Previous Article |
Table of Contents
| Next Article
Department of Neuroscience, Tufts University, School of Medicine,
Boston, MA 02111
Ten or twenty years ago,
glial cells were considered minor players in the nervous system, even
though they outnumber neurons 10-fold. Glia were thought to function as
passive support cells, bringing nutrients to and removing wastes from
the neurons, whereas the latter carried out the critical nervous system
functions of information processing, plasticity, learning, and memory.
Recent studies, reviewed here, are changing this view and demonstrating that glial cells play a key role in these essential brain functions [Sharma and Vijayaraghavan (1) and Ullian et al.
(2)].
A diversity of glial cell types is expressed in the central nervous
system (CNS), each with distinct functions. Oligodendrocytes form
myelin, the tight wrappings of lipid-rich membrane layers that coat
nerve cell axons, serving as electrical insulation that speeds up the
propagation of action potentials down the long nerve cell process.
Astrocytes ensheath synapses, the specialized intercellular contact
sites that function in the rapid transfer of information from neurons
to their target cells. The function of astrocytes is largely undefined.
Many reports show that astrocytes express ion channels, both
ligand-gated and voltage-dependent (3), and are proposed to have the
general function of clearing neurotransmitters and ions away from the
synapse (4). However, recent groundbreaking studies of the identity and
function of ion channels on astrocytes suggest that these cells have a
more direct and active role in synapse function.
One such study by Sharma and Vijayaraghavan (1) shows that astrocytes
share many excitable properties with neurons, but there are also some
interesting differences. This report shows that hippocampal astrocytes
in vitro express functional neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine
receptors (nAChRs). The nAChRs are the highly
Ca2+ permeable The key question is: What is the functional significance of receptor
activation and increases in intracellular Ca2+
levels in these nonneuronal cells? Recent innovative studies, including
one by Parpura and Haydon (8), have shown that activation of functional
glutamate receptors on astrocytes produces an increase in
intracellular Ca2+ levels and the
Ca2+-dependent release of glutamate, the major
excitatory neurotransmitter in the vertebrate CNS (9) (see Fig.
1). The glial-released glutamate
activates neighboring neurons in culture. In this way, astrocytes
enhance interneuronal synaptic transmission. Such astrocyte responses
can be initiated by neurotransmitter released from the neuronal
presynaptic terminal (10). Altogether, these studies demonstrate that
there is activity-dependent rapid intercellular signaling between
astrocytes and neurons (at least in vitro) and that this
signaling modulates interneuronal synaptic activity. The work of Sharma
and Vijayaraghavan extends this field by adding nAChRs to the
repertoire of astrocyte receptors that increase intracellular
Ca2+. In fact, many receptor types are expressed
on astrocytes, including opioid, dopamine, GABAA,
glycine, serotonin,
Commentary
New functions for glia in the brain
![]()
Article
Top
Article
References
7 subtype that are widely
expressed in the vertebrate brain (5). Sharma and Vijayaraghavan (1)
demonstrate that activation of these receptors produces rapid
excitatory inward currents and an increase in intracellular
Ca2+ in the astrocytes. Interestingly, the study
shows two differences between
7-nAChRs on astrocytes and neurons.
First, the density of the functional receptors is an order of magnitude
lower on astrocytes. Second, different calcium signaling mechanisms are used by the receptors on the two cell types. In astrocytes,
7-nAChR activation induces a rapid and large increase in intracellular Ca2+ levels by receptor-mediated
Ca2+ influx that is amplified by the entering
Ca2+ triggering Ca2+
release from caffeine-sensitive internal stores. In contrast, the
increase in internal Ca2+ concentration in
neurons upon
7-nAChR activation is largely because of influx through
voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Blocking the
voltage-gated Ca2+ channels has no effect on
Ca2+ influx in astrocytes (1). As
7-nAChR
current density is relatively low on astrocytes and these receptors
desensitize rapidly, the functional coupling of receptor activation to
Ca2+-induced Ca2+-release
channels may be critical to achieve physiologically significant changes
in intracellular Ca2+ levels in these nonneuronal
cells. As the Sharma and Vijayaraghavan study focuses on astrocytes
in vitro where nAChRs are activated by bath-applied ligand,
it is important to show that in vivo astrocytes respond to
ACh. It will be especially interesting to establish the physiological
conditions that induce nAChR activation on astrocytes as well as nAChR
levels and spatial distribution in vivo, particularly in
relation to the synapse, because the presynaptic terminal is a
potential endogenous source of the neurotransmitter that
activates receptors on nonneuronal cells. It is intriguing to consider
that nAChRs on astrocytes may contribute to the wide-ranging
cholinergic receptor functions in the brain. These functions include
excitatory synaptic transmission between specific neurons, modulating
neurotransmitter release from presynaptic terminals, reinforcing
nicotine addiction, and increasing attention, arousal, and short-term
memory formation (6, 7).
-adrenergic, and purinergic receptors (11).
Important recent studies further show that astrocyte-neuron
intercellular signaling likely occurs in situ. In the
acutely isolated retina and hippocampal slice, activation of astrocytes
elevates internal Ca2+ levels, resulting in
transmitter release and the modulation of electrical activity in the
adjacent neurons (12-15). Overall, these studies suggest that
astrocyte-neuron intercellular signaling is widespread throughout the
CNS and that astrocytes play an important active role in modulating
synaptic communication between neurons.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Schematic of astrocyte-neuron intercellular signaling. Action
potential firing in the neuron (1) induces neurotransmitter release
from the presynaptic terminal (2), receptor activation on adjacent
astrocytes (3), increases in intracellular Ca2+ (4),
Ca2+-dependent neurotransmitter release from the astrocytes
(5), and the activation of neighboring neurons and potentiation of
interneuronal synaptic transmission (6). In addition, astrocyte-derived
soluble neurotrophic factors (red arrow) are also likely to effect CNS
synapse function. R, neurotransmitter receptor.
The new study by Ullian, Barres, and colleagues (2) demonstrates
another exciting unexpected glial cell function
astrocytes profoundly
increase synapse number and are required for their maintenance in
vitro. This effect is likely related, at least in part, to the
capability of astrocytes to increase synaptic activity, as described
above. Earlier attempts to determine the effects of glia on central
synapses were hindered because most CNS neurons require glia for
survival in vitro. To circumvent this experimental obstacle,
the Barres lab developed a means of maintaining a purified pool of
rodent retinal ganglion cells in culture. By adding glia back to the
cultures, Pfrieger and Barres (16) demonstrated for the first time the
surprising result that astrocytes increase the number and efficacy of
CNS neuron synapses. The new study (2) extends these results by showing
that astrocytes increase by 7-fold the number of synapses on each
neuron and enhance synaptic efficacy by altering both presynaptic and
postsynaptic functions. Interestingly, the numerous indices used to
assess pre- and postsynaptic functions (including whole-cell
patch-clamp recording, quantal analyses, and FM1-43 imaging of
synaptic vesicle recycling) all showed quantitatively similar 7-fold
increases. The astrocyte-induced increases in synapse formation and
function are not because of increased neuron survival or maturation.
Instead, the data suggest that there is an astrocyte-dependent
reorganization of existing pre- and postsynaptic proteins to produce
new synapses. Moreover, the neurons require the continued presence of
the astrocytes for synapse maintenance, as glial removal causes a
4-fold reduction in synapse number. Altogether, the Barres lab studies
define a novel and important function for astrocytes to induce and
stabilize CNS synapses.
Determining whether astrocytes play a similar role in vivo and identifying the molecular mechanisms that underlie the astrocyte-induced alterations in neurons are important issues to resolve. Preliminary studies from the Barres lab have already begun to address such questions. Their results show that during normal development, most retinal ganglion cells have extended their axons into the superior colliculus target field by embryonic day 16, but their synapse formation is largely delayed until astrocytes appear, around postnatal day 7 (2). Direct astrocyte-neuron contact is likely not required for the potentiating effects of astrocytes, because medium "conditioned" by astrocytes in culture is capable of promoting synapse formation by retinal ganglion cells (2, 16). Soluble neurotrophic factors have previously been shown to enhance pre- and postsynaptic differentiation, synaptic efficacy, and ion channel function (17, 18). Although preliminary attempts to identify specific glial-derived neurotrophic factors responsible for the action of astrocytes on ganglion cell synapses have yet to strike gold (16), the involvement of such a signaling molecule is considered likely (see Fig. 1). In addition, the excitable properties of astrocytes may also contribute to their effects on synapse number and function. Astrocytes respond to and release neurotransmitter rapidly and cause increases in neuron excitation and synaptic transmission, as described above. Precedence shows that increased synaptic activity can cause long-term increases in synapse number and strength, forming the basis of the Hebbian model of the synaptic plasticity that underlies learning and memory (19). Thus, multiple astrocyte-derived signals are likely to mediate the enhancement of CNS synapse formation and function.
The field of glial cell biology is advancing rapidly. The innovative work reviewed here demonstrates unexpected functions of glia that go well beyond the "supporting role" in which they were cast historically. It is now clear that detailed knowledge of the conversation between astrocytes and neurons will be essential for understanding the development of the nervous system and its response during learning, struggles with injury, and changes with aging.
| |
Acknowledgements |
|---|
We thank Brian Williams for preparation of the figure and Dr. Kathleen Dunlap for critical reading of the manuscript. Work in our laboratory is supported by National Institutes of Health Grant NS 21725.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
See companion article on page 4148.
* To whom reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: michele.jacob{at}tufts.edu.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Sharma, G.
& Vijayaraghavan, S.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98,
4148-4153 |
| 2. |
Ullian, E. M.
, Sapperstein, S. K.
, Christopherson, K. S.
& Barres, B. A.
(2001)
Science
291,
657-661 |
| 3. | Porter, J. T. & McCarthy, K. D. (1997) Prog. Neurobiol. 51, 439-455[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 4. |
Henn, F. A.
& Hamberger, A.
(1971)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
68,
2686-2690 |
| 5. | Role, L. W. & Berg, D. K. (1996) Neuron 16, 1077-1085[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 6. | Lena, C. & Changeux, J. P. (1997) Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7, 674-682[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 7. | MacDermott, A. B. , Role, L. W. & Siegelbaum, S. A. (1999) Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 22, 443-485[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 8. |
Parpura, V.
& Haydon, P. G.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97,
8629-8634 |
| 9. | Araque, A. , Parpura, V. , Sanzgiri, R. P. & Haydon, P. G. (1999) Trends Neurosci. 22, 208-215[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 10. | Dani, J. W. & Smith, S. J. (1995) Ciba Found. Symp. 188, 195-205[Medline] . |
| 11. | Verkhratsky, A. & Steinhauser, C. (2000) Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 32, 380-412[CrossRef][Medline] . |
| 12. | Pasti, L. , Volterra, A. , Pozzan, T. & Carmignoto, G. (1999) J. Neurosci. 15, 7817-7830. |
| 13. | Bezzi, P. , Carmignoto, G. , Pasti, L. , Vesce, S. , Rossi, D. , Rizzini, B. L. , Pozzan, T. & Volterra, A. (1998) Nature (London) 15, 281-285. |
| 14. | Kang, J. , Jiang, L. , Goldman, S. A. & Nedergaard, M. (1998) Nat. Neurosci. 1, 683-692[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 15. |
Newman, E. A.
& Zahs, K. R.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
4022-4028 |
| 16. |
Pfrieger, F. W.
& Barres, B. A.
(1997)
Science
277,
1684-1687 |
| 17. |
Vicario-Abejon, C.
, Collin, C.
, McKay, R. D.
& Segal, M.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
7256-7271 |
| 18. |
Blondel, O.
, Collin, C.
, McCarran, W. J.
, Zhu, S.
, Zamostiano, R.
, Gozes, I.
, Brenneman, D. E.
& McKay, R. D.
(2000)
J. Neurosci.
20,
8012-8020 |
| 19. | Hebb, D. O. (1949) The Organization of Behaviour (Wiley, New York). |
Companion article to this Commentary:
This article has been cited by other articles in HighWire Press-hosted journals:
![]() |
C. Zhang and D. R. Harder Cerebral Capillary Endothelial Cell Mitogenesis and Morphogenesis Induced by Astrocytic Epoxyeicosatrienoic Acid Stroke, December 1, 2002; 33(12): 2957 - 2964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||