Previous Article |
Table of Contents
| Next Article
* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of
California, Irvine, CA 92697-2525; Contributed by Francisco J. Ayala, April 16, 2002
There is presently a conflict between fossil- and
molecular-based evolutionary time scales. Molecular approaches for
dating the branches of the tree of life frequently lead to
substantially deeper times of divergence than those inferred by
paleontologists. The discrepancy between molecular and fossil estimates
persists despite the booming growth of sequence data sets, which
increasingly feeds the interpretation that molecular estimates are
older than stratigraphic dates because of deficiencies in the fossil
record. Here we show that molecular time estimates suffer from a
methodological handicap, namely that they are asymmetrically
bounded random variables, constrained by a nonelastic boundary at the
lower end, but not at the higher end of the distribution. This
introduces a bias toward an overestimation of time since divergence,
which becomes greater as the length of the molecular sequence and the
rate of evolution decrease.
Evolution
A methodological bias toward overestimation of molecular
evolutionary time scales
,
,
Instituto de
Investigaciones Agrobiológicas de Galicia (CSIC), Avenida de Vigo
s/n, Apartado 122, 15780 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; and
§ Misión Biológica de Galicia (CSIC), Apartado
28, 36080 Pontevedra, Spain
To whom reprint requests should be addressed at:
(c/o Francisco J. Ayala) Department of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology, 321 Steinhaus Hall, University of California, Irvine, CA
92697-2525. E-mail: ftrelles{at}iiag.cesga.es.
www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.122231299
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles in HighWire Press-hosted journals:
![]() |
M. E. Baker Evolution of metamorphosis: role of environment on expression of mutant nuclear receptors and other signal-transduction proteins Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2006; 46(6): 808 - 814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Taylor and M. L. Berbee Dating divergences in the Fungal Tree of Life: review and new analyses Mycologia, November 1, 2006; 98(6): 838 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Smith, D. Pisani, J. A. Mackenzie-Dodds, B. Stockley, B. L. Webster, and D. T. J. Littlewood Testing the Molecular Clock: Molecular and Paleontological Estimates of Divergence Times in the Echinoidea (Echinodermata) Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2006; 23(10): 1832 - 1851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.N. Taylor, H. Hass, H. Kerp, M. Krings, and R.T. Hanlin Perithecial ascomycetes from the 400 million year old Rhynie chert: an example of ancestral polymorphism Mycologia, January 1, 2005; 97(1): 269 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Steiper, N. M. Young, and T. Y. Sukarna Genomic data support the hominoid slowdown and an Early Oligocene estimate for the hominoid-cercopithecoid divergence PNAS, December 7, 2004; 101(49): 17021 - 17026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. P. Douzery, E. A. Snell, E. Bapteste, F. Delsuc, and H. Philippe The timing of eukaryotic evolution: Does a relaxed molecular clock reconcile proteins and fossils? PNAS, October 26, 2004; 101(43): 15386 - 15391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. Soltis and D. E. Soltis The origin and diversification of angiosperms Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2004; 91(10): 1614 - 1626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Peterson, J. B. Lyons, K. S. Nowak, C. M. Takacs, M. J. Wargo, and M. A. McPeek Estimating metazoan divergence times with a molecular clock PNAS, April 27, 2004; 101(17): 6536 - 6541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
REDUCTIO AD ABSURDUM: TESTING THE EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS OF EDIACARAN AND PALEOZOIC PROBLEMATIC FOSSILS USING MOLECULAR DIVERGENCE DATES Journal of Paleontology, January 1, 2004; 78(1): 51 - 61. |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Benton and F. J. Ayala Dating the Tree of Life Science, June 13, 2003; 300(5626): 1698 - 1700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Sanderson Molecular data from 27 proteins do not support a Precambrian origin of land plants Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2003; 90(6): 954 - 956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. V. Glazko and M. Nei Estimation of Divergence Times for Major Lineages of Primate Species Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2003; 20(3): 424 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S. Yoon, J. D. Hackett, G. Pinto, and D. Bhattacharya From the Cover: The single, ancient origin of chromist plastids PNAS, November 26, 2002; 99(24): 15507 - 15512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||