Cluster dynamics transcending chemical dynamics toward nuclear fusion

  1. Andreas Heidenreich,
  2. Joshua Jortner*, and
  3. Isidore Last
  1. School of Chemistry, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
  1. Edited by A. Welford Castleman, Jr., Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, and approved January 31, 2006 (received for review October 6, 2005)

  1. Fig. 1.

    Snapshots of the time-resolved structures of (D2)2171 (Left) and (HT)2171 (Right) clusters in a Gaussian laser field (I M = 1018 W·cm−2 at τ = 25 fs marked on the images), at three different times tt s. The lowest part of the image portrays the time axis and the electric field of the laser. The instants of the snapshots are marked on the time axis by a, b, and c. H atoms are represented in blue, T atoms in red, and electrons in light gray. (a) The initial nanoplasma at tt s = 0. (b) At tt s = 8.2 fs, the beginning of spatial expansion of the clusters is manifested. In case of the (HT)n cluster, a shell of H+ ions is displayed. At this time, a large number of electrons are stripped by outer ionization, which occurs repeatedly when the electric field of the laser is close to a maximum. (c) At (tt s) = 13.0 fs, the spatial expansion and shell formation of the HT cluster is pronounced. Also, all nanoplasma electrons have been removed at this time.


  2. Fig. 2.

    The radial distribution functions P(r) for the (D2)2171, (HT)2171, and (DI)2171 clusters in a Gaussian laser field (I M = 1018 W·cm−2 and τ = 25 fs) at various times tt s. t s is the starting time of the simulation with respect to the maximum of the Gaussian laser field envelope located at t = 0 (see Supporting Text). For the heteronuclear (HT)2171 and (DI)2171 clusters, P(r) = P(rr is drawn separately for each ion (as marked on the images), exhibiting shell formations of the nonoverlapping distributions of different isotope/element ions at times tt s > 0. These shells expand with different velocities. (Insets) The time-dependent increase of the first moments 〈R〉 of P(r) relative to the first moment 〈R0 at tt s = 0. Data are presented for different ions, as marked on Insets.


  3. Fig. 3.

    The cluster size dependence of the maximal energies E M (solid lines) and average energies E av (dashed lines) of D+ ions in the uniform CE of (D2)n clusters and in the nonuniform CE of (CD4)n, (DI)n, and (CD3I)n clusters at I = 1018 W·cm−2 and τ = 25 fs. The simulation data manifest the (divergent) power law E M, E avn 2/3. Slight deviations from this scaling dependence for small (DI)n and (CD3I)n ECLHHs originate from ignition and screening effects for inner ionization (12). (Inset) The dependence of E M and I M for clusters marked on the curves.


  4. Fig. 4.

    The kinetic energy distributions of D+ ions from several clusters (marked on the curves) at I M = 1018 W·cm−2 and τ = 25 fs. Three Insets show the simulated data (solid curves) and the results of the ELM (dashed curves) for CE of (D2)16786, (CD4)4213, and (DI)4213 clusters.


  5. Fig. 5.

    Neutron yields per laser pulse (see text) for NFDCE of (D2)n, (CD4)n, (DI)n, and (CD3I)n clusters in the intensity range 1017 to 1019 W·cm−2.


  6. Fig. 6.

    Yields of the 12C(p,γ)13N nucleosynthesis reaction, with the energetic 12C and H+ nuclei being produced by CE of (CH3I)n clusters at I = 1020 W·cm−2. The yields were calculated from the E av (p) and E av (C) energetic data together with the reaction cross sections (Inset adapted from ref. 23). The energetic data for n = 2,171 (R 0 = 38 Å) and for n = 4,230 (R 0 = 47.1 Å) were obtained from simulations (filled circles), whereas for the size domain n = 8,426 (R 0 = 51.3 Å) to n = 33,700 (R 0 = 94.1 Å) the energetic data were evaluated from the n 2/3 scaling law.


Footnotes

  • *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jortner{at}chemsg1.tau.ac.il
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents