Gaussian fluctuations and linear response in an electron transfer protein

  1. Thomas Simonson*
  1. Département de Biologie et Génomique Structurales, Institut de Génétique et Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire (CNRS), 1 Rue Laurent Fries, 67404 Illkirch–Strasbourg, France
  1. Edited by Rudolph A. Marcus, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, and approved February 26, 2002 (received for review December 10, 2001)

Abstract

In response to charge separation or transfer, polar liquids respond in a simple linear fashion. A similar linear response for proteins might be expected from the central limit theorem and is postulated in widely used theories of protein electrostatics, including the Marcus electron transfer theory and dielectric continuum theories. Although these theories are supported by a variety of experimental data, the exact validity of a linear protein dielectric response has been difficult to determine. Molecular dynamics simulations are presented that establish a linear dielectric response of both protein and surrounding solvent over the course of a biologically relevant electron transfer reaction: oxido-reduction of yeast cytochrome c in solution. Using an umbrella-sampling free energy approach with long simulations, an accurate treatment of long-range electrostatics and both classical and quantum models of the heme, good agreement is obtained with experiment for the redox potential relative to a heme–octapeptide complex. We obtain a reorganization free energy that is only half that for heme–octapeptide and is reproduced with a dielectric continuum model where the heme vicinity has a dielectric constant of only 1.1. This value implies that the contribution of protein reorganization to the electron transfer free energy barrier is reduced almost to the theoretical limit (a dielectric of one), and that the fluctuations of the electrostatic potential on the heme have a simple harmonic form, in accord with Marcus theory, even though the fluctuations of many individual protein groups (especially at the protein surface) are anharmonic.

Footnotes

  • * E-mail: simonson{at}igbmc.u-strasbg.fr.

  • This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.

  • For a single perturbing charge q at the origin, ΔH = qFormula d r, where ρ is the charge density of the system, excluding q. Integrating by parts and using divE = 4πρ gives Eq. 1. For an arbitrary perturbing charge density, viewed as a set of infinitesimal point charges, the same result follows by superposition.

  • Recent work on irreversibility in MD free energy simulations suggests that the average of a forward and backward run is a good estimator of the free energy change, and that the associated uncertainty can be much smaller than the difference between the two runs (76).

  • Abbreviations:
    MD,
    molecular dynamics;
    Cyt c,
    cytochrome c
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents