A role of electrical inhibition in sensorimotor integration

  1. Shennan A. Weiss,
  2. Thomas Preuss1, and
  3. Donald S. Faber2
  1. Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461
  1. Edited by Michael V. L. Bennett, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, and approved September 19, 2008 (received for review June 25, 2008)

Abstract

Although it is accepted that extracellular fields generated by neuronal activity can influence the excitability of neighboring cells, whether this form of neurotransmission has a functional role remains open. In vivo field effects occur in the teleost Mauthner (M)-cell system, where a combination of structural features support the concept of inhibitory electrical synapses. A single spike in one M-cell evoked within as little as 2.2 ms of the onset of an abrupt sound, simulating a predatory strike, initiates a startle-escape behavior [Zottoli SJ (1977) J Exp Biol 66:243–254]. We show that such sounds produce synchronized action potentials in as many as 20 or more interneurons that mediate feed-forward electrical inhibition of the M-cell. The resulting action currents produce an electrical inhibition that coincides with the electrotonic excitatory drive to the M-cell; the amplitude of the peak of the inhibition is ≈40% of that of the excitation. When electrical inhibition is neutralized with an extracellular cathodal current pulse, subthreshold auditory stimuli are converted into ones that produce an M-spike. Because the timing of electrical inhibition is often the same as the latency of M-cell firing in freely swimming fish, we conclude that electrical inhibition participates in regulating the threshold of the acoustic startle-escape behavior. Therefore, a field effect is likely to be essential to the normal functioning of the neural network.

Footnotes

  • 2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dfaber{at}aecom.yu.edu
  • Author contributions: S.A.W. and D.S.F. designed research; S.A.W., T.P., and D.S.F. performed research; S.A.W., T.P., and D.S.F. analyzed data; and S.A.W., T.P., and D.S.F. wrote the paper.

  • 1Present address: Department of Psychology, Hunter College, New York, New York 10021.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0806145105/DCSupplemental.

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents