Previous Article |
Table of Contents
| Next Article
Ecology and Evolution Program, Department of Biology, University of
Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1210
Edited by May R. Berenbaum, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL,
and approved September 13, 2001 (received for review July 26, 2001)
To date, all altered patterns of seasonal interactions observed in
insects, birds, amphibians, and plants associated with global warming
during the latter half of the 20th century are explicable as variable
expressions of plastic phenotypes. Over the last 30 years, the
genetically controlled photoperiodic response of the pitcher-plant
mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii, has shifted toward shorter,
more southern daylengths as growing seasons have become longer. This
shift is detectable over a time interval as short as 5 years. Faster
evolutionary response has occurred in northern populations where
selection is stronger and genetic variation is greater than in southern
populations. W. smithii represents an example of
actual genetic differentiation of a seasonality trait that is
consistent with an adaptive evolutionary response to recent global warming.
The latter half of the 20th
century has experienced a period of rapid global warming that is
unprecedented over the last millennium (1). At least in eastern North
America, the increase in mean surface temperature of the Earth has
occurred more through the moderation of daily and annual minima than by
raising extreme maxima (2-4). Hence, a major effect of global warming
has been the earlier arrival of spring, longer growing seasons, and
consequently, altered seasonal patterns and biotic interactions of
insects, birds, amphibians, and plants (5-7). These altered seasonal
interactions are explicable entirely as temperature-sensitive responses
to the environment by individuals, i.e., as expressions of plastic phenotypes, rather than as actual genetic changes in populations. Cytogenetic changes consistent with recent global warming have been
observed in Drosophila (8) but the "magnitude of genetic variation in natural populations for traits likely to be critical to
survival and reproduction in future climates is largely unknown" (9). Herein we provide evidence for a microevolutionary (genetic) response to the longer growing seasons generated by global warming by
documenting recent changes in the photoperiodic response of the
pitcher-plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii, that are
detectable over as short a time span as 5 years.
A wide variety of plants and animals use the length of day
(photoperiod) as a pivotal environmental cue to program their seasonal patterns of dormancy, migration, development, and reproduction (10-12). Failure to accommodate to the novel seasonality is
responsible for outbreeding depression in a managed population of the
Hungarian Ibex (13) and is the major cause of the failure of insect
populations introduced for biological control (14).
Among most temperate arthropods with an hibernal diapause (dormancy),
long days sustain development and short days induce diapause. Hence,
during the late summer, individuals perceive the shortening days and
switch from active development and reproduction to diapause. It is
important to note that it is the length of the growing season and the
timing of the onset of winter that impose selection on the optimal time
to switch from continuous development to diapause. In the northern
hemisphere, winter arrives earlier in the north where daylengths are
longer than in the south; consequently, to enter diapause on an earlier
date in the north, insects must use a longer daylength to cue the
switch from active development to diapause. This switching daylength,
or critical photoperiod, increases regularly with latitude and altitude
in a wide variety of arthropods (15-19). If populations have been adapting to longer growing seasons and later onsets of winter as a
consequence of global warming, then they should show a more southern
phenotype now than they did a few decades ago. Hence, we should see
progressively shorter critical photoperiods now than in the recent past.
W. smithii.
As parts of different experiments run over the last 30 years, our lab
has evaluated variation in photoperiodic response of multiple
populations of the pitcher-plant mosquito, W. smithii, over
a wide geographic range in eastern North America. W. smithii completes its preadult development entirely within the water-filled leaves of the purple pitcher plant, Sarracenia purpurea.
Hence, W. smithii lives in a highly consistent microhabitat
throughout its range. Both W. smithii and S. purpurea flourish in controlled-environment chambers where we are
able to mimic field conditions common to all populations. The range of
the mosquito tracks that of its host plant from the Gulf of Mexico to
northern Canada (30-54°N). Throughout its range, W. smithii enter a larval diapause whose onset, maintenance, and
termination are mediated by photoperiod (20). The critical photoperiod
mediating the onset and maintenance of diapause is closely correlated
with latitude and altitude, but not longitude, of origin with
R2 repeatedly >90% (17, 21-23).
Heritabilities of critical photoperiod within populations range from
15% to 70% (21) and hybrids between populations from distant
latitudes and altitudes show intermediate phenotypes (20-22). Critical
photoperiod in W. smithii is a genetically based, highly
heritable, adaptive trait regulating the seasonal patterns of its life cycle.
From the Cover
Evolution
Genetic shift in photoperiodic response correlated with
global warming
![]()
Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Localities at 30-50°N latitude from which W. smithii
were collected from S. purpurea (Inset)
from the overwintering generation in 1972, 1988, 1993, and 1996. For
each pie diagram, a blackened quadrant indicates a year that larvae
were collected at that locality.
1972 vs. 1996. Critical photoperiod determined with fixed daylengths is the 50% intercept on the photoperiodic response curve relating percentage development to hours of light per day, that is, the number of hours of light per day that initiates or maintains diapause in 50% of a sample population and averts or terminates diapause in the other 50%. In unchilled larvae, the critical photoperiod is the same for the initiation, maintenance, and termination of diapause (24). Separate samples of larvae are exposed to a range of fixed daylengths in half-hour increments at 25°C (1972) (17) or 23°C (1996) (23) until there is >90% development in the long-day controls. Percentage development is then plotted as a function of photoperiod and the critical photoperiod determined as the 50% intercept by simple interpolation. The 1972 critical photoperiods reflect the response of diapausing larvae collected directly from the field (fall 1971, 40-47°N) or the initiation of diapause in the F1 of larvae collected late winter, 1972 (30-36°N). The 1996 critical photoperiods reflect development of diapausing larvae in the F3 generation of larvae caught late winter 1996. The use of field-collected and F1 larvae directly for experiments may have introduced a bias in our results, but this bias is against showing a genetic change in photoperiodic response. Possible chilling of diapausing larvae in nature (25) before their collection in 1972 and the higher experimental temperatures (15, 16, 19) in 1972 than 1996 would, if anything, bias the results toward shorter, rather than the longer critical photoperiods we found in 1972.
1988 vs. 1993. Critical photoperiod determined with changing daylengths is the mean daylength of pupation of a sample of diapausing larvae exposed to daylengths that start as short and increment by 3 min per day until all larvae pupate. This method is possible because diapausing W. smithii continue to respond to photoperiod and diapause is always terminated by long days (20, 24). Critical photoperiods were determined at temperatures that fluctuated in a smooth sine wave from 13° to 29°C with a mean of 21°C. Initially, the temperature cycle lagged the light cycle by 3 h and daylength was increased by advancing dawn 3 min per day. Experimental larvae were in the F2 (1988) and the F6 (1993) lab generation.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1972 vs. 1996.
We estimated critical photoperiod in populations collected in 1972 and
1996 by using static daylengths. Critical photoperiod determined from
the pooled 1972 and 1996 collections was positively correlated
(R2 = 0.941) with latitude and
altitude of origin (b ± SE: latitude = 0.173 ± 0.008, t = 22.62, P < 0.001;
altitude = 0.00112 ± 0.00013, t = 8.53, P < 0.001). For each locality, we calculated the
altitude-corrected latitude from the regression coefficients
(b) of critical photoperiod regressed on latitude and
altitude (20): ACL = latitude(°N) + altitude(m) × (bALTITUDE
bLATITUDE). The critical photoperiods from 1972 showed a steeper regression on altitude-corrected latitude and were longer on average, than those from 1996 (Table
1; Fig. 2A). We were able to compare
directly between years within localities for the seven specific
populations [AL, FL, NC (3), NJ (2): 30-40°N] that were collected
in both 1972 and 1996. All seven critical photoperiods were shorter
from collections in 1996 than in 1972 [mean pair-wise difference in
critical photoperiod (±SE) = 0.246 ± 0.073 h; t
test for paired comparisons: t = 3.36, df = 6, P = 0.015]. Both analyses show
significantly shorter critical photoperiods in the populations
collected recently than in populations collected 24 years previously,
and the differences in critical photoperiod between collection dates
increase with latitude of origin. This shift toward shorter critical
photoperiods over a 24-year period is in the direction predicted from a
longer growing season, i.e., toward a more southern phenotype in more
recent years.
|
|
1988 vs. 1993.
We estimated critical photoperiod in populations collected in 1988 and
1993 by using changing daylengths. This method reflects the mean
response of many individuals rather than an interpolation between two
smaller samples. Development under these conditions is log-normally
distributed; the data were log10-transformed
before averaging and critical photoperiods were calculated as mean
log(hr). Critical photoperiod determined from the pooled 1988 and 1993 collections was positively correlated
(R2 = 0.945) with latitude but not
altitude (b ± SE: latitude = 0.00555 ± 0.00048, t = 11.56, P < 0.001;
altitude = 0.0000243 ± 0.0000138, t = 1.75, P = 0.107). Critical photoperiods from 1988 showed a significantly steeper regression on altitude-corrected latitude, but
were not longer, on average, than those from 1993 (Table 1; Fig.
2B). We were able to compare directly between years
within localities for the three specific populations (FL, ME,
ON: 30-49°N) that were collected in both 1988 and 1993. All
three critical photoperiods from the 1993 collections were shorter than
those from the 1988 collections, but, with only 2 df, the difference was not significant [
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The shift toward shorter critical photoperiods has been more pronounced in the north than in the south (Fig. 2). From the regressions in Fig. 2A, at 50°N latitude the critical photoperiod declines from 15.79 to 15.19 h from 1972 to 1996, corresponding to 9 days later in the fall of 1996 than 1972. This value is strikingly similar to the advancement of other seasonal events in the north temperate region over the same time span: British birds began laying eggs an average of 8.8 days earlier in 1995 than in 1971 (27) and British frogs began spawning an average of 9-10 days earlier in 1994 than in 1978 (28). Land surface temperatures have generally increased faster in northeastern North America than in the southeast (2, 3, 29) and genetic variability underlying photoperiodic response in W. smithii increases with latitude (21). We therefore attribute the faster evolutionary response of the northern populations to a combination of their encountering stronger directional selection and their harboring a greater genetic capacity to evolve.
Because each matched set of experiments was run under a highly controlled, matched set of conditions, we conclude that differences in critical photoperiod among populations indicate genetic differences among them and that differences in critical photoperiod between collection dates represent genetic change toward shorter critical photoperiods at later dates. We also conclude that genetic change in critical photoperiod can take place over as short a time span as 5 years. This shift toward shorter critical photoperiods is consistent with an adaptive response to longer growing seasons and, therefore, with the indirect effects of global warming on seasonality. W. smithii represents an example of actual genetic differentiation of a seasonality trait that is consistent with an adaptive evolutionary (genetic) response to global warming. Our results suggest that other species may be in the process of analogous evolutionary responses to altered seasonality and that the composition of future biotic communities may depend on the relative abilities of their constituent species to adapt to altered seasonal interactions.
| |
Acknowledgements |
|---|
We thank M. C. Quebodeaux for determining the critical photoperiods from the 1996 collections and D. Udovic for reading earlier versions of this paper. Our research over the last 30 years has been supported by the National Science Foundation Programs in Population Biology and in Ecological and Evolutionary Physiology.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
* To whom reprint requests should be sent at the present address: General Delivery, Black Butte Ranch, OR 97759. E-mail: wyomya{at}aol.com.
This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Stott, P. A. , Tett, S. F. B. , Jones, G. S. , Allen, M. R. , Mitchell, J. F. B. & Jenkins, G. J. (2000) Science 290, 2133-2137. |
| 2. | Easterling, D. R. , Meehl, G. A. , Parmesan, C. , Changnon, S. A. , Karl, T. R. & Mearns, L. O. (2000) Science 289, 2068-2074. |
| 3. | DeGaetano, A. T. (1996) J. Climate 9, 1646-1660. |
| 4. | Kerr, R. A. (2001) Science 288, 589-590. |
| 5. | Hughes, L. (2000) Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 56-61. |
| 6. | Wuethrich, B. (2000) Science 287, 794-795. |
| 7. | Thomas, D. W. , Blondel, J. , Perret, P. , Lambrechts, M. M. & Speakman, J. R. (2001) Science 291, 2598-2600. |
| 8. | Rodríguez-Trelles, F. & Rodríguez, M. A. (1998) Evol. Ecol. 12, 829-838. |
| 9. | Davis, M. B. & Shaw, R. G. (2001) Science 292, 673-679. |
| 10. | Vaartaja, O. (1959) Ecol. Mongr. 29, 91-111. |
| 11. | Withrow, R. B., ed. (1959) Photoperiodism and Related Phenomena in Plants and Animals (Am. Assoc. Advancement of Science, Washington, DC). |
| 12. | Anonymous. (1960) Biological Clocks (Long Island Biological Assoc., Cold Spring Harbor, NY). |
| 13. | Templeton, A. R. (1986) in Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, ed. Soulé, E. (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA), pp. 105-116. |
| 14. | Stiling, P. (1993) Am. Entomol. 39, 31-37. |
| 15. | Tauber, M. J. , Tauber, C. A. & Masaki, S. (1986) Seasonal Adaptations of Insects (Oxford Univ. Press, New York). |
| 16. | Danilevskii, A. S. (1965) Photoperiodism and Seasonal Development of Insects (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh). |
| 17. | Bradshaw, W. E. (1976) Nature (London) 262, 384-386. |
| 18. | Taylor, F. & Spalding, J. (1986) in The Evolution of Insect Life Cycles, eds. Taylor, F. & Karban, R. (Springer, New York), pp. 66-85. |
| 19. | Danks, H. V. (1987) Insect Dormancy: An Ecological Perspective (Biological Survey of Canada, Ottawa). |
| 20. | Bradshaw, W. E. & Lounibos, L. P. (1977) Evolution 31, 546-567. |
| 21. | Hard, J. J. , Bradshaw, W. E. & Holzapfel, C. M. (1993) Am. Nat. 142, 457-473. |
| 22. | Lair, K. P. , Bradshaw, W. E. & Holzapfel, C. M. (1997) Genetics 147, 1873-1883. |
| 23. | Quebodeaux, M. C. (1998) M.S. thesis (Univ. of Oregon, Eugene). |
| 24. | Bradshaw, W. E. & Lounibos, L. P. (1972) Can. J. Zool. 50, 713-719. |
| 25. | Bradshaw, W. E. & Phillips, D. L. (1980) Oecologia (Berlin) 44, 311-316. |
| 26. | Anonymous. (1985) SAS User's Guide: Statistics (SAS Institute, Cary, NC), Version 5. |
| 27. | Crick, H. Q. P. , Dudley, C. , Glue, D. E. & Thomspon, D. L. (1997) Nature (London) 388, 526. |
| 28. | Beebe, T. J. C. (1995) Nature (London) 374, 219-220. |
| 29. | Hegerl, G. C. , von Storch, H. , Hasselmann, K. , Santer, B. D. , Cubasch, U. & Jones, P. D. (1996) J. Climate 9, 2281-2306. |
This article has been cited by other articles in HighWire Press-hosted journals:
![]() |
R. F. Sage, D. A. Way, and D. S. Kubien Rubisco, Rubisco activase, and global climate change J. Exp. Bot., April 23, 2008; (2008) ern053v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Mathias, L. Jacky, W. E. Bradshaw, and C. M. Holzapfel Quantitative Trait Loci Associated with Photoperiodic Response and Stage of Diapause in the Pitcher-Plant Mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii Genetics, May 1, 2007; 176(1): 391 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Balanya, J. M. Oller, R. B. Huey, G. W. Gilchrist, and L. Serra Response to Comment on "Global Genetic Change Tracks Global Climate Warming in Drosophila subobscura" Science, March 16, 2007; 315(5818): 1497b - 1497b. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. E. Rank, D. A. Bruce, D. M. McMillan, C. Barclay, and E. P. Dahlhoff Phosphoglucose isomerase genotype affects running speed and heat shock protein expression after exposure to extreme temperatures in a montane willow beetle J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2007; 210(5): 750 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Franks, S. Sim, and A. E. Weis Rapid evolution of flowering time by an annual plant in response to a climate fluctuation PNAS, January 23, 2007; 104(4): 1278 - 1282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Balanya, J. M. Oller, R. B. Huey, G. W. Gilchrist, and L. Serra Global Genetic Change Tracks Global Climate Warming in Drosophila subobscura Science, September 22, 2006; 313(5794): 1773 - 1775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Mathias, L. K. Reed, W. E. Bradshaw, and C. M. Holzapfel Evolutionary Divergence of Circadian and Photoperiodic Phenotypes in the Pitcher-Plant Mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii. J Biol Rhythms, April 1, 2006; 21(2): 132 - 139. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Umina, A. R. Weeks, M. R. Kearney, S. W. McKechnie, and A. A. Hoffmann A Rapid Shift in a Classic Clinal Pattern in Drosophila Reflecting Climate Change Science, April 29, 2005; 308(5722): 691 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. E. Bradshaw, B. P. Haggerty, and C. M. Holzapfel Epistasis Underlying a Fitness Trait Within a Natural Population of the Pitcher-Plant Mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii Genetics, January 1, 2005; 169(1): 485 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Phillips and R. Shine Adapting to an invasive species: Toxic cane toads induce morphological change in Australian snakes PNAS, December 7, 2004; 101(49): 17150 - 17155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Primack, C. Imbres, R. B. Primack, A. J. Miller-Rushing, and P. Del Tredici Herbarium specimens demonstrate earlier flowering times in response to warming in Boston Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2004; 91(8): 1260 - 1264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Berteaux, D. Reale, A. G. McAdam, and S. Boutin Keeping Pace with Fast Climate Change: Can Arctic Life Count on Evolution? Integr. Comp. Biol., April 1, 2004; 44(2): 140 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Sutherst Global Change and Human Vulnerability to Vector-Borne Diseases Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2004; 17(1): 136 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Hoffmann, R. J. Hallas, J. A. Dean, and M. Schiffer Low Potential for Climatic Stress Adaptation in a Rainforest Drosophila Species Science, July 4, 2003; 301(5629): 100 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||