Previous Article |
Table of Contents
| Next Article
* Medicine Branch, National Cancer Institute, and
Contributed by Kyriacos C. Nicolaou, December 15, 1999
The epothilones are naturally occurring antimitotic drugs
that share with the taxanes a similar mechanism of action without apparent structural similarity. Although photoaffinity labeling and
electron crystallographic studies have identified the taxane-binding site on The clinical
success of paclitaxel (PTX) and docetaxel has stimulated a search for
compounds with a similar mode of action and has resulted in the
identification of three nontaxane chemical classes of natural products:
the soil bacteria-derived epothilones A and B (Epo A and Epo B) (1),
the marine sponge-derived discodermolide (2, 3), and the coral-derived
eleutherobins/sarcodictyins (4, 5). All three classes stabilize
microtubules (MTs) and competitively inhibit the binding of PTX to
tubulin polymers, indicating overlap of binding sites (1-3, 6, 7). The
epothilones, however, display some superior qualities: they are water
soluble, can be produced in large quantities through bacterial
fermentation, and retain activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR)
cell lines and tumors (5, 8, 9).
The PTX-binding site on The unification of taxane, epothilone, and sarcodictyin chemistries in
a single pharmacophore, and the fact that their structure-activity relationship profile against both the parental and mutant tubulins can
be successfully explained by our modeling and docking studies, provide
a framework to study drug-tubulin interactions that should assist in
the rational design of agents targeting tubulin.
Materials.
PTX and docetaxel were obtained from the Drug Synthesis and Chemistry
Branch of the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. Epo A and B
(13), Epo B pyridine analogue,
Pharmacology
A common pharmacophore for epothilone and taxanes: Molecular
basis for drug resistance conferred by tubulin mutations in human
cancer cells
,
,
,
,
Genetics and Biochemistry Branch, National Institute of
Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of
Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
Target Structure-Based Drug
Discovery Group, Information Technology Branch, and ** Laboratory of
Drug Discovery Research and Development, Developmental Therapeutics
Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health,
Frederick, MD 21702; § Life Science Division, Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory, and Molecular and Cell Biology
Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; and
¶ Department of Chemistry and The Skaggs Institute for
Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037
![]()
Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References
-tubulin, similar data are not available for epothilones. To
identify tubulin residues important for epothilone binding, we have
isolated two epothilone-resistant human ovarian carcinoma sublines
derived in a single-step selection with epothilone A or B. These
epothilone-resistant sublines exhibit impaired epothilone- and
taxane-driven tubulin polymerization caused by acquired
-tubulin mutations (
274Thr
Ile and
282Arg
Gln)
located in the atomic model of 
-tubulin near the taxane-binding site. Using molecular modeling, we investigated the conformational behavior of epothilone, which led to the identification of a common pharmacophore shared by taxanes and epothilones. Although two binding
modes for the epothilones were predicted, one mode was identified as
the preferred epothilone conformation as indicated by the activity of a
potent pyridine-epothilone analogue. In addition, the
structure-activity relationships of multiple taxanes and epothilones in the tubulin mutant cells can be fully explained by the model presented here, verifying its predictive value. Finally, these pharmacophore and activity data from mutant cells were used to model
the tubulin binding of sarcodictyins, a distinct class of microtubule
stabilizers, which in contrast to taxanes and the epothilones interact
preferentially with the mutant tubulins. The unification of taxane,
epothilone, and sarcodictyin chemistries in a single pharmacophore
provides a framework to study drug-tubulin interactions that should
assist in the rational design of agents targeting tubulin.
![]()
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References
-tubulin has been identified both by
electron crystallography, showing PTX bound on the of

-tubulin dimer (10), and by photoaffinity labeling, which has
identified amino acids
1-31 and
217-233 as important areas
for PTX binding (11, 12). Similar studies, however, for
epothilones are not available. In this study, we present a report
of epothilone-resistant (EpoR) human cancer cell
lines with acquired
-tubulin mutations. The residues involved,
274 and
282, both map near the taxane-binding site in the atomic
model of tubulin (10). These mutations affect the ability of
epothilones to induce tubulin polymerization as well as inhibit cell
growth. Using molecular modeling and guided by the mutation data and
the activity profile of several MT-stabilizing agents against the cell
lines with mutant tubulins, we were able to identify a common
pharmacophore shared by taxanes and epothilones and in turn model Epo
binding onto tubulin. In addition, we have identified an MT-active
agent of the sarcodictyin family which, in contrast to taxanes and
epothilones, is preferentially active against the tubulin mutants, and
we have modeled the way it binds tubulin.
![]()
Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References

and
sarcodictyin A analogue (14) were prepared by chemical synthesis.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
-tubulin antibody (Tub2.1)
were from Sigma, and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated sheep anti-mouse
IgG antibody was from Amersham.
Cell Culture and Cytotoxicity Assay. The EpoR cell lines, 1A9/A8 and 1A9/B10, were isolated in a single step after exposure of the human ovarian carcinoma cell line A2780 (1A9) to lethal concentrations (IC99) of either Epo A or Epo B (IC99 concentrations: 6 nM for Epo A and 0.5 nM for Epo B). After an initial expansion, the concentration of epothilones in the culture medium was gradually increased to 30 nM for Epo A and 5 nM for Epo B. Cells were maintained in drug, in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere at 37°C in RPMI medium 1640 (GIBCO/BRL) containing 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 units/ml), and streptomycin (100 µg/ml) (GIBCO/BRL). Before an experiment, the 1A9/A8 and 1A9/B10 cells were cultured for at least 7-10 days in drug-free medium. Cytotoxicity assays using the protein-staining sulforhodamine B method were performed in 96-well plates as described previously (15), by seeding 500 cells per well and incubating with cytotoxic agents for 4 days.
Tubulin Polymerization Assay.
Quantitation of the degree of in vivo tubulin polymerization
in response to MT-stabilizing agents was performed as previously described (15). Briefly, cells were plated in 24-well plates and the
following day were exposed to increasing concentrations of PTX or
epothilones for 5 h. Then, cells were lysed in a hypotonic buffer
(1 mM MgCl2/2 mM EGTA/0.5% Nonidet P-40/2
mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride/200 units/ml aprotinin/100 µg/ml
soybean trypsin inhibitor/5.0 mM
-aminocaproic acid/1 mM
benzamidine/20 mM Tris·HCl, pH 6.8), the cytoskeletal and
cytosolic fractions containing polymerized (p) and soluble (s) tubulin,
respectively, were separated by centrifugation, resolved by
electrophoresis through SDS/10% polyacrylamide gels, and
immunoblotted with an antibody against
-tubulin.
PCR and Sequencing of
-Tubulin.
PCR amplification and sequencing of the predominant
-tubulin isotype
(protein class I/gene M40) from the EpoR clones
(1A9/A8 and 1A9/B10) were performed with overlapping sets of
primers as previously described (15).
Molecular Modeling Methods.
For molecular modeling methods and docking of epothilones and
sarcodictyins on the 
tubulin crystal structure, please refer to
the supplemental data on the PNAS web site, www.pnas.org.
| |
Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Two EpoR clones were isolated by selecting 1A9 human ovarian carcinoma cells with Epo A or Epo B. The two clones, designated 1A9/A8 and 1A9/B10, are 25- to 57-fold resistant to Epo A and B and 5- to 10-fold cross-resistant to PTX, docetaxel, and their precursor, baccatin (Table 1). Neither of the EpoR clones express MDR1 mRNA (data not shown), showing that epothilones do not select for an multidrug resistance phenotype, as the selection of the resistant clones was performed in the absence of any P-glycoprotein (Pgp) modulator.
|
Compared with parental cells, both resistant clones demonstrated impaired in vivo epothilone-driven tubulin polymerization (Fig. 1). In parental cells, 150 nM Epo A resulted in the polymerization of 98% of tubulin. In contrast, even 5,000 nM Epo A was unable to induce substantial tubulin polymerization in the EpoR clones (see Fig. 1, 10% P in 1A9/A8 and 21% P in 1A9/B10 cells). Similarly, PTX-driven polymerization was impaired. Treatment with 1,500 nM PTX resulted in the polymerization of only 25% and 40% of tubulin in clones 1A9/A8 and 1A9/B10, respectively, compared with 100% in parental cells. These in vivo polymerization results concur with the cytotoxicity profile of the two EpoR clones, showing higher resistance to Epo A than to PTX (see Table 1). These observations suggested that the resistant phenotype most likely resulted from impaired Epo interaction with tubulin and prompted us to sequence tubulin in the EpoR cells.
|
We sequenced the predominant
-tubulin isotype (protein class
I/gene M40) in both EpoR clones and the 1A9
cells from which they were derived. Class I
-tubulin is one of six
different
-tubulin isotypes expressed in human cells, and it
accounts for 90% of total
-tubulin mRNA in 1A9 cells (15) and the
EpoR clones (data not shown). A different point
mutation was identified in each clone:
274Thr
Ile (ACC
ATC) in clone 1A9/A8 and
282Arg
Gln (CGA
CAA) in clone 1A9/B10.
Both
274 and
282 are evolutionarily conserved in all vertebrate
-tubulins and all known
-tubulin isotypes in these organisms
(18). Furthermore, they cluster in space with two
-tubulin mutations
previously identified in PTX-resistant cell lines
(
270Phe
Val and
364Ala
Thr) (15). This spatial clustering on
the region identified in the crystal structure of 
-tubulin as the
taxane-binding site, together with the cross-resistance patterns,
reinforces the idea that epothilones share a common binding site with
the taxanes. The above observations raised the possibility of a common
pharmacophore; the flexible nature of the epothilones, however,
required consideration of many epothilone conformations and their
relationships with the relatively rigid taxane structure. We therefore
postulated that the common pharmacophore between taxanes and
epothilones should (i) be observable within a set of
low-energy conformational isomers of epothilones, (ii)
consistently overlap in conformational space with the taxanes, and
(iii) sterically fit into the taxane-tubulin binding site
model in a manner that is consistent with the relevant mutation data.
These three criteria reduced the number of possible conformational Epo
isomers to two.
Investigation of possible taxane-Epo superimpositions started with the use of molecular dynamics to sample Epo conformations (see Molecular Modeling Methods). This procedure resulted in a sample of 100 low-energy, conformationally distinct structures. Next, because the C12,C13 epoxide is the most rigid portion on the Epo ring, we used its oxygen as a reference to track distances to other features of the Epo molecule. Such measurements revealed that the centroid of the 3-OH, 7-OH, and 4-gem-dimethyl groups of Epo fell consistently at mean distance of 6.93 Å (SD = 1.18 Å) from its epoxide oxygen. Interestingly, this feature corresponds to the centroid of the part of the baccatin ring system of the taxanes consisting of the 1-OH, 9-carbonyl, and 15-gem-dimethyl group, which is 6.95 Å from its oxetane oxygen. These common groups were then used as a template to fit the Epo molecule onto the baccatin ring system of taxanes. Fig. 2 A and B illustrate the two-dimensional pharmacophoric overlap of Epo B and PTX. Two Epo conformations are presented. Fig. 2 C and D display the three-dimensional overlaps corresponding to the pharmacophores in 2 A and B, respectively. In these three-dimensional figures, docetaxel, which has a C5'-tert-butoxycarbonyl moiety in place of the C5'-benzoyl group of PTX, is the taxane depicted. To reiterate, these two conformations were the only ones that met the intramolecular pharmacophore requirements and at the same time fit the docetaxel-tubulin binding site model in a manner consistent with the tubulin mutation data. We emphasize that in the absence of additional biological or crystallographic data, the two different conformations of epothilones presented here appear equally likely.
|
Using this pharmacophore and guided by the mutations in the
EpoR cells, we succeeded in docking Epo on an
energy-refined model of the 3.7-Å density map of the docetaxel-binding
site on
-tubulin (Fig. 3). In
agreement with the cross-resistance data and the in vivo
polymerization studies, the model predicts that the change in residue
274 from Thr to Ile should have a greater impact on the binding of
epothilones as compared with that of taxanes. The model predicts that
the reason for this is that epothilones use their C7-OH group to
hydrogen bond in the vicinity of the Thr-
274; when Thr-
274 is
mutated to Ile, this hydrogen bond is disrupted. In contrast, taxanes,
which have hydrogen bond donors or acceptors at the C10, C9, and C7
positions, can form alternate hydrogen bonds.
|
The
282Arg
Gln mutation sits on the M loop
(Fig. 3), identified as the major region in lateral contacts between
protofilaments (19), and is located near the common binding site of
taxanes and epothilones. As the N terminus of the M loop is part of the
taxane ring-binding region, the mutation of Arg-
282 could directly
affect the binding of taxanes and epothilones. In addition, the
mutation could cause a disruption of lateral contacts. This is in
agreement with our findings that in the absence of drug the Epo
B-selected clone, 1A9/B10, harboring the
282Arg
Gln mutation, has a significantly
slower growth rate than the parental 1A9 cells and the Epo A-selected
clone, 1A9/A8. The doubling times for 1A9, 1A9/A8, and 1A9/B10
cells are 24 h, 30 h, and 50 h, respectively. A combined
effect on both drug binding and lateral interactions is also possible.
The data presented thus far do not allow one to determine a preference
between the two modes of Epo binding shown in Fig. 2. However, drug
sensitivity data in 1A9 cells and the previously described PTX-selected
cell line (PTX10), containing a
270Phe
Val
mutation (15), provided us with a tool to test this conformational hypothesis. Specifically, drug sensitivity data using an Epo B analogue
with a pyridine moiety in place of
the thiazole ring of the parent compound (Table 1) allowed us to
identify binding mode II (Fig. 2) as the preferred conformation of
epothilones. This preference is because the pyridine ring is bulkier
than the thiazole side chain, which in binding mode II is in close
proximity to Phe-
270. If binding mode II is preferred, one would
predict that the
270Phe
Val mutation would
have a greater impact on the sensitivity of the pyridine-containing Epo
B derivative compared with the thiazole-containing molecule. This
prediction is confirmed by the cytotoxicity data, which show that the
270Phe
Val mutation has only a 3-fold effect
on the sensitivity of the thiazole containing Epo B (15) compared with
a 10-fold change for the pyridine Epo B (IC50
values: 0.1 nM for 1A9 and 1 nM for the
270Phe
Val mutant cells). While these data,
together with the fact that the Epo B-pyridine analogue is equipotent
to Epo B, provide strong evidence in support of binding mode II,
further empirical crystallographic evidence will be required to
determine which binding mode is more likely.
The model presented here is in agreement with studies of both taxane
and Epo structure-activity relationships (SAR). For example, SAR
studies have shown that the C4-C5 oxetane ring of taxanes is
absolutely required for activity (20), whereas in epothilones replacement of the C12,C13 epoxide with a cyclopropane ring results in
total loss of activity both in vitro with purified tubulin and in whole cells (21). In the proposed Epo/tubulin pharmacophore model, the oxygen atoms contained in the oxetane of taxanes and the
epoxide of epothilones overlap (Fig. 2). Both the epoxide and the
oxetane are restricted ethers containing conformationally rigid oxygens
that are likely to function as hydrogen bond acceptors. In the tubulin
structure, the C4-C5 oxetane of docetaxel is located near a cluster of
polar backbone atoms from tubulin residues 273, 275, and 276, with the
hydroxyl side chain of Thr-
274 also located in this hydrophilic
area. In the Epo/tubulin model the epoxide is similarly disposed. In
addition, studies have shown that with the C12,C13 epoxide present,
some substitutions at C12 lead to analogues with increased biological
activity (13). Included among these is the naturally occurring Epo B,
which differs from Epo A by a single methyl group substitution at C12,
a modification that increases its potency by 14-fold (see Table 1).
According to the model presented here, the C12 methyl group stabilizes
a favorable hydrophobic interaction in the vicinity of the side chains
of Leu-
273, Leu-
215, Leu-
228, and Phe-
270; this may account
for the increased potency of Epo B compared with Epo A. Furthermore,
Epo analogues in which the C12,C13 epoxide is removed and replaced by a
double bond (deoxy-12,13-olefinic derivative), display intact
enhancement of in vitro tubulin polymerization (21, 22).
This result further supports the pharmacophore model described here,
because the C12-C13 double bond results in a very favorable
hydrophobic interaction in a similar manner to the methyl group in Epo
B, while at the same time, the projection of its electron-rich
cloud toward a water molecule may serve as a weak hydrogen bond acceptor.
One way to conceptualize these observations is to compare the
epothilones with baccatin, the "inactive" taxane precursor. Baccatin is a structurally rigid molecule, with poor in
vitro tubulin-polymerization-enhancing activity, likely resulting
from its weak binding to tubulin. Enhanced baccatin binding has been achieved in the taxanes with the introduction of the C13 and the C2
side chains, the importance of which is underscored by the electron
crystallographic data showing the docetaxel side chains in contact with
-tubulin (10). Although epothilones lack the overall bulk of
taxanes, their macrolide ring system provides a larger hydrophobic core
compared with the diterpene ring system of baccatin. This, coupled with
the occupancy of epothilones' side chain in the vicinity of the C13
side chain of taxanes and the critical hydrogen bonds formed by the
C1-OH, C7-OH, and epoxide oxygens, enables epothilones to interact with
high affinity with tubulin even though they have significantly less
molecular volume than taxanes. A recent report of a common
pharmacophore between nonataxel (a nonaromatic PTX analogue) and
epothilones proposes that baccatin is a nonessential component of these
drugs (23). This conclusion was based on a relatively inactive analogue
that was designed before data on the taxane-binding site, available from the crystal structure of
/
tubulin dimer (10),
could be considered. Thus, our modeling in combination with the
mutational data reinforces our belief that baccatin is an essential
moiety for tubulin binding and should not be viewed as a passive
scaffold holding functional groups. We would emphasize that our
proposed conformation of the binding of Epo to the docetaxel-binding
site of tubulin is distinct from both the crystal structure (16) and
the reported solution conformations (24). This difference is not
surprising, given the finding that ligands frequently undergo conformational changes upon binding to proteins (25).
The identification of a common pharmacophore between taxanes and
epothilones prompted us to examine whether sarcodictyins, a distinct
class of coral-derived MT-stabilizing agents, would fit in the same
model. However, in contrast to taxanes and epothilones, which have
reduced activity in the mutant cells compared with parental cells, the
activities of sarcodictyins A and B (not shown) and a methyl ketal
analogue of sarcodictyin A (7) were enhanced (Table 1). This favorable
interaction of sarcodictyins with the EpoR cells
harboring mutant tubulins can be explained according to our
pharmacophore model. The sarcodictyin A analogue was modeled into the
taxane-binding site in a manner similar to that described for the
epothilones (Molecular Modeling Methods) (Fig.
4). According to the pharmacophore model,
the isopropyl group at C14 of sarcodictyin corresponds to the
gem-dimethyl groups of the epothilones and the taxanes. Furthermore,
the restricted ether oxygen attached to C4 and C7 of sarcodictyins is
within 2 Å from the epoxy and oxetane oxygens of the epothilones and
the taxanes, respectively, and is also favorably placed to accept the
same hydrogen bond from the single water molecule. The methylimidazole
side chain of sarcodictyins lies in the vicinity of Phe-
270 (Fig.
4). This location is similar to those of the aromatic side chain in
binding mode II of the epothilones and the C13 side chain of taxanes. The sarcodictyins contain a methyl group at C7, which makes an unfavorable yet tolerable hydrophobic-polar interaction with the alcohol side chain of Thr-
274 (Fig. 4). However, in the
274Thr
Ile mutant, this same interaction
becomes a highly favorable hydrophobic interaction between the C7
methyl group of sarcodictyin and the Ile-
274 aliphatic side chain.
This explains why the potency of sarcodictyins is substantially
increased in the 1A9/A8 cells with the
274Thr
Ile mutation compared with parental
1A9 cells with a Thr at position 274.
|
To further understand the molecular mechanism of drug binding, we
utilized an energy-refined model of the 3.7-Å crystal structure of the
docetaxel-binding site on
-tubulin that includes water interactions
with the protein (Fig. 5). In this
energy-refined model, water molecules were added to portions of tubulin
that were sterically and electrostatically feasible as evidenced by their energy-minimized coordinates. The model must be interpreted with
caution and may provide a possible explanation for the mutational analysis. We postulate that, in the apo-structure of tubulin (unbound tubulin), solvent may occupy a large portion of the binding pocket, forming a hydrogen-bonded network that is coordinated by the spatial disposition of neighboring polar amino acid side chains and backbone residues. For example, in such a model, Arg-
282 is linked to this
solvent network by a salt bridge with Glu-
288 (Fig. 5). At the apex
of this water network, the OH group of Thr-
274 controls the location
of water molecules that form a critical hydrogen bond with the C7-OH of
Epo. According to this model, the
274Thr
Ile
mutation is disruptive because it shifts the location of these waters,
resulting in the loss of the C7-OH hydrogen bond with tubulin. The
282Arg
Gln mutation may also be disruptive
because loss of the salt bridge with Glu-
288 enhances the anionic
charge of the latter. In an attempt to screen this anionic charge, more
water may enter the area, encouraging the OH side chain of Thr-
274
and its hydrogen-bonded waters to shift to a new location. This finding
is further supported by the enhanced activity of sarcodictyin in the
282Arg
Gln mutant cells. As before, the
shift of the OH group of the Thr-274 side chain causes the simultaneous
shift of the methyl group of the Thr side chain in the location
previously occupied by the OH moiety. This rearrangement explains the
decreased activity of epothilones caused by the unfavorable
hydrophobic-polar interaction between the C7-OH of epothilones and the
methyl group of the Thr-274 side chain. At the same time it also
explains the increased activity of sarcodictyin caused by the favorable
hydrophobic-hydrophobic interaction between the C7-methyl group of
sarcodictyins and the methyl group of the Thr-274 side chain.
|
The clinical success of taxanes has made tubulin a very
attractive target for cancer chemotherapy (26) and has prompted a
worldwide search for compounds with similar mechanism of action. Here
we present acquired
-tubulin mutations in human carcinoma cells that
confer resistance to epothilones and taxanes by impairing their binding
to tubulin. The biological importance of this finding is underscored in
a recent study reporting that patients with non-small-cell lung cancer
not responding to PTX harbored
-tubulin mutations near the
taxane-binding site (27). The identification of a common pharmacophore
for taxanes and epothilones presented here is a valuable example of
molecular modeling guided by mutational/biological data that helps us
to better understand the interaction of these compounds with their
common intracellular receptor, tubulin. We believe our data should
assist in the engineering of MT-stabilizing molecules with improved
characteristics, such as the Epo B-pyridine analogue and the
sarcodictyin A analogue, setting the stage for advances in cancer chemotherapy.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
PTX, paclitaxel; MT, microtubule; Epo A, epothilone A; Epo B, epothilone B; EpoR, epothilone-resistant.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
To whom reprint requests should be addressed at:
Medicine Branch, NCI, NIH, Bldg. 10, Room 12N226, 9000 Rockville Pike,
Bethesda, MD 20892. E-mail: evigi{at}box-e.nih.gov.

The synthesis of this Epo B analogue will be
reported elsewhere.
Article published online before print: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 10.1073/pnas.040546297.
Article and publication date are at www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.040546297
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Bollag, D. M., McQueney, P. A., Zhu, J., Hensens, O., Koupal, L., Liesch, J., Goetz, M., Lazarides, E. & Woods, C. M. (1995) Cancer Res. 55, 2325-2333[ISI][Medline]. |
| 2. |
ter Haar, E., Kowalski, R. J., Hamel, E., Lin, C. M., Longley, R. E., Gunasekera, S. P., Rosenkranz, H. S. & Day, B. W.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
243-250 |
| 3. | Kowalski, R. J., Giannakakou, P., Gunasekera, S. P., Longley, R. E., Day, B. W. & Hamel, E. (1997) Mol. Pharmacol. 52, 613-622[ISI][Abstract/Full Text]. |
| 4. | Long, B. H., Carboni, J. M., Wasserman, A. J., Cornell, L. A., Casazza, A. M., Jensen, P. R., Lindel, T., Fenical, W. & Fairchild, C. R. (1998) Cancer Res. 58, 1111-1115[ISI][Abstract]. |
| 5. |
Nicolaou, K. C., Winssinger, N., Vourloumis, D., Ohshima, T., Kim, S., Pfefferkorn, J., Xu, J. Y. & Li, T.
(1998)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
120,
10814-10826[ISI] |
| 6. | Kowalski, R. J., Giannakakou, P. & Hamel, E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 2534-2541[ISI][Abstract/Full Text]. |
| 7. | Hamel, E., Sackett, D. L., Vourloumis, D. & Nicolaou, K. C. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 5490-5498[ISI][Medline]. |
| 8. | Cowden, C. J. & Paterson, I. (1997) Nature (London) 387, 238-239[ISI][Medline]. |
| 9. | Service, R. F. (1996) Science 274, 2009-2010[ISI][Full Text]. |
| 10. | Nogales, E., Wolf, S. G. & Downing, K. H. (1998) Nature (London) 391, 199-203[ISI][Medline]. |
| 11. | Rao, S., Krauss, N. E., Heerding, J. M., Swindell, C. S., Ringel, I., Orr, G. A. & Horwitz, S. B. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 3132-3134[ISI][Abstract]. |
| 12. | Rao, S., Orr, G. A., Chaudhary, A. G., Kingston, D. G. & Horwitz, S. B. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 20235-20238[ISI][Abstract/Full Text]. |
| 13. | Nicolaou, K. C., Winssinger, N., Pastor, J., Ninkovic, S., Sarabia, F., He, Y., Vourloumis, D., Yang, Z., Li, T., Giannakakou, P. & Hamel, E. (1997) Nature (London) 387, 268-272[ISI][Medline]. |
| 14. |
Nicolaou, K. C., Xu, J. Y., Kim, S., Pfefferkorn, J., Ohshima, T., Vourloumis, D. & Hosokawa, S.
(1998)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
120,
8661-8673[ISI] |
| 15. | Giannakakou, P., Sackett, D. L., Kang, Y. K., Zhan, Z., Buters, J. T., Fojo, T. & Poruchynsky, M. S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 17118-17125[ISI][Abstract/Full Text]. |
| 16. |
Hofle, G., Bedorf, N., Steinmetz, H., Schomburg, D., Gerth, K. & Reichenbach, H.
(1996)
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
35,
1567-1569[ISI] |
| 17. | Maple, J. R., Hwang, M. J., Jalkanen, K. J., Stockfisch, T. P. & Hagler, A. T. (1998) J. Comp. Chem. 19, 430-458[ISI]. |
| 18. | Sullivan, K. F. & Cleveland, D. W. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 4327-4331[ISI][Medline]. |
| 19. | Nogales, E., Whittaker, M., Milligan, R. A. & Downing, K. H. (1999) Cell 96, 79-88[ISI][Medline]. |
| 20. | Kingston, D. G. (1994) Trends. Biotechnol. 12, 222-227[ISI][Medline]. |
| 21. | Nicolaou, K. C., Finlay, M. R., Ninkovic, S., King, N. P., He, Y., Li, T., Sarabia, F. & Vourloumis, D. (1998) Chem. Biol. 5, 365-372[ISI][Medline]. |
| 22. |
Su, D. S., Meng, D. F., Bertinato, P., Balog, A., Sorensen, E. J., Danishefsky, S. J., Zheng, Y. H., Chou, T. C., He, L. F. & Horwitz, S. B.
(1997)
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
36,
757-759[ISI] |
| 23. | Ojima, I., Chakravarty, S., Inoue, T., Lin, S., He, L., Horwitz, S. B., Kuduk, S. D. & Danishefsky, S. J. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 4256-4261[ISI][Abstract/Full Text]. |
| 24. |
Taylor, R. E. & Zajicek, J.
(1999)
J. Org. Chem.
64,
7224-7228[ISI] |
| 25. |
Nicklaus, M. C., Wang, S., Driscoll, J. S. & Milne, G. W.
(1995)
Bioorg. Med. Chem.
4,
411-428 |
| 26. | Jordan, M. A. & Wilson, L. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 123-130[ISI][Medline]. |
| 27. | Monzo, M., Rosell, R., Sanchez, J. J., Lee, J. S., O'Brate, A., Gonzalez-Larriba, J. L., Alberola, V., Lorenzo, J. C., Nunez, L., Ro, J. Y. & Martin, C. (1999) J. Clin. Oncol. 17, 1786-1793[ISI][Abstract/Full Text]. |
This article has been cited by other articles in HighWire Press-hosted journals:
![]() |
S. Sirikantaramas, M. Yamazaki, and K. Saito From the Cover: Mutations in topoisomerase I as a self-resistance mechanism coevolved with the production of the anticancer alkaloid camptothecin in plants PNAS, May 6, 2008; 105(18): 6782 - 6786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Lee and S. M. Swain The Epothilones: Translating from the Laboratory to the Clinic Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2008; 14(6): 1618 - 1624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Raccor, A. Vogt, R. P. Sikorski, C. Madiraju, R. Balachandran, K. Montgomery, Y. Shin, Y. Fukui, W.-H. Jung, D. P. Curran, et al. Cell-Based and Biochemical Structure-Activity Analyses of Analogs of the Microtubule Stabilizer Dictyostatin Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2008; 73(3): 718 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Fojo Commentary: Novel Therapies for Cancer: Why Dirty Might Be Better Oncologist, March 1, 2008; 13(3): 277 - 283. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Yin, F. Cabral, and S. Veeraraghavan Amino acid substitutions at proline 220 of {beta}-tubulin confer resistance to paclitaxel and colcemid Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2007; 6(10): 2798 - 2806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Burnett, G. Ruthel, C. M. Stegmann, R. G. Panchal, T. L. Nguyen, A. R. Hermone, R. G. Stafford, D. J. Lane, T. A. Kenny, C. F. McGrath, et al. Inhibition of Metalloprotease Botulinum Serotype A from a Pseudo-peptide Binding Mode to a Small Molecule That Is Active in Primary Neurons J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2007; 282(7): 5004 - 5014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Dabydeen, J. C. Burnett, R. Bai, P. Verdier-Pinard, S. J. H. Hickford, G. R. Pettit, J. W. Blunt, M. H. G. Munro, R. Gussio, and E. Hamel Comparison of the Activities of the Truncated Halichondrin B Analog NSC 707389 (E7389) with Those of the Parent Compound and a Proposed Binding Site on Tubulin Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2006; 70(6): 1866 - 1875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Vassal, C. Barette, X. Fonrose, R. Dupont, E. Sans-Soleilhac, and L. Lafanechere Miniaturization and Validation of a Sensitive Multiparametric Cell-Based Assay for the Concomitant Detection of Microtubule-Destabilizing and Microtubule-Stabilizing Agents J Biomol Screen, June 1, 2006; 11(4): 377 - 389. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sampath, L. M. Greenberger, C. Beyer, M. Hari, H. Liu, M. Baxter, S. Yang, C. Rios, and C. Discafani Preclinical Pharmacologic Evaluation of MST-997, an Orally Active Taxane with Superior In vitro and In vivo Efficacy in Paclitaxel- and Docetaxel-Resistant Tumor Models. Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2006; 12(11): 3459 - 3469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hari, F. Loganzo, T. Annable, X. Tan, S. Musto, D. B. Morilla, J. H. Nettles, J. P. Snyder, and L. M. Greenberger Paclitaxel-resistant cells have a mutation in the paclitaxel-binding region of {beta}-tubulin (Asp26Glu) and less stable microtubules. Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2006; 5(2): 270 - 278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Gokmen-Polar, D. Escuin, C. D. Walls, S. E. Soule, Y. Wang, K. L. Sanders, T. M. LaVallee, M. Wang, B. D. Guenther, P. Giannakakou, et al. {beta}-Tubulin Mutations Are Associated with Resistance to 2-Methoxyestradiol in MDA-MB-435 Cancer Cells Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 65(20): 9406 - 9414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Escuin, E. R. Kline, and P. Giannakakou Both Microtubule-Stabilizing and Microtubule-Destabilizing Drugs Inhibit Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1{alpha} Accumulation and Activity by Disrupting Microtubule Function Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 65(19): 9021 - 9028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Hudis Testing Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Timing Is Everything J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2005; 23(24): 5434 - 5436. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-P. H. Yang, P. Verdier-Pinard, F. Wang, E. Lippaine-Horvath, L. He, D. Li, G. Hofle, I. Ojima, G. A. Orr, and S. B. Horwitz A highly epothilone B-resistant A549 cell line with mutations in tubulin that confer drug dependence Mol. Cancer Ther., June 1, 2005; 4(6): 987 - 995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Ferguson, C. Taylor, A. Stanley, E. Butler, A. |