p-adic L functions and trivial zeroes
Abstract
The following is adapted from the notes for the lecture. It announces results and conjectures about values of the p-adic L function of the symmetric square of an elliptic curve.
First let us give some examples of trivial zeroes. Let
K/ℚ be an imaginary quadratic field such that
p splits in K, η the associated quadratic
Dirichlet character; the Euler factor of L(η, s) at
p is 1 − p
−s. Choose an ideal 𝒫
above p and a compatible embedding of an algebraic closure
of ℚ in an algebraic closure
p of ℚp.
There exists a Kubota–Leopoldt p-adic L function
L
p(η, s) such that for n > 0
and even,
Theorem [Ferrero–Greenberg (1)].
with ℓp(η) =
and q = π/π̄, 𝒫h = (π).
Let E/ℚ be a modular elliptic curve with split multiplicative reduction at p. Mazur et al. (2) have constructed a p-adic L function L p(E, s).
Theorem [Greenberg–Stevens (3)].
with ℓ
p(E) =
and qE the Tate parameter of E/ℚp.
It has been recently proved that ℓp(E) is
nonzero: Barré-Sirieix et al. (12) proved that if
E/
is a Tate curve at p, and if
j
E is algebraic, then q
E
is transcendental.
Finally, let E be a modular elliptic curve over ℚ and
1 − a
p
p
s + p
1−2s
the Euler factor at p of its L function. Let
M = Sym
2(h
1(E)) =
Sym
2(h
1(E)) (2). The Tate twist of
M is M* (1) = sl(h
1(E)) =
sl(h
1(E)). The Euler factor at
p of M is
where α + β = a
p, αβ = p. The Euler
factor at p of M*(1) is
When E has ordinary reduction, a p-adic
L function has been constructed by interpolation of values
of twists of L(M, s) at s = 0 (4). The
complex L function L(M, s) is nonzero at
s = 0 because 0 is inside the convergence domain of the
Euler product.
Under a mild technical hypothesis, the following theorem has been proved:
Theorem [Greenberg–Tilouine (5)]. Assume
E has multiplicative reduction at p. Then,
where Ω∞ is some explicit complex period and
ℓp(M) = ℓp(E).
So L p(M, s) has a simple zero [recall ℓp(E) is nonzero].
In general, a trivial zero should appear when 1 or p −1annihilates the p-Euler factor. It means that the p-adic L function should have a zero of multiplicity strictly bigger than the one of the complex L function.
The following work has been done by Greenberg (6) (in the ordinary situation). (i) He gives a definition of some ℓp(M) in a very general case. In particular, for M = Sym 2(h 1(E)) with E having (good) ordinary reduction. (ii) He gives a conjecture for the behavior of the p-adic L function at the trivial zero (multiplicity order of the zero and behavior of the dominant coefficient of the expansion at this zero). (iii) He checks that one recovers theorems already proved.
In this talk, we look only at the case of the symmetric square of an elliptic curve with good reduction at p, we explain in this special case: (i) the construction of the Greenberg invariant in the ordinary case, (ii) a construction of a similar invariant in the supersingular case; (iii) the conjectural definition of the p-adic L function; (iv) a conjectural link between the p-adic L function and a conjectural special system, and (v) consequences on the p-adic L function and the trivial zero.
Section 1. Notations
Fix an algebraic closure
of ℚ,
G
ℚ = Gal(
/ℚ). In the
following, M will designe
Sym
2(h
1(E)). The p-adic
realization of M is V = M
p =
Sym
2(V
p(E)) with V
p(E) =
ℚp ⊗
lim←n
E
pn. It’s a p-adic
representation of G
ℚ of dimension 3.
Let D p(V) be the filtered ϕ-module associated to V by Fontaine’s theory. If D dR(M) = Sym 2(H dR 1(E))[−2], there exists a natural isomorphism D p(V) = ℚp ⊗ D dR(M). We describe the action of ϕ and the filtration explicitly. Let (e 0, e −1, e −2) be a basis such that ϕe −1 = p −1 e −1, ϕe 0 = α−2 e 0, ϕe −2 = β−2 e −2.
In the ordinary case, we can choose α to be in
ℤp
×; the filtration is given by
where ωe =
e
−2 +
e
−1 +
e0 for some
λ ∈ ℚpthat we assume nonzero.
In the supersingular case (and a
p =
0, which is automatic if p > 3), V is a direct
sum (as a G
ℚp-representation):
V = W
1 ⊕ W
2 with
and
The filtration is given by
with ωe = e
−1 −
e
0 [for some suitable choice of
(e
0, e
−1, e
−2)].
In both cases, D p(V)ϕ=p−1 = ℚp e −1. In supersingular case, take λ = −1/2.
Section 2. Greenberg Invariants
2.1. Ordinary Case.
On V, there exists a
filtration of p-adic representations of
G
ℚp =
Gal(
/ℚp):
such that
So there is a natural surjection Filp
1
V →
ℚp(1). We choose e
−1 such
that the map
sends e
−1 to 1.
It’s easy to see that H
1(ℚp,
Filp
1
V) ≅ H
1(ℚp,
V)=H
g
1(ℚp, V) (we use the notation
H
f
1,
H
g
1 of Bloch–Kato). Recall that there is an
isomorphism
The first one is just Kummer theory where
(ℚp
×)p =
lim←n
ℚp
×/ℚp
×pn,
the second one is given by q ↦
(logp
q,
ordp
q) where logp is
the logarithm on ℚp
× such that
logp
p = 0. So there is a map
Definition. If x ∈ H
1
(ℚp, V), let
it depends only on the line ℚp
x.
Definition. If x ∈
H1(ℚ, V) is a universal norm in the
ℤp
×-cyclotomic extension, define
The universal norms are contained in
H
f,{p}
1(ℚ, V)
[elements of H
1(ℚ, V) which are unramified
outside of p]. Thanks to Flach (7) and under technical
conditions, (i) the universal norms are of dimension 1;
(ii) H
f
1(ℚ, V) = 0 and dim
H
f,{p}
1(ℚ, V) = 1. So in the above
definition, ℓp(M) = ℓ(x) for any nonzero
element x of H
f,{p}
1(ℚ, V).
2.2. Supersingular Case.
The canonical map
is an isomorphism. On the other hand, by Bloch–Kato, there is a
natural map
Once having chosen logp on
ℚp
×(logp
p =
0), there is a canonical splitting of the inclusion
and so we obtain an extension of the Boch–Kato logarithm
logW1 to
Hg
1(ℚp, W
1):
Definition.
If x = (x
1,
x
2) ∈ H
g
1(ℚp, V) =
H
g
1(ℚp, W
1) ⊕
H
f
1(ℚp,
W
2), define ℓ(x) ∈ ℚp ∪
∞ by
Definition. Define ℓp(M) =
ℓ(x) with x a universal norm in
H
1(ℚ, V) [again, we can just take a nonzero
element in Hf,{p}
1(ℚ, V)].
Section 3. p-adic L Functions
Let G
∞ =
Gal(ℚ(μp∞)/ℚ) ≅
ℤp
× and
ℤp[[G
∞]] the continuous
group algebra of G
∞. Define some algebras:
Here ℋ(G
∞) is the algebra of elements
in ℚp[[G
∞]] which are
O(logr) for a suitable r:
it means that f ∈ ℋ(G
∞) can be
written f = Σn
a
n(γ −
1)n with supn>0 |a
n|/n
r < ∞ (γ is a topological
generator of the p-part of G
∞);
𝒦(G
∞) is the total fraction ring of
ℋ(G
∞). If η is a continuous character from
G
∞ with values
ℚ̄p
×, we can evaluate η on any
element of ℋ(G
∞).
Conjecture (10): For any n ∈
∧2
D
p(V), there exists
an element
L
{p}
p(n)
∈ ℋ(G
∞) such that for any nontrivial even
character η of G∞ of conductor pa
where (i) e
is a basis of
the ℚ-vector space det DdR =
ℚ(−3)dR
, and
ωℚ is a basis of Fil0
DdR; (ii) Ω
∞,ωℚ
e =
ωℚ ∧
n
B
+
∈ ℂ
⊗ det DdR
with nB
+
a basis of det MB
+[for example of det
Sym
2(H1(E,
ℤ))+]; (iii)
Ω
p,ωℚ (n) =
ωℚ ∧ n; and (iv) G(η)
is a Gauss sum associated to η.
So
η(L
{p}
p(n))ωℚ
∧ nB
+ =
½ G(η)2
L
{p}(M, η,
0)ωℚ ∧ (pϕ)−a(n). We may
see L
{p}
p(M) =
L
{p}
p as an element
of Hom
ℚp(ℚp ⊗ ∧2
D
dR(M), ℋ(G
∞)) and as a function of
s ∈ ℤp: if χ is the cyclotomic
character,
with n ∈
∧2
D
p(V). For any f ∈
ℋ(G
∞), define ∂(f) =
〈 χ 〉s
(f))|s=0.
Section 4. Logarithm
Let K
n =
ℚp(μpn+1) and
Z
∞
1(ℚp, T)=
lim←n
H
1(Kn, T) with
T = Sym
2(T
p(E)). It’s
a ℤp[[G
∞]]-module of rank
3. Note π0 the projection on
H
1(ℚp, T). One can construct a map
(9)
Recall only some properties of ℒ (the first one depends on a
“reciprocity law” conjecture that seems to be proved now). If
x ∈ Z
∞
1(ℚp,
T) (11):
If π0(x) ∈
H
e
1(ℚp, T),
Section 5. Special Systems and p-adic L Functions
There should exist a special element
c
p
spec ∈ ℚp ⊗
lim←n
H
1(ℚ(μpn+1), T)
such that the p-adic L function should be defined
by the formula
for any n ∈ ∧2
D
p(V).
Define c p flach(p) = π0 (c p spec) ∈ H 1(ℚ, V).
Conjecture:
where π[−1]
is the projection
on
D
p(V)ϕ=p−1
with respect to the other eigenspaces of ϕ.
In the ordinary case, it means that
or
Section 6. Some Theorems
We assume the existence of c p spec and the fact that the p-adic L function can be calculated by the formula L {p} p(n)e = ℒ(c p spec) ∧ n.
Theorem: The function
L
{p}
p
is nonzero
at the trivial character
1
if and only if
c
p
flach(p)∉
Hf
1(ℚ, T) and one
has
In particular, by using Flach’s theorem (7),
L
{p}
p is nonzero
if and only if c
p
flach(p)
is nonzero.
Assume c p flach(p) ≠ 0. Let L {p} p,sc = L {p} p(e −1 ∧ e −2) ∈ ℋ (G ∞).
Theorem:
The function
L
{p}
p,sc
has a
zero at
1
which is simple if and only if
ℓp(M) ≠ 0 and one has
Theorem:
The following formulas are equivalent
where Ω
p,ωℚ
sc
∈
ℚp is defined by
Ω
p,ωQ
sc e =
ωℚ ∧ e
−1 ∧ e
−2.
In the ordinary case, L {p} p,sc should be the p-adic function already known, the last formula is then the formula conjectured by Greenberg.
Section 7. Even More Speculations
c
p
flach(p) should come from
a motivic element: so it would exist in any of the l-adic
realizations of M; call it
c
l
flach(p) ∈
H
1(ℚ, M
l), this element should again
have good reduction outside of p. For l ≠
p, let D
l(M) =
M
l
Ip; there is a map
and for l = p,
We have
A candidate of such an element has been constructed by Flach. On
the other hand, there exists a natural ℚ-vector space 𝒟 such that
It can be described in terms of the Néron–Severi group of
the reduction E × E at p (8). We would like to
compare
λg
l(c
l
flach(p))
for different l and give a link with the p-adic
L function (work in preparation). For l ≠
p, see calculations of Flach (7).
Footnotes
- Copyright © 1997, The National Academy of Sciences of the USA
.gif?ad=15653&adview=true)





