Long-range protein electron transfer observed at the single-molecule level: In situ mapping of redox-gated tunneling resonance

1. 

   View larger version:

   • In this window
   • In a new window

   • Download as PowerPoint Slide

   Fig. 1.

   Assembly and characterization of azurin monolayers. (A) Schematic representation of noncovalent interactions between the methyl group of alkanethiol (octanethiol is represented here, and the thiol group is ignored) and the hydrophobic patch of azurin. The hydrophobic patch consisting of specific amino acid residues is extracted from the x-ray crystallographic structure according to ref. 43. (B) Schematic illustration of azurin molecules wired by the octanethiol monolayer self-assembled on the Au(111) surface, with a molecular orientation of the copper center facing the electrode surface. (C) A STM image of the azurin monolayer with molecular resolution obtained at the azurin/octanethiol/Au(111) system in NH₄Ac buffer (pH 4.6). Scan area is 200 × 200 nm, I _t = 0.1 nA, V _bias =–0.25 V, and substrate potential =+0.2 V vs. SCE. (D) A typical cyclic voltammogram of the azurin/octanethiol/Au(111) system in the same buffer as in STM imaging (C) with a scan rate of 2 V·s^–1. The shaded area shows the anodic Faradaic charge.

   
   
2. 

   View larger version:

   • In this window
   • In a new window

   • Download as PowerPoint Slide

   Fig. 2.

   Stability evaluation and distant electron transfer. (A) Stability evaluation of the system represented by azurin/octanethiol/Au(111) subjected to successive cyclic voltammetry scans at 5 V·s^–1, equivalent to a redox switch frequency of ≈10 Hz. The relative charges were obtained by integrating the redox peaks and normalizing vs. the initial charge. (B) Distance-dependent ET kinetics shown by a plot of the rate constant (in natural logarithm) vs. the distance. The distance was estimated according to refs. 46 and 47 for the alkanethiolate lengths on the gold surface. The decay factors (defined as the rate decay per unit distance), obtained from the slopes (for long-chain alkanethiols, n > 8), were 0.83 and 0.91 Å^–1 in H₂O and D₂O media, respectively.

   
   
3. 

   View larger version:

   • In this window
   • In a new window

   • Download as PowerPoint Slide

   Fig. 3.

   A series of STM images showing in situ observations of redox-gated electron-tunneling resonance arising from single azurin molecules. The images were obtained by using the azurin/octanethiol/Au(111) system in NH₄Ac buffer (pH 4.6) with a fixed bias voltage (defined as V _bias = E _T – E _S) of –0.2 V but variable substrate overpotentials (vs. the redox potential of azurin, +100 mV vs. SCE): +200 (A), +100 (B), 0 (C), –100 (D), and –200 mV (E). Scan area is 35 × 35 nm.

   
   
4. 

   View larger version:

   • In this window
   • In a new window

   • Download as PowerPoint Slide

   Fig. 4.

   A correlation between the normalized contrast and the overpotential, showing an asymmetric dependence with a maximum on/off ratio of ≈9.

   
   
5. 

   View larger version:

   • In this window
   • In a new window

   • Download as PowerPoint Slide

   Fig. 5.

   Theoretical analysis and computation. (A) Schematic energy diagram of the ECSTM showing the relative energy levels of the substrate, the tip, and the redox molecule. ε_FS and ε_FT denote the Fermi levels of the substrate and the tip, respectively; the energy levels of the redox molecule at the oxidized and reduced forms are represented by ε_ox and ε_red, respectively. (B) Dependence of STM tunneling current on the overpotential calculated by Eqs. 1-3 (see the text) with ρ_t = 0.42 and ρ_s = 0.29 number of states·eV^–1·atom^–1, α_t = α_s = 0.5, V _bias =–0.2 V, E _r = 0.45 eV, κ_S = 0.1, κ_t = 0.01, ξ = 0.7, γ = 0.20, θ = 5.6 eV^–1, ω_eff = 10¹³, T = 295 K, and other parameters with their normal values. The tunneling current is normalized relative to the maximum value.