This Article Free via Open Access: OA OA Abstract OA Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supporting Appendix Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a colleague Related Commentary in PNAS Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Google Scholar Articles by Petchey, O. L. Articles by Warren, P. H. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Petchey, O. L. Articles by Warren, P. H. Social Bookmarking                What's this?

 Previous Article  | Table of Contents |  Next Article 

Size, foraging, and food web structure

Owen L. Petchey^*,, Andrew P. Beckerman^*, Jens O. Riede, and Philip H. Warren^*

*Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, Alfred Denny Building, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom; and Department of Biology, Darmstadt University of Technology, Schnittspahnstrasse 10, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany

View larger version (55K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Food web structures illustrated in predation matrices show the importance of allometry for structure. The allometric equation is given below the panel; parameter values are arbitrary and do not affect the qualitative patterns illustrated. Black circles indicate a realized feeding interaction. Body size increases from left to right and top to bottom, so that interactions in the upper-right triangle are for consumers feeding on resources smaller than themselves. Dashed diagonals lines indicate the position that cannibalistic interactions would take. Each element of the predation matrix is colored according to resource (row) profitability for the consumer (column) (yellow to red indicate low to high profitability, Ei/Hij). In g and h, no color indicates zero profitability. In b, c, and d, variation in diet breadth is caused by the effect of consumer identity (cj) on handling times; here, this effect is independent of consumer size.

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Performance of the allometric diet breadth models (ADBM). Performance is measured as the proportion of correctly predicted feeding links. The ratio ADBM performs better than the power ADBM for 13 of the 15 modeled food webs. Paired t test: t = 3.6; df = 14; P = 0.003. The dashed line is the 1:1 relationship for reference.

View larger version (48K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Four real food webs and various models of them. Each predation matrix describes a food web, with resources in rows and consumers in columns. Body size increases from left to right and top to bottom. A black dot indicates the consumer in that column feeds upon the resource in that row. Hence, dots in the upper right triangle indicate feeding links where consumers are larger than their resources. The dashed diagonal line represents the position that cannibalistic links would occupy. Yellow to red indicate low to high resource profitability in the ADBM models. Here, consumer diets (columns of black dots) always include the darker red (most profitable) resources and extend by different amounts into yellows (less profitable resources). Ratio and power refer to the handling time allometries (see Materials and Methods). The predation matrices of all 15 real webs and their models are in SI Appendix.

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Ability of the ADBM to predict food web structure. The standardized error in predicting 12 food web structural properties (listed in the SI Appendix) decreases with increases in the proportion of links correctly predicted. Large colored points are the mean standardized error of the ADBM for each web. Small black dots indicate the standardized error of each of the 12 properties for each web. Solid line is linear regression through the means (t = 3.0, df = 13, P = 0.01). The range of mean standardized error of the niche model (11) is shown by the vertical extent of the gray rectangle. The key in Fig. 2 applies.

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg