PNAS Peer Review  Sign up for PNAS Online eTocs
Link: Info for AuthorsLink: Editorial BoardLink: AboutLink: SubscribeLink: AdvertiseLink: ContactLink: Sitemap Link: PNAS Home
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Link: Current Issue "" Link: Archives "" Link: Online Submission ""  Link: Advanced Search

Published online on November 5, 2007, 10.1073/pnas.0705873104
PNAS | November 13, 2007 | vol. 104 | no. 46 | 18270-18275


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, H.
Right arrow Articles by Cui, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, H.
Right arrow Articles by Cui, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg  
What's this?

 Previous Article  | Table of Contents |  Next Article 

BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES / NEUROSCIENCE
Mg2+ mediates interaction between the voltage sensor and cytosolic domain to activate BK channels

Huanghe Yang{dagger}, Lei Hu{dagger}, Jingyi Shi{dagger}, Kelli Delaloye{dagger}, Frank T. Horrigan{ddagger}, and Jianmin Cui{dagger},§

{dagger}Department of Biomedical Engineering and Cardiac Bioelectricity and Arrhythmia Center, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130; and {ddagger}Department of Physiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6085

Edited by Ramón Latorre, Centro de Estudios Científicos, Valdivia, Chile, and approved September 25, 2007 (received for review June 22, 2007)


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Results
 Discussion
 Methods
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The voltage-sensor domain (VSD) of voltage-dependent ion channels and enzymes is critical for cellular responses to membrane potential. The VSD can also be regulated by interaction with intracellular proteins and ligands, but how this occurs is poorly understood. Here, we show that the VSD of the BK-type K+ channel is regulated by a state-dependent interaction with its own tethered cytosolic domain that depends on both intracellular Mg2+ and the open state of the channel pore. Mg2+ bound to the cytosolic RCK1 domain enhances VSD activation by electrostatic interaction with Arg-213 in transmembrane segment S4. Our results demonstrate that a cytosolic domain can come close enough to the VSD to regulate its activity electrostatically, thereby elucidating a mechanism of Mg2+-dependent activation in BK channels and suggesting a general pathway by which intracellular factors can modulate the function of voltage-dependent proteins.

electrostatic interaction | interdomain interaction | magnesium | Ca2+-activated K+ channel | metal ion regulation


Voltage-dependent ion channels are modular proteins (1) containing four voltage-sensor domains (VSDs) that control the opening and closing of a central pore domain. Each VSD contains charged residues in transmembrane segments that sense changes in membrane potential. VSDs are important for controlling not only ion channel pores but also enzymatic activity (2) and can serve as stand-alone proton channels in the absence of a separate pore domain (3, 4). Because VSDs impact multiple aspects of cellular function, it is important to understand how VSD function is regulated. Many intracellular factors such as ligand binding, posttranslational modification, and the presence of cytosolic domains, accessory proteins, or subunits can alter the function of voltage-dependent ion channels (5). In some cases such modulation is thought to involve the voltage sensor (610). However, the mechanisms by which intracellular factors and VSDs interact are poorly understood. BK channels are activated by membrane depolarization, intracellular Ca2+, and Mg2+ (11) and are essential for modulating muscle contraction and neuronal activities such as synaptic transmission and hearing (12, 13). Like other voltage-dependent K+ (Kv) channels, BK channels possess a VSD where the S4 segment contains multiple Arg residues (14, 15). However, in BK channels, only one of these, R213, contributes to voltage sensing (1518). Interestingly, neutralizing R213 by mutation (R213Q) not only alters voltage-dependent activation but also abolishes Mg2+-dependent activation of BK channels, revealing that the VSD contributes to Mg2+ sensitivity, although the mechanism is unknown (18). Here, we investigate the mechanism of Mg2+ action to determine whether and how the VSD interacts with Mg2+ ions that are bound to the BK channel's COOH-terminal cytosolic domain.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Results
 Discussion
 Methods
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Mg2+ May Activate the VSD by Electrostatic Interaction. Physiological concentrations of Mg2+ in the low millimolar range activate BK channels, independent of the effects of micromolar Ca2+, by binding to a site that includes residues E374 and E399 (1921). The putative Mg2+ binding site is located in a cytosolic domain that is homologous to the RCK1 domain of MthK and Escherichia coli K+ channels (19, 2225). Fig. 1a shows the structure of the cytosolic domain of MthK, in which the residues at positions corresponding to E374 and E399 of the mSlo1 BK channel (E138, N158) have been changed to Glu and colored red. The Mg2+ binding site is apparently exposed on the surface of the RCK1 domain, facing the membrane. The distance between the Mg2+ binding site and the central axis of the MthK channel pore ({approx}31 Å) roughly coincides with that between the C terminus of S4 and the central axis of the Kv1.2 channel (Fig. 1a, yellow circle), suggesting that the Mg2+ site and VSD of the BK channel may lie close together. However, the detailed structure of the BK channel is unknown. Moreover, the BK channel is a complex allosteric protein whose cytosolic domain is thought to undergo conformational changes associated with ligand binding and channel opening (11). Therefore, it is not clear whether Mg2+ and the VSD interact directly or indirectly, through what physical mechanism, or in which conformational state(s). One possibility, depicted in Fig. 1b, is that the binding of the Mg2+ may alter the local electric field that is sensed by charged residues in the VSD, thereby activating the channel. This hypothesis is consistent with the fact that Mg2+ shifts the voltage dependence of channel opening to more negative voltages and that the neutralization of R213 abolishes Mg2+ sensitivity (18). Another line of evidence supporting this hypothesis is that Mg2+-dependent activation is sensitive to the ionic strength of intracellular solution. In our normal intracellular solution with intracellular K+ concentration ([K+]i) = 142 mM (see Methods), 10 mM Mg2+ activates the channel by shifting the voltage dependence of conductance (G-V relationship) to more negative voltages {Delta}V1/2 = –60 ± 3.8 mV, where V1/2 is the voltage at half-maximum conductance (Fig. 1 c and d). The amount of G-V shift caused by 10 mM Mg2+ increases in lower [K+]i and decreases in higher [K+]i (Fig. 1e), as expected if Mg2+ activates the channel by an electrostatic interaction. To the contrary, ionic strength does not significantly affect Ca2+-dependent activation (Fig. 1e), suggesting that Ca2+ does not activate the channel by an electrostatic interaction and the changes in ionic strength do not affect Ca2+ binding. Similarly, the strong response of Mg2+-dependent activation to ionic strength may not reflect changes in Mg2+ binding.


Figure 1
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Mg2+ may activate the BK channel by an electrostatic interaction. (a) The crystal structure of the cytosolic domain of the MthK channel (Protein Data Bank ID code 1LNQ, top view from the cytoplasmic membrane), in which E138 corresponds to E374 of the mSlo1 channel, while G156 and N158 were mutated to the corresponding Q397 and E399. The yellow circle indicates the distance from the β-carbon of R303 in S4 to the central axis in the Kv1.2 crystal structure (Protein Data Bank ID code 2A79) (1). R303 of Kv1.2 corresponds to R213 in mSlo1. (b) Mg2+ binds to the site in the cytosolic RCK1 domain and interacts with R213 to affect the voltage sensor movement. (c) Current traces of WT mSlo1 channels in 0 and 10 mM [Mg2+]i. Testing potentials were –30 to 230 mV with 20-mV increments. Both holding and repolarizing potentials were –80 mV. (d) Mean G-V relations of WT channels in 0 [Mg2+]i, 10 mM [Mg2+]i, and 200 µM [Ca2+]i. (e) Effects of ionic strength on Mg2+ and Ca2+ sensing of WT mSlo1. {Delta}V1/2 equals the V1/2 change from 0 to 10 mM [Mg2+]i or from 0 to 200 µM [Ca2+]i in specific [K+]i. {Delta}V1/2(142[K+]) is the V1/2 change in 142 mM[K+]i and equals –60.7 ± 3.8 mV for Mg2+ sensing and –214.3 ± 2.8 mV for Ca2+ sensing, respectively. V1/2 is the voltage where the G-V relation is half maximum and obtained by fitting the G-V relation to the Boltzmann function (see Methods).

A Positive Charge on Residue 397 Produces Effects Similar to Mg2+. To further test the idea that an electrostatic interaction underlies Mg2+ action, we compared the effects on BK channel gating of Mg2+ with those of adding charges to position 397 (Q397; Fig. 1 a and b). Q397 lies close to the Mg2+-binding site, based on the MthK structure, and it is only one residue away from E399 in the primary sequence. Our previous results suggest that adding charges to this position by mutation or chemical modification does not abolish Mg2+-dependent activation but affects Mg2+ sensitivity through electrostatic interaction with the bound Mg2+ (21). Thus, the electric field of the charge at position 397 overlaps that of bound Mg2+. Therefore, if our hypothesis is correct, a positive charge at position 397 should have effects on channel activation that are qualitatively similar to those of Mg2+, as if a cation was constitutively bound near the Mg2+ site.

Consistent with the above prediction, mutations of Q397 to positively charged amino acids (Q397K, Q397R) activate the channel by shifting the G-V relation to more negative voltages in the absence of intracellular Mg2+ (Fig. 2 a and b). Also consistent with an electrostatic interaction, mutations of Q397 to negatively charged amino acids (Q397E, Q397D) shift the G-V relation to more positive voltages, whereas Q397C has insignificant effects on the G-V relation (P > 0.05). Similar to Mg2+-dependent activation, the G-V shift caused by mutation Q397K is also affected by ionic strength (Fig. 2c). The fractional changes of {Delta}V1/2 caused by Mg2+ and the mutation superimpose at low [K+]i and only differ at high [K+]i. Because the mutation adds a charge permanently to the channel, this result further suggests that changing ionic strength alters Mg2+-dependent activation primarily by affecting an electrostatic interaction, with only a small effect on Mg2+ binding. BK channels traverse multiple states during activation (11). Interestingly, the change in electric field produced by Mg2+ binding is not felt uniformly by all these transitions. Unlike the G-V relation, the voltage dependence of activation kinetics ({tau}-V relation) is not shifted by increasing intracellular Mg2+ concentration ([Mg2+]i) from 0 to 10 mM (2729). Similarly, the mutations Q397R and Q397K do not shift the {tau}-V relation (Fig. 2d), further supporting that positive charges at position 397 affect the same set of gating transitions as Mg2+.


Figure 2
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Mg2+ and a positive charge at residue 397 have similar effects on the voltage dependence of IK. (a) Mean G-V relations of WT, Q397K, and Q397E in 0 [Mg2+]i compared with that of WT in 10 mM [Mg2+]i. (b) Shifts of the G-V relation caused by 10 mM [Mg2+]i for the WT mSlo1 and by Q397 mutations in 0 [Mg2+]i. Here and in Fig. 4a the G-V shift of WT channel from 0 to 10 mM [Mg2+]i is subtracted by –12.2 mV because of Mg2+ binding to another low-affinity Mg2+ site (28). There is no statistically significant difference between the V1/2s of WT and Q397C (Student's t test, P > 0.05). (c) Effects of ionic strength on Mg2+ sensing of WT channels (the same data as in Fig. 1d) and the G-V shift of Q397K relative to WT channels in 0 [Mg2+]i. {Delta}V1/2(142[K+]) equals –30.8 ± 3.0 mV for Q397K-induced shift. (d) Mean activation time constants as a function of voltage. (e) Mean G-V relations of Q397C:C430A mutant channels in 0 [Mg2+]i before and after MTSET(+) treatment. (f) G-V shifts of WT, C430A, and Q397C:C430A mutant channels induced by MTSET(+) treatment in 0 [Mg2+]i.

The effects of adding a positive charge to position 397 by chemical modification also mimic qualitatively the effects of Mg2+ binding on the G-V relation (Fig. 2 e and f). In this experiment, the Q397C mutant was treated with the Cys-modifying reagent MTSET(+) at the intracellular side during patch-clamp recordings. Because MTSET(+) is known to alter the voltage dependence of WT BK channels by modifying C430 (30), the channels in our study contained another mutation C430A to eliminate this background effect of MTSET(+). Modification of Q397C by MTSET(+) shifted the G-V relation to more negative voltages in the absence of Mg2+, indicating that the covalent addition of a positive charge to Q397C activates the channel. The results in Fig. 2 suggest that the gating of the BK channel is affected primarily by alterations in charge near the Mg2+-binding site. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that there are differences in the G-V shift produced by mutation and chemical modification of position 397 and Mg2+ binding, which may reflect differences in the number, orientation, and environment of charges as well as their distance relative to the VSD.

State-Dependent Interaction Between Mg2+ and VSD. The movement of the voltage sensor in response to a change in voltage generates a transient gating current (Ig). If Mg2+ activates the channel through electrostatic interactions with the VSD, it should alter Ig. BK channel voltage sensors can move between the resting and activated state and generate gating current no matter whether channels are closed or open (16, 31) (Fig. 3). However, voltage-sensor activation occurs at less depolarized voltages in the open conformation, thereby promoting voltage-dependent opening (31). The results in Fig. 3 show that, consistent with our hypothesis, Mg2+ enhances voltage-sensor activation, but interestingly, Mg2+ acts primarily when channels are open and has little effect when channels are closed.


Figure 3
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Mg2+ and a positive charge at residue 397 have similar effects on gating current and limiting slope measurements. (a) IgON (black) and IK (blue) traces for mSlo1 channels. (b) QC-V relations for WT, Q397R, and Q397K channels. Solid lines are fits to the Boltzmann relation. (c) Gating current traces for WT channels elicited by voltage pulses to 250 mV with durations of 0.3, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, and 10 ms. The peaks of IgOFF at 10 mM [Mg2+]i (red) are aligned with an IK trace (blue) measured at the same voltage and [Mg2+]i. The time constant of IK is 0.92 ms. (d) Superposition of IgOFF currents after 0.3 (black) and 3 ms (red) pulses to 250 mV for WT channels in 0 and 10 mM [Mg2+]i, respectively. The amplitudes of IgOFF after 3-ms pulse were normalized to the corresponding IgOFF amplitude after 0.3-ms pulse. (e) Ig traces for WT channel and Q397C mutation before (black) and after (red) 200 µM MTSET(+) treatment. (f and g) Po-V relations. Straight lines indicate the slope of the curves at different voltage ranges (f) or fits to the HCA model (g). The fitting parameters are: L0 = 1.5e-6, ZJ = 0.57, ZL = 0.3; for WT channel in 0 [Mg2+]i: Vhc = 167 mV, Vho = 17 mV; for WT channel in 10 mM [Mg2+]i: Vhc = 157 mV, Vho = –33 mV; for Q397R in 0 [Mg2+]i: Vhc = 167 mV, Vho = –7 mV. All measurements were made in 0 [Mg2+]i unless indicated otherwise.

On Ig (IgON) elicited by a depolarizing voltage pulse is associated with movement of the voltage sensor from the resting to the activated state, and in BK channels it is very rapid compared with the opening of the pore and rise of K+ current (Fig. 3a). Thus the movement of the voltage sensor is essentially complete before channels open, and IgON reflects voltage sensor movement when channels are closed. The amplitude of IgON is slightly larger in 10 mM than in 0 [Mg2+]i ({approx}10% increase at +250 mV; data not shown), whereas the time course of IgON is not altered (Fig. 3c). The relationship between gating charge movement and membrane voltage when channels are closed (QC-V relation), determined by integrating the area under the IgON traces at various voltages, exhibits no significant change between 0 and 10 mM [Mg2+]i (Fig. 3b) ({approx}10-mV difference in the voltage at the half-maximum of the QC-V relation, Vhc). These results indicate that Mg2+ does not affect the closed channel significantly, which may also explain why K+ ionic current (IK) activation kinetics are insensitive to Mg2+ (Fig. 2d).

On the other hand, off Igs (IgOFF), which reflect the return of the voltage sensor from the activated to the resting state, are decreased in amplitude and slowed by 10 mM [Mg2+]i (Fig. 3 c and d). Under our experimental conditions (see Methods) K+ currents through the pore are blocked but channels are still open in response to depolarization (31). Therefore, a fraction of channels are open at the end of a voltage pulse when IgOFF is recorded. To examine whether the change of IgOFF is related to the fraction of open channels, we measured IgOFF after pulses of various duration (Fig. 3c). After a 0.30-ms voltage pulse, few channels are open and IgOFF is similar in the presence or absence of Mg2+. However, as pulse duration increases IgOFF amplitude is greatly reduced in 10 mM [Mg2+]i (red traces, Fig. 3c), indicating that Mg2+ affects voltage sensor movement more significantly when channels are open. Previous studies indicate that voltage-sensor deactivation is slowed when channels are open even in the absence of Mg2+ (31, 32) (Fig. 3d). In our experiment at +250 mV, channels should be almost maximally activated in the presence or absence of Mg2+ (Figs. 1d and 3b). Therefore, the greater effect on IgOFF in 10 mM [Mg2+]i (Fig. 3d) does not merely reflect a change in open probability but rather implies that deactivation of voltage sensors in open channels is slowed by Mg2+.

The charge-voltage relation for open BK channels (QO-V) is difficult to measure directly from gating currents because, in contrast to the case of voltage-sensor activation and channel opening (Fig. 3a), the time course of voltage-sensor deactivation is not much faster than channel closing (31). However, a shift in the QO-V relation to more negative voltages caused by 10 mM [Mg2+]i is evident from the voltage dependence of open probability (Po) at negative voltages (Fig. 3f). BK channels can open even when voltage sensors are in the resting state; thus Po can be measured at voltages more negative than the range of voltage-sensor activation (33). Such openings have weak voltage dependence as indicated by the red line in Fig. 3f. At more positive voltages the Log(Po)-V relation becomes steeper (solid lines in Fig. 3f) because of voltage-sensor activation, and this inflection in slope provides an indication of the position of the QO-V relation along the voltage axis (32). Clearly, Mg2+ does not affect channel opening when the voltage sensor is in the resting state because the Log(Po)-V relations in 0 and 10 mM [Mg2+]i superimpose at the most negative voltages. Mg2+ increases Po only at potentials where voltage sensors can activate and shifts the inflection point in the Log(Po)-V relation to more negative voltages, indicating that Mg2+ enhances voltage-sensor activation when the channel is open. This result is consistent with an earlier report (26). Fitting the Log(Po)-V relations over a wide range of the Po with a well established model that describes the voltage-dependent activation of BK channels (33) (see Methods) reveals that 10 mM [Mg2+]i shifts the Qo-V relation by –50 ± 2 mV (Fig. 3g).

Similar to Mg2+ binding, a positive charge at residue 397 enhances voltage-sensor activation more when channels are open. QC-V relations for the mutant channels Q397R and Q397K are similar to those of the WT (Fig. 3b). Modification of the Q397C channel by MTSET(+) reduces the amplitude and slows the relaxation of IgOFF but leaves IgON unchanged (Fig. 3e). The mutation Q397R, like Mg2+, has no effect on Po at very negative voltages, but shifts voltage-sensor activation for open channels to more negative voltages by –24 ± 2 mV (Fig. 3 f and g), similar to the shift in the G-V relation by Q397R (Fig. 2c). Because the Q397R channel is still sensitive to Mg2+ (21), the charges of the Arg side chain and the bound Mg2+ must be located at different positions. Given this difference, the similar effects on voltage-sensor activation and channel opening produced by the spatially separated Arg at 397 and bound Mg2+ suggest that the interaction between cytosolic and VSDs is mediated by long-range electrostatic interactions.

R213 in Transmembrane Segment S4 Senses Mg2+. Which residues in the VSD sense the changes in the electric field as a result of Mg2+ binding and are responsible for the functional changes in channel gating? Analysis of the primary sequence of BK channels indicates that 12 charged residues in the VSD (S1–S4 and the S4–S5 linker) may be exposed to cytosol. We mutated each of these residues individually to alter their charge and examined the effects of these mutations on the shift of the G-V relation in response to 10 mM Mg2+ (Fig. 4a). Of all of these mutations, only R213C completely abolishes Mg2+ sensitivity (Fig. 4 a and b), consistent with the previous finding that R213Q abolishes Mg2+ sensitivity (18). Residue 213 is located in the C-terminal half of S4, is accessible to intracellular Cys-modifying reagents when the voltage sensor is in the resting state (18), and contributes to gating charge (14, 15). Thus, this residue is a sensor of both membrane voltage and Mg2+ binding. Fig. 4b shows that when R213 is mutated to Cys the substitution of a positively charged residue at position 397 (the double mutation R213C:Q397R) no longer shifts the G-V relation to negative voltages, supporting that R213 is the main sensor of charges around the Mg2+-binding site. Finally, if Mg2+ activates the channel by an electrostatic interaction with the charge of R213, adding a positive charge back to position 213 should rescue some of the Mg2+ sensitivity that is lost because of the R213C mutation. As expected, modification of R213C channels, but not R213Q, by MTSEA(+) restores Mg2+ sensitivity such that the deactivation of the channel is slowed down and the G-V relation is shifted to more negative voltages by 10 mM Mg2+ (Fig. 4 c and d). The results in Fig. 4 indicate that a positive charge at residue 213 is sufficient and necessary for the VSD to sense Mg2+ binding and bears the primary responsibility for Mg2+-dependent activation.


Figure 4
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Intracellular Mg2+ moves the voltage sensor by electrostatic interaction with R213. (a) Shifts of the G-V relation caused by an increase of [Mg2+]i from 0 to 10 mM for WT and mutant channels. The G-V relations were measured in 0 [Ca2+]i except for that of R213C (*, measured in 100 µM [Ca2+]i). (b) Mean G-V relations for R213C and R213C:Q397R. (c and d) Current traces (c) and mean G-V relations (d) for R213Q and R213C after MTSEA(+) treatment. Testing potentials were –80 to 200 mV with 20-mV increments. Both holding and repolarizing potentials were –80 mV. In b–d all measurements were made in 100 µM [Ca2+]i and 0 [Mg2+]i unless indicated otherwise.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Results
 Discussion
 Methods
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Our results demonstrate that in BK channels the VSD senses not only membrane voltage but also intracellular Mg2+ to control channel activation (Fig. 1b). Mg2+ binding in the cytosolic domain alters the electric field at R213 in S4 to promote the occupation of the activated state by the voltage sensor, thereby favoring the open state of the channel. This mechanism is based on three lines of evidence: (i) Mg2+-dependent activation strongly depends on intracellular ionic strength, (ii) positive charges at residue 397, close to the Mg2+-binding site, alter channel gating similarly to Mg2+ in all major aspects, whereas negative charges at this site inhibit activation, and (iii) a positive charge at residue 213 in S4 is necessary and sufficient to sustain Mg2+ sensitivity. Although intracellular ionic strength influences Mg2+-dependent activation, it has only a small effect on Ca2+-dependent activation (Fig. 1e). Similarly, charges at residues 397 and 213 have little effect on Ca2+ sensitivity (ref. 17 and data not shown). Considering that the Mg2+-binding site is located in the N-terminal half of the RCK1 domain, which is also important for Ca2+-dependent activation (34), these results suggest that Mg2+ or the charges at residue 397 do not cause a global change in channel structure. Rather, they are involved in a local interaction specific for Mg2+-dependent activation. On the other hand, the charges at residue 397 were able to reproduce the effects of Mg2+ on channel gating regardless if they were introduced via mutation or cysteine modification, and differences in side-chain size, orientation, or charge distribution only result in minor quantitative variations of the effects. These results are compatible with a long-range electrostatic interaction.

During voltage-dependent activation, S4 moves in response to voltage changes to open the channel. Our results indicate that R213 in BK channel S4 can be sufficiently close to its tethered cytosolic domain to interact electrostatically with bound Mg2+ and charge at residue 397. Because the energy of the electrostatic interaction is manifested as a shift in the Qo-V relation we can estimate the average distance between the charges of R213 and R397 as follows. Because voltage sensors in each of the four BK channel {alpha}-subunits are thought to activate independently via a two-state process (31, 32), the energy to shift the QO-V is:

Formula 1

where zg is the gating charge per voltage sensor (zg = 0.58e) (15) and {Delta}V1/2 = –24 mV (Fig. 3 f and g). The energetic effect on voltage-sensor activation produced by electrostatic interaction of Q397R with R213 is:

Formula 2

where {psi}R and {psi}A are the electrostatic potentials imposed by 397R on R213 in the resting and activated state, respectively, and zR213 is the charge of R213 (zR213 = e). Because {psi} falls off quickly with distance and in the activated state R213 is likely to be buried in the protein because it is a gating charge (15), we can assume {psi}A << {psi}R. Thus, combining Eqs. 1 and 2 to solve for {Delta}G[QO] = {Delta}G[R213] yields:

Formula 3

This electrostatic potential between the charges of R213 and R397 ({psi}R = 13.9 mV) implies that the average distance between them in the resting state is 9.1 Å (see Methods for calculation). This calculation may overestimate the distance if R213 also interacts with 397R when the voltage sensor is in the activated state. Such a short distance between the membrane-spanning and the cytosolic domains in BK channels is consistent with the structure of BK channels, in which a short peptide linker of only 17 aa connects S6 to the cytosolic domain (35). Thus it is reasonable to expect that close interaction between the membrane spanning and the cytosolic domains can occur.

We find that the effect of Mg2+ is state-dependent, enhancing voltage-sensor activation primarily when the channel is open. Although Mg2+ has been proposed to bind with lower affinity to closed than open channels (36), state-dependent binding cannot account for the lack of effect of Mg2+ on QC-V. First, 10 mM [Mg2+]i is higher than the estimated dissociation constant of the closed channel (36) so that more than half of the Mg2+-binding sites should be occupied when channels are closed. Second, the permanent addition of positive charge at residue 397 near the Mg2+-binding site also has no effect on QC-V (Fig. 2b). Taken together, these results indicate that the interaction between the bound Mg2+ and the VSD is state-dependent, presumably involving a conformational change in the cytosolic domain and/or VSD upon channel opening that exposes R213 to the electric field of the bound Mg2+. One possibility is that the distance between R213 and the bound Mg2+ is enlarged in the closed state because of the relative movements between S4 and the cytosolic domain. The crystal structures of MthK channels suggest that the cytosolic gating ring may expand 8 Å at the outer rim in parallel to the membrane from the closed to the open conformation (37). On the other hand, in BK (15) and Shaker (38) K+ channels rearrangements of the VSD have been suggested to occur upon channel opening. Similar changes in BK channels may change the distance between R213 and the bound Mg2+. Another possibility is that the conformational rearrangements in the VSD and the cytosolic domain during channel opening may change the orientation of R213 or the bound Mg2+ such that the side chain of R213 is only exposed to the electric field of the bound Mg2+ in the open state. The detailed mechanism of the state dependence of Mg2+ modulation is not known at this time. Nevertheless, it is clear that VSD activity is regulated not only by Mg2+ bound to the cytosolic domain but also by feedback from the activation gate in the pore domain.

Aside from elucidating the mechanism of Mg2+-dependent activation in BK channels, our results also demonstrate that a tethered cytosolic protein domain can come close enough to the VSD to regulate its activity through electrostatic interaction. This interaction sets precedence that various cytosolic domains, accessory subunits, or regulatory proteins may, through a similar mechanism, regulate the function of other ion channels or enzymes that contain VSDs. Introduction of charged residues at position 397 in the BK channel alters voltage-sensor activation, suggesting that interactions between the VSD and native charged residues in the cytosolic domain may normally exist and influence VSD function even in the absence of a charged ligand. A similar example may involve the cytosolic tetramerization (T1) domain of Kv channels where mutation of some charged residues facing the transmembrane domain produce large shifts in the voltage dependence of channel activation through unknown mechanisms (39, 40). Importantly, charges in the cytosolic domain of the BK channel do not act merely to bias the voltage detected by the VSD, as in the case of surface-charge effects (41). Rather, the impact of these charges varies as the relative position of cytosolic and VSDs change during channel opening. Similarly, it is possible that conformational changes in the cytosolic domain induced by neutral ligands or ligands distal from the VSD may expose the VSD to native charges to alter the activation of channels and enzymes. Finally, the VSD may be regulated by signaling processes other than ligand binding because posttranslational modifications such as phosphorylation, sulfation, oxidation, protonation, and methylation can increase or decrease the charge of amino acid side chains in cytosolic domains.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Results
 Discussion
 Methods
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Mutagenesis and Expression. All channel constructs were made from the mbr5 clone of the mouse Slo1 BK (mSlo1) by using PCR with Pfu polymerase (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The PCR-amplified regions of all mutants were verified by sequencing. RNA was transcribed in vitro with T3 polymerase (Ambion, Austin, TX). We injected 0.05–50 ng (for macroscopic currents and limiting Popen recordings) or 150–250 ng (for gating currents) of RNA into each Xenopus laevis oocyte 2–6 days before recording.

Electrophysiology. Ionic currents were recorded with inside-out patches with an Axopatch 200-B patch-clamp amplifier (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA) and Pulse acquisition software (HEKA Electronik, Lambrecht/Pfalz, Germany) (19). The pipette solution contains 140 mM KMeSO3, 20 mM Hepes, 2 mM KCl, and 2 mM MgCl2, pH 7.2. The internal solution contains 140 mM KMeSO3, 20 mM Hepes, 2 mM KCl, and 1 mM N-(2-hydroxyethyl)ethylenediamine-N,N',N'-triacetic acid (HEDTA), pH 7.2. CaCl2 was added to the internal solution to give the appropriate free intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i), which was measured with a calcium-sensitive electrode. For 0 [Ca2+]i, the same internal solution was used except that HEDTA was substituted by 5 mM EGTA and no CaCl2 was added. The basal internal solution for ionic strength experiments contains 20 mM Hepes, 15 mM KOH and 5 mM EGTA for 0 [Ca2+]i and 20 mM Hepes, 6.5 mM KOH for 200 µM [Ca2+]i, pH 7.2. KCl was added to reach the target [K+]is. A sewer pipe flow system was used to perfuse the internal solution on the cytosolic face of the patch. Po (<0.01–0.1) at negative voltages was measured by single-channel recordings in patches containing hundreds of channels (17, 33).

Gating currents were recorded with inside-out patches (31). The pipette solution contains 127 mM tetraethylammonium hydroxide, 125 mM HMeSO3, 2 mM HCl, 2 mM MgCl2, and 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.2. The internal solution contains 141 mM N-methyl-D-glucamine, 135 mM HMeSO3, 6 mM HCl, 20 mM Hepes, and 5 mM EGTA, pH 7.2. MgCl2 was added to the internal solution to reach 10 mM [Mg2+]i. Voltage commands were filtered at 20 kHz with an eight-pole Bessel filter (Frequency Devices, Haverhill, MA) to prevent the saturation of fast capacitive transients (31). Data were sampled at 100,000 Hz with an 18-bit A/D converter (ITC-18; Instrutech, Mineola, NY) and filtered at 10 kHz with Axopatch's internal filter. Capacitive transients and leak currents were subtracted by using a P/5 protocol with a holding potential of –120 mV.

Chemical Modification. MTSET ([2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl] methanethiosulfonate bromide) and MTSEA (2-aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate hydrobromide) were purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals (Downsview, Canada). An aliquot of 100 mM MTS reagents stock solution was thawed and diluted 500-fold into the basal internal solution immediately before use. In ionic current recordings, currents were recorded after 2.5 min of MTS reagents treatment and 0.5 min of washing of patches with the inside-out configurations. In gating current recordings, MTSET was added directly into the bath.

Data Analysis. For macroscopic current, relative conductance was determined by measuring tail current amplitudes at –80 mV. The gating charge movements were determined by integrating the area under the rising phase and single exponential fits to the decaying phase of IgON at various voltages. The conductance-voltage (G-V) relations or the charge-voltage (Qc-V) relations of the WT and mutant channels were fitted with the Boltzmann equation:

Formula 4

or

Formula 5

In Eq. 4, z is the number of equivalent charges, V1/2 is the voltage for channel in half-activation, e is the elementary charge, k is Boltzmann's constant, and T is the absolute temperature. In Eq. 5, zJ is the gating charge associated with voltage sensor movement, Vhc is the voltage for half of the gating charge movements at the closed conformation of the channel, and the other parameters are as in Eq. 4. The data were obtained from n = 4–16 patches. Error bars represent the SEM in all figures.

HCA Model Fitting. Po-V relation at negative voltages, G-V and Qc-V relations at 0 [Ca2+]i were fitted to Eq. 6 derived from the HCA model (33),

Formula 6

where Vhc and Vho are the voltages for half of the gating charge movements at the closed and the open conformation, respectively; zJ is the gating charge associated with voltage sensor movement; L0 is the intrinsic equilibrium constant for the activation gate, and zL is the charge associated with channel opening.

Our results indicate that mutation Q397R shifts the Qo-V relation via changing the local voltage sensed by R213. R213 is likely to be located in the crevice among the VSD, pore and cytosolic domains and exposed to the aqueous solution when interacting with R397, which is located at the border between a low dielectric (protein of the cytosolic domain) and a high dielectric (water in the crevice) medium. Thus, the distance between the charges of R213 and R397, r = 9.1 Å, can be calculated from the following equation (42, 43):

Formula 7

where {Psi}R = 0.58*{Delta}V1/2, {Delta}V1/2 is the the Qo-V shift (–24 mV; Fig. 3 f and g), e is the elementary charge, {varepsilon}r is the dielectric constant of water, {varepsilon}0 is the permittivity of free space, and 1/{kappa} (8.07 Å) is the Debye length in the aqueous phase and is calculated as in ref. 26.

Structural Model. The structure of Mg2+ binding site of the mSlo1 channel was generated based on the crystal structure of the MthK channel by using the PyMol molecular graphics system (www.pymol.org).


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 Results
 Discussion
 Methods
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
We thank Carol Deutsch, Toshi Hoshi, Zhe Lu, Colin Nichols, and Yasushi Okamura for critical discussions; Akansha Saxena for calculations of structural models; and Larry Salkoff (Washington University) for the mSlo1 clone. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (F.T.H. and J.C.). J.C. is Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering on the Spencer T. Olin Endowment.


    Footnotes
 

Abbreviations: VSD, voltage-sensor domain; Kv, voltage-dependent K+; V1/2, voltage at half-maximum conductance; Vhc, voltage for half of the gating charge movements at the closed conformation of the channel; Ig, gating current; IgON, on Ig; IgOFF, off Ig; IK, K+ ionic current; [Mg2+]i, intracellular Mg2+ concentration; [K+]i, intracellular K+ concentration; Po, open probability; [Ca2+]i, intracellular Ca2+ concentration.

§To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jcui{at}biomed.wustl.edu

Author contributions: H.Y. and L.H. contributed equally to this work; H.Y., L.H., and J.C. designed research; H.Y., L.H., J.S., and K.D. performed research; F.T.H. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; H.Y. and L.H. analyzed data; and H.Y., F.T.H., and J.C. wrote the paper.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

Horrigan FT (2005) Biophys J 88:100A (abstr). Back

© 2007 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Results
 Discussion
 Methods
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

  1. Long, SB, Campbell, EB & Mackinnon, R (2005) Science 309, 897–903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Murata, Y, Iwasaki, H, Sasaki, M, Inaba, K & Okamura, Y (2005) Nature 435, 1239–1243.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Ramsey, IS, Moran, MM, Chong, JA & Clapham, DE (2006) Nature 440, 1213–1216.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Sasaki, M, Takagi, M & Okamura, Y (2006) Science 312, 589–592.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Hille, B (2001) Ion Channels of Excitable Membranes (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA).
  6. Perozo, E & Bezanilla, F (1990) Neuron 5, 685–690.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  7. Jones, LP, Patil, PG, Snutch, TP & Yue, DT (1997) J Physiol (London) 498, 601–610.[ISI][Medline]
  8. Bao, L & Cox, DH (2005) J Gen Physiol 126, 393–412.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Orio, P & Latorre, R (2005) J Gen Physiol 125, 395–411.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Terlau, H, Heinemann, SH, Stuhmer, W, Pongs, O & Ludwig, J (1997) J Physiol (London) 502, 537–543.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  11. Magleby, KL (2003) J Gen Physiol 121, 81–96.[Free Full Text]
  12. Salkoff, L, Butler, A, Ferreira, G, Santi, C & Wei, A (2006) Nat Rev Neurosci 7, 921–931.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  13. Ledoux, J, Werner, ME, Brayden, JE & Nelson, MT (2006) Physiology (Bethesda) 21, 69–78.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Diaz, L, Meera, P, Amigo, J, Stefani, E, Alvarez, O, Toro, L & Latorre, R (1998) J Biol Chem 273, 32430–32436.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ma, Z, Lou, XJ & Horrigan, FT (2006) J Gen Physiol 127, 309–328.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Stefani, E, Ottolia, M, Noceti, F, Olcese, R, Wallner, M, Latorre, R & Toro, L (1997) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94, 5427–5431.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Cui, J & Aldrich, RW (2000) Biochemistry 39, 15612–15619.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Hu, L, Shi, J, Ma, Z, Krishnamoorthy, G, Sieling, F, Zhang, G, Horrigan, FT & Cui, J (2003) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 10488–10493.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Shi, J, Krishnamoorthy, G, Yang, Y, Hu, L, Chaturvedi, N, Harilal, D, Qin, J & Cui, J (2002) Nature 418, 876–880.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Xia, XM, Zeng, X & Lingle, CJ (2002) Nature 418, 880–884.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Yang, H, Hu, L, Shi, J & Cui, J (2006) Biophys J 91, 2892–2900.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Jiang, Y, Lee, A, Chen, J, Cadene, M, Chait, BT & MacKinnon, R (2002) Nature 417, 515–522.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Jiang, Y, Pico, A, Cadene, M, Chait, BT & MacKinnon, R (2001) Neuron 29, 593–601.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  24. Fodor, AA & Aldrich, RW (2006) J Gen Physiol 127, 755–766.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Kim, HJ, Lim, HH, Rho, SH, Eom, SH & Park, CS (2006) J Biol Chem 281, 38573–38581.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Elinder, F & Arhem, P (1999) Biophys J 77, 1358–1362.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Zeng, XH, Xia, XM & Lingle, CJ (2005) J Gen Physiol 125, 273–286.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Hu, L, Yang, H, Shi, J & Cui, J (2006) J Gen Physiol 127, 35–50.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  29. Zhang, X, Solaro, CR & Lingle, CJ (2001) J Gen Physiol 118, 607–636.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Zhang, G & Horrigan, FT (2005) J Gen Physiol 125, 213–236.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Horrigan, FT & Aldrich, RW (1999) J Gen Physiol 114, 305–336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Horrigan, FT & Aldrich, RW (2002) J Gen Physiol 120, 267–305.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Horrigan, FT, Cui, J & Aldrich, RW (1999) J Gen Physiol 114, 277–304.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Krishnamoorthy, G, Shi, J, Sept, D & Cui, J (2005) J Gen Physiol 126, 227–241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Wallner, M, Meera, P & Toro, L (1996) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 14922–14927.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Shi, J & Cui, J (2001) J Gen Physiol 118, 589–606.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Ye, S, Li, Y, Chen, L & Jiang, Y (2006) Cell 126, 1161–1173.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  38. Pathak, M, Kurtz, L, Tombola, F & Isacoff, E (2005) J Gen Physiol 125, 57–69.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  39. Robinson, JM & Deutsch, C (2005) Neuron 45, 223–232.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  40. Minor, DL, Lin, YF, Mobley, BC, Avelar, A, Jan, YN, Jan, LY & Berger, JM (2000) Cell 102, 657–670.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  41. MacKinnon, R, Latorre, R & Miller, C (1989) Biochemistry 28, 8092–8099.[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. McLaughlin, S (1989) Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 18, 113–136.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  43. Elinder, F, Mannikko, R & Larsson, HP (2001) J Gen Physiol 118, 1–10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles in HighWire Press-hosted journals:


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
Z. Ma, K. Y. Wong, and F. T. Horrigan
An Extracellular Cu2+ Binding Site in the Voltage Sensor of BK and Shaker Potassium Channels
J. Gen. Physiol., May 1, 2008; 131(5): 483 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
C. J. Lingle
Mg2+-dependent Regulation of BK Channels: Importance of Electrostatics
J. Gen. Physiol., December 31, 2007; 131(1): 5 - 11.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
F. T. Horrigan and Z. Ma
Mg2+ Enhances Voltage Sensor/Gate Coupling in BK Channels
J. Gen. Physiol., December 31, 2007; 131(1): 13 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, H.
Right arrow Articles by Cui, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, H.
Right arrow