Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event

  1. Jeffrey A. Fawcetta,b,1,
  2. Steven Maerea,b,1 and
  3. Yves Van de Peera,b,2
  1. aDepartment of Plant Systems Biology, Flanders Institute for Biotechnology, 9052 Gent, Belgium; and
  2. bDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Genetics, Ghent University, 9052 Gent, Belgium
  1. Communicated by Marc C. E. Van Montagu, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, January 31, 2009

  2. 1J.A.F. and S.M. contributed equally to this work. (received for review October 21, 2008)

Abstract

Most flowering plants have been shown to be ancient polyploids that have undergone one or more whole genome duplications early in their evolution. Furthermore, many different plant lineages seem to have experienced an additional, more recent genome duplication. Starting from paralogous genes lying in duplicated segments or identified in large expressed sequence tag collections, we dated these youngest duplication events through penalized likelihood phylogenetic tree inference. We show that a majority of these independent genome duplications are clustered in time and seem to coincide with the Cretaceous–Tertiary (KT) boundary. The KT extinction event is the most recent mass extinction caused by one or more catastrophic events such as a massive asteroid impact and/or increased volcanic activity. These events are believed to have generated global wildfires and dust clouds that cut off sunlight during long periods of time resulting in the extinction of ≈60% of plant species, as well as a majority of animals, including dinosaurs. Recent studies suggest that polyploid species can have a higher adaptability and increased tolerance to different environmental conditions. We propose that polyploidization may have contributed to the survival and propagation of several plant lineages during or following the KT extinction event. Due to advantages such as altered gene expression leading to hybrid vigor and an increased set of genes and alleles available for selection, polyploid plants might have been better able to adapt to the drastically changed environment 65 million years ago.

Keywords:

Footnotes

  • 2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: yves.vandepeer{at}psb.vib-ugent.be
  • Author contributions: S.M. and Y.V.d.P. designed research; J.A.F. and S.M. performed research; J.A.F. and S.M. analyzed data; and J.A.F., S.M., and Y.V.d.P. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • See Commentary on page 5455.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0900906106/DCSupplemental.

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents
From the Cover