroES7 exchange were proportional to the concentration of unlabeled free GroES7. This concentration dependence points to an associative mechanism in which exchange of GroES7 occurs by way of a transient 2:1 complex and excludes a dissociative mechanism in which exchange occurs by way of free GroEL14. Exchange of radiolabeled ADP from 1:1 complexes was much slower than the exchange of GroES7. In agreement with recent structural studies, this indicates that conformational changes in GroEL14 following the dissociation of GroES7 must precede ADP release. These results explain how the GroEL14 cavity can become reversibly accessible to proteins under in vivo conditions that favor 2:1 complexes.

Footnotes

  • To whom reprint requests should be addressed.

  • § The rate of GroES7 exchange observed by using chromatography to separate the GroES7–GroEL14 complex from free GroES7 is slower than that observed by using PAGE. We attribute this discrepancy to excluded volume effects in the polyacrylamide gel matrix (26).

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents