Schmer et al. 10.1073/pnas.0704767105.
Table 1. Summary of total agricultural energy inputs for switchgrass fields grown for bioenergy for 5 years in Nebraska, South Dakota, and North Dakota
|
Location |
Seeding* |
Fertilizer |
Herbicide |
Packaging |
Transportation |
Diesel |
Machinery and Labor |
Total |
|
--------------------------------------------------MJ ha-1-------------------------------------------------- |
||||||||
|
Lawrence, NE |
88 |
3665 |
309 |
21 |
50 |
698 |
239 |
5070 |
|
Douglas, NE |
114 |
3994 |
399 |
24 |
56 |
901 |
268 |
5756 |
|
Atkinson, NE |
175 |
2238 |
208 |
14 |
32 |
720 |
286 |
3673 |
|
Crofton, NE |
88 |
2307 |
737 |
14 |
34 |
844 |
289 |
4313 |
|
Ethan, SD |
88 |
4072 |
253 |
23 |
55 |
844 |
279 |
5613 |
|
Huron, SD |
88 |
1504 |
784 |
9 |
22 |
1070 |
346 |
3822 |
|
Highmore, SD |
88 |
1207 |
156 |
7 |
17 |
652 |
213 |
2340 |
|
Bristol, SD |
88 |
3891 |
736 |
23 |
70 |
1298 |
316 |
6451 |
|
Streeter, ND |
88 |
2700 |
379 |
16 |
37 |
827 |
276 |
4323 |
|
Munich, ND |
88 |
3422 |
775 |
20 |
48 |
965 |
321 |
5637 |
|
Mean |
99 |
2900 |
474 |
17 |
42 |
882 |
283 |
4700 |
*A partial reseeding was done in areas at the Douglas farm. The Atkinson farm was reseeded in 2001 because of stand failure caused by drought in 2000.
Table 2. Agriculture and biorefinery inputs and respective energy values used to determine the energy balance of switchgrass grown for cellulosic ethanol
|
Inputs |
Energy values |
Source(s) (refs) |
Notes |
|
Agriculture |
|||
|
MJ kg-1 |
|||
|
Seed |
45.1 |
- |
See Table 5. |
|
Nitrogen Fertilizer |
49.0 |
1, 2 |
|
|
Herbicide |
322.3 |
1, 2 |
|
|
Electricity* |
NA |
||
|
Material Transport |
0.65 |
1, 2 |
|
|
Packaging |
0.27 |
3 |
|
|
Embodied energy† |
MJ ha-1 |
||
|
Tillage |
46 |
4-6 |
|
|
Sprayer |
37 |
4-6 |
|
|
Fertilizer cart |
14 |
4-6 |
|
|
No-till drill |
98 |
4-6 |
|
|
Harvest and transport |
251 |
4-6 |
Cut, bale, and transport bales to edge of field |
|
Diesel use |
- |
See Table 7. |
|
|
Biorefinery |
|||
|
MJ L-1 |
|||
|
Feedstock transport |
0.63 |
1, 2 |
Transport bales from field to cellulosic plant |
|
Nonrenewable power |
0 |
1, 2 |
Biorefinery uses lignin for steam and electricity |
|
Diesel use |
0.06 |
1, 2 |
|
|
Plant capital and equip. |
0.44 |
2, 7 |
|
|
Process water |
0.29 |
2, 7 |
|
|
Sewage effluent |
0.29 |
2, 7 |
|
|
L kg-1 |
|||
|
Ethanol yield |
0.38 |
2 |
* Agricultural electricity use for switchgrass biomass production was not estimated in this study. EBAMM uses a value of 46 MJ Mg-1 from GREET 1.6 that is based on estimated electrical rates for switchgrass production (1, 2),which are higher than electrical rates for corn grown in rain-fed regions (8, 9). The main use for electricity for corn production is for grain drying and/or in irrigation (9). Switchgrass will not require electricity for drying and projected land areas for switchgrass production will be non-irrigated fields. There is no direct agricultural application that would require electricity usage to vary by biomass yield (1).
† Farm Machinery Energy (MJ ha-1) = [Total operational cost (dollar hectare-1) ´ (35.9 MJ
dollar-1 iron and steel manufacturing + 7.95 MJ dollar-1 farm machinery and equipment manufacturing)/15 years] (4, 5). Farm machinery energy inputs from this study were similar to estimates in previous reports (2, 3, 6, 10).
Table 3. Net energy values [output energy (MJFuel literFuel-1) - input energy (MJInput literFuel-1)] for switchgrass fields
|
|
Harvest year |
|||||
|
|
1* |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Mean |
|
Location |
-----------------MJ L-1----------------- |
|||||
|
Lawrence, NE |
NH |
19.9 |
21.0 |
22.1 |
21.9 |
21.2 |
|
Douglas, NE |
NH |
20.7 |
19.9 |
22.3 |
21.6 |
21.1 |
|
Atkinson, NE |
NH |
17.0 |
18.7 |
21.7 |
21.7 |
19.8 |
|
Crofton, NE |
NH |
20.1 |
20.4 |
22.5 |
22.0 |
21.3 |
|
Ethan, SD |
NH |
18.8 |
21.5 |
22.8 |
21.2 |
21.1 |
|
Huron, SD |
23.0 |
23.6 |
22.4 |
23.2 |
21.4 |
22.7 |
|
Highmore, SD |
NH |
NH |
22.4 |
22.9 |
23.2 |
22.8 |
|
Bristol, SD |
21.9 |
20.2 |
22.8 |
22.6 |
23.7 |
22.3 |
|
Streeter, ND |
NH |
23.0 |
22.1 |
21.9 |
21.1 |
22.0 |
|
Munich, ND |
14.3 |
21.5 |
21.6 |
21.9 |
22.7 |
20.4 |
|
Mean |
19.7 |
20.5 |
21.3 |
22.5 |
22.0 |
21.5 |
*NH, no harvest.
Table 4. Biomass yields from established (2 years after planting) switchgrass fields in the midcontinental US
|
|
Harvest year |
|||
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
Mean |
|
Location |
--------------Mg ha-1------------- |
|||
|
Lawrence, NE |
5.2 |
7.1 |
6.2 |
6.2 |
|
Douglas, NE |
3.9 |
8.8 |
7.5 |
6.7 |
|
Atkinson, NE |
4.9 |
5.5 |
- |
5.2 |
|
Crofton, NE |
4.8 |
7.2 |
6.3 |
6.1 |
|
Ethan, SD |
8.0 |
6.9 |
6.1 |
7.0 |
|
Huron, SD |
6.6 |
10.5 |
5.5 |
7.5 |
|
Highmore, SD |
8.4 |
8.3 |
3.7 |
6.8 |
|
Bristol, SD |
9.9 |
11.4 |
12.1 |
11.1 |
|
Streeter, ND |
5.0 |
8.3 |
6.1 |
6.5 |
|
Munich, ND |
8.2 |
8.4 |
6.9 |
7.8 |
|
Mean |
6.5 |
8.2 |
6.7 |
7.1 |
Ethanol conversion efficiency was estimated at 0.38 liters kg-1 (2).
Table 5. Summary of estimated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of ethanol derived from switchgrass
|
Estimated GHG emissions by location and harvest year* |
||||||
|
Estab.† |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Mean |
|
|
Location |
g CO2equivalent MJ-1 ethanol produced‡ |
|||||
|
Lawrence, NE |
NH |
17 |
16 |
4 |
7 |
11 |
|
Douglas, NE |
NH |
12 |
27 |
1 |
8 |
12 |
|
Atkinson, NE |
7 |
37 |
8 |
9 |
- |
15 |
|
Crofton, NE |
NH |
6 |
20 |
(2) |
0 |
6 |
|
Ethan, SD |
NH |
31 |
11 |
(3) |
13 |
13 |
|
Huron, SD |
(11) |
(12) |
(3) |
(6) |
7 |
(5) |
|
Highmore, SD |
NH |
NH |
(1) |
(4) |
(11) |
(5) |
|
Bristol, SD |
(7) |
22 |
(2) |
0 |
(13) |
0 |
|
Streeter, ND |
NH |
(10) |
3 |
6 |
13 |
3 |
|
Munich, ND |
17 |
8 |
8 |
6 |
(2) |
8 |
|
Mean |
1 |
12 |
9 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
Estimated GHG emissions are based on switchgrass production inputs, cellulosic ethanol production requirements and ethanol distribution (2).
*Negative values (in parentheses) indicate displaced and sequestered CO2 equivalents exceeded total CO2 equivalents in the production of ethanol derived from switchgrass.
†NH, no harvest. All agricultural GHG emissions on nonharvested years were added to the first harvested year. The Atkinson, NE, farm was analyzed as having 2 establishment years.
‡GHG displaced by ethanol (Fig. 5) = [g CO2 equivalent MJ-1 ethanol (Table 5) - 94g CO2 equivalent MJ-1 petroleum]/ 94g CO2 equivalent MJ-1 petroleum (2),
where
g CO2 equivalent MJ-1 ethanol = [Net GHG emissions g CO2 equivalent liter-1/ethanol low heating value (21.2 MJ liter-1)] - ethanol distribution (1.4 g CO2 equivalent MJ-1), where
Net GHG emissions (g CO2 equivalent liter-1) = [agriculture sector GHG emissions (kg CO2 equivalent ha-1)/switchgrass biomass yield (kg ha-1) ´2.63 (kg biomass liter-1 ethanol) ´ 1,000 g kg-1] + [Biorefinery sector GHG emissions (124 g CO2 equivalent liter-1) - coproduct credit (106 g CO2 equivalent liter-1)] (2), where
Agriculture sector GHG emissions (kg CO2 equivalent ha-1) = [Nitrogen fertilizer emissions + herbicide emissions + transportation emissions + diesel emissions + packaging emissions + farm machinery emissions (2) - CO2 sequestered (138.1 kg CO2 per Mg of aboveground biomass; 11)].
Table 6. Energy inputs for switchgrass seed production using typical management practices for USDA-ARS Grain, Forage, and Bioenergy Research Unit (Lincoln, NE)
|
Seed inputs |
Energy values |
Source(s) (refs) |
Notes |
|
MJ ha-1 |
|||
|
Fertilizer |
|||
|
Nitrogen |
5488 |
1, 2 |
|
|
Phosphorus |
128 |
1, 2 |
Amortized for 5 years |
|
Herbicides |
2627 |
1, 2 |
|
|
Diesel use |
|||
|
Tandem disk |
35 |
5 |
Amortized for 5 years |
|
Roller harrow |
23 |
5 |
Amortized for 5 years |
|
Seed drill |
45 |
5 |
Amortized for 5 years |
|
Fertilizer cart |
53 |
12 |
|
|
Sprayer |
35 |
5 |
|
|
Row-crop cultivator |
227 |
5 |
High-residue cultivator |
|
Combine w/grain header |
465 |
5 |
|
|
Packaging and Transport |
158 |
1, 2 |
|
|
Machinery and labor energy |
335 |
4, 5, 12 |
|
|
Electricity |
10 |
1, 2 |
Processing, cleaning, and storage |
|
Total |
9628 |
||
|
Seed energy (MJ/kg) |
43.8 |
220 kg ha-1 seed yield* |
The seed field was assumed to be in production for 5 years.
*Switchgrass seed yields range from 220 to > 1,000 kg ha-1 (13, 14). A seed yield of 220 kg ha-1 was used to give a conservative seed energy value.
Table 7. Diesel use estimates for agricultural field applications in the production of switchgrass
|
Field application |
Diesel use |
Source (ref.) |
Notes |
|
Fixed |
|||
|
Liter ha-1- |
|||
|
Tandem disk |
4.59 |
5 |
6.4-m rigid tandem disk |
|
Roller harrow |
2.99 |
5 |
8.5-m packing width |
|
Land roller |
3.07 |
6 |
12-m rolling width |
|
No-till drill |
7.98 |
5 |
4.8-m planting width |
|
Fertilizer cart |