Previous Article |
Table of Contents
| Next Article
* Code 691, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard
Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771; Edited by Robert P. Kirshner, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for
Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA, and approved January 12, 2000 (received for review November 6, 2000)
Understanding dynamic conditions in the Solar Nebula is the
key to prediction of the material to be found in comets. We suggest that a dynamic, large-scale circulation pattern brings processed dust
and gas from the inner nebula back out into the region of cometesimal
formation It is
almost an article of faith among members of the planetary science
community that comets are the most primitive bodies in the Solar
System. In general, this is taken to mean that materials in comets are
preserved in nearly the same state today as when the material
originally aggregated from the Solar Nebula to form cometesimals.
Nothing we say below will contradict this axiom. However, we will show
that comets are not simply collections of unaltered presolar grains and
ices formed in the precollapse molecular cloud, but are instead
aggregates of materials representative of the building blocks then
present in the nebula at the time of their accretion. In our opinion,
comets represent the best grab bag samples of material from the
primitive Solar Nebula. However, this does not imply that materials
incorporated into cometesimals did not undergo very significant
processing in the nebula itself, only that little further processing
occurred once material was incorporated into the cometesimal.
In this paper, we show that grains incorporated into comets and seen
around young A and B stars as their protoplanetary disks begin to clear
contain silicate grains that have undergone processing at temperatures
as high as 1,100 K for periods of minutes, or more likely, at
temperatures near 1,000 K for days to weeks, and that such processing
can only have occurred in the inner nebula. After processing, the
grains were transported beyond the protostellar snow line where they
acquired a primarily water-ice mantle, and became part of freshly
accreted cometesimals. In the following sections, we briefly discuss
observations of young, 2-3 solar mass stars as analogs of solar-mass
systems, and review UV observations that establish the presence of
significant cometary infall rates in the disks of young A- and B-stars.
We then discuss laboratory evidence detailing the IR spectral evolution
of amorphous magnesium silicate dust subjected to thermal annealing. We
show that the IR spectra of dust in these stars changes systematically
with the age of the star and that dust around older stars contains higher fractions of processed material than does the dust surrounding younger A-stars.
This evidence implies that dust (and gas) mixing and transport
scales in protostellar nebulae could be many tens to several hundred AU
and that such enormous mixing lengths could have significant consequences for nebular chemistry. We argue that dust and volatiles in
comets should be reflective of the period in nebular history during
which an individual comet aggregated. Therefore, because the spectral
properties of the dust available for accretion evolves with time, the
spectral properties of the dust can be used to establish a cometary age
sequence. Comets formed early in nebular history will contain only
primitive, amorphous interstellar grains and ices because no nebular
processing has had time to occur. Comets formed very late in nebular
history will contain considerably more crystalline olivine dust and
complex organic materials. These complex organic molecules could have
played an important role in the origin of life on Earth and possibly on
other bodies throughout the Solar System. Indeed, they could represent
a natural, primary process occurring in every protoplanetary system.
Our goal is to understand conditions in the Solar Nebula at
the epoch of planetesimal formation and planet building. This goal can
be approached by studies of the fossil record The first indication that such systems might harbor comets came
from the nearby [d = 19.6 pc (parsec = 3.09 × 1016 m)] A-star Similar, red-shifted, gas-phase absorption features are observed
in many Herbig Ae/Be stars (17, 18). Such stars are thought to be
younger than Herbig Ae/Be stars, like young solar-type stars, have
strong stellar winds that have been identified from their optical
(23-25) and UV spectra (17, 26) (Fig.
1). Winds typically have radial velocities of 200-400 km/s, and are more easily observed in systems where material from the disk does not obscure the star (17). The
precise geometry of these winds has been a topic of lively discussion.
Recent Hubble Space Telescope (HST) observations indicate that in at
least one case (HD 163296) the outflow consists of two spatially
distinct components: (i) a collimated, bipolar outflow moving with space velocities of 300-500 km/s (27); and
(ii) an apparently uncollimated flow, detectable in
scattered Lyman alpha up to 1.5" (180 AU) from the star. The presence
of the collimated outflow, together with FUV emission features
compatible with the presence of a chromosphere/transition region,
suggests that many of the same mechanisms thought to be active in the
young Solar System may also be effective in these protoplanetary disks.
It is the uncollimated outflow, if typical of young stars, that can potentially provide a mechanism for cycling material from the inner
disk out to distances of tens to hundreds of AU where cometesimals can
begin to form.
Special Feature
Review
Constraints on nebular dynamics and chemistry based on
observations of annealed magnesium silicate grains in comets and in
disks surrounding Herbig Ae/Be stars
,
,
The National
Optical Astronomy Observatories, Code 681, National Aeronautics and
Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771;
§ DuPont Central Research and Development, 328/318B,
Wilmington, DE 19880-0328; and ¶ University of
Cincinnati, Physics Department, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0011
![]()
Abstract
Top
Abstract
Comets: Ancestors and...
A-Stars: Astronomical...
Observations of Stellar Winds
Evolution of Silicate Spectra:...
Chemistry of Protostellar...
The Formation of Comets
Implications for Astrobiology
References
extending possibly hundreds of astronomical units (AU) from
the sun
and that the composition of comets is determined by a chemical
reaction network closely coupled to the dynamic transport of dust and
gas in the system. This scenario is supported by laboratory studies of
Mg silicates and the astronomical data for comets and for
protoplanetary disks associated with young stars, which demonstrate
that annealing of nebular silicates must occur in conjunction with a
large-scale circulation. Mass recycling of dust should have a
significant effect on the chemical kinetics of the outer nebula by
introducing reduced, gas-phase species produced in the higher
temperature and pressure environment of the inner nebula, along with
freshly processed grains with "clean" catalytic surfaces to the
region of cometesimal formation. Because comets probably form
throughout the lifetime of the Solar Nebula and processed (crystalline)
grains are not immediately available for incorporation into the first
generation of comets, an increasing fraction of dust incorporated into
a growing comet should be crystalline olivine and this fraction can
serve as a crude chronometer of the relative ages of comets. The
formation and evolution of key organic and biogenic molecules in comets
are potentially of great consequence to astrobiology.
![]()
Comets: Ancestors and Antecedents of the Solar System
Top
Abstract
Comets: Ancestors and...
A-Stars: Astronomical...
Observations of Stellar Winds
Evolution of Silicate Spectra:...
Chemistry of Protostellar...
The Formation of Comets
Implications for Astrobiology
References
![]()
A-Stars: Astronomical Laboratories for Studying Comet Infall
Top
Abstract
Comets: Ancestors and...
A-Stars: Astronomical...
Observations of Stellar Winds
Evolution of Silicate Spectra:...
Chemistry of Protostellar...
The Formation of Comets
Implications for Astrobiology
References
the comets, or
meteorites
and by observations of stars with protoplanetary disks of
the desired age. Studies of circumstellar material associated with
young solar-mass stars are hampered by strong stellar activity, and low
relative luminosity of the stars. Slightly more massive stars (2-3
solar masses), Herbig Ae/Be stars, are surrounded by significant dust
disks (1-3) with diameters comparable to or somewhat larger than the
diameters of disks observed around lower-mass stars (4). The disk
evolutionary time scales, measured by the presence of a near-IR excess
and optical emission signatures, appear comparable to young solar-type
stars (5), suggesting that the time required to clear the inner few AU
of the disks are also comparable. Observations suggest that IR excesses
associated with colder, and hence more distant, material in the disks
drop gradually with age for single stars, and become undetectable by 400 million years ago (Myr) (6), which is compatible with the duration
of the heavy bombardment phase in the inner Solar System. Because of
the higher effective temperatures (7,500-10,500 K) of these stars,
they have both higher UV luminosities and relatively simple stellar
spectra compared with young solar-type stars, making them convenient
laboratories for probing the evolution of protoplanetary nebula.
Pictoris (7), which is
surrounded by an extensive dust disk (8). Replenishment of µm-sized
dust in the disk of this 20 million-year-old star (9) requires a
population of larger bodies (10). Similar conclusions have been reached
from the study of circumstellar absorption features that are
conspicuous in the UV and optical spectrum of
Pictoris. Shortly
after detection of the disk, UV spectroscopy of the star revealed
circumstellar absorption features that are systematically red-shifted
(11-13). The time-variable nature of these red-shifted absorption
features suggest that they occur following planetary perturbation of
swarms of comets resident in the disk (13-15). As these comets fall
toward the central star, the volatiles evaporate and appear to an
outside observer as red-shifted absorptions. For a more complete
discussion, see ref. 16.
Pictoris (19, 20), spanning the range from premain
sequence (PMS) to zero-age main sequence (ZAMS). For the youngest
stars, the composition of the infalling gas is comparable with
unprocessed disk material (21) and is routinely observed, in contrast
to the episodic nature of the infall in
Pictoris (18). For some
older Herbig Ae/Be stars, the infall activity is either episodic (22)
or deviates from the stellar composition, suggesting that in these
cases, infall of processed material is being witnessed.
![]()
Observations of Stellar Winds
Top
Abstract
Comets: Ancestors and...
A-Stars: Astronomical...
Observations of Stellar Winds
Evolution of Silicate Spectra:...
Chemistry of Protostellar...
The Formation of Comets
Implications for Astrobiology
References

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
UV spectra obtained with the IUE of the Herbig Be star HD 100546 at two
epochs (thin and thick lines). The spectra illustrate variability in
the red-shifted infall features and variability in the strength of
blue-shifted absorption associated with the stellar wind. The wind can
be traced to
200 km/s. The electronic transitions involved are the
Si+ UV multiplet 2 and the resonance doublet of
C+3.
| |
Evolution of Silicate Spectra: Laboratory and Astrophysical Comparisons |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The IR spectra of silicates in the interstellar medium and
around most Asymtotic Giant Branch (AGB) stars show that they are amorphous and characterized by a broad, relatively featureless pair of
infrared peaks at
9.7 and
20 microns. Although recent observational evidence has shown that a fraction (
10%) of the silicate formed around the highest-mass-loss-rate AGB stellar population is actually crystalline (28, 29), it is unlikely that
crystalline grains comprise a significant fraction of interstellar silicates. Even if crystalline silicates escape destruction via supernova shock waves (30, 31), their crystallinity will be destroyed
via long exposure to galactic cosmic rays (32). Therefore, the silicate
dust observed around most premain sequence (PMS) stars should be amorphous.
If we examine the IR spectra of Herbig Ae/Be stars, we find a mixture
of dust types, including highly amorphous silicates akin to
interstellar silicates and to glass with embedded metal sulfide (GEMS)
within interplanetary dust particles.
We
also find reasonably well crystallized materials (16, 19, 34, 35). The
most conspicuous examples of crystallized materials are seen in the
Herbig Ae/Be stars that are either near the zero-age main sequence
(ZAMS) and/or exhibit IR excesses suggestive of significant clearing
of the inner disk (30, 36-40), including HD 100546, where the silicate
emission bands are indistinguishable from those seen in comet
Hale-Bopp. Younger and/or less centrally cleared Herbig Ae/Be stars
tend to show stronger amorphous silicate emission (16, 41-43).
This trend prompted Waelkens et al. (34) and
Nuth
to suggest that the silicate crystallinity should
increase with stellar age due to processes occurring within the
circumstellar disk. The presence of amorphous silicates resembling
interstellar grains and the presence of GEMS in interplanetary dust
particles effectively eliminates dust processing via an accretion shock
as the source of the crystalline material seen in older nebulae. Though
Molster et al. (45) argued for low temperature
crystallization of dust in higher density regions of disks (based on
detection of similar silicate bands in circumstellar material
associated with evolved stars that are in the process of building
planetary nebulae), no mechanism for such crystallization has been
proposed. In contrast, laboratory annealing studies of Mg silicates
summarized below provide constraints on the temperature and time
required to transform amorphous, circumstellar/interstellar silicate
dust into crystalline grains.
Hallenbeck et al. (46) published a study of the evolution of
amorphous magnesium silicate smokes subjected to thermal annealing in vacuo at temperatures near 1,000 K. The rate of evolution
of the spectrum of silicates is extremely sensitive to the temperatures to which they are exposed. A more recent study can be used to predict
the IR spectrum of grains annealed at any given temperature and time
(47). Whereas magnesium silicate smokes anneal beyond the stall (46) in
only
2 h at 1,048 K, at 1,000 K this same transition requires
300
days. Annealing small interstellar silicates at significantly higher
temperatures (e.g., T > 1,500 K) could result in their
vaporization, whereas annealing at lower temperatures could require
millions of years to achieve significant changes (Table
1), and thus cannot be the source of
crystalline silicates in young Herbig Ae/Be stars. Malfait et
al. (36) demonstrated the similarity of the dust spectrum for HD
100546 (t = 10 million years) to dust in comet Hale-Bopp, and
Knacke et al. (48) have suggested similarities between dust
in the
Pictoris system and that seen in olivine-rich comets. More
recent observations (49) suggest that dust in this system is a mixture
of amorphous silicates and only a small fraction of crystalline grains.
Because dust around
Pictoris, and potentially also around HD 100546 (22) most likely originates in evaporating comets, the dust in those comets must have been processed at high temperatures
on the order of
1,000 K. And because Comets Halley, Hale-Bopp, Bradfield, and Mueller
also exhibit olivine-rich dust features (50), one can infer that some
dust in these comets was also exposed to high temperatures before
incorporation into the individual comet. Hallenbeck et al.
(46) demonstrated that dust spectra of these comets can be fit by using
the same set of IR peaks used to fit the spectra of partially annealed
magnesium silicate smokes in the laboratory (Fig.
2). Given the similarity of the
laboratory spectra to those in comets, we believe that we understand
the degree of annealing required in the natural system to reproduce the
observations. Such temperatures (
1,000 K) are only found within the
innermost regions of the solar and other protoplanetary nebulae (51).
|
|
| |
Chemistry of Protostellar Nebulae |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our understanding of chemical processes in the primitive Solar Nebula and of processes common to nebulae surrounding many protostars, has increased considerably as more detailed models of nebular evolution have become available. Early models (52) simply assumed that very hot gas in the Solar Nebula cooled slowly enough to maintain thermodynamic equilibrium until at least the more refractory vapors had condensed. Later models (53) examined potential consequences of local to medium-scale turbulence that would naturally accompany any viscous accretion disk. Prinn and Fegley (54) demonstrated that even major gas phase species such as N2/NH3 could fail to achieve equilibrium because of low temperatures and slow chemical-reaction rates near the outer planets. More recent work (55) has demonstrated that, for mineral species, constraints in achieving equilibrium with gas in the nebula are even more severe. In particular, oxidation/reduction or hydration reactions expected to occur spontaneously at temperatures ranging from 500 K to 700 K might easily lack the time necessary to achieve equilibrium in a rapidly evolving Solar Nebula.
Observations of Herbig Ae/Be stars discussed above add to the
difficulties of assuming that chemical equilibrium is ever achieved at
any place or time in the evolution of protostellar nebulae. Most models
assume that mass accretion onto the sun occurs in a predictable way:
mass falls onto the accretion disk and travels more or less steadily
inward. Even turbulent mixing scenarios (53) are primarily consistent
with this picture, because mixing only really occurs between adjacent
chemical regimes. Observation of a large population of annealed
silicates in comets perturbed into star-grazing orbits following
planetary encounters implies that mixing occurs on significant distance
scales. Such scales (several AU to
100 AU) far exceed those in the
models (53). This is consistent with the constraint that thermal
annealing at
1,000 K must be followed by condensation of an ice
mantle onto annealed grains before their aggregation into comets. In a
simple-minded scenario, mixing occurs from an annulus within about 1 AU
from the central star out to well beyond at least 5 to 10 AU. In
reality, the mixing lengths are probably both much longer and shorter
than this (Fig. 3).
|
Shu et al. (56, 57) suggested that grains and dust
aggregates reaching the surface of the protosun, in contact with the accretion disk, could be hurled out along magnetic field lines to land
in the region of chondrite formation. Grains reaching such temperatures
as part of a large dust aggregate quickly melt and coalesce through
surface tension (greatly reducing their exposed surface) and resist
evaporation until transported to cooler environments. Individual 10- to
100-nm grains exposed to solar surface temperatures would rapidly
vaporize. Even if such vapors later recondensed, the new silicates
would be highly amorphous and their IR spectra would more resemble
grains condensed around the majority of mass-losing Asymtotic Giant
Branch (AGB) stars than grains from olivine-rich comets. It seems
unlikely that the chondrule-forming mechanism of Shu et al.
(57) is directly responsible for transporting individual submicron
grains heated to more moderate temperatures (
1,000 K) to the outer nebula.
Large-scale circulation patterns that are capable of transporting
significant quantities of presolar silicates from hotter nebular
environments to beyond the snow line must exist at some stage of
nebular evolution. Because individual grains should be closely coupled
to the gas, such circulation patterns would also transport an even
larger mass of gas equilibrated at high temperatures (
1,000 K) out
beyond the giant planet formation region. The gas composition would be
similar to that predicted for Giant Gaseous Protoplanetary Subnebulae
(58, 59), but would probably be spread more uniformly around the
accretion disk.
If there is a steady flow from the inner to the outer regions of the Solar Nebula, then the chemistry of the gas-phase would be dominated by chemical kinetics to a much greater degree than currently modeled (54, 55). In particular, circulation patterns could lead to freshly condensed and partially annealed grains (natural, catalytic surfaces) in the outer Solar System. This could greatly enhance rates of gas-grain reactions, such as the Fischer Tropsch-Type synthesis of methane and higher hydrocarbons from CO and H2 or the analogous conversion of molecular N2 and H2 to NH3 (61, **). Such catalytic syntheses would be over and above the NH3 and hydrocarbons produced in the inner Solar System and transported with the processed grains.
The dynamic circulation pattern suggested by the steady increase in the proportion of processed dust in comets around Herbig Ae and Be stars is not consistent with models of evolving stellar accretion disks. This inconsistency may be due more to the limits of computational techniques used to model angular momentum transport in disks than to any physical reason preventing such circulation. In fact, large-scale circulation cells moving material from the inner to the outer regions, both above and below an inward-flowing accretion disk, have been discussed by both Prinn (62) and Stevenson (63). Perhaps it is time to reconsider this topic, at least for its potential to accurately predict the chemistry of comets.
| |
The Formation of Comets |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Weidenschilling (64) examined the formation of comets in a minimum mass nebula by using a one-dimensional model to follow accretion of µm-sized dust particles into kilometer-scale bodies. Comets form on time scales of a few hundred thousand years, even neglecting action of several factors that result in swifter accretion rates. A growing comet accretes material from a large volume in the nebula; the initial coagulation process is aided greatly by gas-drag-induced orbital migration. Migration homogenizes material accreted into comets by giving them feeding zones from 10 to 100 AU in radius that obscure small compositional differences between comets that end up at different nebular radii. Comets form much more rapidly in higher mass nebulae where gas-drag-induced orbital migration and accumulation due to gravitational instabilities would be more important. The differences we might expect to observe in the dust and volatile compositions of individual comets depends on the ratio of comet accumulation time scale to nebular lifetime. If these are comparable, then all comets look similar. If the nebular lifetime were much longer than the time required to accumulate comets, then substantial diversity will exist in this population as the crystalline fraction of the dust and the complex organic content of the volatiles increases with time. These latter predictions certainly appear to be more consistent with observations of both the dust (50, 65) and gas (66, 67) content of recent comets.
Comets formed early in nebular history will consist of amorphous silicates and unaltered interstellar ices; no processed material is yet available. Comets formed late contain more hydrocarbons, ammonia, and annealed dust than those formed earlier. This increase will not necessarily be linear. However, after accretion of fresh material from the surrounding molecular cloud ceases, accumulation of processed gas and dust in the comet formation region should at least be monotonic. The time-dependent nature of dust and gas accreted into comets might easily obscure less significant differences in cometary chemistry such as potential distinctions between comets accreted at higher temperatures in the Jupiter-Saturn region and those accreted in cooler zones near, or even beyond, Uranus-Neptune.
Older comets should be rich in CO, CO2,
N2, and amorphous dust, whereas younger comets
contain an abundance of crystalline olivine, hydrocarbons,
NH3, and prebiotic organics. We predict that the
fraction of crystalline dust is correlated to the ratios of
hydrocarbons to CO and of NH3/amines/amides
to N2. Fig. 4 shows vapor pressures (68, 69) for compounds formed in molecular clouds,
present as icy mantles on interstellar grains
(N2, CO, and CO2) along
with more hydrogenated species synthesized in the nebula
(CH4,
C2H4,
C2H6,
C3H6,
C3H8, and
NH3). Interstellar grains heated above
50 K
lose CO and N2 from their mantles, whereas interstellar CO2 could remain trapped. Hence, CO
and N2 are both suitable indicators of
interstellar volatiles in comets. Alternatively, if
NH3 and most hydrocarbons synthesized in the
nebula are cooled below
150 K, they will be trapped on grain
surfaces. CH4 requires much cooler temperatures
to achieve the same degree of condensation and might not condense into
comets even if it were present in the nebula. Therefore,
CH4 would not make a useful indicator of processed nebular gas in comets. One good proxy for the ratio of the
processed-to-primitive nebular gas in comets is the ratio of
C2H4 to CO, another is the
ratio of C2H6 to CO.
Hydrocarbons are synthesized primarily in the nebula and thereafter
trapped on icy grains, whereas CO is associated with grain mantles
formed within a giant molecular cloud core that had never been
sufficiently heated to permit vaporization. Using similar reasoning,
the ratio of NH3 to N2
should also be a good measure of the ratio of processed-to-primitive gas in comets. Hence, the ratio of crystalline (to total) cometary dust
will be positively correlated to ratios of
C2H4/CO,
C2H6/CO, and
NH3/N2 in cometary comae.
|
| |
Implications for Astrobiology |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prebiotic synthesis of biogenic molecules has traditionally been viewed as a planetary process. Unfortunately, the classic Miller-Urey Experiment (70, 71) requires a reducing atmosphere to efficiently synthesize amino acids and the early terrestrial atmosphere was at best just slightly oxidizing, consisting largely of N2 and CO rather than the CH4, NH3, and H2O that Urey originally hypothesized. Modern assessments are even more pessimistic for the abiotic synthesis of organic materials as CO2 may have been a major atmospheric constituent (72-74). Several workers (75, 76) pointed out that such an atmosphere makes abiotic synthesis of amino acids difficult to explain. Miller (77) asserted that although methane is the primary source of amino acid production, it can still occur when using CO and CO2. Clearly the latter are less favored than CH4 for amino acid synthesis, but may have contributed adequately. Undersea vents are now an integral part of the new Astrobiology Program. Such vents are reducing environments that might produce prebiotic organics on the primitive earth and might also exist on other planetary bodies such as Europa. However, these vents are not the only source of biogenic compounds available throughout the primitive Solar System.
Comets have been invoked as a source of organic materials needed for the evolution of life on Earth (78), and this idea has been revived recently (79). Comets are interesting because they may have delivered large volumes of water, along with the organics. Biogenic compounds like amino acids have not been identified in comets, but comets do contain simple volatile organic compounds, CH3OH, H2CO (68), C2H2 (80), C2H6 and CH4 (81), and H2CO2. Volatiles are observed in cometary comae. Laboratory experiments show that other organic compounds form from these molecules with an appropriate energy source, such as ion-bombardment or UV-irradiation. The overall suite of complex organics in comets is still unknown and may remain so until examined by a cometary lander. In situ sampling and sample return missions will be very important because large amino acids and primitive proteins are less volatile than water and would remain in the nucleus to temperatures well above 300 K.
The sources of organic materials in comets are unknown. They could represent unmelted, unprocessed ices and organic residues on presolar interstellar grains. Additional components may be low molecular weight organics synthesized in the nebula, or in higher pressure subnebulae of the giant planets. These hypotheses have been studied and both have had some success in explaining volatiles in comets (55). Gas-grain reaction experiments appropriate for such environments are in their infancy (82) and must be extended by using more realistic catalytic materials. Another new avenue for research is coupled accretion, chemistry, and dynamic evolution of planetesimals. Trapped radicals from presolar ices could react with liquid water in the interior of water-rich planetesimals subject to radioactive heating to form amino acids. Liquid water was present in many planetesimals and left an extensive record of hydrothermal alteration easily read in the meteoritic record. Water was also present on the early Earth and reaction of radicals produced via space irradiation of organics could occur following the fall of an icy planetesimal into a lake or pond.
A second aspect of this problem is the delivery of the organics,
intact, to the primitive Earth. However, meteorites deliver a
considerable quantity of organic material to the modern Earth each
year. Some very fragile meteorites have survived passage through the
atmosphere, as have meteorites containing a significant (>10%) mass
of organics (83). Fragile organic components are preserved within the
frozen bolide because of the inefficient transfer of thermal energy to
the interior and heat dissipation by sublimation of its outer layers.
If cometary ices are at least as coherent as the more fragile
meteoritic specimens found in our museums, and if entry heating ablates
the surface rather than conducting heat into the interior, then solid
pieces of cometary ice could fall into primitive lakes or oceans.
Recent studies (44, 84, 
) have shown that
significant fractions of amino acids in icy impactors survive to
planetary surfaces. Infalling material could have had a considerable
effect on the organic chemistry of the early oceans, as some models
predict that a significant fraction of the Earth's oceans were
acquired from c-type asteroids and comets (79).
Though comets do contain volatile organic compounds, their overall complement of organics is completely unknown. Even the volatile compounds detected by ground-based observational studies are not easily predictable by standard models of nebular chemistry (55). Most models invoke a combination of nebular processing and chemistry in the higher temperature-pressure environments of Giant Gaseous Protoplanets to explain observed ratios of reduced/oxidized cometary molecules (e.g., NH3/N2 or CnH2n+2/CO). Studies of catalytic activity on interstellar grain surfaces or on grains formed in situ are just beginning (62, 82, **). Much more work is needed to extend the work of Anders on Fischer-Tropsch-type reactions in the nebula (60).
Understanding the dynamic conditions in the Solar Nebula is key to successful prediction of the material found in comets. If gas and grains formed in cold molecular clouds take a one-way trip into the sun then comets will be dominated by interstellar species sparsely leavened with molecules that formed in Giant Gaseous Protoplanets. If there is large-scale circulation bringing processed dust and gas from the inner nebula back out into the region of comet formation, then the composition of comets will be determined by a chemical-kinetic reaction network closely coupled to the dynamic transport of dust and gas in the system (85). It is impossible to predict the output of this chemical reaction network without a comprehensive understanding of the dynamics of the nebula. Unfortunately, current models of protostellar nebulae are far from ready to supply the detailed environmental and dynamic parameters needed to construct a complete model. Without such a model, understanding chemical evolution leading to the origin of life on Earth and in the Solar System is an unconstrained problem with little prospect for a unique solution. As such, it is imperative that detailed models of the dynamics of protostellar nebulae and appropriate observational programs to test and constrain them must be accorded high priority by astrobiologists.
| |
Acknowledgements |
|---|
H.G.M.H. was supported by the National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council Resident Research Associateship Program. C.A.G. was supported by National Aeronautics and Space Administration Guaranteed Time Observer funding to the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrometer Science Team through the HST Project at Goddard Space Flight Center, and through the National Optical Astronomy Observatories. The National Optical Astronomy Observatories are operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.
| |
Abbreviation |
|---|
AU, astronomical unit.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
To whom reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail:
hill{at}lepvax.gsfc.nasa.gov.
Nuth, J. A., Lunar and Planetary
Science Conference, March 15-19, 1999, Houston, TX, abstr.
** Fegley, B. (1998) Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 30, 1092 (abstr.).

Pierazzo, E. & Chyba, C. F. Lunar and
Planetary Science Conference, March 15-19, 1999, Houston, TX, abstr.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Mannings, V. , Koerner, D. W. & Sargent, A. I. (1997) Nature (London) 388, 555-557[CrossRef][Medline] . |
| 2. | Mannings, V. & Sargent, A. I. (1997a) Astrophys. J. 490, 792-802[CrossRef]. |
| 3. | Mannings, V. & Sargent, A. I. (2000) Astrophys. J. 529, 391-401[CrossRef]. |
| 4. | Holland, W. S. , Greaves, J. S. , Zuckerman, B. , Webb, R. A. , McCarthy, C. , Coulson, I. M. , Walther, D. M. , Dent, W. R. F. , Gear, W. K. & Robson, I. (1998) Nature (London) 392, 788-790[CrossRef]. |
| 5. | Strom, S. E. , Edwards, S. & Skrutskie, M. F. (1993) in Protostars and Planets III, eds. Levy, E. H., Lunine, J. I. & Matthews, M. S. (Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ), pp. 837-866. |
| 6. | Habing, H. J. , Dominik, C. , Jourdain de Muizon, M. , Kessler, M. F. , Laureijs, R. J. , Leech, K. , Metcalfe, L. , Salama, A. , Siebenmorgen, R. & Trams, N. (1999) Nature (London) 401, 456-458[CrossRef]. |
| 7. | Crifo, F. , Vidal-Madjar, A. , Lallement, R. , Ferlet, R. & Gerbaldi, M. (1997) Astron. Astrophys. 320, L29-L32[ISI]. |
| 8. |
Smith, B. A.
& Terrile, R. J.
(1984)
Science
226,
1421-1424 |
| 9. | Barrado y Navascués, D. , Stauffer, J. R. , Song, I. & Caillault, J. P. (1999) Astrophys. J. 520, L123-L126[CrossRef][ISI]. |
| 10. | Norman, C. A. & Paresce, F. (1989) in The Formation and Evolution of Planetary Systems, eds. Weaver, H. A. & Danly, L. (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York), pp. 151-169. |
| 11. | Kondo, Y. & Bruhweiler, F. C. (1985) Astrophys. J. 291, L1-L5. |
| 12. | Hobbs, L. M. (1987) Astrophys. J. 308, 854-858[CrossRef]. |
| 13. | Ferlet, R. , Vidal-Madjar, A. & Hobbs, L. M. (1987) Astron. Astrophys. 185, 267-270. |
| 14. | Beust, H. , Lagrange-Henri, A. M. , Vidal-Madjar, A. & Ferlet, R. (1989) Astron. Astrophys. 223, 304-312. |
| 15. | Beust, H. , Lagrange, A.-M. , Plazy, F. & Mouillet, D. (1996) Astron. Astrophys. 310, 181-198. |
| 16. | Grady, C. A. , Sitko, M. L. , Russell, R. W. , Lynch, D. K. , Hanner, M. S. , Perez, M. R. , Bjorkman, K. S. & de Winter, D. (2000) in Protostars and Planets IV, eds. Mannings, V., Boss, A. P. & Russell, S. S. (Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ), pp. 613-638. |
| 17. | Grady, C. A. , Perez, M. R. , Talavera, A. , Bjorkman, K. S. , de Winter, D. , The, P.-S. , Molster, F. J. , van den Ancker, M. E. , Sitko, M. L. , Morrison, N. D. , et al. (1996) Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 120, 157-177. |
| 18. | Grady, C. A., Mora, A. & de Winter, D. (2000) Astron. Soc. Pac. Conf. Ser., in press. |
| 19. | Palla, F. & Stahler, S. W. (1993) Astrophys. J. 418, 414-425[CrossRef]. |
| 20. | van den Ancker, M. E. , Thé, P. S. , Tjin, A. , Djie, H. R. E. , Catala, C. , de Winter, D. , Blondel, P. F. C. & Waters, L. B. F. M. (1997) Astron. Astrophys. 324, L33-L36. |
| 21. | Natta, A. , Grinin, V. P. & Tambovtseva, L. V. (2000) Astrophys. J. 542, 421-427[CrossRef]. |
| 22. | Grady, C. A. , Sitko, M. L. , Bjorkman, K. S. , Perez, M. R. , Lynch, D. K. , Russell, R. W. & Hanner, M. S. (1997) Astrophys. J. 483, 449-456[CrossRef]. |
| 23. | Finkenzeller, U. & Mundt, R. (1984) Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 55, 109-141. |
| 24. | Reipurth, B. , Pedrosa, A. & Lago, M. T. V. T. (1996) Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 120, 229-256. |
| 25. | Hamann, F. C. & Persson, S. E. (1992) Astrophys. J. Suppl. 82, 285-309[CrossRef]. |
| 26. | Catala, C. , Simon, T. , Praderie, F. , Talavera, A. , The, P. S. , Tjin, A. & Djie, H. R. E. (1989) Astron. Astrophys. 221, 273-286. |
| 27. | Devine, D. , Grady, C. A. , Kimble, R. A. , Woodgate, B. , Bruhweiler, F. C. , Boggess, A. , Linsky, J. L. & Clampin, M. (2000) Astrophys. J. 542, L115-L118. |
| 28. | Waters, L. B. F. M. , Molster, F. J. , de Jong, T. , Beintema, D. A. , Waelkins, C. , Boogert, A. C. A. , Boxhoorn, D. R. , de Graauw, T. , Drapatz, S. , Feuchtgruber, H. , et al. (1996) Astron. Astrophys. 315, L361-L364[ISI]. |
| 29. | Waelkens, C. , Waters, L. B. F. M. , de Graauw, M. S. , Huygen, E. , Malfait, K. , Plets, H. , Vandenbussche, B. , Beintena, D. A. , Boxhoorn, D. R. , Habing, H. J. , et al. (1996) Astron. Astrophys. 315, L245-L248[ISI]. |
| 30. | Jones, A. P. , Tielens, A. G. G. M. , Hollenback, D. J. & McKee, C. F. (1994) Astrophys. J. 433, 797-810[CrossRef]. |
| 31. | Jones, A. P. , Tielens, A. G. G. M. & Hollenback, D. J. (1996) Astrophys. J. 469, 740-764[CrossRef]. |
| 32. |
Bradley, J. P.
(1994)
Science
265,
925-929 |
| 33. | Bradley, J. P. , Keller, L. P. , Flynn, G. J. & Sitko, M. L. (2000) Astron. Soc. Pac. Conf. Ser. 196, 119-125. |
| 34. | Waelkens, C. , Malfait, K. & Waters, L. B. F. M. (1997) Astrophys. Space Sci. 255, 25-33[CrossRef]. |
| 35. | Waters, L. B. F. M. , Molster, F. J. , Hony, S. , Kemper, F. , Yamamura, I. , de Jong, T. , Tielens, A. G. G. M. & Waelkens, C. (2000) Astron. Soc. Pac. Conf. Ser. 196, 3-14. |
| 36. | Malfait, K. , Waelkens, C. , Waters, L. B. F. M. , Vandenbussche, B. , Huygen, E. & de Graauw, M. S. (1998) Astron. Astrophys. 332, L25-L28[ISI]. |
| 37. | Sitko, M. L. , Grady, C. A. , Lynch, D. K. , Russell, R. W. & Hanner, M. S. (1999) Astrophys. J. 510, 408-412[CrossRef]. |
| 38. | van den Ancker, M. E. , Bouwman, J. , Wesselius, P. R. , Waters, L. B. F. M. , Dougherty, S. M. & van Dishoeck, E. F. (2000) Astron. Astrophys. 357, 325-329. |
| 39. | Bouwman, J. , de Koter, A. , van den Ancker, M. E. & Waters, L. B. F. M. (2000) Astron. Astrophys. 360, 213-226. |
| 40. | Meeus, G. , Bouwman, J. , Waters, L. B. F. M. , van den Ancker, M. E. , Waelkens, C. & Malfait, K. (2000) Astron. Astrophys. (in press). |
| 41. | Wooden, D. H. , Harker, D. E. & Woodward, C. E. (2000) Astron. Soc. Pac. Conf. Ser. 196, 99-108. |
| 42. | Siebenmorgen, R. , Prusti, T. , Natta, A. & Müller, T. G. (2000) Astron. Astrophys. 361, 258-264. |
| 43. | Sylvester, R. J. , Skinner, C. J. , Barlow, M. J. & Mannings, V. (1996) MNRAS 279, 915-939. |
| 44. | Pierazzo, E. & Melosh, H. J. (2000) Meteoritics Planet. Sci. 35, 117-130. |
| 45. | Molster, F. J. , Yamamura, I. , Waters, L. B. F. M. , Tielens, A. G. G. M. , de Graauw, Th , de Jong, T. , de Koter, A. , Malfait, K. , van der Ancker, M. E. , Van Winckel, H. , et al. (1999) Nature (London) 401, 563-565[CrossRef][Medline] . |
| 46. | Hallenbeck, S. L. , Nuth, J. A. & Dankantas, P. L. (1998) Icarus 131, 198-209[CrossRef]. |
| 47. | Hallenbeck, S. L. , Nuth, J. A. & Nelson, R. N. (2000) Astrophys. J. 535, 247-255[CrossRef]. |
| 48. | Knacke, R. F. , Fajardo-Acosta, S. B. , Telesco, C. M. , Hackwell, J. A. , Lynch, D. K. & Russell, R. W. (1993) Astrophys. J. 418, 440-450[CrossRef]. |
| 49. | Pantin, E. , Waelkens, C. & Malfait, K. (1999) in The Universe as Seen By ISO, eds. Cox, P. & Kessler, M. F. (European Space Agency Special Publication 427), pp. 385-388. |
| 50. | Hanner, M. , Lynch, D. K. & Russell, R. W. (1994) Astrophys. J. 425, 274-285[CrossRef]. |
| 51. | Woolum, D. S. & Cassen, P. (1999) Meteoritics Planet. Sci. 34, 897-907. |
| 52. | Grossman, L. (1972) Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 36, 597-619. |
| 53. | Morfill, G. E. , Tscharnuter, W. & Volk, H. J. (1985) in Protostars and Planets II, eds. Black, D. C. & Matthews, M. S. (Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ), pp. 493-533. |
| 54. | Prinn, R. G. & Fegley, B. (1989) in Origin and Evolution of Planetary and Satellite Atmospheres, eds. Atreya, S. K., Pollock, J. B. & Matthews, M. S. (Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ), pp. 78-136. |
| 55. | Fegley, B. (1993) in The Chemistry of Life's Origins, eds. Greenberg, J. M., Mendoza-Gomez, C. X. & Pirronello, V. (Kluwer, Boston), pp. 75-147. |
| 56. | Shu, F. , Najita, J. , Galli, D. , Ostriker, E. , Wilken, F. , Ruden, S. & Lizano, S. (1994) Astrophys. J. 429, 781-796[CrossRef]. |
| 57. | Shu, F. H. , Shang, H. & Lee, T. (1996) Science 271, 1545-1552[Abstract]. |
| 58. | Fegley, B. (1999) Space Sci. Rev. 90, 239-252[CrossRef]. |
| 59. | Fegley, B. (2000) Space Sci. Rev. 92, 177-200. |
| 60. | Hayatsu, R. & Anders, E. (1981) Top. Curr. Chem. 99, 1-39[ISI]. |
| 61. | Fegley, B. & Hong, Y. (1998) Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 79, S361-S362. |
| 62. | Prinn, R. G. (1990) Astrophys. J. 348, 725-729[CrossRef]. |
| 63. | Stevenson, D. J. (1990) Astrophys. J. 348, 730-737[CrossRef]. |
| 64. | Weidenschilling, S. J. (1997) Icarus 127, 290-306[CrossRef][ISI]. |
| 65. | Hanner, M. H. (1999) Space Sci. Rev. 90, 99-108[CrossRef]. |
| 66. | A'Hearn, M. F. , Millis, R. L. , Schleicher, D. G. , Osip, D. J. & Birth, P. V. (1995) Icarus 118, 223-270[CrossRef][ISI]. |
| 67. | Mumma, M. , Weissman, P. & Stern, S. A. (1993) Protostars and Planets III (Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ), pp. 1177-1252. |
| 68. | Brown, G. N. & Ziegler, W. T. (1980) in Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, eds. Timmerhaus, K. D. & Snyder, H. A. (Plenum, New York), Vol. 25, pp. 662-670. |
| 69. | Lide, D. R., ed. (1994) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (CRC, Boca Raton, FL), pp. 66-76. |
| 70. |
Miller, S. L.
(1953)
Science
117,
528-529 |
| 71. |
Miller, S. L.
& Urey, H. C.
(1959)
Science
130,
245-251 |
| 72. | Walker, J. C. G. (1976) in The Early History of the Earth, ed. Windley, B. F. (Wiley, New York), pp. 537-546. |
| 73. | Levine, J. S. (1982) J. Mol. Evol. 18, 161-172[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 74. | Levine, J. S. (1985) in Photochemistry of Atmospheres, ed. Levine, J. S. (Academic, Orlando, FL), pp. 3-37. |
| 75. | Chameides, W. L. & Walker, J. C. G. (1981) Origins of Life 11, 291-302[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 76. | Schlesinger, G. & Miller, S. L. (1983) J. Mol. Evol. 19, 383-390[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 77. | Miller, S. L. (1992) in Major Events in the History of Life, ed. Schopf, J. W. (Jones & Bartlett, Boston). |
| 78. | Oro, J. (1961) Nature (London) 190, 389-390. |
| 79. |
Chyba, D. F.
, Thomas, P. J.
, Brookshaw, L.
& Sagan, C.
(1990)
Science
249,
366-373 |
| 80. | Brooke, T. Y. , Tokunaga, A. T. , Weaver, H. A. , Crovisier, J. , Bockelee-Morvan, D. & Crisp, D. (1996) Nature (London) 383, 606-608[CrossRef][Medline] . |
| 81. | Mumma, M. J. , DiSanti, M. A. , Dello Russo, N. , Fomenkova, M. , Magee-Sauer, K. , Kaminski, C. D. & Xie, D. X. (1996) Science 272, 1310-1314[Abstract]. |
| 82. | Ferrante, R. F. , Moore, M. H. , Nuth, J. A. & Smith, T. (2000) Icarus 145, 297-300[CrossRef]. |
| 83. | Cronin, J. R. & Chang, S. (1993) in The Chemistry of Life's Origins, eds. Greenberg, J. M., Mendoza-Gomez, C. X. & Pirronello, V. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), pp. 209-258. |
| 84. | Pierazzo, E. & Chyba, C. F. (1999) Meteoritics Planet. Sci. 34, 909-918. |
| 85. | Nuth, J. A. , Hill, H. G. M. & Kletetschka, G. (2000) Nature (London) 406, 275-276[CrossRef][Medline] . |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||