Adaptive response of Yersinia pestis to extracellular effectors of innate immunity during bubonic plague
- Florent Sebbane*,†,
- Nadine Lemaître*,‡,§,
- Daniel E. Sturdevant¶,
- Roberto Rebeil*,‖,
- Kimmo Virtaneva¶,
- Stephen F. Porcella¶, and
- B. Joseph Hinnebusch*,**
- *Laboratory of Zoonotic Pathogens and
- ¶Genomics Core Facility, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, MT 59840;
- ‡Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 801 and Faculté de Médecine Henri Warembourg, Université de Lille II, Lille F-59045, France; and
- §Institut Pasteur, Lille F-59021, France
-
Edited by John J. Mekalanos, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, and approved June 13, 2006 (received for review February 11, 2006)
-
Fig. 1.Principal component analysis of microarray data from six biological replicate samples for each of the in vitro and in vivo conditions. The first two principal components show the separation of the bubo-specific expression profile from the expression profiles in exponential and stationary-phase cultures grown at 21°C and 37°C. Ellipses encompass exponential, stationary, and rat samples.
-
Fig. 2.Differential expression in the bubo of genes implicated in the response to iron limitation (A) (9), nitrosative stress (B) (13–20), and oxidative stress (C) (22, 39). The mean fold increase or decrease in individual gene expression in the bubo compared with exponential (E) and stationary (S) phase cultures at 21°C and 37°C is indicated by the color scale bar. For the nitrosative stress gene list (B), genes specifically required for resistance to NO and GSNO or to peroxynitrite are highlighted in yellow and green, respectively. Genes highlighted in gray, along with hmp and ytfE, are predicted to be up-regulated in response to RNS by repression of the NO-sensitive negative regulator encoded by nsrR (17, 18); the other genes were shown to be up-regulated at least 2-fold in response to NO or GSNO stress in three different in vitro microarray studies (13–15). The YPO and Y numbers refer to the Y. pestis CO92 and KIM genome annotations, respectively (10, 11). ∗, not annotated in Y. pestis CO92; a, pseudogene; b, the Y. pestis response to superoxide may not occur via SoxRS regulation because no soxRS homologs were identified in the genome (10, 11).
-
Fig. 3.iNOS expression by PMNs in the bubo. Shown are sections of a bubo (A–D) or uninfected lymph node (E and F) stained to detect iNOS (A, C, and E) or PMNs (B, D, and F; yellow arrowheads). PMNs producing iNOS (dark brown) are indicated by red arrowheads. Masses of extracellular bacteria adjacent to PMNs are indicated by blue arrowheads. (Magnification: A and B, ×100; D, ×400; C, E, and F, ×600.)
-
Fig. 4.Decreased resistance of Y. pestis to RNS attenuates virulence more than decreased resistance to ROS. (A and B) Susceptibility of Y. pestis wild type (black bars), Δhmp (gray bars), and ΔsodA (white bars) to RNS and ROS in vitro (A) and to intracellular killing by macrophages (B). The mean and standard error of three experiments are shown. (C and D) Incidence of plague in rats injected intradermally with ≈150 Y. pestis wild type (black circles), Δhmp (gray circles), or ΔsodA (white circles).
Footnotes
- **To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jhinnebusch{at}niaid.nih.gov
- © 2006 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA
