Distance measurements reveal a common topology of prokaryotic voltage-gated ion channels in the lipid bilayer
- Jessica Richardson*,
- Rikard Blunck*,†,
- Pinghua Ge‡,
- Paul R. Selvin‡,
- Francisco Bezanilla*,§,¶,
- Diane M. Papazian*, and
- Ana M. Correa§,¶
- Departments of §Anesthesiology and
- *Physiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095; and
- ‡Department of Physics and Biophysics Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
-
Contributed by Francisco Bezanilla, August 29, 2006
Abstract
Voltage-dependent ion channels are fundamental to the physiology of excitable cells because they underlie the generation and propagation of the action potential and excitation–contraction coupling. To understand how ion channels work, it is important to determine their structures in different conformations in a membrane environment. The validity of the crystal structure for the prokaryotic K+ channel, KVAP, has been questioned based on discrepancies with biophysical data from functional eukaryotic channels, underlining the need for independent structural data under native conditions. We investigated the structural organization of two prokaryotic voltage-gated channels, NaChBac and KVAP, in liposomes by using luminescence resonance energy transfer. We describe here a transmembrane packing representation of the voltage sensor and pore domains of the prokaryotic Na channel, NaChBac. We find that NaChBac and KVAP share a common arrangement in which the structures of the Na and K selective pores and voltage-sensor domains are conserved. The packing arrangement of the voltage-sensing region as determined by luminescence resonance energy transfer differs significantly from that of the KVAP crystal structure, but resembles that of the eukaryotic KV1.2 crystal structure. However, the voltage-sensor domain in prokaryotic channels is closer to the pore domain than in the KV1.2 structure. Our results indicate that prokaryotic and eukaryotic channels that share similar functional properties have similar helix arrangements, with differences arising likely from the later introduction of additional structural elements.
Footnotes
- ¶To whom correspondence may be sent at the present address: Institute for Molecular Pediatric Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 E-mail: fbezanilla{at}uchicago.edu or nanicorrea{at}uchicago.edu
-
Author contributions: F.B. and A.M.C. designed research; J.R. performed research; P.G., P.R.S., and F.B. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; J.R., R.B., F.B., and A.M.C. analyzed data; and J.R., D.M.P., and A.M.C. wrote the paper.
-
↵ †Present address: Département de Physique, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada H3C 3J7.
-
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Abbreviations:
- LRET,
- luminescence resonance energy transfer.
- © 2006 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA










