Human centromere repositioning “in progress”
- David J. Amor*,†,
- Karen Bentley*,
- Jacinta Ryan*,†,
- Jo Perry*,
- Lee Wong*,
- Howard Slater*,†, and
- K. H. Andy Choo*,‡
- *Murdoch Children's Research Institute and Department of Paediatrics, and †Genetic Health Services Victoria, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Victoria 3052, Australia
-
Edited by Louis M. Kunkel, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (received for review December 23, 2003)
Abstract
Centromere repositioning provides a potentially powerful evolutionary force for reproductive isolation and speciation, but the underlying mechanisms remain ill-defined. An attractive model is through the simultaneous inactivation of a normal centromere and the formation of a new centromere at a hitherto noncentromeric chromosomal location with minimal detrimental effect. We report a two-generation family in which the centromeric activity of one chromosome 4 has been relocated to a euchromatic site at 4q21.3 through the epigenetic formation of a neocentromere in otherwise cytogenetically normal and mitotically stable karyotypes. Strong epigenetic inactivation of the original centromere is suggested by retention of 1.3 megabases of centromeric α-satellite DNA, absence of detectable molecular alteration in chromosome 4-centromereproximal p- and q-arm sequences, and failure of the inactive centromere to be reactivated through extensive culturing or treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A. The neocentromere binds functionally essential centromere proteins (CENP-A, CENP-C, CENP-E, CENP-I, BUB1, and HP1), although a moderate reduction in CENP-A binding and sister-chromatid cohesion compared with the typical centromeres suggests possible underlying structural/functional differences. The stable mitotic and meiotic transmissibility of this pseudodicentric-neocentric chromosome in healthy individuals and the ability of the neocentric activity to form in a euchromatic site in preference to a preexisting alphoid domain provide direct evidence for an inherent mechanism of human centromere repositioning and karyotype evolution “in progress.” We discuss the wider implication of such a mechanism for meiotic drive and the evolution of primate and other species.
Footnotes
-
↵ ‡ To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: andy.choo{at}mcri.edu.au.
-
This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.
-
Abbreviations: BAC, bacterial artificial chromosome; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; PD-NC, pseudodicentric-neocentric chromosome; PFGE, pulse-field gel electrophoresis; TSA, trichostatin A; Mb, megabase(s).
- Copyright © 2004, The National Academy of Sciences





