McKinney et al. 10.1073/pnas.0409328102.
Fig. 5. Time traces and FRET histograms for J1TGGG and J1TTGT. (A) A record of donor (green) and acceptor (red) intensities (Upper) and calculated FRET efficiency (Lower) from single molecules of J1TGGG and J1TTGT as a function of time. The molecules interconvert between high and low FRET efficiency and exhibit two distinct dynamic behaviors, undergoing a transition at the arrows. (B) FRET efficiency histograms of the data from the full FRET traces in A, divided into segments undergoing fast and slow interconversions. There is a clear distinction between the high FRET value for the faster oscillating and slower oscillating segments.
Fig. 6. Time traces and FRET histograms for J1TGGGt and J1TGGGa. (A) A record of donor (green) and acceptor (red) intensities (Upper) and calculated FRET efficiency (Lower) from single molecules of J1TGGGt and J1TGGGa as a function of time. The molecules interconvert between high and low FRET efficiency and exhibit two distinct dynamic behaviors, undergoing a transition at the arrows. (B) FRET efficiency histograms of the data from the full FRET traces in A, divided into segments undergoing fast and slow interconversions. There is a clear distinction between the high FRET value for the faster oscillating and slower oscillating segments.
Fig. 7. Hydroxyl radical probing on J1TGGG. The phosphorimage of the sequencing gel is shown. Tracks labeled J and D show the products of hydroxyl radical cleavage on the junction and duplex species, respectively. A+G reactions (25 mM Na citrate, pH 4.0 for 10 min at 80°C) were carried out on the single strands, and the products were electrophoresed in the tracks labeled M.
Fig. 8. Nonuniform distributions of branchpoint position and stacking conformer population in one-step branch migration junctions. Each of these junctions shows a large preference for one of the two step positions (M or U) and varying degrees of conformer biases as well. Assignment of the major branchpoint was made on the basis of hydroxyl radical probing experiments.
Table 2. J1TGGG Mg2+ dependence
|
[Mg2+], mM |
Uhigh lifetime, s |
Ulow lifetime, s |
Mhigh lifetime, s |
Mlow lifetime, s |
U lifetime, s |
M lifetime, s |
a , U |
a , M |
|
50 |
2.2 ± 0.05 |
0.317 ± 0.007 |
0.144 ± 0.004 |
0.044 ± 0.001 |
20 ± 5.14 |
1.2 ± 0.31 |
16 ± 4.13 |
12 ± 3.1 |
|
30 |
2.0 ± 0.04 |
0.26 ± 0.003 |
0.10 ± 0.003 |
0.035 ± 0.002 |
21 ± 5.32 |
0.85 ± 0.22 |
18 ± 4.65 |
10 ± 2.69 |
|
20 |
1.2 ± 0.07 |
0.11 ± 0.003 |
0.072 ± 0.004 |
0.025 ± 0.002 |
14 ± 5.72 |
0.75 ± 0.31 |
20 ± 8.16 |
15 ± 6.12 |
|
10 |
0.94 ± 0.02 |
0.12 ± 0.001 |
0.038 ± 0.0005 |
0.024 ± 0.0005 |
8.7 ± 1.74 |
0.52 ± 0.104 |
15 ± 3.04 |
12 ± 2.42 |
Summary of significant state lifetimes for J1TGGG at different Mg2+ concentrations. a refers to the average number of conformational transitions occurring before a step from M to U (or vice versa) is taken.
Fig. 9. The profiles of radical attack for the four strands of J1TGGGt. The results are very similar to those of J1TGGG, with central protection on the b and r strands. The results show that the major species in solution is in U, isoII conformation.
Fig. 10. The profiles of radical attack for the four strands of J1TTGT. There is clearly protection on the b and r strands (i.e., isoII conformation), but the positions of protection indicate that this junction is predominantly in the M branched form.
Fig. 11. The profiles of radical attack for the four strands of J1TCGC. Protection is seen on all four strands, and the distribution of protected nucleotides indicates that both branchpoints are present.
Fig. 12. The profiles of radical attack for the four strands of J1TAGA. Protection is seen on all four strands, and the distribution of protected nucleotides indicates that both branchpoints are present. Like J1TCGC, this junction exhibits a protection profile indicative of the presence of both stacking conformers and branchpoints.