Distinct thermal behavior of GeO2 glass in tetrahedral, intermediate, and octahedral forms

  1. Guoyin Shen*,,
  2. Hanns-Peter Liermann*,
  3. Stanislav Sinogeikin*,
  4. Wenge Yang*,
  5. Xinguo Hong,
  6. Choong-Shik Yoo§, and
  7. Hyunchae Cynn§
  1. *High Pressure Collaborative Access Team, Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Argonne, IL 60439;
  2. GeoSoilEnviroCARS, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; and
  3. §High Pressure Physics Group, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550
  1. Edited by Raphael D. Levine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel, and approved July 25, 2007 (received for review April 3, 2007)

Abstract

One fascinating high-pressure behavior of tetrahedral glasses and melts is the local coordination change with increasing pressure, which provides a structural basis for understanding numerous anomalies in their high-pressure properties. Because the coordination change is often not retained upon decompression, studies must be conducted in situ. Previous in situ studies have revealed that the short-range order of tetrahedrally structured glasses and melts changes above a threshold pressure and gradually transforms to an octahedral form with further pressure increase. Here, we report a thermal effect associated with the coordination change at given pressures and show distinct thermal behaviors of GeO2 glass in tetrahedral, octahedral, and their intermediate forms. An unusual thermally induced densification, as large as 16%, was observed on a GeO2 glass at a pressure of 5.5 gigapascal (GPa), based on in situ density and x-ray diffraction measurements at simultaneously high pressures and high temperatures. The large thermal densification at high pressure was found to be associated with the 4- to 6-fold coordination increase. Experiments at other pressures show that the tetrahedral GeO2 glass displayed small thermal densification at 3.3 GPa arising from the relaxation of intermediate range structure, whereas the octahedral glass at 12.3 GPa did not display any detectable thermal effects.

Footnotes

  • To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gshen{at}hpcat.aps.anl.gov
  • Author contributions: G.S. designed research; G.S., H.-P.L., S.S., and X.H. performed research; H.-P.L., S.S., X.H., C.-S.Y., and H.C. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; G.S., W.Y., and X.H. analyzed data; and G.S. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • Abbreviations:
    FSDP,
    first sharp diffraction peak;
    SDP,
    second distinct peak;
    DAC,
    diamond anvil cell.
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents