Culling and cattle controls influence tuberculosis risk for badgers

  1. Rosie Woodroffe*,,,
  2. Christl A. Donnelly,§,
  3. Helen E. Jenkins§,
  4. W. Thomas Johnston§,
  5. David R. Cox,,,
  6. F. John Bourne,
  7. Chris L. Cheeseman,
  8. Richard J. Delahay,
  9. Richard S. Clifton-Hadley**,
  10. George Gettinby,††,
  11. Peter Gilks§,
  12. R. Glyn Hewinson**,
  13. John P. McInerney, and
  14. W. Ivan Morrison,‡‡
  1. *Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616;
  2. Independent Scientific Group on Cattle TB, c/o Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, 1A Page Street, London SW1P 4PQ, United Kingdom;
  3. §Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom;
  4. Nuffield College, New Road, Oxford OX1 1NF, United Kingdom;
  5. Central Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, York YO41 1LZ, United Kingdom;
  6. **Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Woodham Lane, Surrey KT15 3NB, United Kingdom;
  7. ††Department of Statistics and Modelling Science, University of Strathclyde, Richmond Street, Glasgow G1 1XH, United Kingdom; and
  8. ‡‡Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, United Kingdom
  1. Contributed by David R. Cox, July 26, 2006

Abstract

Human and livestock diseases can be difficult to control where infection persists in wildlife populations. In Britain, European badgers (Meles meles) are implicated in transmitting Mycobacterium bovis, the causative agent of bovine tuberculosis (TB), to cattle. Badger culling has therefore been a component of British TB control policy for many years. However, large-scale field trials have recently shown that badger culling has the capacity to cause both increases and decreases in cattle TB incidence. Here, we show that repeated badger culling in the same area is associated with increasing prevalence of M. bovis infection in badgers, especially where landscape features allow badgers from neighboring land to recolonize culled areas. This impact on prevalence in badgers might reduce the beneficial effects of culling on cattle TB incidence, and could contribute to the detrimental effects that have been observed. Additionally, we show that suspension of cattle TB controls during a nationwide epidemic of foot and mouth disease, which substantially delayed removal of TB-affected cattle, was associated with a widespread increase in the prevalence of M. bovis infection in badgers. This pattern suggests that infection may be transmitted from cattle to badgers, as well as vice versa. Clearly, disease control measures aimed at either host species may have unintended consequences for transmission, both within and between species. Our findings highlight the need for policymakers to consider multiple transmission routes when managing multihost pathogens.

Footnotes

  • To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: rwoodroffe{at}ucdavis.edu or david.cox{at}nuffield.oxford.ac.uk
  • Author contributions: R.W., C.A.D., D.R.C., F.J.B., C.L.C., R.S.C.-H., G.G., J.P.M., and W.I.M. designed research; R.J.D. and R.G.H. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; R.W., C.A.D., H.E.J., W.T.J., D.R.C., and P.G. analyzed data; and R.W. and C.A.D. wrote the paper.

  • Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts declared.

  • Abbreviations:
    FMD,
    foot-and-mouth disease;
    NAO,
    North Atlantic Oscillation;
    RBCT,
    Randomised Badger Culling Trial;
    TB,
    tuberculosis.
  • Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents
OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE