Partitions with difference conditions and Alder's conjecture

  1. Ae Ja Yee*
  1. Department of Mathematics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
  1. Edited by Richard V. Kadison, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, and approved October 6, 2004 (received for review September 20, 2004)

Abstract

In 1956, Alder conjectured that the number of partitions of n into parts differing by at least d is greater than or equal to that of partitions of n into parts ≡ ±1 (mod d + 3) for d ≥ 4. In 1971, Andrews proved that the conjecture holds for d = 2r – 1, r ≥ 4. We sketch a proof of the conjecture for all d ≥ 32.

1. Introduction

The well known Rogers–Ramanujan identities may be stated partition-theoretically as follows. If c = 1 or 2, then the number of partitions of n into parts ≡ ±c (mod 5) equals the number of partitions of n into parts ≥ c with minimal difference 2 between parts. In 1926, I. Schur (1) proved that the number of partitions of n with minimal difference 3 between parts and no consecutive multiples of 3 equals the number of partitions into parts ≡ ±1 (mod 6).

In 1956, H. L. Alder (2) posed the following problems. Let qd(n) be the number of partitions of n into parts differing by at least d; let Qd(n) be the number of partitions of n into parts ≡±1 (mod d + 3); let Δd(n) = qd(n) – Qd(n). (a) Is Δd(n) nonnegative for all positive d and n? It is known that Δ1(n) = 0 for n > 0 by Euler's identity, that the number of partitions of n into distinct parts equals that of partitions of n into odd parts, that Δ2(n) = 0 for n > 0 by the first Rogers–Ramanujan identity, and that Δ3(n) ≥ 0 for all n > 0 by Schur's theorem, which states that Δ3(n) equals the number of those partitions of n into parts differing by at least 3 that contain at least one pair of consecutive multiples of 3. (b) If problem a is true, can Δd(n) be characterized as the number of partitions of n of a certain type, as is the case for d = 3?

In 1971, G. E. Andrews (3) gave some partial answers to problem a.

Theorem 1.1 (ref. 3 ). For any d ≥ 4, limn →∞ Δd(n) = ∞.

Theorem 1.2 (ref. 3 ). If d = 2r – 1, r ≥ 4, then Δd(n) ≥ 0 for all n.

To prove Theorem 1.2, Andrews studied the set of partitions of n into distinct parts ≡ 2i (mod d) for 0 ≤ i < r, the size of which is greater than or equal to Qd(n) for any n, and he succeeded in finding a set of partitions with difference conditions between parts that are complicated but much stronger than the difference condition for qd(n). He then proved that partitions into distinct parts ≡ 2i (mod d) for 0 ≤ i < r and partitions with the difference conditions are equinumerous. As a result, he was able to prove Alder's conjecture in these particular cases.

By generalizing Andrews' methods and constructing an injection, we are able to prove that Alder's conjecture holds for d = 7 and d ≥ 32 (unpublished work). Therefore, Alder's conjecture still remains unresolved for 4 ≤ d ≤ 30 and d ≠ 7, 15.

In Section 2, we will give an outline of the proof of the case when d = 2r – 1, r ≥ 4 by Andrews, and in Section 3, we will sketch the proof of the case when d ≥ 32.

In the sequel, we assume that |q| < 1 and use the customary notation for q-series Formula

2. The Case When d = 2r – 1

From the definitions of qd(n) and Qd(n), the generating functions for qd(n) and Qd(n) are, respectively, Formula (see ref. 4, chapter 1).

For a given d = 2r – 1, define Formula Then Formula Let Formula and Formula Let βd(m) denote the least positive residue of m modulo d. For mAd, let b(m) be the number of terms appearing in the binary representation of m, and let v(m) denote the least 2i in this representation. We need a theorem of Andrews (5), which we state without proof in the following theorem.

Theorem 2.1. Let D(Ad; n) denote the number of partitions of n into distinct parts taken from Ad, and let E(Ad; n) denote the number of partitions of n into parts taken from Ad of the form n = λ1 + λ2 + ··· + λs, such that Formula Then D(Ad; n) = E(Ad; n).

Meanwhile, Andrews (3) established the following general theorem in the theory of partitions.

Theorem 2.2. Let Formula and Formula be two strictly increasing sequences of positive integers such that b 1 = 1 and aibi for all i. Let ρ(S; n) and ρ(T; n) denote the numbers of partitions of n into parts taken from S and T, respectively. Then, for n ≥ 1, Formula

By comparing parts arising in partitions counted by Qd(n) and Ld(n), we see that Ld(n) ≥ Qd(n) for r ≥ 4. Because Ld(n) = D(Ad; n) and qd(n) ≥ E(Ad; n), it follows from Theorem 2.1 that qd(n) ≥ Ld(n). Therefore, we have shown that qd(n) ≥ Qd(n) for d = 2r – 1, r ≥ 4.

3. The Case When d ≠ 2r – 1

We denote the coefficient of qn in an infinite series s(q) by [qn](s(q)).

For a given d, uniquely define the integer r by Formula and let Ld(n) be the number of partitions of n into distinct parts ≡ 1, 2, 4,..., 2r –1 (mod d). Then the generating function fd(q) for Ld(n) is Formula

By examining the generating function fd(q), we find from Theorem 2.2 that for d ≥ 32, Formula where Ld(m) = 0 if m ≤ 0. Thus, we only need to prove that Formula Let X(d; n) and Y(d; n) be the sets of partitions of n counted by qd(n) and Ld(n), respectively. Then Formula because the conditions for Y(d; n) are much stronger than those for X(d; n). Thus, if there exists an injection from Y(d; n – 2r) to X(d; n)\Y(d; n), then the Alder conjecture holds.

Lemma 3.1. For any d ≥ 32 not of the form 2r – 1, Formula

To obtain Lemma 3.1, we construct an injection from Y(d; n – 2r) to X(d; n) such that the image of a partition in Y(d; n – 2r) does not satisfy the conditions for Y(d; n). For n < 4d + 2r, we can show that qd(n) ≥ Qd(n) by merely counting qd(n) and Qd(n). Therefore, from Lemma 3.1, inequality 3.1, and Andrews' result we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 3.2. For d ≥ 31, Formula

4. Conclusion

The most intriguing identities in the theory of partitions have been the Rogers–Ramanujan identities. Extremely motivated by these identities, Schur searched for further analogous partition identities. In 1926, Schur (1) proved that the number of partitions of n with minimal difference 3 between parts and no consecutive multiples of 3 equals the number of partitions of n into parts ≡ ±1 (mod 6).

Alder's conjecture has naturally arisen from the Rogers– Ramanujan identities and the Schur identity, and has been open for ≈50 years. The difficulty in dealing with the conjecture is that no set S exists such that the number of partitions of n with parts from S is equal to qd(n) for d ≥ 3 (see refs. 6 and 7). Thus finding injections between two sets might not be the most efficient method, but it is the best approach for the conjecture at this point.

Acknowledgments

I thank George E. Andrews for suggesting that I work on this project and Bruce C. Berndt for his comments and advice.

Footnotes

  • * E-mail: yee{at}math.psu.edu.

  • This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.

References

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents