Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation
- Tanya Stiversa,1,
- N. J. Enfielda,
- Penelope Browna,
- Christina Englertb,
- Makoto Hayashic,
- Trine Heinemannd,
- Gertie Hoymanna,
- Federico Rossanoa,
- Jan Peter de Ruitera,e,
- Kyung-Eun Yoonf and
- Stephen C. Levinsona
- aLanguage and Cognition Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6525XD Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
- bCenter for Language and Cognition, University of Groningen, 9172TS Groningen, The Netherlands;
- cDepartment of East Asian Languages and Cultures, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801;
- dSønderborg Participatory Innovation Research Center and The Institute of Business Communication and Information Science, University of Southern Denmark, 6400 Sønderborg, Denmark;
- eFaculty for Linguistics and Literary Sciences, Bielefeld University, D-33501 Bielefed, Germany; and
- fDepartment of African and Asian Languages and Literatures, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
-
Edited by Paul Kay, International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, CA, and approved April 28, 2009 (received for review April 2, 2009)
Abstract
Informal verbal interaction is the core matrix for human social life. A mechanism for coordinating this basic mode of interaction is a system of turn-taking that regulates who is to speak and when. Yet relatively little is known about how this system varies across cultures. The anthropological literature reports significant cultural differences in the timing of turn-taking in ordinary conversation. We test these claims and show that in fact there are striking universals in the underlying pattern of response latency in conversation. Using a worldwide sample of 10 languages drawn from traditional indigenous communities to major world languages, we show that all of the languages tested provide clear evidence for a general avoidance of overlapping talk and a minimization of silence between conversational turns. In addition, all of the languages show the same factors explaining within-language variation in speed of response. We do, however, find differences across the languages in the average gap between turns, within a range of 250 ms from the cross-language mean. We believe that a natural sensitivity to these tempo differences leads to a subjective perception of dramatic or even fundamental differences as offered in ethnographic reports of conversational style. Our empirical evidence suggests robust human universals in this domain, where local variations are quantitative only, pointing to a single shared infrastructure for language use with likely ethological foundations.
Footnotes
- 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tanya.stivers{at}mpi.nl
-
Author contributions: T.S. and N.J.E. designed research; T.S., N.J.E., P.B., C.E., M.H., T.H., G.H., F.R., J.P.d.R., K.-E.Y., and S.C.L. performed research; T.S. and N.J.E. analyzed data; and T.S., N.J.E., and S.C.L. wrote the paper.
-
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
-
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
-
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0903616106/DCSupplemental.










