Structural insights into the bactericidal mechanism of human peptidoglycan recognition proteins

  1. Sangwoo Cho*,
  2. Qian Wang*,
  3. Chittoor P. Swaminathan*,
  4. Dusan Hesek,
  5. Mijoon Lee,
  6. Geert-Jan Boons,
  7. Shahriar Mobashery,§, and
  8. Roy A. Mariuzza*,§
  1. *Center for Advanced Research in Biotechnology, W. M. Keck Laboratory for Structural Biology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, 9600 Gudelsky Drive, Rockville, MD 20850;
  2. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556; and
  3. Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
  1. Edited by David R. Davies, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, and approved April 11, 2007 (received for review February 16, 2007)

Abstract

Peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs) are highly conserved pattern-recognition molecules of the innate immune system that bind bacterial peptidoglycans (PGNs), which are polymers of alternating N-acetylglucosamine (NAG) and N-acetylmuramic acid (NAM) cross-linked by short peptide stems. Human PRGPs are bactericidal against pathogenic and nonpathogenic Gram-positive bacteria, but not normal flora bacteria. Like certain glycopeptide antibiotics (e.g., vancomycin), PGRPs kill bacteria by directly interacting with their cell wall PGN, thereby interfering with PGN maturation. To better understand the bactericidal mechanism of PGRPs, we determined the crystal structure of the C-terminal PGN-binding domain of human PGRP-Iβ in complex with NAG-NAM-l-Ala-γ-d-Glu-l-Lys-d-Ala-d-Ala, a synthetic glycopeptide comprising a complete PGN repeat. This structure, in conjunction with the previously reported NMR structure of a dimeric PGN fragment, permitted identification of major conformational differences between free and PGRP-bound PGN with respect to the relative orientation of saccharide and peptide moieties. These differences provided structural insights into the bactericidal mechanism of human PGRPs. On the basis of molecular modeling, we propose that these proteins disrupt cell wall maturation not only by sterically encumbering access of biosynthetic enzymes to the nascent PGN chains, but also by locking PGN into a conformation that prevents formation of cross-links between peptide stems in the growing cell wall.

Footnotes

  • §To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: mobashery{at}nd.edu or mariuzza{at}carb.nist.gov
  • Author contributions: S.C., C.P.S., S.M., and R.A.M. designed research; S.C., Q.W., and C.P.S. performed research; D.H., M.L., G.-J.B., and S.M. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; S.C., C.P.S., S.M., and R.A.M. analyzed data; and S.C., S.M., and R.A.M. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • Data deposition: Atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, www.pdb.org [PDB ID codes 2EAV (for PGRP-IβC) and 2EAX (for PGRP-IβC-GMPP)].

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0701453104/DC1.

  • Abbreviations:
    Dap-type,
    diaminopimelate type;
    GMPP,
    glucosamyl muramyl pentapeptide;
    ITC,
    isothermal titration calorimetry;
    Lys-type,
    l-lysine type;
    MPP,
    muramyl pentapeptide;
    NAG,
    N-acetylglucosamine;
    NAM,
    N-acetylmuramic acid;
    PGN,
    peptidoglycan;
    PGRP,
    PGN recognition protein;
    PGRP-IαC,
    C-terminal PGN-binding domain of human PGRP-Iα;
    PGRP-IβC,
    C-terminal PGN-binding domain of human PGRP-Iβ.
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents