Zeta functions and Eisenstein series on classical groups
Abstract
We construct an Euler product from the Hecke eigenvalues of an automorphic form on a classical group and prove its analytic continuation to the whole complex plane when the group is a unitary group over a CM field and the eigenform is holomorphic. We also prove analytic continuation of an Eisenstein series on another unitary group, containing the group just mentioned defined with such an eigenform. As an application of our methods, we prove an explicit class number formula for a totally definite hermitian form over a CM field.
Section 1.
Given a reductive algebraic group G over
an algebraic number field, we denote by G
A,
G
a, and G
h its
adelization, the archimedean factor of G
A, and
the nonarchimedean factor of G
A. We take an
open subgroup D of G
A of the form
D = D
0
G
a
with a compact subgroup D
0 such that
D
0 ∩ G
a is maximal
compact in G
a. Choosing a specific type of
representation of D
0 ∩
G
a, we can define automorphic forms on
G
A as usual. For simplicity we consider here the
forms invariant under D
0 ∩
G
h. Each Hecke operator is given by
DτD, with τ in a subset 𝔛 of
G
A, which is a semigroup containing D
and the localizations of G for almost all
nonarchimedean primes. Taking an automorphic form f
such that f|DτD =
λ(τ)f with a complex number λ(τ) for every
τ ∈ 𝔛 and a Hecke ideal character χ of F, we put
where ν0(τ) is the denominator ideal of τ and
N(ν0(τ)) is its norm. Now our first main
result is that if G is symplectic, orthogonal, or unitary,
then
where Λ(s, χ) is an explicitly determined product
of L-functions depending on χ,
W
p is a polynomial determined for
each v ∈ h whose constant term is 1, and
p runs over all the prime ideals of the basic number
field. This is a purely algebraic result concerning only nonarchimedean
primes.
Let Z(s, f, χ) denote the right-hand side of Eq. 1.2. As our second main result, we obtain a product 𝔊(s) of gamma factors such that 𝔊Z can be continued to the whole s-plane as a meromorphic function with finitely many poles, when G is a unitary group of an arbitrary signature distribution over a CM field, and f corresponds to holomorphic forms.
Now these problems are closely connected with the theory of Eisenstein
series E on a group G′ in which G is
embedded. To describe the series, let ℨ′ denote the symmetric space
on which G′ acts. Then the series as a function of (z,
s) ∈ ℨ′ × C can be given (in the classical style)
in the form
where Γ is a congruence subgroup of G′, and
P is a parabolic subgroup of G′ which is a
semidirect product of a unipotent group and G ×
GL
m with some m. The adelized version
of δ will be explicitly described in Section 5. Now our third main
result is that there exists an explicit product 𝔊′ of gamma factors
and an explicit product Λ′ of L-functions such that
𝔊′(s)Λ′(s)Z(s,
f,
χ)E(z, s; f, χ) can be continued
to the whole s-plane as a meromorphic function with finitely
many poles.
Though the above results concern holomorphic forms, our method is applicable to the unitary group of a totally definite hermitian form over a CM field. In this case, we can give an explicit class number formula for such a hermitian form, which is the fourth main result of this paper.
Section 2.
For an associative ring R with identity element, we denote by R × the group of all its invertible elements and by R n m the R-module of all m × n matrices with entries in R. To indicate that a union X = ∪i∈I Y i is disjoint, we write X = ⊔i∈I Y i.
Let K be an associative ring with identity element and an
involution ρ. For a matrix x with entries in K,
we put x* = t
x
ρ, and
x̂ = (x*)−1 if
x is square and invertible. Given a finitely generated left
K-module V, we denote by
GL(V) the group of all K-linear
automorphisms of V. We let GL(V) act
on V on the right; namely we denote by wα the
image of w ∈ V under α ∈
GL(V). Given ɛ = ±1, by an ɛ-hermitian form
on V, we understand a biadditive map ϕ:V
× V → K such that ϕ(x,
y)ρ = ɛϕ(y, x) and ϕ(ax,
by) = aϕ(x, y)b
ρ
for every a, b ∈ K. Assuming that ϕ is
nondegenerate, we put
Given (V, ϕ) and (W, ψ), we can define
an ɛ-hermitian form ϕ ⊕ ψ on V ⊕ W by
We then write (V ⊕ W, ϕ ⊕ ψ) =
(V, ϕ) ⊕ (W, ψ). If both ϕ and ψ are
nondegenerate, we can view G
ϕ ×
G
ψ as a subgroup of
G
ϕ⊕ψ. The element (α, β) of
G
ϕ × G
ψ viewed as an
element of G
ϕ⊕ψ will be denoted by α ×
β or by (α, β). Given a positive integer r, we put
H
r =
I′r ⊕
I
r, I
r =
I′r =
K
r
1 and
We shall always use H
r,
I′r,
I
r, and ηr in this
sense. We understand that H
0 = {0} and
η0 = 0.
Hereafter we fix V and a nondegenerate ϕ on V,
assuming that K is a division ring whose characteristic is
different from 2. Let J be a K-submodule of
V which is totally ϕ-isotropic, by which we mean that
ϕ(J, J) = 0. Then we can find a decomposition
(V, ϕ) = (Z, ζ) ⊕ (H, η) and
an isomorphism f of (H, η) onto
(H
r, ηr) such that
f(J) = I
r. In this
setting, we define the parabolic subgroup
of G
ϕ
relative to J by
and define homomorphisms
→
G
ζ and
→
GL(J) such that zα −
zπζ
ϕ (α) ∈ J and
wα =
wλJ
ϕ(α)
if z ∈ Z, w ∈
J, and α ∈
Taking a fixed nonnegative integer m, we put
We can naturally view G
ψ ×
G
ϕ as a subgroup of
G
ω. Since W = V ⊕
H
m, we can put X = V
⊕ H
m ⊕ V with the first summand
V in W, and write every element of X
in the form (u, h, v) with (u, h) ∈
V ⊕ H
m = W and
v ∈ V. Put
Observing that U is totally ω-isotropic, we can
define
Proposition 1. Let λ(ϕ) be the maximum
dimension of totally ϕ-isotropic K-submodules of V.
Then
has exactly λ(ϕ) orbits.
Moreover,
with ξ running over G
ϕ
and β over
G
ψ, where
H = H
m
and I = Im.
In fact, we can give an explicit set of representatives {τe}e=1 λ(ϕ) for Eq. 2.6 and also an explicit set of representatives for P U ω/P U ωτe[G ψ × G ϕ] in the same manner as in Eq. 2.7. This proposition plays an essential role in the analysis of our Eisenstein series E(z, s; f, χ).
Section 3.
In this section, K is a locally compact
field of characteristic 0 with respect to a discrete valuation. Our aim
is to establish the Euler factor W
p
of Eq. 1.2. We denote by r and q
the valuation ring and its maximal ideal; we put q =
[r:q] and |x| =
q
−ν if x ∈ K and
x ∈ πν r×
with ν ∈ Z. We assume that K has an
automorphism ρ such that ρ2 = 1, and put
F = {x ∈ K |
x
ρ = x}, g =
F ∩ r, and d−1 =
{x ∈ K |
TrK/F (xr)
⊂ g} if K ≠ F. We
consider (V, ϕ) as in Section 2 with V =
K
n
1 and ϕ defined by
ϕ(x, y) = xϕy* for x,
y ∈ V with a matrix ϕ of the form
where t = n − 2r. We
assume that θ is anisotropic and also that
Thus our group G
ϕ is orthogonal,
symplectic, or unitary. The element δ of Eq. 3.2b can be
obtained by putting δ = u −
u
ρ with u such that r
= g[u]. We include the case
rt = 0 in our discussion. If t = 0, we
simply ignore θ; this is always so if K =
F and ɛ = −1. We have ϕ = θ if r = 0.
Denoting by {e
i} the standard basis of
K
n
1, we put
Then G
ϕ =
P
J
ϕ
C.
We choose
{e
r+i}i=1
t
so that N =
∑i=1
tre
r+i.
Then we can find an element λ of
rt
t such that
Put
We can write every element of
P
J
ϕ in the form
If t = 0, we simply ignore b, e, and
f, so that ξ =
[
];
we have ξ = e if r = 0.
We consider the Hecke algebra ℜ(E,
GL
r(K)) consisting of all formal finite
sums ∑cxExE with c
x ∈
Q and x ∈
GL
r(K), with the law of
multiplication defined as in ref. 1. Taking r indeterminates
t
1, … , t
r, we
define a Q-linear map
as follows; given ExE with x ∈
GL
r(K), we can put
ExE = ⊔y
Ey with
upper triangular y whose diagonal entries are
πe1, … ,
πer with e
i
∈ Z. Then we put
Next we consider the Hecke algebra ℜ(C,
G
ϕ) consisting of all formal finite sums
∑cτCτC with
c
τ ∈ Q and τ ∈
G
ϕ. We then define a Q-linear map
as follows; given CτC with τ ∈
G
ϕ, we can put
CτC = ⊔ξ
Cξ
with ξ ∈ P of form Eq. 3.5. We then put
where ω0 is given by Eq. 3.6 and
d
ξ is the d-block in Eq.
3.5. We can prove that this is well defined and gives a
ring-injection.
Given x ∈ K n m, we denote by ν0(x) the ideal of r which is the inverse of the product of all the elementary divisor ideals of x not contained in r; we put then ν(x) = [r:ν0(x)]. We call x primitive if rank(x) = Min(m, n) and all the elementary divisor ideals of x are r.
Proposition 2. Given ξ as in Eq.
3.5, suppose that both e and
(δθ)−1 (e − 1) have
coefficients in r if t > 0. Let
a = g
−1
h
with primitive [g
h]
∈ r
2r
r
and
gb = j
−1
k with primitive [j
k]
∈ r
r+t
r. Then
where
we
take
j = 1r
if
t = 0.
We now define a formal Dirichlet series 𝔗 by
This is a formal version of the Euler factor of Eq. 1.2
at a fixed nonarchimedean prime.
Theorem 1. Suppose
that δϕ ∈
GL
n(r); put
p =
[g:g ∩ q]. (Thus
p = q
if
K = F.) Then
Here θi = 1 if i is even; when i is odd,
θi is −1 or 0 according as d =
r or d ≠ r.
This can be proved in the same manner as in ref. 2 by means of Proposition 2.
Since we are going to take localizations of a global unitary group, we
have to consider G
ϕ =
G(V, ϕ) of Eq. 2.1 with
V = K
n
1,
K = F × F, and ρ defined
by (x, y)ρ = (y, x), where
F is a locally compact field of characteristic 0 with
respect to a discrete valuation. Let g and p
be the valution ring of F and its maximal ideal; put
r = g × g and p
= [g:p]. We consider ℜ(C,
G
ϕ) with C =
G
ϕ ∩
GL
n(r). Then the projection map pr
of GL
n(K) onto
GL
n(F) gives an isomorphism
η:ℜ(C, G
ϕ) →
ℜ(E
1,
GL
n(F)), where
E
1 = GL
n(g).
To be explicit, we have η(C(x,
tx
−1)C) =
E
1
xE
1. Let
ω1 denote the map of Eq. 3.6 defined with
n, E
1, and F in place of
r, E, and K. Putting ω = ω1 ○
η, we obtain a ring-injection
For z = (x, y) ∈
K
n
n with x,
y ∈ F
n
n
put ν1(z) = ν(x) and
ν2(z) = ν(y), where ν is
defined with respect to g instead of r. We
then put
Then we obtain
Section 4.
We now take a totally imaginary quadratic extension
K of a totally real algebraic number field F of
finite degree. We denote by a (resp. h) the set
of archimedean (resp. nonarchimedean) primes of F; further
we denote by g (resp. r) the maximal order of
F (resp. K). Let V be a vector space
over K of dimension n. We take a
K-valued nondegenerate ɛ-hermitian form ϕ on
V with ɛ = 1 with respect to the Galois involution of
K over F, and define G
ϕ
as in Section 2. For every v ∈ a ∪
h and an object X, we denote by
X
v its localization at v. For
v ∈ h not splitting in K and
for v ∈ a, we take a decomposition
with anisotropic θ′v and a
nonnegative integer r
v. Put
t
v = dim(T
v). Then
n = 2r
v +
t
v. If n is odd, then
t
v = 1 for every v ∈
h. If n is even, then t
v =
0 for almost all v ∈ h and
t
v = 2 for the remaining v ∈
h. If n is odd, by replacing ϕ by
cϕ with a suitable c ∈ F, we
may assume that ϕ is represented by a matrix whose determinant times
(−1)(n−1)/2 belongs to
N
K/F(K).
We take and fix an element κ of K such that
κρ = −κ and
iκvϕv has
signature (r
v + t
v,
r
v) for every v ∈
a. Then
G(iκvϕv)
modulo a maximal compact subgroup is a hermitian symmetric space which
we denote by ℨv
ϕ. We take a suitable
point i
v of
ℨv
ϕ which plays the role of
“origin” of the space. If r
v = 0, we
understand that ℨv
ϕ consists of a single
point i
v. We put ℨϕ =
∏v∈a
ℨv
ϕ. To simplify our notation, for
x ∈ K
A
× or
x ∈
(C
×)a, a
∈ Z
a, and c ∈
(C
×)a, we put
For ξ ∈ G
v
ϕ and
w ∈ ℨv
ϕ, we define
ξw ∈ ℨv
ϕ in a
natural way and define also a scalar factor of automorphy
j
ξ(w) so that
det(ξ)rv
j
ξ(w)−n
is the jacobian of ξ. Given k, ν ∈
Z
a, z ∈ ℨϕ,
and α ∈ G
A
ϕ,
we put
Then, for a function f:ℨϕ →
C, we define
f∥k,να:ℨϕ
→ C by
Now, given a congruence subgroup Γ of
G
ϕ, we denote by
𝔐k,ν
ϕ(Γ) the vector
space of all holomorphic functions f on ℨϕ
which satisfy f∥k,νγ =
f for every γ ∈ Γ and also the cusp condition if
G
ϕ is of the elliptic modular type. We then
denote by 𝔖k,ν
ϕ(Γ)
the set of all cusp forms belonging to
𝔐k,ν
ϕ(Γ). Further, we
denote by 𝔐k,ν
ϕ resp.
𝔖k,ν
ϕ the union of
𝔐k,ν
ϕ(Γ) resp.
𝔖k,ν
ϕ(Γ) for all
congruence subgroups Γ of G. If ϕ is anisotropic, we
understand that 𝔖0,ν
ϕ =
C.
Let D be an open subgroup of
G
A
ϕ such that
D ∩
G
h
ϕ is compact.
We then denote by
𝔖k,ν
ϕ(D) the
set of all functions f:
G
A
ϕ →
C satisfying the following conditions:
for every
p ∈ G
h
ϕ
there exists an element
f
p ∈ 𝔖k,ν
ϕ
such that
We now take D in a special form. We take a maximal
r-lattice M in V whose norm is
g in the sense of ref. 3 (p. 375) and put
where d is the different of K relative to
F and c is a fixed integral
g-ideal. Clearly M̃ is an
r-lattice in V containing M, and we
easily see that D
ϕ is an open subgroup of
G
A
ϕ. We assume
that
Define a subgroup 𝔛 of
G
A
ϕ by
We then consider the algebra ℜ(D, 𝔛) consisting of
all the finite linear combinations of DτD with
τ ∈ 𝔛 and define its action on
𝔖k,ν
ϕ (D) as
follows. Given τ ∈ 𝔛 and f ∈
𝔖k,ν
ϕ(D),
take a finite subset Y of
G
h
ϕ so that
DτD =
⊔η∈Y
Dη and define
f|DτD:G
A
ϕ
→ C by
These operators form a commutative ring of normal operators on
𝔖k,ν
ϕ(D).
For x ∈
G
A
ϕ, we define
an ideal ν0(x) of r by
where ν0(x
v) is defined as in
Section 3 with respect to an
rv-basis of
M
v. Clearly ν0(x)
depends only on CxC.
Let f be an element of
𝔖k,ν
ϕ(D)
that is a common eigenfunction of all the DτD
with τ ∈ 𝔛, and let
f|DτD =
λ(τ)f with λ(τ) ∈ C. Given a Hecke
ideal character χ of K such that |χ| = 1, define a
Dirichlet series 𝔗(s, f, χ) by
where χ* is the ideal character associated with χ and
N(a) is the norm of an ideal a.
Denote by χ1 the restriction of χ to
F
A
×, and by θ the Hecke
character of F corresponding to the quadratic extension
K/F. For any Hecke character ξ of F,
put
From Theorem 1 and Eq. 3.13, we see that
with a polynomial Wq of degree
n whose constant term is 1, where q runs over
all the prime ideals of K prime to c. Let
Z(s, f, χ) denote the function of
Eq. 4.16. Put
Theorem 2. Suppose
that
χa(b) =
b
μ|b|iκ−μ
with μ ∈
Za
and κ ∈ Ra
such
that ∑v∈a κv = 0. Put
m
= k + 2ν − μ and
with γv defined by
Then ℜ(s,
f, χ) can be
continued to the whole s-plane as a meromorphic function with finitely
many poles, which are all simple. It is entire if
χ1 ≠ θν
for ν = 0, 1.
We can give an explicitly defined finite set of points in which the possible poles of ℜ belong. Notice that p v and q v are polynomials; in particular, p v = 1 if 0 ≤ m v ≤ k v and q v = 1 if |μv − 2νv| ≥ n − 1.
The results of the above type and also of the type of Theorem 3 below were obtained in refs. 2, 4, and 5 for the forms on the symplectic and metaplectic groups over a totally real number field. The Euler product of type Z, its analytic continuation, and its relationship with the Fourier coefficients of f have been obtained by Oh (6) for the group G ϕ as above when ϕ = ηr.
Section 5.
We now put (W, ψ) = (V,
ϕ) ⊕ (H
m, ηm) as in
Eq. 2.5 with (V, ϕ) of Section 4 and
m ≥ 0. Writing simply I =
I
m, we can consider the parabolic subgroup
P
I
ψ of
G
ψ. We put P
ψ =
P
I
ψ for
simplicity, λ0(α) =
det(λI
ψ(p))
for p ∈ P
ψ, and
with M of Section 4 and the standard basis
{ɛi,
ɛm+n+i}i=1
m
of H
m. We can define the space
ℨψ and its origin i
ψ in the
same manner as for G
ϕ. We then put
Here e
v is the element of
End(V
v) defined for x
v by
wx
v − we
v ∈
(H
m)v for
w ∈ V
v. We define an
R-valued function h on
G
A
ψ by
Taking f ∈
𝔖k,ν
ϕ(D
ϕ)
and χ as in Section 4, we define
μ:G
A
ψ →
C as follows: μ(x) = 0 if x ∉
P
A
ψ
D
ψ;
if x = pw with p ∈
P
A
ψ and
w ∈ D
ψ ∩
C
0
ψ, then we put
where χc =
∏v|c χv. Then we
define E(x, s) for x ∈
G
A
ψ and
s ∈ C by
This is meaningful if χa(b) =
b
k+2ν|b|iκ−k−2ν
with κ ∈ R
a,
∑v∈a κv
= 0, and the conductor of χ divides c. We take such a
χ in the following theorem. The series of Eq. 5.6 is the
adelized version of a collection of several series of the type in Eq.
1.3.
Theorem 3. Define γv as in
Theorem 2 with m = 0. Put
Then the product
can be continued to the whole s-plane as a
meromorphic function with finitely many poles, which are all
simple.
We can give an explicitly defined finite set of points in which the possible poles of the above product belong.
Section 6.
Let G be an arbitrary reductive
algebraic group over Q. Given an open subgroup U
of G
A containing
G
a and such that U ∩
G
h is compact, we put
U
a = aUa
−1 and
Γa = G ∩
U
a for every a ∈
G
A. We assume that
G
a acts on a symmetric space 𝔚, and we
let G act on 𝔚 via its projection to
G
a. We also assume that
Γa/𝔚 has finite measure, written
vol(Γa/𝔚), with respect to a fixed
G
a-invariant measure on 𝔚. Taking a
complete set of representatives 𝔅 for
G/G
A/U, we put
where T is the set of elements of G
which act trivially on 𝔚, and we assume that
[Γa ∩ T:1] is finite. Clearly
σ(U) does not depend on the choice of 𝔅. We call
σ(G, U) the mass of G with respect to
U. If G
a is compact, we take
𝔚 to be a single point of measure 1 on which
G
a acts trivially. Then we have
We can show that σ(U′) =
[U:U′]σ(U′) if U′ is a
subgroup of U. If strong approximation holds for the
semisimple factor of G, then it often happens that both
[Γa ∩ T:1] and
vol(Γa/𝔚) depend only on U, so
that
If G
a is compact and U is
sufficiently small, then Γa = {1} for
every a, in which case we have σ(U) =
#(G/G
A/U). If U is
the stabilizer of a lattice L in a vector space on which
G acts, then
#(G/G
A/U) is the number of
classes in the genus of L. Therefore, σ(U) may
be viewed as a refined version of the class number in this sense.
Coming back to the unitary group G ϕ of Section 4, we can prove the following theorem.
Theorem 4. Suppose that
G
a
ϕ
is compact. Let M be
a g-maximal lattice in V of norm
g and let d be the different
of K relative to F. Define an open subgroup D of
G
A
ϕ
by Eq.
4.9
with an integral ideal c.
If n is odd, assume that ϕ is represented
by a matrix whose determinant times
(−1)(n−1)/2
belongs to
N
K/F(K); if n is
even, assume that c is divisible by
the product e of all prime ideals for which
tv = 2. Then
where
d = [F:Q],
DF is the discriminant of
F, and
A = 1 or
A =
N(e)n
N(d)−n/2
according
as
n
is
odd
or
even.
If n is odd, we can also consider σ(D′) for
with an arbitrary integral ideal c. Then
σ(D′) = 2−τσ(D), where τ is
the number of primes in F ramified in K.
Section 7.
Let us now sketch the proof of the above
theorems. The full details will be given in ref. 7. We first take 𝔅
⊂
so that
=
⊔b∈𝔅
G
ϕ
bD
ϕ.
Given E(x, s) as in Eq. 5.6, for each
q ∈
G
h
ψ we can
define a function E
q(z, s) of
(z, s) ∈ ℨψ × C by
The principle is the same as in Eq. 4.6, and so it is
sufficient to prove the assertion of Theorem 3 with
E
q(z, s) in place of
E(x, s). In particular, we can take q
to be q = b ×
12m with b ∈ 𝔅. Define
(X, ω) as in Eq. 2.5. Then there is an
isomorphism of (X, ω) to
(H
m+n,
ηm+n) which maps
P
U
ω of
Proposition 1 to the standard parabolic subgroup
P of G(ηm+n).
Therefore, we can identify ℨω with the space
ha with
We can also define an Eisenstein series E′(x,
s; χ) for x ∈
G
A
ω and
s ∈ C, which is defined by Eq.
5.6 with
(G(ηm+n)A,
P, 1) in place of
(G
A
ψ,
P
ψ, f). Taking
E′ and (q, a) ∈
G
h
ω (with a ∈
𝔅) in place of E(x, s) and q, we can
define a function
E′q,a(z,
s) of (z, s) ∈
ha × C in the same
manner as in Eq. 7.1. There is also an injection ι of
ℨψ × ℨϕ into
ha compatible with the embedding
G
ψ × G
ϕ →
G(ηm+n). We put then
for every function g on
ha, where δ(w, z) is a
natural factor of automorphy associated with the embedding ι. Take a
Hecke eigenform f as in Section 4 and define
f
a by the principle of Eq. 4.6. Then,
employing Proposition 1, we can prove
where q = b ×
12m, A is a certain gamma factor, and
Φa =
Γa/ℨϕ. The computation is
similar to, but more involved than, that of ref. 4 (Section 4). Since
the analytic nature of E′q,a
can be seen from the results of ref. 8, we can derive Theorem
3 from Eq. 7.4.
Take m = 0. Then ψ = ϕ and E q(z, s) = f b(z). Then the analytic nature of 𝔗 (s, f, χ), and consequently that of Z(s, f, χ), can be derived from Eq. 7.4. However, here we have to assume that χa(b) = b k+2ν|b|iκ−k−2ν with κ ∈ R a, ∑v∈a κv = 0, and the conductor of χ divides c. The latter condition on c is a minor matter, but the condition on χa is essential. To obtain Z(s, f, χ) with an arbitrary χ, we have to replace E′q,a by 𝔇E"q,a, where E" is a series of type E′ with 2ν − μ in place of k and 𝔇 is a certain differential operator on ha.
As for Theorem 4, we take again ψ = ϕ and observe that a constant function can be taken as f if G a ϕ is compact. The space ℨϕ consists of a single point. The integral on the right-hand side of Eq. 7.4 is merely the value (E′q,a)°(z, w; s). We can compute its residue at s = n explicitly. Comparing it with the residue on the left-hand side, we obtain Theorem 4 when c satisfies Eq. 4.10. If n is odd, we can remove this condition by computing a group index of type [U:U′].
Footnotes
- Copyright © 1997, The National Academy of Sciences of the USA





