Previous Article |
Table of Contents
| Next Article
* Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School
of Public Health, 60 Haven Avenue-B1, Columbia
University, New York, NY 10032;
Communicated by Donald C. Malins, Pacific Northwest Research
Institute, Seattle, WA, December 27, 2002 (received for review August
22, 2002)
Mechanisms of estrogen-induced tumorigenesis in the target
organ are not well understood. It has been suggested that oxidative stress resulting from metabolic activation of carcinogenic estrogens plays a critical role in estrogen-induced carcinogenesis. We tested this hypothesis by using an estrogen-induced hamster renal tumor model,
a well established animal model of hormonal carcinogenesis. Hamsters
were implanted with 17 tumor|hormonal
carcinogenesis|menadione|prostaglandin|metabolic
activation
Sex hormones are implicated
in the development of a variety of human cancers (1-4). Estrogen
administration to postmenopausal women is associated with an increased
risk of endometrial and breast cancer (1-4). An increasing evidence of
elevated breast cancer risk with increases in total lifetime exposure
of women to estrogens has been presented (1-3). Recently, the clinical trial of estrogen plus progestin treatment therapy was stopped because
of an increased risk of breast cancer (5). Knowledge of how estrogens
induce proliferation and tumorigenesis in their target organ is not
well defined (6-9). The mechanism of tumor induction by estrogens is
being investigated in rodent models of hormonal carcinogenesis. The
natural female sex hormone 17 Estrogens can be metabolically activated into catechol estrogens by
cytochrome P450 enzymes (18, 19). Metabolic redox cycling between
catechol estrogens and their corresponding quinones generates oxidative
stress and potentially harmful free radicals that are postulated to be
required for the carcinogenic process, and analogous to the metabolic
activation of hydrocarbons and other nonsteroidal estrogen carcinogens
(9, 19-22). We have investigated the role of oxidative stress in
estrogen carcinogenesis by using a well established hamster renal tumor
model that shares several characteristics with human breast and uterine
cancers, pointing to a common mechanistic origin (6, 9, 23). Different estrogens used in the present study differ in their estrogenic, carcinogenic, and metabolic activation potentials (14-17). Treatment of Animals.
Male Syrian hamsters (4-6 weeks old; Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Madison,
WI) were housed in our animal facility with Purina rodent chow and
water available ad libitum throughout the experiment. Hamsters were
implanted s.c. with 25-mg pellets of Tissue Preparation for Histopathology and Immunocytochemistry.
The formalin-fixed tissue was embedded in paraffin, and sections of 4- to 5-µm thickness were cut. Paraffin-embedded sections of the kidneys
and livers were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for
histopathological evaluation. Gross examination and histological sections were interpreted by two independent pathologists in a blinded
fashion, without knowledge as to how the animals were stratified.
Paraffin-embedded sections were also used for cell-specific expression
of estrogen receptor (ER)- Semiquantitative Analysis of Critical Histopathological
Differences.
The severity of the total kidney damage was evaluated by a scoring
system that gave a semiquantitative measurement of the damage as
described (32). The four types of damage for which semiquantitative
analysis was performed were glomerular atrophy, glomerular congestion,
tubular congestion, and nodular proliferation. One hundred nephrons
(glomeruli and adjacent tubules) were examined histologically, and each
nephron was scored from 0 to 4. For glomerular atrophy, glomeruli that
contained >20 nuclei were graded as "0," and those glomeruli
which contained <10 nuclei were scored as "4." For glomerular
congestion, glomeruli that did not contain eosionophilic and pink
deposits were graded as "0," and those that had Analysis of 8-iso-PGF2 Total 8-iso-PGF2 Statistical Analysis.
Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS
statistical software package (SPSS, Chicago). Unpaired t
test was used to assess significance between the two different
treatment groups. Tumor incidence was analyzed by Fisher's exact test.
Tumor Incidence.
On macroscopic examination, no tumor nodules were detected in untreated
hamsters and in groups of hamsters that were treated with
Biochemistry
Critical role of oxidative stress in
estrogen-induced carcinogenesis
,
,
,
Center for Radiological Research, Columbia
University, New York, NY 10032; and
Departments of § Pathology and
¶ Medicine, Charles Drew University, Los
Angeles, CA 90059
![]()
Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-estradiol (
E2), 17
-estradiol (
E2),
17
-ethinylestradiol (
EE), menadione, a combination of
E2 and
EE, or a combination of
EE and menadione for 7 months. The group
treated with
E2 developed target organ specific kidney tumors. The
kidneys of hamsters treated with
E2,
EE, or menadione alone did
not show any gross evidence of tumor. Kidneys of hamsters treated with
a combination of
E2 and
EE showed early signs of proliferation in
the interstitial cells. Kidneys of hamsters treated with a combination
of menadione and
EE showed foci of tumor with congested tubules and
atrophic glomeruli.
E2-treated tumor-bearing kidneys showed >2-fold
increase in 8-iso-prostaglandin F2
(8-iso-PGF2
) levels compared with untreated controls.
Kidneys of hamsters treated with a combination of menadione and
EE
showed increased 8-iso-PGF2
levels compared with
untreated controls, whereas no increase in 8-iso-PGF2
was detected in kidneys of
EE-treated group. A chemical known to
produce oxidative stress or a potent estrogen with poor ability to
produce oxidative stress, were nontumorigenic in hamsters, when
given as single agents, but induced renal tumors, when given together.
Thus, these data provide evidence that oxidant stress plays a crucial
role in estrogen-induced carcinogenesis.
![]()
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-estradiol (
E2) and the synthetic
estrogen diethylstilbestrol induce tumors in rats, mice, and hamsters
(10-13). It must be noted that in rodent models, different estrogens
tested have not shown similar carcinogenic potential despite their
similar hormonal potencies (6, 14, 15). However, carcinogenic and
noncarcinogenic estrogens differ in their metabolic activation profiles
(14-17). Therefore, it is postulated that estrogen metabolism may play
a key role in hormonal carcinogenesis.
E2 is a
good catechol progenitor and a potent estrogen; its use results in
80-100% tumor incidence in the hamster kidney (6, 10, 14, 15).
17
-estradiol (
E2) is a nontumorigenic, weak estrogen with a
catechol-forming potential similar to that of
E2 (24, 25).
17
-Ethinylestradiol (
EE) is a potent estrogen, but a weak
catechol progenitor that is either nontumorigenic or very weakly
tumorigenic in the hamster model with >9 months of continuous exposure
required for less than 10% tumor incidence (15, 17). Menadione
(2-methyl-1,4-napthaquinone) is used in the present study as a model
compound with known oxidant stress potential to study the influence of
oxidative stress on estrogen-induced carcinogenesis (26-28). We used a
combination of an oxidant chemical menadione and a noncarcinogenic
estrogen
EE to show the induction of renal tumors in a rodent model
of hormonal carcinogenesis. We also demonstrated increased levels of
8-iso-prostaglandin F2
(8-iso-PGF2
), a known marker of oxidant stress
(29, 30), in
E2-induced tumor-bearing kidneys as well as in
menadione plus
EE-treated kidneys of hamsters. Our studies suggest
that oxidative stress plays a critical role in estrogen-induced carcinogenesis.
![]()
Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
E2,
E2,
EE, menadione, a
combination of
E2 +
EE, or a combination of
EE + menadione.
These hamsters received a second estrogen or menadione pellet 3 months
after initial treatment. Before implantation of the drug pellets,
hamsters were anesthetized with a combination of ketamine and xylazine
(ketamine, 100 mg/kg body weight, i.p., and xylazine, 10 mg/kg body weight, i.p.). Estrogen and menadione pellets were
prepared by using a hand press and implanted into the hamsters s.c. as
described (10, 12). There were 10 hamsters in each group. A control
group of 10 animals was sham operated and left untreated. Hamsters were
killed after 7 months and inspected macroscopically for tumor nodules
on the surface of each kidney as reported (31). Portions of liver and
kidney tissue were placed on dry ice and stored at
80°C for further
studies. Other portions of liver and kidney were placed in 10%
buffered formalin for histopathological evaluation and
immunocytochemical studies. Menadione and all estrogens used in the
present study were purchased from Sigma.
and -
proteins. Deparaffinized sections were incubated with the corresponding primary antibodies: ER-
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology, SC-542) and ER-
(Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, SC-6821) at dilutions suggested by the suppliers.
Incubation with the primary antibodies was performed overnight at
4°C. Nonspecific sites were blocked by covering sections with
solutions of 1% BSA (Sigma). After washing in PBS, the sections were
incubated with peroxidase-conjugated, affinity-purified
F(ab')2 fragment of donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson
ImmunoResearch) for 60 min at room temperature as described (12).
Slides were rinsed three times in PBS, and staining was developed by
incubating with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrachloride/H2O2
(Sigma) for 2-5 min. 3,3'-Diaminobenzidine solution was prepared
according to the manufacturer's recommendations. After staining, the
sections were rinsed in distilled water, dehydrated in ethanol/water
baths with decreasing water content, and finally rinsed in xylene
before being mounted with a permanent mounting medium.
80% of
glomeruli with such deposits were graded as "4." For tubular
congestion, convoluted tubules that did not contain eosinophilic and
pink deposits were graded as "0," and those convoluted tubules
that contained
80% deposits were graded as "4."
Intermediate stages were graded as 1, 2, and 3. For proliferation,
sections of kidneys were graded as "4" if they contained tumor
nodules, and as "0" if they did not have any tumor nodules. The
sum of individual scores of 100 counts on each kidney section was used as an estimate of the severity of the kidney damage. A total score of
1,600 was given by the sum of the four descriptive damages described
above (each kind of damage getting a maximum score of 400).
For each type of damage, six to eight hematoxylin and eosin-stained kidney sections were examined from each treatment group and scored, and
data were expressed as a mean ± SEM of the individual scores.
Levels.
levels in kidney tissue of
hamsters treated with different chemicals were quantified by using a
direct 8-iso-PGF2
enzyme immunoassay kit from
Assay Designs (Ann Arbor, MI, catalog no. 900-091) according to the
supplier's recommendations. Kidney tissue (50-100 mg) was homogenized
in cold PBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.005% butylated hydroxytoluene.
Tissue homogenates (10% wt/vol) were prepared by using a PRO 200 homogenizer with a 5 mm × 75 mm generator (PRO Scientific,
Oxford, CT) in 2-ml microfuge tubes. Homogenization was carried out by
moving the motor speed dial of the homogenizer from 0 to 5 (0-30,000
rpm) back and forth five times with a total homogenization time of
5 s. 8-iso-PGF2
esters in 100 µl of
the total kidney homogenate were hydrolyzed by incubation with 25 µl
of 10 N NaOH at 45°C for 2 h. The reaction
mixture was cooled on ice for 5 min and neutralized with 25 µl of 12 N HCl, and centrifuged in a microcentrifuge for 5 min. The clear
neutralized supernatant was transferred into a new microfuge tube, and
50 µl of the neutralized sample was used for
8-iso-PGF2
assay. The samples were incubated
with the 8-iso-PGF2
antibody for 18 h at
4°C in a 96-well format. After incubation, the contents of the wells
were emptied and washed with wash buffer; wash buffer was removed from
the wells, and the color was developed by incubation with 200 µl of
p-nitrophenyl phosphate for 45 min at room temperature. The
reaction was stopped by the addition of 50 µl of stop solution, and
the plate was read at 405 nm. A standard curve was generated by
measuring the optical density of 160-100,000 pg/ml of
8-iso-PGF2
standards that were processed
simultaneously with unknown samples on the same plate. Protein
concentrations from the neutralized homogenates were determined by
using a Pierce protein assay kit. 8-iso-PGF2
and protein were analyzed from 10 kidney homogenates from each group,
and data were expressed as mean 8-iso-PGF2
pg/mg protein ± SEM.
![]()
Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
E2,
EE,
menadione, or a combination of
E2 and
EE for 7 months (Table
1). In contrast, hamsters treated with
either
E2 or a combination of
EE and menadione for 7 months
developed renal tumors. The tumor incidence was 90% for the group
treated with
E2 and 30% for the group treated with a combination of
EE and menadione (Table 1). The mean number of tumor nodules was higher in the group treated with
E2 compared with the group treated with a combination of
EE and menadione (Table 1).
Table 1.
Influence of different estrogens and menadione on renal
carcinogenesis in male Syrian hamsters
Histopathological Analysis.
Sections from untreated hamster kidneys demonstrated normal convoluted tubules and glomeruli within the cortex (Fig. 1). The corticomedullary junction appeared normal, as did the renal hilum, which was lined by normal transitional urothelium.
|
Kidneys of hamsters treated with
E2 for 7 months were abnormal and
contained numerous tumor nodules (Fig.
2a). The nodules were composed
of a combination of round hyperchromatic cells and round to spindled,
irregular, hyperchromatic cells (Fig. 2b). Scattered tubules
within the tumor nodules were congested (Fig. 2a). Most of
the tumor nodules were in the cortical area of the kidney and, in some
of the nodules, entrapped and atrophic glomeruli were seen (Fig.
2c). Sections from the kidney away from the tumor were also
markedly abnormal and demonstrated large dilated congested convoluted
tubules, which were lined by somewhat flattened, cuboidal epithelial
cells (Fig. 2d). Many of the congested tubules were filled
with pink eosinophilic deposits (Fig. 2d). A significant increase in the number of congested convoluted tubules, congested glomeruli, atrophic glomeruli, and nodular proliferation was detected in the
E2-treated tumor-bearing kidneys compared with untreated controls by using the semiquantitative estimates of the total kidney
damage (Fig. 3).
|
|
Microscopic evidence of tumor nodules was not seen in any of the
kidneys of hamsters treated with
E2 for 7 months. Kidney sections
showed normal glomeruli and convoluted tubules within the renal cortex.
No abnormal proliferations were seen. The medulla and hilum were
microscopically normal (data not shown).
Atypical congested convoluted tubules were seen in kidneys of hamsters
treated with
EE for 7 months (Fig. 3). In some areas, the convoluted
tubules were lined by crowded hyperchromatic cuboidal cells, which had
decreased cytoplasm, and the kidney sections also showed some congested
glomeruli (see Fig. 7, which is published as supporting information on
the PNAS web site, www.pnas.org). No nodular proliferation was detected
in the kidney sections of hamsters treated with
EE for 7 months
(Fig. 3).
Kidney sections of hamsters treated with menadione for 7 months demonstrated renal convoluted tubules with evidence of vascular as well as glomerular congestion (Fig. 3) and the presence of an altered epithelial layer of convoluted tubules (see Fig. 8, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). No tumor nodules were identified, and there was no evidence of atrophic glomeruli (Fig. 3).
On microscopic examination, vascular congestion of glomeruli and of
convoluted tubules was observed in the kidneys of hamsters treated with
a combination of
E2 plus
EE for 7 months (Figs. 3 and
4a). Kidneys contained foci
where there were atypical collections of both interstitial cells and
convoluted tubules (Fig. 4b). In these areas, some of the
tubules contained cuboidal cells, which had scant cytoplasm and
irregular, slightly pleomorphic, hyperchromatic nuclei (Fig.
4c). Some slightly crowded hyperchromatic renal collecting tubules were observed (Fig. 4d).
|
Kidney sections of hamsters treated with a combination of
EE plus
menadione demonstrated foci of tumor that contained congested tubules
(Fig. 5a). The tumor nodules
were characterized by hyperchromatic, spindled to rounded cells with
marked nuclear crowding and overlapping (Fig. 5b). This
group showed significant congestion of both renal convoluted tubules
and glomeruli when compared with
E2 and
EE treated groups (Fig.
3). Glomerular atrophy and nodular proliferation were detected in the
kidneys of hamsters treated either with a combination of
EE plus
menadione, or with
E2 for 7 months (Figs. 3 and 5b).
|
Microscopic examination of tissue sections from livers of hamsters
treated with
E2,
E2,
EE, menadione,
E2 +
EE, or
menadione +
EE did not show any evidence of tumor or dysplasia (data
not shown).
Immunocytochemical Analysis.
Renal tumors induced by a carcinogenic estrogen or by a combination of
a noncarcinogenic estrogen and a chemical known to produce oxidative
stress were characterized immunocytochemically. Cell-specific
expression of ER-
and -
was examined in the kidneys of hamsters
treated with different estrogens, either alone or in combination with
menadione. ER-
protein expression was not detected either in control
or in tumor-bearing kidneys (data not shown). A very poor
immunoreactivity for ER-
protein was observed in the tubules of
untreated control kidneys (see Fig. 9, which is published as supporting
information on the PNAS web site). Intense nuclear staining for ER-
protein was found in
E2-induced renal tumors (see Fig. 9). ER-
protein expression was not detected in the glomeruli or kidney tubules
of menadione-treated animals (data not shown). Moderate to strong
immunoreactivity for ER-
protein was observed in the renal tumor
area of
EE plus menadione-treated hamsters and some of the tubules
within the tumor mass also expressed high levels of ER-
protein (see
Fig. 9).
8-iso-PGF2
Analysis.
Total 8-iso-PGF2
levels in kidney tissue of
hamsters treated with different chemicals were quantified. A >2-fold
increase in 8-iso-PGF2
was detected in
tumor-bearing kidney homogenates of hamsters treated with
E2 for 7 months compared with untreated controls (Fig.
6). Kidney homogenates of hamsters
treated with
EE for 7 months did not show any increase in
8-iso-PGF2
levels compared with untreated
controls (Fig. 6). The fold increases in
8-iso-PGF2
were 1.38, 1.50, 1.52, and 1.55, respectively, for kidneys of hamsters treated with
E2, menadione,
E2 +
EE, and menadione +
EE compared with untreated controls
(Fig. 6). There were no significant differences in
8-iso-PGF2
levels between
E2-, menadione-,
E2 +
EE-, and menadione +
EE-treated groups.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several potent estrogens, such as
EE, 2-fluoroestradiol, and
11
-methylestradiol, have previously been identified, which are
weakly or not at all carcinogenic despite their high hormonal potencies
as measured by receptor binding, uterine wet weight increase, or other
assays of estrogenic activity (6, 14, 15, 24, 33, 34). A number of
studies of estrogen-induced carcinogenesis indicate that tumor
induction depends on estrogen metabolism, and oxidative stress as a
result of the redox cycling of estrogen metabolites (6, 16, 20, 21,
35). It has been shown that
E2 in target organs of estrogen-induced
cancer is metabolized to 2- and 4-hydroxyestradiol, commonly known as catechol estrogens (16, 36, 37). Elevated estradiol-4-hydroxylase activity has also been shown in organs that are prone to
estradiol-induced hyperplasia or cancer in rodents, in humans, and in
human breast cancer cell lines (16, 18, 36-40). Catechol estrogens are
orthohydroquinones that are capable of undergoing metabolic redox
cycling (16, 19, 20). Metabolic redox cycling between catechol
estrogens and their corresponding quinones generates oxidative
stress and potentially harmful free radicals (21, 22). Therefore,
redox cycling and free radical generation represent a potential
mechanism, whereby relatively low concentrations of active metabolites
might generate major cell damage. Reactive oxygen species and metabolic activation have been known to modulate gene expression and several studies support the role of oxidative stress in tumor formation (21,
22, 41-45).
We hypothesized that if we use a combination of a potent estrogen with
poor ability to form catechol estrogens such as
EE (15, 17) and a
chemical that is known to produce oxidative stress such as menadione
(26-28), we should be able to mimic the effect of
E2, a tumorigenic
potent estrogen that is also a strong catechol progenitor (10, 12, 16,
19, 24). A similar effect may be observed if hamsters are treated with
a combination of a noncarcinogenic estrogen of poor hormonal potency
but with good catechol forming capability such as
E2 (24, 25) and a
potent estrogen such as
EE (15, 17, 24). As expected, the group of
hamsters treated with
E2 showed 90% tumor incidence, which is in
agreement with the previously reported results (10, 12). This group
also showed a >2-fold increase in 8-iso-PGF2
levels compared with untreated controls, suggesting an increased state
of oxidative stress. Chronic treatment of hamsters with
E2 for 9 days has previously been shown to result in increased lipid
hydroperoxide levels in kidney, the target organ of estrogen-induced carcinogenesis in hamster, but not in liver, a nontarget organ (44).
Kidneys of hamsters treated with a combination of
E2 and
EE
showed signs of early neoplastic changes with proliferation of
interstitial cells. Tumors were clearly seen in kidneys of hamsters
treated with a combination of
EE and menadione. This treatment group
also showed a significant increase in
8-iso-PGF2
levels compared with
EE-treated
group and compared with untreated controls. Menadione is reduced to a
semiquinone radical through one electron reduction catalyzed by
cellular reductases (26). Redox cycling of menadione has been shown to
generate free radicals/reactive oxygen species, and has been widely
used to investigate chemical-induced oxidative stress (26-28).
Metabolic activation of
E2 and redox cycling of estrogen-quinone
metabolites generates free radicals by a mechanism similar to redox
cycling of menadione and its semiquinone (20, 21, 26, 41). Moreover,
tumors induced by
E2, or by a combination of
EE plus menadione,
showed similar histological and immunocytochemical characteristics.
Although early signs of proliferation in the renal interstitium, as
demonstrated by foci with atypical collection of interstitial cells and
increased 8-iso-PGF2
levels, were seen in the
kidneys of hamsters treated with a combination of
E2 and
EE,
tumors were not clearly visible. It may take >7 months for tumors to
develop with this treatment regimen. It has been shown earlier that
tumor foci and early neoplastic cells arise in the renal interstitium
(12, 46, 47). It is also possible that
EE, which is known to inhibit
cytochrome P450 enzyme activity, may reduce the catechol forming
potential of both
E2 and
EE (48, 49).
E2 forms
8-iso-PGF2
at reduced levels compared with
E2. This observation may indicate that
E2 catechols may be
methylated faster than
E2 catechols, thus making them available at a
reduced level for catechol-quinone redox cycling. Cotreatment with
menadione and
EE resulted in tumor development in the hamster
kidney. Menadione may induce cytochrome P450 activity, or it may
antagonize the inhibitory effect on P450 by
EE. The reduced ability
of
EE to form catechol estrogens has been suggested to be
responsible for the poor carcinogenic potential of
EE (17). Menadione may also inhibit the catechol-O-methyl
transferase-mediated conversion of 2- and 4-hydroxylated
EE to
methoxyestrogens, thus leading to an increased state of oxidant stress
as a result of metabolic redox cycling of estrogen catechols and
quinones. No evidence of hemosiderin was observed in kidney sections of
hamsters treated with menadione or menadione plus
EE, suggesting
that the histopathological effects of menadione are not through its effects on iron homeostasis (50). Although subchronic treatment of
hamsters with menadione or
E2 also increased 8-iso-PGF2
levels compared with untreated controls, tumors were not detected in these two
treatment groups. These chemicals either lack or have weak estrogenic
activities (24). It appears that both estrogenic potential and
oxidative stress as a result of metabolic redox cycling of estrogen
metabolites are essential for estrogen-induced carcinogenesis, because,
if estrogen is withdrawn, tumors will regress (10). The hormonal
effects of estrogens may promote the development of tumors.
Our results demonstrate that tumors can be induced in a rodent model of
hormonal carcinogenesis by subchronic treatment with a combination of a
noncarcinogenic estrogen and a chemical known to produce oxidative
stress. Our results are in agreement with the role of oxidant stress in
estrogen-induced carcinogenesis. It has been recently shown that
hydroxylated and O-methylated estrogens account for nearly
95% of the total estrogen in normal human breast and in human breast
tumor tissue, with no difference in O-methylated estrogens
between the tumor and control group (51). Both 2- and 4-hydroxy-
E2
levels have been shown to be significantly increased in the human
breast tumor compared with normal tissue, with 4-hydroxy-
E2 showing
an
20-fold increase in breast tumor tissue compared with normal
tissue (51). The elevated expression of estrogen-4-hydroxylase activity
has been demonstrated in organs of rodents that develop
estrogen-induced tumors, in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells, in human
uterine myoma, and in human breast cancer, but not in livers of these
species (16, 18, 36-40). As suggested by several investigators,
4-hydroxy-
E2 may undergo metabolic redox cycling between its
catechol and quinone metabolites and potentially generate harmful free
radicals and oxidative stress (19-22). Therefore, cancer may develop
only in those organs that synthesize hydroxyl metabolites of estrogen at the target site of carcinogenesis, which may elicit biological activities distinct from
E2; most notably, an oxidant stress response induced by free radicals generated by metabolic redox cycling reactions. In summary, our data support the concept
that oxidative stress plays a critical role in estrogen-induced carcinogenesis.
| |
Acknowledgements |
|---|
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants CA66724 and P30 ES09089 (to H.K.B.), ES05785, ES11804, and P30 ES09089 (to G.M.C. and T.K.H.); and P20 R11145 (to J.V.V.); and the Jean Sindab/AVON Breast Cancer Foundation grant (to H.K.B.).
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
E2, 17
-estradiol;
E2, 17
-estradiol;
EE, 17
-ethinylestradiol;
ER, estrogen receptor;
8-iso-PGF2
, 8-iso-prostaglandin F2
.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
hb2009{at}columbia.edu.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Henderson, B. E.
& Feigelson, H. S.
(2000)
Carcinogenesis
21,
427-433 |
| 2. |
Ross, R. K.
, Paganini-Hill, A.
, Wan, P. C.
& Pike, M. C.
(2000)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
92,
328-332 |
| 3. | Key, T. J. (1999) Endocrine-Related Cancer 6, 175-180[Abstract]. |
| 4. |
Verloop, J.
, Rookus, M. A.
& Van Leeuwen, F. E.
(2000)
N. Engl. J. Med.
342,
1838-1839 |
| 5. |
Rossouw, J. E.
, Anderson, G. L.
, Prentice, R. L.
, LaCroix, A. Z.
, Kooperberg, C.
, Stefanick, M. L.
, Jackson, R. D.
, Beresford, S. A.
, Howard, B. V.
, Johnson, K. C.
, Kotchen, J. M.
& Ockene, J.
(2002)
J. Am. Med. Assoc.
288,
321-333 |
| 6. |
Liehr, J. G.
(2000)
Endocr. Rev.
21,
40-54 |
| 7. | Li, J. J. , Gonzalez, A. , Banerjee, S. , Banerjee, S. K. & Li, S. A. (1993) Environ. Health Perspect. 101,(Suppl. 5), 259-264. |
| 8. | Russo, I. H. & Russo, J. (1998) J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neopl. 3, 49-61[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 9. | Cavalieri, E. , Frenkel, K. , Liehr, J. G. , Rogan, E. & Roy, D. (2000) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 27, 75-93. |
| 10. | Kirkman, H. (1959) Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 1, 1-57[Medline] . |
| 11. |
Newbold, P. R.
, Bullock, B. C.
& McLachlan, J. A.
(1990)
Cancer Res.
50,
7677-7681 |
| 12. |
Bhat, H. K.
, Hacker, H. J.
, Bannasch, P.
, Thompson, E. A.
& Liehr, J. G.
(1993)
Cancer Res.
53,
5447-5451 |
| 13. |
Shull, J. D.
, Spady, T. J.
, Snyder, M. C.
, Johansson, S. L.
& Pennington, K. L.
(1997)
Carcinogenesis
18,
1595-1601 |
| 14. | Liehr, J. G. , Stancel, G. M. , Chorich, L. P. , Bousfield, G. R. & Ulubelen, A. A. (1986) Chem. Biol. Interact. 59, 173-184[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 15. |
Li, J. J.
, Li, S. A.
, Oberly, T. D.
& Parson, J. A.
(1995)
Cancer Res.
55,
4347-4351 |
| 16. | Weisz, J. , Bui, Q. D. , Roy, D. & Liehr, J. G. (1992) Endocrinology 131, 655-661[Abstract]. |
| 17. | Zhu, B. T. , Roy, D. & Liehr, J. G. (1993) Endocrinology 132, 577-583[Abstract]. |
| 18. | Spink, D. C. , Eugster, H. P. , Lincoln, D. W. , Schuetz, J. D. , Schuetz, E. G. , Johnson, J. A. , Kaminsky, L. S. & Gierthy, J. F. (1992) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 293, 342-348[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 19. |
Liehr, J. G.
, Ulubelen, A. A.
& Strobel, H. W.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
16865-16870 |
| 20. | Liehr, J. G. & Roy, D. (1990) Free Radical Biol. Med. 8, 415-423[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 21. | Cavalieri, E. L. , Rogan, E. G. & Chakravarti, D. (2002) Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 59, 665-681[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 22. | Cavalieri, E. L. & Rogan, E. G. (1992) Pharmacol. Ther. 55, 183-199[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 23. | Liehr, J. G. (1997) Environ. Health Perspect. 105, 565-569. |
| 24. | Korenman, S. G. (1969) Steroids 13, 163-177[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 25. | Hershey, R. M. , Lloyd, T. , MacLusky, N. J. & Weisz, J. (1982) Endocrinology 111, 1734-1736[Abstract]. |
| 26. |
Thor, H.
, Smith, M. T.
, Hartzell, P.
, Bellomo, G.
, Jewell, S. A.
& Orrenius, S.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
12419-12425 |
| 27. | Ngo, E. O. , Sun, T. P. , Chang, J. Y. , Wang, C. C. , Chi, K. H. , Cheng, A. L. & Nutter, L. M. (1991) Biochem. Pharmacol. 42, 1961-1968[CrossRef][Medline] . |
| 28. | Chang, M. , Shi, M. & Forman, J. (1992) Am. J. Physiol. 262, L637-L643[Medline] . |
| 29. |
Morrow, J. D.
, Hill, K. E.
, Burk, R. F.
, Nammour, T. M.
, Badr, K. F.
& Roberts, L. J., II
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87,
9383-9387 |
| 30. |
Pratico, D.
, Lawson, J. A.
& FitzGerald, G. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
9800-9805 |
| 31. |
Liehr, J. G.
, Sirbasku, D. A.
, Jurka, E.
, Randerath, K.
& Randerath, E.
(1988)
Cancer Res.
48,
779-783 |
| 32. | Iturri, G. M. & Cox, H. W. (1969) Military Med. 134, 1119-1128. |
| 33. | Liehr, J. G. (1983) Mol. Pharmacol. 23, 278-281[Abstract]. |
| 34. |
Liehr, J. G.
, Purdy, R. H.
, Baren, J. S.
, Nutting, E. F.
, Colton, F.
& Randerath, E.
(1987)
Cancer Res.
47,
2583-2588 |
| 35. |
Li, S. A.
, Klicka, J. K.
& Li, J. J.
(1985)
Cancer Res.
45,
181-185 |
| 36. | Bunyagidj, C. & McLachlan, J. A. (1988) J. Steroid Biochem. 31, 795-801[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 37. | Bui, Q. D. & Weisz, J. (1988) Pharmacology 36, 356-364[ISI][Medline] . |
| 38. | Bui, Q. D. & Weisz, J. (1989) Endocrinology 124, 1085-1087[Abstract]. |
| 39. |
Liehr, J. G.
, Ricci, M. J.
, Jefcoate, C. R.
, Hannigan, E. V.
, Hokanson, J. A.
& Zhu, B. T.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92,
9220-9224 |
| 40. |
Liehr, J. G.
& Ricci, M. J.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93,
3294-3296 |
| 41. | Jan, S. T. , Devanesan, P. D. , Stack, D. E. , Ramanathan, R. , Byun, J. , Gross, M. L. , Rogan, E. G. & Cavalieri, E. L. (1998) Chem. Res. Toxicol. 11, 412-419[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 42. |
Wang, M. Y.
& Liehr, J. G.
(1995)
Carcinogenesis
16,
1941-1945 |
| 43. |
Wang, M. Y.
& Liehr, J. G.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
284-291 |
| 44. |
Malins, D. C.
, Polissar, N. L.
& Gunselman, S. J.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93,
2557-2563 |
| 45. |
Amstad, P. A.
, Krupitza, G.
& Cerutti, P. A.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
3952-3960 |
| 46. |
Hacker, H. J.
, Bannasch, P.
& Liehr, J. G.
(1988)
Cancer Res.
48,
971-976 |
| 47. |
Gonzales, A.
, Oberley, T. D.
& Li, J. J.
(1989)
Cancer Res.
49,
1020-1028 |
| 48. | White, I. N. H. & Muller-Eberhard, U. (1977) Biochem. J. 166, 57-64[Medline] . |
| 49. |
Oritz de Montellano, P. R.
& Kunze, K. L.
(1980)
J. Biol. Chem.
255,
5578-5585 |
| 50. | Calderaro, M. , Martins, E. A. & Meneghini, R. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biochem. 126, 17-23[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 51. |
Castagnetta, L. A. M.
, Granata, O. M.
, Traina, A.
, Ravazzolo, B.
, Amoroso, M.
, Miele, M.
, Bellavia, V.
, Agostara, B.
& Carruba, G.
(2002)
Clin. Cancer Res.
8,
3146-3155 |
This article has been cited by other articles in HighWire Press-hosted journals:
![]() |
S. K. Quick, P. G. Shields, J. Nie, M. E. Platek, S. E. McCann, A. D. Hutson, M. Trevisan, D. Vito, R. Modali, T. A. Lehman, et al. Effect Modification by Catalase Genotype Suggests a Role for Oxidative Stress in the Association of Hormone Replacement Therapy with Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2008; 17(5): 1082 - 1087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. N.C. Tam, I. Leav, and S.-M. Ho Sex Hormones Induce Direct Epithelial and Inflammation-Mediated Oxidative/Nitrosative Stress That Favors Prostatic Carcinogenesis in the Noble Rat Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2007; 171(4): 1334 - 1341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E TROSKO From Adult Stem Cells to Cancer Stem Cells: Oct-4 Gene, Cell-Cell Communication, and Hormones during Tumor Promotion Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., November 1, 2006; 1089(1): 36 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. PROKAI-TATRAI and L. PROKAI Impact of Metabolism on the Safety of Estrogen Therapy Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., June 1, 2005; 1052(1): 243 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-Y. Guo, X. Li, J. D. Browning Jr., G. E. Rottinghaus, D. B. Lubahn, A. Constantinou, M. Bennink, and R. S. MacDonald Dietary Soy Isoflavones and Estrone Protect Ovariectomized ER{alpha}KO and Wild-Type Mice from Carcinogen-Induced Colon Cancer J. Nutr., January 1, 2004; 134(1): 179 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |