Previous Article |
Table of Contents
| Next Article
Edited by Robert W. Mahley, The J. David Gladstone Institutes,
San Francisco, CA, and approved April 5, 2002 (received for review January 31, 2002)
The nuclear receptors LXR Recent work has
identified the nuclear receptors LXR In the liver, LXRs seem to regulate both cholesterol and fatty
acid metabolism. Mice carrying a targeted disruption of the Lxr The ability of LXR-signaling pathways to have an impact on
multiple aspects of systemic lipid metabolism makes the long-term effects of synthetic LXR agonists difficult to predict. On the one
hand, the promotion of reverse cholesterol transport and inhibition of
intestinal cholesterol absorption would be expected to reduce atherosclerotic risk. On the other hand, elevation of plasma
triglyceride levels would be expected to have unfavorable effects on
the development of metabolic disease. Indeed, significant controversy
exists as to whether LXR agonists or antagonists would be the more
useful agents for the modulation of human lipid metabolism (6, 8, 12).
In the present study, we have analyzed the effect of a synthetic LXR
ligand in two different murine models of atherosclerosis. Chronic
administration of GW3965 significantly reduced atherosclerosis in both
LDLR Cell Culture and RNA Analysis.
Peritoneal macrophages were obtained from thioglycolate-injected
mice as described (9) and cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS. For
ligand treatments, cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 5%
lipoprotein-deficient serum (Intracel, Frederick, MD) and ligand
for 48 h. In some experiments, cells were preloaded with 50 µg/ml protein AcLDL (Intracel) for 24 h. Total RNA was isolated by using Trizol (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD). Northern analysis was performed as described (18) by using radiolabeled cDNA
probes. Real-time quantitative PCR assays were performed by using an
Applied Biosystems 7700 sequence detector as in ref. 19. In brief, 1 µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed with random hexamers by using
Taqman Reverse Transcription Reagents Kit (Applied Biosystems). Each
amplification mixture (50 µl) contained 50 ng cDNA, 900 nM forward
primer, 900 nM reverse primer, 100 nM fluorogenic probe (Applied
Biosystems), and 25 µl of Universal PCR Master Mix. Samples were
analyzed for 36B4 or 18S rRNA expression in parallel in the same run.
Quantitative expression values were extrapolated from separate standard
curves for controls and unknowns generated with 10-fold dilutions of
cDNA. Assays were performed in duplicate. Primer and probe sequences
are available on request.
Animals and Diets.
LDLR knockout mice on a C57BL/6 background were
obtained from The Jackson Laboratory and fed ad libitum a
western diet (Research Diets, D12079B; 21% fat, 1.5% cholesterol)
with or without GW3965, as indicated. ApoE knockout male
mice on a C57BL/6 background were maintained on normal chow (RM1
maintenance diet; SDS, London, U.K.). Body weight and food
intake monitored at regular intervals. Experiments were performed on
age-matched mice of 2.5-4 months of age. Where indicated, diets were
supplemented with GW3965 [EC50 190 nM on LXR Plasma Lipids.
Mice were fasted overnight and euthanized; blood was collected from the
abdominal vena cava. Aliquots of plasma were subjected to lipid
analysis by using commercially available enzymatic kits, ILab600
Clinical Chemistry Analyzer (Instrumentation Laboratory, Lexington, MA)
or by HPLC (Kroma System 2000, Bio-Tek Kontron Instruments, Winooski,
VT). Values are reported as mean ± SEM. Comparisons
between control and treated mice were made by using the Student
t test for independent samples (two-tailed) and ANOVA.
Histology and Lesion Analysis.
For en face analysis, mice were euthanized and the
aorta dissected out, opened longitudinally from heart to the iliac
arteries, and stained with Sudan IV to determine lesion area (21).
Images were captured by use of a Sony 3-CCD video camera and analyzed by a single technician who was blinded to the study protocol and used
IMAGEPRO image analysis software. The extent of lesion
formation is expressed as the percentage of the total aortic surface
area covered by lesions. Atherosclerotic lesions at the aortic valve were analyzed as described (22). The upper portion of the heart and
proximal aorta were obtained, embedded in OCT compound (Fisher, Tustin, CA), and stored at Previous work has identified LXRs as mediators of the
effects of oxysterols on ABCA1, ABCG1, and apoE expression in
macrophages. The synthetic LXR ligands T1317 and GW3965 have also been
shown to induce expression of these genes (6, 9, 10, 19). However, the
impact of LXR ligands on lipid-loaded macrophages that already contain
high levels of LXR activators has not been explored. In theory, for
synthetic agonists to exhibit utility for the promotion of cholesterol
efflux from lipid-loaded cells, they must be more efficacious than the
endogenous ligands present in such cells. As shown in Fig.
1A, GW3965 was significantly
more effective than acetylated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in
inducing ABCA1 expression in thioglycolate-elicited murine peritoneal
macrophages. Moreover, both GW3965 and the structurally unrelated
agonist T1317 were able to induce expression of the LXR target genes
ABCA1, ABCG1, and apoE further in cells that had been preloaded with acetylated LDL (Fig. 1B). This observation suggests that it
may be possible to promote LXR target gene expression and cholesterol efflux from highly lipid-loaded macrophages in the context of an
atherosclerotic lesion.
Medical Sciences
Synthetic LXR ligand inhibits the development of atherosclerosis
in mice
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,§§
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and the Departments
of * Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, ¶ Medicine,

Human Genetics, and 
Microbiology,
Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los
Angeles, CA 90095-1662;
Atherosclerosis Department,
Cardiovascular and Urology CEDD, GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage SG1
2NY, United Kingdom; and § Nuclear Receptor Discovery
Research and ** Biometabolism Research Support, GlaxoSmithKline,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3398
![]()
Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
and LXR
have been implicated
in the control of cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism in
multiple cell types. Activation of these receptors stimulates
cholesterol efflux in macrophages, promotes bile acid synthesis
in liver, and inhibits intestinal cholesterol absorption, actions that
would collectively be expected to reduce atherosclerotic risk. However, synthetic LXR ligands have also been shown to induce lipogenesis and
hypertriglyceridemia in mice, raising questions as to the net effects
of these compounds on the development of cardiovascular disease. We
demonstrate here that the nonsteroidal LXR agonist GW3965 has potent
antiatherogenic activity in two different murine models. In
LDLR
/
mice, GW3965 reduced lesion area by 53% in
males and 34% in females. A similar reduction of 47% was observed in
male apoE
/
mice. Long-term (12-week) treatment with
LXR agonist had differential effects on plasma lipid profiles in
LDLR
/
and apoE
/
mice. GW3965
induced expression of ATP-binding cassettes A1 and G1 in
modified low-density lipoprotein-loaded macrophages in
vitro as well as in the aortas of hyperlipidemic mice,
suggesting that direct actions of LXR ligands on vascular gene
expression are likely to contribute to their antiatherogenic effects.
These observations provide direct evidence for an
atheroprotective effect of LXR agonists and support their further
evaluation as potential modulators of human cardiovascular disease.
![]()
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
and LXR
as central
regulators of lipid homeostasis. The physiologic ligands for these
receptors are likely to be specific intermediates in the cholesterol
biosynthetic pathway such as 24(S),25-epoxycholesterol (1-3). LXR
is expressed primarily in liver, intestine, adipose tissue, and macrophages, whereas LXR
is expressed in many cell types
(4). In peripheral cells such as macrophages, LXRs seem to coordinate a
physiologic response to cellular cholesterol loading. LXRs directly
control transcription of several genes involved in the cholesterol
efflux pathway, including ATP-binding cassette (ABC) A1 (5-8), ABCG1
(9), and apolipoprotein E (apoE) (10). In the intestine, ligand
activation of LXR/RXR heterodimers dramatically reduces dietary
cholesterol absorption, an effect postulated to be mediated by ABCA1
(6).
gene fail to induce transcription of the gene
encoding cholesterol 7
-hydroxylase (CYP7A1) in response to dietary
cholesterol, implicating LXRs in the control of bile acid synthesis
(11). Mice lacking LXR
were also observed to be deficient in
expression of fatty acid synthase, steroyl-coA desaturase 1, acyl-coA carboxylase, and sterol regulatory element binding protein-1,
suggesting an additional role in lipogenesis. This hypothesis was
supported by the subsequent demonstration that the synthetic LXR ligand T1317 induces expression of lipogenic genes and raises plasma triglyceride levels in mice (12). The recent observation that both the
sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c and fatty acid synthase
promoters are direct targets for LXR/RXR heterodimers provides a
potential mechanism for these effects (13-15). Hepatic cholesterol
ester transfer protein and lipoprotein lipase expression are also
regulated by LXRs (16, 17).
/
mice and
apoE
/
mice, providing direct evidence for
an atheroprotective effect of LXR agonists. These observations suggest
that LXR ligands may represent promising agents for intervention in
human cardiovascular disease.
![]()
Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
(20)], at a level sufficient to provide the appropriate milligrams per
kilogram body weight (mpk) dose on consumption of a 5-g diet by a 30-g
mouse per day. Animal experiments were approved by the Institutional
Animal Care and Research Advisory Committee of the University of
California, Los Angeles.
70°C. For
LDLR
/
mice, serial 10-µm-thick
cryosections of aorta, beginning at the aortic root, were collected for
a distance of 400 µm. For apoE
/
mice,
4-µm sections were analyzed for a distance of 600 µm. Sections were
stained with Oil Red O and hematoxylin. The lipid-staining areas on 25 sections were determined in a blinded fashion by light microscopy. The
mean value of lesion area of aortic wall per section was then
calculated. Comparisons between control and treated mice were made by
using the Student t test for independent samples (two-tailed) and ANOVA. Immunohistochemical analyses of atherosclerotic lesions in the aortic root were performed as described (23). In brief,
10-µm-thick cryosections were fixed in acetone and incubated with
rabbit polyclonal antibody to mouse ABCA1 (a gift of O. Francone, Pfizer) (24), rat monoclonal antibody to mouse macrophages (MOMA-2, Accurate Chemicals), or control rabbit IgG, followed by incubation with
biotinylated anti-rabbit or antirat secondary antibodies. Signals were detected with peroxidase chromogen and alkaline
phosphatase, respectively (Vector Laboratories).
![]()
Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Synthetic LXR ligands are more efficacious than endogenous
LXR ligands in lipid-loaded macrophages. (A) Murine
thioglycolate-elicited peritoneal macrophages from C57BL/6 mice were
treated for 24 h with vehicle (DMSO), 5 µM GW3965, or 50 µg/ml protein AcLDL. (B) Peritoneal macrophages were
cultured for 24 h in the presence of 50 µg/ml AcLDL and then
treated for an additional 24 h with the indicated concentration of
GW3965 or T1317. RNA was isolated and gene expression assayed by real
time quantitative PCR. Data are presented as mRNA level relative to
vehicle control.
The influence of GW3965 on the development of atherosclerosis was
analyzed in both LDLR
/
and
apoE
/
mice. In the first study,
LDLR
/
mice of 12 weeks of age were fed an
atherogenic high-fat diet for 12 weeks. One group received high-fat
diet alone, one group received a high-fat diet containing 1 mpk GW3965,
and one group received a high-fat diet containing 10 mpk GW3965. The
10-mpk dosing regimen was determined to result in plasma drug
concentrations between 200 and 400 nM (EC50 on
LXR
= 190 nm). No difference occurred in body weight or food
consumption between groups (Table 1).
After 12 weeks, mice treated with GW3965 showed a significant decrease
in total cholesterol and unesterified cholesterol compared with
controls (Table 1). Total cholesterol was also significantly reduced in
the group receiving 1 mpk GW3965. In contrast to short-term treatment
(data not shown), plasma triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein
(HDL) cholesterol were not different from control after chronic
treatment with LXR agonist. This observation is consistent with
previous work in C57BL/6 mice showing that the marked
hypertriglyceridemia induced by LXR ligands is largely transient (15).
|
Atherosclerotic lesions in LDLR
/
mice
were quantified by en face analysis (21) of aortas after 12 weeks on a high-fat diet in the presence or absence of LXR agonist.
Quantification of Sudan IV-stained en face preparations of
aortas revealed a dose-dependent reduction in atherosclerosis in mice
treated with GW3965. In male mice, the group receiving 1 mpk GW3965
showed a slight decrease in lesion area compared with controls (25%)
that did not reach statistical significance (P < 0.28)
(Fig. 2). However, male mice receiving 10 mpk GW3965 showed a statistically significant (P < 0.01) 50% reduction in average lesion area (Figs. 2 and
3) compared with control mice. A similar
reduction of 35% was observed in female mice receiving 10 mpk GW3965
(Fig. 2, P < 0.01). To document further the effects on
atherosclerosis, aortic root sections from male
LDLR
/
mice were analyzed. Quantification of
lesions after Oil Red O staining again revealed a statistically
significant 35% reduction in lesion area in the animals treated with
10 mpk GW3965 compared with controls (P < 0.005, Fig.
4A).
|
|
|
The influence of LXR agonists on the development of atherosclerosis was
also analyzed in apoE
/
mice. In comparison
with LDLR
/
mice,
apoE
/
mice develop atherosclerosis on a
normal chow diet and have a distinct lipoprotein profile (25). The
apoE gene itself has also been an LXR target gene in
macrophages (10). Male apoE
/
mice of 12 weeks of age were maintained for 12 weeks on either normal chow diet or
normal chow diet containing 10 mpk GW3965. Plasma levels of GW3965 were
monitored throughout the study and averaged between 200 and 400 nM
(data not shown). At the end of the study, plasma total cholesterol
levels and HDL cholesterol were not different between groups (Table
2). However, very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was reduced, and triglycerides were
significantly increased. Atherosclerotic lesion area in aortic root
sections was quantitated after Oil Red O staining. As shown in Fig.
4B, apoE
/
mice receiving LXR
agonist showed a 47% reduction in lesion area (P < 0.005) compared with control mice. Thus, GW3965 inhibits the
development of atherosclerosis in two distinct murine models. These
data indicate that apoE expression is not required for the antiatherogenic effects of LXR agonists.
|
The effect of chronic LXR agonist administration on target gene
expression in liver and small intestine of
apoE
/
mice was analyzed by real-time
quantitative PCR (Taqman) assays. As shown in Fig.
5A, treatment with GW3965 led
to a significant induction in hepatic CYP7A expression in liver that
persisted after 4 weeks. Consistent with previous work, liver
expression of ABCA1 and ABCG1 was minimally affected by LXR agonist
treatment. In the intestine, strong induction of ABCA1 and ABCG1 was
observed in response to GW3965, although the magnitude of the induction seemed to decline with time (Fig. 5B). Indeed, after 12 weeks, only modest differences in target-gene expression were found
between control and treated groups. Similar declines in target-gene
expression with time were observed in C57bl/6 and
LDLR
/
mice (data not shown). These
observations suggest that tolerance or compensation may occur with
chronic GW3965 administration.
|
The marked reduction in atherosclerosis observed in mice treated
with GW3965 despite modest changes in plasma lipoprotein levels
suggests that the mechanism of this effect may involve direct effects
on cells of the artery wall in addition to effects in liver and
intestine. Although previous work has documented the expression of
ABCA1 mRNA in macrophages, expression of this protein in cells of the
artery wall has not been examined. We therefore analyzed expression of
ABCA1 protein in atherosclerotic lesions. Immunostaining of aortic root
sections from LDLR
/
mice with purified
anti-mouse ABCA1 antibody (24) revealed significant protein expression
that largely colocalized with expression of the macrophage marker
MOMA-2 (Fig. 6). In contrast, no
macrophage staining was observed with control rabbit antibody.
|
Finally, we investigated the ability of GW3965 to regulate
expression of cholesterol efflux genes in the aortas of
apoE
/
mice. As shown in Fig.
7A, treatment of
apoE
/
mice for 4 days with 10 mpk GW3965
led to an induction of ABCA1 and ABCG1 expression in the small
intestine, but had no effect on expression of LXR
itself. A
significant induction of ABCA1 and ABCG1 was also observed in the
atherosclerotic aortas of apoE
/
mice (Fig.
7B). In contrast, expression of LXR
and CD68 was not
different between control and treated mice. Thus, LXR agonist was able
to induce aortic expression of ABCA1 and ABCG1 further despite the
presence of baseline hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis. The ability of
GW3965 to induce ABCA1 expression in lipid-loaded macrophages in
vitro, the expression of LXR
and ABCA1 protein in
macrophage-derived foam cells, and the induction of ABCA1 expression in
the aortas of treated mice collectively suggest that direct effects of
LXR agonists on cells of the artery wall may contribute to their
antiatherogenic effects.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The recent characterization of LXR
and LXR
as regulators of
cholesterol absorption and reverse cholesterol transport has generated
widespread interest in the development of synthetic LXR ligands as
therapeutics. However, the observation that short-term treatment with
an LXR ligand stimulates hepatic lipogenesis and raises triglyceride
levels has raised questions as to whether LXR agonists or antagonists
might be the more useful drug. The effects of chronic LXR agonist
administration on lipid metabolism and the development of
atherosclerosis have not been addressed previously. We have shown here
that the synthetic nonsteroidal LXR agonist GW3965 inhibits the
development of atherosclerotic lesions in two distinct murine models. A
reduction in lesion area of approximately 50% was observed in both
LDLR
/
and apoE
/
male mice treated with GW3965. These observations provide direct evidence for an atheroprotective effect of LXR agonists.
The reduction in atherosclerosis observed in
LDLR
/
mice was accompanied by modest
(
20%) reductions in total cholesterol, but no significant change in
HDL levels. Although it is likely that alterations in plasma lipid
profiles may contribute to the beneficial effects of LXR agonist in
this study, the magnitude of the changes would seem to be insufficient
to explain a 50% reduction in lesions. In
apoE
/
mice, total cholesterol levels and
HDL cholesterol were unchanged, whereas triglycerides were mildly
increased. Despite this less favorable lipid profile,
apoE
/
mice also showed a substantial
reduction in atherosclerosis in response to GW3965. Although previous
work has shown that LXR ligands reduce cholesterol absorption (6), the
mechanism behind this effect is not entirely clear. Studies on ABCA1
knockout mice have reported that loss of this protein does not alter
cholesterol or bile acid excretion (26). Other studies have shown that
the lipoproteins primarily affected by loss of ABCA1 expression on Western diet are HDL and very-low-density lipoprotein (27). Thus, the
effects of LXR ligands on cholesterol absorption and lipoprotein
metabolism are likely to involve additional target genes, perhaps
including ABCG1, ABCG5, or ABCG8 (28).
Our observations suggest that direct effects of LXR ligands on
macrophages within the artery wall contribute to their anitatherogenic effects. Consistent with this hypothesis, we have shown that reduction of atherosclerosis in hyperlipidemic mice correlates with the induction
of genes involved in reverse cholesterol transport in multiple tissues.
In addition to inducing ABCA1 expression in intestine, GW3965 also
induced ABCA1 and ABCG1 expression in the atherosclerotic aortas of
apoE
/
mice. These results suggest that in
addition to altering cholesterol absorption from the diet, LXR agonists
may promote cholesterol efflux from lipid-loaded macrophages within
atherosclerotic lesions. This hypothesis is supported by data showing
that GW3965 can stimulate ABCA1 expression in macrophages preloaded
with modified LDL in vitro. The studies in apoE knockout
mice demonstrate that the ability of LXR agonists to reduce lesion
formation does not depend on their ability to regulate macrophage apoE
expression. However, recent studies indicate that LXR ligands induce
expression of multiple other apolipoproteins in macrophages that may
also function as cholesterol acceptors in the context of an
atherosclerotic lesion (A. Mak, B.A.L., S.B.J., P.T., and P. Edwards,
manuscript in preparation). Further investigation will be required to
define precisely the mechanism of action of LXR agonists on
atherosclerosis in the apoE
/
and
LDLR
/
models.
Ligands for two other nuclear receptors, PPAR
and RXR, have also
been shown to inhibit the development of atherosclerosis in
LDLR
/
and apoE
/
mice (21, 29, 30). Recent work suggests that the mechanisms of action
of PPAR
, RXR, and LXR agonists may overlap. Studies have shown that
RXR ligands are capable of activating LXR/RXR heterodimers both
in vitro and in vivo. Accordingly, RXR agonists are effective inducers of ABCA1 and ABCG1 expression in macrophages and
intestine (6, 8, 10). In addition, the LXR
gene has been shown to be
a direct transcriptional target of PPAR
. Studies suggest that
PPAR
ligands can modulate ABCA1 expression and cholesterol efflux in
macrophages indirectly by increasing LXR
expression (31, 32).
However, our results differ from previous studies with PPAR
agonists
in that atherosclerosis was reduced in both male and female mice with
GW3965. PPAR
agonists are also likely to have antiatherogenic
effects that are independent of LXR, such as the ability to improve
insulin resistance (29). Thus, it is tempting to speculate that the
combination of a PPAR
agonist and an LXR agonist may be particularly
effective in reducing the risk for atherosclerosis.
| |
Acknowledgements |
|---|
We thank Peter Edwards for discussions and Omar Francone (Pfizer) for murine ABCA1 antibody and Brenda Mueller for administrative support. P.T. is an Assistant Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the University of California, Los Angeles. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants HL 66088 (to P.T.), HL 58328 (to W.A.H.), HL30568 and HL60030 (to A.J.L.) and by Human Frontier Science Project Grant RGY-021 (to P.T.).
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
ABC, ATP-binding cassette; apoE, apolipoprotein E; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; mpk, milligrams per kilogram of body weight.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
S.B.J. and E.M. contributed equally to this work.
§§ To whom reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: ptontonoz{at}mednet.ucla.edu.
This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Janowski, B. A. , Willy, P. J. , Devi, T. R. , Falck, J. R. & Mangelsdorf, D. J. (1996) Nature (London) 383, 728-731[CrossRef][Medline] . |
| 2. |
Janowski, B. A.
, Grogan, M. J.
, Jones, S. A.
, Wisely, G. B.
, Kliewer, S. A.
, Corey, E. J.
& Mangelsdorf, D. J.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96,
266-271 |
| 3. |
Lehmann, J. M.
, Kliewer, S. A.
, Moore, L. B.
, Smith-Oliver, T. A.
, Oliver, B. B.
, Su, J. L.
, Sundseth, S. S.
, Winegar, D. A.
, Blanchard, D. E.
, Spencer, T. A.
& Willson, T. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
3137-3140 |
| 4. | Repa, J. J. & Mangelsdorf, D. J. (2000) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 16, 459-481[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 5. |
Costet, P.
, Luo, Y.
, Wang, N.
& Tall, A. R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
28240-28245 |
| 6. |
Repa, J. J.
, Turley, S. D.
, Lobaccaro, J. A.
, Medina, J.
, Li, L.
, Lustig, K.
, Shan, B.
, Heyman, R. A.
, Dietschy, J. M.
& Mangelsdorf, D. J.
(2000)
Science
289,
1524-1529 |
| 7. | Schwartz, K. , Lawn, R. M. & Wade, D. P. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 274, 794-802[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 8. |
Venkateswaran, A.
, Laffitte, B. A.
, Joseph, S. B.
, Mak, P. A.
, Wilpitz, D. C.
, Edwards, P. A.
& Tontonoz, P.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97,
12097-12102 |
| 9. |
Venkateswaran, A.
, Repa, J. J.
, Lobaccaro, J.-M. A.
, Bronson, A.
, Mangelsdorf, D. J.
& Edwards, P. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
14700-14707 |
| 10. |
Laffitte, B. A.
, Repa, J. J.
, Joseph, S. B.
, Wilpitz, D. C.
, Kast, H. R.
, Mangelsdorf, D. J.
& Tontonoz, P.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.
98,
507-512 |
| 11. | Peet, D. J. , Turley, S. D. , Ma, W. , Janowski, B. A. , Lobaccaro, J. M. , Hammer, R. E. & Mangelsdorf, D. J. (1998) Cell 93, 693-704[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 12. |
Schultz, J. R.
, Tu, H.
, Luk, A.
, Repa, J. J.
, Medina, J. C.
, Li, L.
, Schwendner, S.
, Wang, S.
, Thoolen, M.
, Mangelsdorf, D. J.
,
et al.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
2831-2838 |
| 13. |
Repa, J. J.
, Liang, G.
, Ou, J.
, Bashmakov, Y.
, Lobaccaro, J. M.
, Shimomura, I.
, Shan, B.
, Brown, M. S.
, Goldstein, J. L.
& Mangelsdorf, D. J.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
2819-2830 |
| 14. |
Yoshikawa, T.
, Shimano, H.
, Amemiya-Kudo, M.
, Yahagi, N.
, Hasty, A. H.
, Matsuzaka, T.
, Okazaki, H.
, Tamura, Y.
, Iizuka, Y.
, Ohashi, K.
,
et al.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
2991-3000 |
| 15. |
Joseph, S. B.
, Laffitte, B. A.
, Patel, P. H.
, Watson, M. A.
, Matsukuma, K. E.
, Walczak, R.
, Collins, J. L.
, Osborne, T. F.
& Tontonoz, P.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
11019-11025 |
| 16. |
Zhang, Y.
, Repa, J. J.
, Gauthier, K.
& Mangelsdorf, D. J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
43018-43024 |
| 17. | Luo, Y. & Tall, A. R. (2000) J. Clin. Invest. 105, 513-520[ISI][Medline] . |
| 18. |
Tontonoz, P.
, Hu, E.
, Graves, R. A.
, Budavari, A. I.
& Spiegelman, B. M.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
1224-1234 |
| 19. |
Laffitte, B. A.
, Joseph, S. B.
, Walczak, R.
, Pei, L.
, Wilpitz, D. C.
, Collins, J. L.
& Tontonoz, P.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
7558-7568 |
| 20. | Collins, J. L., Fivush, A. M., Watson, M. A., Galardi, C. M., Lewis, M. C., Moore, L. B., Parks, D. J., Plunket, K. D., Tippin, T. K., Morgan, D. G., et al. (2002) J. Med. Chem., in press. |
| 21. |
Collins, A. R.
, Meehan, W. P.
, Kintscher, U.
, Jackson, S.
, Wakino, S.
, Noh, G.
, Palinski, W.
, Hsueh, W. A.
& Law, R. E.
(2001)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
21,
365-371 |
| 22. | Shih, D. M. , Gu, L. , Xia, Y. R. , Navab, M. , Li, W. F. , Hama, S. , Castellani, L. W. , Furlong, C. E. , Costa, L. G. , Fogelman, A. M. & Lusis, A. J. (1998) Nature (London) 394, 284-287[CrossRef][Medline] . |
| 23. | Tontonoz, P. , Nagy, L. , Alvarez, J. G. , Thomazy, V. A. & Evans, R. M. (1998) Cell 93, 241-252[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 24. |
Bortnick, A. E.
, Rothblat, G. H.
, Stoudt, G.
, Hoppe, K. L.
, Royer, L. J.
, McNeish, J.
& Francone, O. L.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
28634-28640 |
| 25. |
Zhang, S. H.
, Reddick, R. L.
, Piedrahita, J. A.
& Maeda, N.
(1992)
Science
258,
468-471 |
| 26. | Groen, A. K. , Bloks, V. W. , Bandsma, R. H. , Ottenhoff, R. , Chimini, G. & Kuipers, F. (2001) J. Clin. Invest. 108, 843-850[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 27. |
McNeish, J.
, Aiello, R. J.
, Guyot, D.
, Turi, T.
, Gabel, C.
, Aldinger, C.
, Hoppe, K. L.
, Roach, M. L.
, Royer, L. J.
, de Wet, J.
,
et al.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97,
4245-4250 |
| 28. |
Berge, K. E.
, Tian, H.
, Graf, G. A.
, Yu, L.
, Grishin, N. V.
, Schultz, J.
, Kwiterovich, P.
, Shan, B.
, Barnes, R.
& Hobbs, H. H.
(2000)
Science
290,
1771-1775 |
| 29. | Li, A. C. , Brown, K. K. , Silvestre, M. J. , Willson, T. M. , Palinski, W. & Glass, C. K. (2000) J. Clin. Invest. 106, 523-531[ISI][Medline] . |
| 30. |
Claudel, T.
, Leibowitz, M. D.
, Fievet, C.
, Tailleux, A.
, Wagner, B.
, Repa, J. J.
, Torpier, G.
, Lobaccaro, J. M.
, Paterniti, J. R.
, Mangelsdorf, D. J.
,
et al.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98,
2610-2615 |
| 31. | Chawla, A. , Boisvert, W. A. , Lee, C. , Laffitte, B. A. , Barak, Y. , Joseph, S. B. , Liao, D. , Nagy, L. , Edwards, P. A. , Curtiss, L. K. , et al. (2001) Mol. Cell. 7, 161-171[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
| 32. | Chinetti, G. , Lestavel, S. , Bocher, V. , Remaley, A. T. , Neve, B. , Torra, I. P. , Teissier, E. , Minnich, A. , Jaye, M. , Duverger, N. , et al. (2001) Nat. Med. 7, 53-58[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] . |
This article has been cited by other articles in HighWire Press-hosted journals:
![]() |
D J Hausenloy and D M Yellon Targeting residual cardiovascular risk: raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels Heart, June 1, 2008; 94(6): 706 - 714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Zanotti, F. Poti, M. Pedrelli, E. Favari, E. Moleri, G. Franceschini, L. Calabresi, and F. Bernini The LXR agonist T0901317 promotes the reverse cholesterol transport from macrophages by increasing plasma efflux potential J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 954 - 960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wang and Y.-J. Y. Wan Nuclear Receptors and Inflammatory Diseases Experimental Biology and Medicine, May 1, 2008; 233(5): 496 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Movva and D. J. Rader Laboratory Assessment of HDL Heterogeneity and Function Clin. Chem., May 1, 2008; 54(5): 788 - 800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. P. Torra, N. Ismaili, J. E. Feig, C.-F. Xu, C. Cavasotto, R. Pancratov, I. Rogatsky, T. A. Neubert, E. A. Fisher, and M. J. Garabedian Phosphorylation of Liver X Receptor {alpha} Selectively Regulates Target Gene Expression in Macrophages Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2008; 28(8): 2626 - 2636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Smoak, J. Madenspacher, S. Jeyaseelan, B. Williams, D. Dixon, K. R. Poch, J. A. Nick, G. S. Worthen, and M. B. Fessler Effects of Liver X Receptor Agonist Treatment on Pulmonary Inflammation and Host Defense J. Immunol., March 1, 2008; 180(5): 3305 - 3312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zhu, Y. Fu, Y. Hou, N. Wang, Y. Guan, C. Tang, J. Y.-J. Shyy, and Y. Zhu Laminar Shear Stress Regulates Liver X Receptor in Vascular Endothelial Cells Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2008; 28(3): 527 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Tang, Y. Ma, L. Jia, Y. A. Ioannou, J. P. Davies, and L. Yu Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1 Is Required for an LXR Agonist to Raise Plasma HDL Cholesterol in Mice Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2008; 28(3): 448 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zhou, W. He, Z. Huang, A. M. Gotto Jr., D. P. Hajjar, and J. Han Genetic Deletion of Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor Impairs Sterol-induced Mouse Macrophage ABCA1 Expression: A NEW SREBP1-DEPENDENT MECHANISM J. Biol. Chem., January 25, 2008; 283(4): 2129 - 2138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. E. MacDonald, R. R. Singaraja, N. Bissada, P. Ruddle, R. Watts, J. M. Karasinska, W. T. Gibson, C. Fievet, J. E. Vance, B. Staels, et al. Absence of stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 ameliorates features of the metabolic syndrome in LDLR-deficient mice J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 217 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Talukdar, S. Bhatnagar, S. Dridi, and F. B. Hillgartner Chenodeoxycholic acid suppresses the activation of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase-{alpha} gene transcription by the liver X receptor agonist T0-901317 J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 2647 - 2663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Commerford, L. Vargas, S. E. Dorfman, N. Mitro, E. C. Rocheford, P. A. Mak, X. Li, P. Kennedy, T. L. Mullarkey, and E. Saez Dissection of the Insulin-Sensitizing Effect of Liver X Receptor Ligands Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2007; 21(12): 3002 - 3012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Scott The Liver X Receptor and Atherosclerosis N. Engl. J. Med., November 22, 2007; 357(21): 2195 - 2197. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Birrell, M. C. Catley, E. Hardaker, S. Wong, T. M. Willson, K. McCluskie, T. Leonard, S. N. Farrow, J. L. Collins, S. Haj-Yahia, et al. Novel Role for the Liver X Nuclear Receptor in the Suppression of Lung Inflammatory Responses J. Biol. Chem., November 2, 2007; 282(44): 31882 - 31890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |