Previous Article |
Table of Contents
| Next Article
Vol. 96, Issue 19, 10585-10587, September 14, 1999
Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S
3G7; and Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry,
United Kingdom CV4 7AL
The Tiebout Hypothesis asserts that, when it
is efficient to have multiple jurisdictions providing local public
goods, then competition between jurisdictions for residents will lead to a near-optimal outcome. Research from cooperative game theory both
provides a foundation for the hypothesis and extends the hypothesis to
diverse situations where small groups of participants are effective.
The Tiebout Hypothesis (1) asserts that, in
economic situations where it is optimal to have many jurisdictions
offering competing packages of public goods, the movement of consumers to jurisdictions where their wants are best satisfied and competition between jurisdictions for residents will lead to near-optimal, "market-like" outcomes. A jurisdiction (or club) is a group of individuals who collectively provide public goods for themselves exclusively (the public goods are local). Tiebout also suggested that
individuals would sort into taste-homogeneous jurisdictions.
This article primarily reports on research interpreting and
extending the Tiebout Hypothesis through cooperative game theory: in
large economies with relatively small effective coalitions, there are
outcomes in the core, that is, there are feasible states of the economy
that cannot be improved upon by any coalition. (Note that a coalition
may consist of many jurisdictions.) Moreover, the core has the equal
treatment property The results apply more broadly
Perspective
Multijurisdictional economies, the Tiebout Hypothesis, and sorting
![]()
ARTICLE
outcomes in the core do not discriminate between
identical individuals, a "market-like" feature. When the effect
of an individual on others is determined by his crowding type (his
observable characteristics, including profession, appearance, age,
gender, and lifestyle), the core dictates not only that identical
individuals are treated identically but also that, in their
interactions with others, individuals with the same crowding
types are treated equally (2-4). These features all are in
stark contrast to the situation with pure public goods (such as radio
or national defense), for which relatively small jurisdictions are inefficient.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles in HighWire Press-hosted journals:
![]() |
A. Kovalenkov and M. H. Wooders An Exact Bound on Epsilon for Nonemptiness of Epsilon Cores of Games Mathematics of Operations Research, November 1, 2001; 26(4): 654 - 678. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The hard sciences PNAS, September 14, 1999; 96(19): 10549 - 10549. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||