p-adic L functions and trivial zeroes

  1. Bernadette Perrin-Riou
  1. Mathématique, Université de Paris-Sud, Bâtiment 425, F-91405 Orsay, France

Abstract

The following is adapted from the notes for the lecture. It announces results and conjectures about values of the p-adic L function of the symmetric square of an elliptic curve.

First let us give some examples of trivial zeroes. Let K/ℚ be an imaginary quadratic field such that p splits in K, η the associated quadratic Dirichlet character; the Euler factor of L(η, s) at p is 1 − p s. Choose an ideal 𝒫 above p and a compatible embedding of an algebraic closure Formula of ℚ in an algebraic closure Formula p of ℚp. There exists a Kubota–Leopoldt p-adic L function L p(η, s) such that for n > 0 and even, Formula Theorem [Ferrero–Greenberg (1)]. Formula Formula with ℓp(η) = Formula and q = π/π̄, 𝒫h = (π).

Let E/ℚ be a modular elliptic curve with split multiplicative reduction at p. Mazur et al. (2) have constructed a p-adic L function L p(E, s).

Theorem [Greenberg–Stevens (3)]. Formula Formula with ℓ p(E) = Formula and qE the Tate parameter of E/ℚp.

It has been recently proved that ℓp(E) is nonzero: Barré-Sirieix et al. (12) proved that if E/Formula is a Tate curve at p, and if j E is algebraic, then q E is transcendental.

Finally, let E be a modular elliptic curve over ℚ and 1 − a p p s + p 1−2s the Euler factor at p of its L function. Let M = Sym 2(h 1(E)) = Sym 2(h 1(E)) (2). The Tate twist of M is M* (1) = sl(h 1(E)) = sl(h 1(E)). The Euler factor at p of M is Formula where α + β = a p, αβ = p. The Euler factor at p of M*(1) is Formula When E has ordinary reduction, a p-adic L function has been constructed by interpolation of values of twists of L(M, s) at s = 0 (4). The complex L function L(M, s) is nonzero at s = 0 because 0 is inside the convergence domain of the Euler product.

Under a mild technical hypothesis, the following theorem has been proved:

Theorem [Greenberg–Tilouine (5)]. Assume E has multiplicative reduction at p. Then, Formula Formula where Ω is some explicit complex period and p(M) = ℓp(E).

So L p(M, s) has a simple zero [recall ℓp(E) is nonzero].

In general, a trivial zero should appear when 1 or p −1annihilates the p-Euler factor. It means that the p-adic L function should have a zero of multiplicity strictly bigger than the one of the complex L function.

The following work has been done by Greenberg (6) (in the ordinary situation). (i) He gives a definition of some ℓp(M) in a very general case. In particular, for M = Sym 2(h 1(E)) with E having (good) ordinary reduction. (ii) He gives a conjecture for the behavior of the p-adic L function at the trivial zero (multiplicity order of the zero and behavior of the dominant coefficient of the expansion at this zero). (iii) He checks that one recovers theorems already proved.

In this talk, we look only at the case of the symmetric square of an elliptic curve with good reduction at p, we explain in this special case: (i) the construction of the Greenberg invariant in the ordinary case, (ii) a construction of a similar invariant in the supersingular case; (iii) the conjectural definition of the p-adic L function; (iv) a conjectural link between the p-adic L function and a conjectural special system, and (v) consequences on the p-adic L function and the trivial zero.

Section 1. Notations

Fix an algebraic closure Formula of ℚ, G = Gal(Formula/ℚ). In the following, M will designe Sym 2(h 1(E)). The p-adic realization of M is V = M p = Sym 2(V p(E)) with V p(E) = ℚp ⊗ lim←n E pn. It’s a p-adic representation of G of dimension 3.

Let D p(V) be the filtered ϕ-module associated to V by Fontaine’s theory. If D dR(M) = Sym 2(H dR 1(E))[−2], there exists a natural isomorphism D p(V) = ℚpD dR(M). We describe the action of ϕ and the filtration explicitly. Let (e 0, e −1, e −2) be a basis such that ϕe −1 = p −1 e −1, ϕe 0 = α−2 e 0, ϕe −2 = β−2 e −2.

In the ordinary case, we can choose α to be in ℤp ×; the filtration is given by Formula where ωe = Formula e −2 + e −1 + Formulae0 for some λ ∈ ℚpthat we assume nonzero.

In the supersingular case (and a p = 0, which is automatic if p > 3), V is a direct sum (as a G p-representation): V = W 1W 2 with Formula Formula and Formula Formula The filtration is given by Formula with ωe = e −1e 0 [for some suitable choice of (e 0, e −1, e −2)].

In both cases, D p(V)ϕ=p−1 = ℚp e −1. In supersingular case, take λ = −1/2.

Section 2. Greenberg Invariants

2.1. Ordinary Case.

On V, there exists a filtration of p-adic representations of G p = Gal(Formula/ℚp): Formula such that Formula Formula So there is a natural surjection Filp 1 V → ℚp(1). We choose e −1 such that the map Formula sends e −1 to 1.

It’s easy to see that H 1(ℚp, Filp 1 V) ≅ H 1(ℚp, V)=H g 1(ℚp, V) (we use the notation H f 1, H g 1 of Bloch–Kato). Recall that there is an isomorphism Formula The first one is just Kummer theory where (ℚp ×)p = lim←np ×/ℚp ×pn, the second one is given by q ↦ (logp q, ordp q) where logp is the logarithm on ℚp × such that logp p = 0. So there is a map Formula Definition. If xH 1 (ℚp, V), let Formula it depends only on the line ℚp x.

Definition. If x ∈ H1(ℚ, V) is a universal norm in the ℤp ×-cyclotomic extension, define Formula The universal norms are contained in H f,{p} 1(ℚ, V) [elements of H 1(ℚ, V) which are unramified outside of p]. Thanks to Flach (7) and under technical conditions, (i) the universal norms are of dimension 1; (ii) H f 1(ℚ, V) = 0 and dim H f,{p} 1(ℚ, V) = 1. So in the above definition, ℓp(M) = ℓ(x) for any nonzero element x of H f,{p} 1(ℚ, V).

2.2. Supersingular Case.

The canonical map Formula is an isomorphism. On the other hand, by Bloch–Kato, there is a natural map Formula Once having chosen logp on ℚp ×(logp p = 0), there is a canonical splitting of the inclusion Formula and so we obtain an extension of the Boch–Kato logarithm logW1 to Hg 1(ℚp, W 1): Formula

Definition.

If x = (x 1, x 2) ∈ H g 1(ℚp, V) = H g 1(ℚp, W 1) ⊕ H f 1(ℚp, W 2), define ℓ(x) ∈ ℚp ∪ ∞ by Formula Definition. Define ℓp(M) = ℓ(x) with x a universal norm in H 1(ℚ, V) [again, we can just take a nonzero element in Hf,{p} 1(ℚ, V)].

Section 3. p-adic L Functions

Let G = Gal(ℚ(μp)/ℚ) ≅ ℤp × and ℤp[[G ]] the continuous group algebra of G . Define some algebras: Formula Here ℋ(G ) is the algebra of elements in ℚp[[G ]] which are O(logr) for a suitable r: it means that f ∈ ℋ(G ) can be written f = Σn a n(γ − 1)n with supn>0 |a n|/n r < ∞ (γ is a topological generator of the p-part of G ); 𝒦(G ) is the total fraction ring of ℋ(G ). If η is a continuous character from G with values ℚ̄p ×, we can evaluate η on any element of ℋ(G ).

Conjecture (10): For any n ∈ ∧2 D p(V), there exists an element L {p} p(n) ∈ ℋ(G ) such that for any nontrivial even character η of G of conductor pa Formula where (i) e is a basis of the ℚ-vector space det DdR = ℚ(−3)dR , and ω is a basis of Fil0 DdR; (ii) Ω ∞,ω e = ω n B + ∈ ℂ ⊗ det DdR with nB + a basis of det MB +[for example of det Sym 2(H1(E, ℤ))+]; (iii) Ω p,ω (n) = ω ∧ n; and (iv) G(η) is a Gauss sum associated to η.

So η(L {p} p(n))ω ∧ nB + = ½ G(η)2 L {p}(M, η, 0)ω ∧ (pϕ)a(n). We may see L {p} p(M) = L {p} p as an element of Hom p(ℚp ⊗ ∧2 D dR(M), ℋ(G )) and as a function of s ∈ ℤp: if χ is the cyclotomic character, Formula with n ∈ ∧2 D p(V). For any f ∈ ℋ(G ), define ∂(f) = Formula 〈 χ 〉s (f))|s=0.

Section 4. Logarithm

Let K n = ℚppn+1) and Z 1(ℚp, T)= lim←n H 1(Kn, T) with T = Sym 2(T p(E)). It’s a ℤp[[G ]]-module of rank 3. Note π0 the projection on H 1(ℚp, T). One can construct a map (9) Formula Recall only some properties of ℒ (the first one depends on a “reciprocity law” conjecture that seems to be proved now). If xZ 1(ℚp, T) (11): Formula If π0(x) ∈ H e 1(ℚp, T), Formula

Section 5. Special Systems and p-adic L Functions

There should exist a special element c p spec ∈ ℚp ⊗ lim←n H 1(ℚ(μpn+1), T) such that the p-adic L function should be defined by the formula Formula for any n ∈ ∧2 D p(V).

Define c p flach(p) = π0 (c p spec) ∈ H 1(ℚ, V).

Conjecture: Formula where π[−1] is the projection on D p(V)ϕ=p−1 with respect to the other eigenspaces of ϕ.

In the ordinary case, it means that Formula or Formula

Section 6. Some Theorems

We assume the existence of c p spec and the fact that the p-adic L function can be calculated by the formula L {p} p(n)e = ℒ(c p spec) ∧ n.

Theorem: The function L {p} p is nonzero at the trivial character 1 if and only if c p flach(p)∉ Hf 1(ℚ, T) and one has Formula In particular, by using Flach’s theorem (7), L {p} p is nonzero if and only if c p flach(p) is nonzero.

Assume c p flach(p) ≠ 0. Let L {p} p,sc = L {p} p(e −1e −2) ∈ ℋ (G ).

Theorem: The function L {p} p,sc has a zero at 1 which is simple if and only if p(M) ≠ 0 and one has Formula Theorem: The following formulas are equivalent Formula Formula Formula where Ω p,ω sc ∈ ℚp is defined by Ω p,ωQ sc e = ωe −1e −2.

In the ordinary case, L {p} p,sc should be the p-adic function already known, the last formula is then the formula conjectured by Greenberg.

Section 7. Even More Speculations

c p flach(p) should come from a motivic element: so it would exist in any of the l-adic realizations of M; call it c l flach(p) ∈ H 1(ℚ, M l), this element should again have good reduction outside of p. For lp, let D l(M) = M l Ip; there is a map Formula and for l = p, Formula We have Formula A candidate of such an element has been constructed by Flach. On the other hand, there exists a natural ℚ-vector space 𝒟 such that Formula It can be described in terms of the Néron–Severi group of the reduction E × E at p (8). We would like to compare λg l(c l flach(p)) for different l and give a link with the p-adic L function (work in preparation). For lp, see calculations of Flach (7).

Footnotes

References

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents