Blocking the apolipoprotein E/amyloid-β interaction as a potential therapeutic approach for Alzheimer's disease

  1. Martin J. Sadowski*,,,
  2. Joanna Pankiewicz*,
  3. Henrieta Scholtzova*,
  4. Pankaj D. Mehta§,
  5. Frances Prelli*,
  6. David Quartermain*, and
  7. Thomas Wisniewski*,,,§,
  1. *Departments of Neurology,
  2. Psychiatry, and
  3. Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016; and
  4. §New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, 1050 Forest Hill Road, Staten Island, NY 10314
  1. Edited by Robert W. Mahley, The J. David Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA, and approved October 18, 2006 (received for review May 22, 2006)

  1. Fig. 1.

    Aβ12-28P binds to apoE and abolishes its effect on Aβ fibrillization. (a) Shown is a solid-phase binding assay of lipidated human apoE4 isoform to Aβ1-40, Aβ12-28P, and Aβ12-28 synthesized from l-amino acids. K D values represent mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. (b) Shown is dose-dependent inhibition of the apoE4/Aβ binding by increasing concentrations of Aβ12-28. P values represent mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. (c) Thioflavin-T aggregation assay demonstrates the effect of Aβ12-28P on the apoE/Aβ interaction. Adding the human lipidated apoE4 complexes dramatically increases the amount of Aβ1-40 fibrils formed over time (P = 0.007, repeated measures ANOVA; P < 0.01 for specific post hoc comparison of Aβ1-40 + apoE4 versus Aβ1-40 alone). Preincubation of apoE with Aβ12-28P abolishes the apoE effect on Aβ1-40 aggregation (P < 0.01 and nonsignificant post hoc analysis for the specific effect of Aβ+apoE/Aβ12-28P versus Aβ + apoE and Aβ, respectively). Aβ12-28P alone has no effect on the aggregation of Aβ1-40 (nonsignificant). Aβ12-28P does not aggregate over time. (d) Shown is a lack of direct effect of Aβ12-28P on Aβ1-40 aggregation. Aβ1-40 (200 μmol/liter) was incubated in the presence of Aβ12-28P concentrations ranging from 0 to 200 μmol/liter (repeated measures ANOVA P = 0.573).


  2. Fig. 2.

    Treatment with Aβ12-28P rescues APPK670N/M671L mice from memory decline. Aβ12-28P-treated APPK670N/M671L mice performed comparably to WT, age- and sex-matched littermates on radial arm maze testing. Both groups performed statistically better than APPK670N/M671L mice treated with vehicle; ANOVA P < 0.0001, post hoc Aβ12-28P vs. WT nonsignificant, Aβ12-28P vs. vehicle P < 0.001, WT vs. vehicle P < 0.001 (n = 11 for vehicle and Aβ12-28P-treated Tg groups, n = 12 for WT).


  3. Fig. 3.

    Treatment with Aβ12-28P reduces Aβ deposition in APPK670N/M671L and APPK670N/M671L/PS1M146L mice. (a) Decrease in the total Aβ burden in the neocortex, the cingulated cortex, and the hippocampus as quantified by unbiased hierarchical sampling (n = 11; ∗, P < 0.01; ∗∗, P < 0.001). (b) Hemispheric sections from 7-month-old APPK670N/M671L/PS1M146L mice treated with vehicle (Left) and Aβ12-28P (Right) depict the difference in Aβ burden. Immunostaining was done with a mixture of 4G8 and 6E10 anti-Aβ mAbs. (c) Shown is a reduction in the fibrillar Aβ burden in Aβ12-28P-treated animals (n = 11; ∗, P < 0.05). (d) Shown is the cingulate cortex and the neocortex of 18-month-old vehicle-treated (Left) and Aβ12-28P-treated (Right) APPK670N/M671L mice stained with Thioflavin-S. There is a clearly visible reduction in the burden of parenchymal Aβ deposits (yellow arrowhead) and CAA (white arrowhead). Both types of deposits were quantified separately. (e) Shown is a decrease in the CAA burden in Aβ12-28P-treated APPK670N/M671L mice (∗, P < 0.05). (f) Shown is Perls staining of parenchymal vessels in Aβ12-28P-treated APPK670N/M671L mice, revealing a lack of microhemorrhages.


  4. Fig. 4.

    Treatment with Aβ12-28P reduces the amount of apoE present in Aβ deposits. (a) Shown is double immunofluorescent staining colocalizating apoE in Aβ deposits in the hippocampus of APPK670N/M671L mice. Only a minority of plaques were apoE-negative in both groups (see white arrowheads). (b) Shown is a reduction in the burden of apoE-positive deposits in Aβ12-28P-treated animals (∗, P < 0.01; ∗∗, P < 0.001). Values are averaged for all three areas of interest. (c) Shown is the reduction in the mean optic density (O.D.) index of apoE deposits in Aβ12-28P-treated animals (∗, P < 0.05).


  5. Fig. 5.

    Treatment with Aβ12-28P decreases the levels of total Aβ40 and Aβ42 but does not alter levels of the soluble Aβ fraction or Aβ oligomers. (a) Shown is a statistically significant decrease in the levels of FA-extracted (FAextr) Aβ40 and Aβ42 (total Aβ) in APPK670N/M671L mice (Left) and APPK670N/M671L/PS1M146L mice (Right). The level of soluble Aβ40 and Aβ42 fractions extracted with DEA (DEAextr) did not differ between groups (n = 11; ∗, P < 0.05; ns, not significant). (b) A Western blot of brain homogenates stained with A11 oligomer-specific polyclonal antibody. The density and thickness of oligomer bands did not differ between vehicle-and Aβ12-28P-treated 18-month-old APPK670N/M671L mice. No oligomers were detected in age-matched WT littermates. (c) The densitometric analysis of oligomer-specific bands. There is no significant difference between Aβ12-28P- and vehicle-treated groups in either Tg model.


Footnotes

  • To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: sadowm01{at}med.nyu.edu or thomas.wisniewski{at}med.nyu.edu
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents
OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE