New Research In
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
 Agricultural Sciences
 Anthropology
 Applied Biological Sciences
 Biochemistry
 Biophysics and Computational Biology
 Cell Biology
 Developmental Biology
 Ecology
 Environmental Sciences
 Evolution
 Genetics
 Immunology and Inflammation
 Medical Sciences
 Microbiology
 Neuroscience
 Pharmacology
 Physiology
 Plant Biology
 Population Biology
 Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
 Sustainability Science
 Systems Biology
Statistical mechanics and hydrodynamics of bacterial suspensions

Edited by Tom C. Lubensky, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, and approved July 23, 2009 (received for review June 12, 2009)
Abstract
Unicellular living organisms, such as bacteria and algae, propel themselves through a medium via cyclic strokes involving the motion of cilia and flagella. Dense populations of such “active particles” or “swimmers” exhibit a rich collective behavior at large scales. Starting with a minimal physical model of a strokeaveraged swimmer in a fluid, we derive a continuum description of a suspension of active organisms that incorporates fluidmediated, longrange hydrodynamic interactions among the swimmers. Our work demonstrates that hydrodynamic interactions provide a simple, generic origin for several nonequilibrium phenomena predicted or observed in the literature. The continuum model derived here does not depend on the microscopic physical model of the individual swimmer. The details of the largescale physics do, however, differ for “shakers” (particles that are active but not selfpropelled, such as melanocytes) and “movers” (selfpropelled particles), “pushers” (most bacteria) and “pullers” (algae like Chlamydomonas). Our work provides a classification of the largescale behavior of all these systems.
The world of a swimmer at low Reynolds numbers, beautifully described by Purcell in his classic 1977 paper (1), is full of surprises that defy intuition. Much attention has been devoted over the years to understanding the propulsion mechanisms that drive a single organism through a medium (2). More recently, the focus has shifted to the even richer behavior of collections of lowReynoldsnumber swimmers, such as bacterial colonies (3, 4), sperm cells (5), and cell extracts of cytoskeletal filaments and motor proteins (6). These systems exhibit fascinating collective behavior, including the possibility of nonequilibrium phase transitions between disordered and ordered (possibly moving) states, novel longrange correlations, and pattern formation on mesoscopic scales. Apparently diverse phenomena, such as the largescale swirling motion observed in bacterial suspensions and the formation of intricate aster and spiral structures in extracts of cytoskeletal filaments and motor proteins, are well described by the same continuum phenomenological hydrodynamics of active suspensions. Such collective phenomena arise from interactions among the active particles. For a complete understanding of the collective physics of these systems, it is important to elucidate the relative roles of physical interactions, such as excluded volume and mediummediated couplings, genetically and biochemically regulated signaling, and external symmetrybreaking effects, such as chemotaxis. A first important step in this direction is understanding how activity or selfpropulsion modify physical interactions among the units. In an earlier work (7), we showed that modifications of the shortrange excluded volume interactions due to selfpropulsion can explain nonequilibrium effects, such as anomalous number fluctuations observed in active particles on rigid substrates (8). Here we show that for active particles in a fluid, such as bacteria or collections of living cells, all the largescale nonequilibrium phenomena described in the literature arise from the longrange nature of the hydrodynamic interactions among the active particles.
Theoretical efforts to understand the physics of active systems fall broadly into three categories. A group of researchers has analyzed the flow induced by individual or pairs of swimmers moving in a viscous fluid by studying simplified models of moving particles (9–11). A second community has focused on the physics on length scales large as compared with the size of the swimmers by proposing phenomenological hydrodynamic equations built by modifying the wellunderstood hydrodynamics of liquid crystal to include nonequilibrium terms that account for the activity of the system (12–15). Because of their elongated shape, active particles, like nematogens, can exhibit orientational order at high concentration (16) and have been likened to “living liquid crystals”. The phenomenological theories have yielded several important results, including the prediction of a “generic instability” of all bulkordered states of active suspensions (12), the description of the mesoscopic vortices and asters formed in the region where homogeneous ordered states are unstable (17), and the demonstration of novel rheological behavior (18–20). Finally, a third approach has been the derivation of the continuum hydrodynamic equations from specific microscopic models of the dynamics. This approach has included rulebased dynamical models (21, 22), inspired by the seminal work of Vicsek (23), and physical models of selfpropelled rods and filaments on a substrate (7, 17, 24). Here we use a simple model of interacting swimmers in a fluid to derive continuum equations describing the largescale behavior of active suspensions. Our model reproduces the instabilities of both isotropic and ordered homogeneous states previously discussed in the literature and uncovers new ones. It also shows that the longrange nature of hydrodynamic interactions is responsible for all such instabilities.
Bacteria propel themselves by a variety of periodic, nonreciprocating strokes that involve the motion of flagella or cilia (2). Here we are interested in the collective behavior of many swimmers on long time and length scales. With this goal in mind, the details of the mechanism of selfpropulsion is not important, and we simply approximate the force distribution far from an individual swimmer as that of a static force dipole (25). Our physical model of a strokeaveraged swimmer is an asymmetric rigid dumbbell exerting a force dipole of strength f on the fluid, as shown in Fig. 1. The asymmetry of our active dumbbell is essential to make it a “swimmer” as opposed to a “shaker” (a particle—such as a melanocyte, which distributes pigments in the skin (16)—that is active because of intrinsic energy sources but is not selfpropelled). In the Stokes regime, a swimmer needs to have a stroke that is not timereversal invariant. In the strokeaveraged model considered here, this broken temporal symmetry translates into a broken spatial symmetry, corresponding in our case to the asymmetry of the dumbbell. An isolated dumbbell swimmer of length ℓ propels itself through a fluid of viscosity η at a velocity v_{SP} = v_{0}v̂, with v_{0} = −fΔa/(8πηℓᾱ), ᾱ = (a_{L} + a_{S})/2 and Δa = a_{L} − a_{S}. Hence, v_{0} = 0 if a_{L} = a_{S}. More generally, all symmetric swimmers, defined as those for which the center of the force dipole coincides with the hydrodynamic center of the swimmer (26), are actually “shakers” with v_{0} = 0. Finally, it is important to stress that although our model for a single swimmer is a static force dipole, hydrodynamic interactions do generate all multipoles in the collective flow field.
Active particles can also be classified according to the forces they exert on the surrounding fluid. Contractile swimmers or “pullers” are propelled by flagella at the head of the organism. They pull fluid in along their long axis and push fluid out along an axis normal to their midpoint (Fig. 2A). With the definition of forces shown in Fig. 1, pullers correspond to f < 0. The unicellular flagellate algae Chlamydomonas are examples of pullers. In the strokeaveraged representation, the swimmer is a puller when the hydrodynamic center lies near the “head” of the swimmer, defined with respect to its direction of selfpropelled motion. Conversely, tensile swimmers with f > 0 push fluid out along their long axis and pull fluid in at their midpoint. They are propelled from the rear, hence “pushers”. Most bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, belong to this class. In this case, the hydrodynamic center of the swimmer lies near the “tail” (Fig. 2B).
We derive equations for the microscopic dynamics of a collection of such swimmers in a fluid by eliminating the fluid flow velocity and recasting it explicitly in the form of longranged hydrodynamic interactions among the particles. We characterize the resulting interactions and identify how they depend on the swimmer's status as either a puller or a pusher. At short distances, the swimmers also interact repulsively via excluded volume effects that are known to yield orientational order at high density. These effects are understood (27), and so for simplicity we do not include them in the derivation of the continuum hydrodynamics. By using the standard tools of nonequilibrium statistical mechanics, we then obtain coarsegrained hydrodynamic equations that describe the collective dynamics of the swimmers on long length and time scales. Finally, we examine the nature of fluctuations in these systems and the underlying microscopic mechanisms that give rise to them. Before describing the derivation, we summarize some key new outcomes of our work.

We show that pairwise hydrodynamic interactions (within the Stokes approximation) alone do not yield homogeneous orientational order in bulk. When steric effects are incorporated in the model, the swimmers order in a nematic state at high density. This is an equilibrium effect (although modified by selfpropulsion (7)). Neither steric effects nor hydrodynamic interactions yield, however, a bulk polar state.

We demonstrate that a uniform isotropic suspension of pullers is unstable above a critical active force f. This instability arises from the suppression of mass diffusion because of the attractive hydrodynamic forces along the axis of contractile swimmers. It is similar to the “bundling” instability obtained in refs. 17 and 24 for filamentmotor mixtures. In that case, however, the bundling is induced by active crosslinkers; hence, by a very specific contact interaction among filaments. In the present work, the suppression of diffusion arises entirely from hydrodynamic forces among the swimmers and is therefore a general new effect.

It is known that uniform ordered active suspensions (swimmers, shakers, pullers, or pushers) are “generically” unstable because of the growth of orientational fluctuations (12). Our work identifies the origin of this instability in the longranged (∼ 1/r^{2}) nature of the hydrodynamic interactions. This connection also suggests mechanisms for suppressing the instability, as described in Hydrodynamic Equations.

Our work shows that the instabilities of active suspensions arise from hydrodynamic interactions and provides the classification of such instabilities for different types of swimmers summarized in the phase diagram of Fig. 3.

By providing a microscopic calculation of the parameters in the hydrodynamic equations, we show that the parameter controlling the instabilities is a Péclet number defined in terms of the typical convective velocity of the suspension (rather than the individual swimmer's velocity).
Finally, our work also reproduces the orientational instability of a uniform isotropic suspension of pushers reported in refs. 29 and 30. Here this instability occurs because above a critical f, any inhomogeneity in the orientational order is enhanced by active hydrodynamic torques, which tend to align the swimmers when f > 0.
To address the important question of whether these instabilities may be observable experimentally, we need to estimate the parameters that control the strength of the interaction among active units. The analysis below shows that the instabilities are controlled by a dimensionless concentration of active particles, c_{0}^{*} = V_{act}c_{0}, where V_{act} = ℓᾱ(ℓPe) is the active volume of each swimmer. Here
Model Swimmer and Hydrodynamic Interactions
Our model of a strokeaveraged swimmer is shown in Fig. 1. It is an asymmetric rigid dumbbell with spherical head and tail of radii a_{L} and a_{S}. The length ℓ of the swimmer is the distance between the centers of the two spheres. The orientation of the swimmer is described by a unit vector v̂ directed along its axis from the small to the large sphere. The swimmer exerts equal and opposite forces f = ±fv̂ on the fluid. The center of this symmetric force dipole is the swimmer's midpoint, M, located at ℓ/2. The fluid exerts equal and opposite forces on the swimmer and the net force is zero at all times. The swimmer is assumed to be at neutral buoyancy. The Reynolds number Re = ρvℓ/η for one of these swimmers, where ρ and η are the density and viscosity of the fluid, and v the typical velocity of the swimmer, can be estimated by using numbers typical for bacteria (v ∼ 10 − 30μm/sec, ℓ ∼ μm, η ∼ 10^{−2} − 1Pasec) as Re ∼ 10^{−4} − 10^{−5}. In this regime one can assume that, in the absence of fluid fluctuations, the swimmer is convected along with the fluid at the local fluid velocity, u(r). The dynamics of the αth rigid swimmer is then described by where r_{Lα} and r_{Sα} denote the position of the large and small sphere with respect to a fixed origin, with r_{Lα} − r_{Sα} = ℓv̂_{α} to enforce the rigidity constraint. The flow velocity u(r) of the fluid at r is determined by the solution of the Stokes equation, where is the active force density by the swimmer on the fluid, and describes the effect of fluid fluctuations. The random forces ξ_{α}^{L,S}(t) are Markovian white noise terms on each of the two spheres. They have zero mean and variance 〈ξ_{αi}^{L,S}(t)ξ_{βj}^{L,S}(t′)〉 = 2ζ_{L,S}k_{B}T_{a}δ_{ij}δ_{αβ}δ(t − t′), with ζ_{L,S} = 6πηa_{L,S} the friction of a sphere of radius a_{L,S} in a fluid of viscosity η and T_{a} an active temperature. In general, there will be noise generated by the swimmer itself. Here we assume that this can also be described as white Langevin noise and only modifies the amplitude of the fluctuations. Finally, we assume that the fluid is incompressible; hence ∇·u = 0.
The Stokes equation given by Eq. 2 can be solved with the result where O_{ij}(r) is the Oseen tensor, O_{ij}(r) = (δ_{ij} + r̂_{i}r̂_{j})/(8πηr), for r > a_{L,S}, with r̂ = r/r a unit vector. The Oseen tensor relating the flow around a sphere of radius a_{L,S} to a point force applied from the center of the sphere diverges at the origin for a point force. This divergence is eliminated in the standard way by assuming O_{ij}(r ≤ a_{L,S}) = δ_{ij}/ζ_{L,S}.
The dynamics of an extended rigid body in Stokes flow is conveniently described in terms of the translation of the hydrodynamic center of the body and rotations about this point. The hydrodynamic center is the point about which the net hydrodynamic torque on the body vanishes (26). The hydrodynamic center plays the same role in Stokes flow that the center of mass plays in inertial dynamics. For a rigid dumbbell in an externally imposed flow the hydrodynamic center is given by This definition will also be used here to identify the hydrodynamic centers of our swimmers.
By using the formal solution, Eq. 5, of the Stokes equation we can eliminate the flow field from Eq. 1 and obtain closed equations of motion describing the translational and rotational dynamics of the swimmers in the fluid, in the form where the angular velocity describing rotations about the hydrodynamic center is defined by ∂_{t}v̂_{α} = v̂_{α} × ω_{α} and ζ̄ = (ζ_{L} + ζ_{S})/2, ζ_{R} = ℓ^{2}ζ̄. The forces F_{αβ} and torques τ_{αβ} arise from hydrodynamic couplings among the swimmers. The random forces Γ_{α} and Γ_{α}^{R} lead to diffusion of the swimmers at large length scales. They may be expressed in terms of the random forces ξ^{L,S}(t) on each sphere. Neglecting for simplicity hydrodynamic effects in the noise, which have been studied (31), their correlations are given by At low density, D_{∥}, D_{⊥} ∼ k_{B}T/ζ̄ and D_{R} ∼ k_{B}T/(ζ̄ℓ^{2}). The asymmetry of translational diffusion (D_{∥} > D_{⊥}) is due to the hydrodynamic interactions induced by fluid fluctuations at the head and tail of the swimmer. The hydrodynamic interactions due to the random force between different swimmers yield corrections of order (k_{B}T_{a}/ζ̄)(ℓ/r_{12})^{2} to the diffusion constants, with r_{12} = r_{1}^{C} − r_{2}^{C}. At a large Péclet number, these are negligible compared with the order (v_{0}^{2}/ζ̄)(ℓ/r_{12})^{2} corrections from active forces.
It is clear from Eqs. 7 and 8 that an isolated swimmer propels itself in a straight line with selfpropulsion velocity v_{0}v̂ and v_{0} = −fΔa/(8πηℓᾱ).* The presence of other swimmers yields hydrodynamic forces F_{αβ} and torques τ_{αβ} by the β th swimmer on the α th swimmer. To obtain tractable expressions for the hydrodynamic forces and torques, we carry out a multipole expansion of the force distribution on the right hand side of Eq. 5 around the hydrodynamic center of each swimmer by letting r_{αL} = r_{α}^{C} + (ζ_{S}/2ζ̄)ℓv̂_{α} and r_{αS} = r_{α}^{C} − (ζ_{L}/2ζ̄ℓ)v̂_{α} and expanding about r_{α}^{C}. This expansion corresponds to an one in ℓ/r_{12}. Assuming r_{12} ∼ c_{0}^{−1/3}, this is a small parameter at low mean concentration c_{0} of swimmers. In spite of this approximation, the form of the hydrodynamic equations obtained here remains valid at high concentration, although with different values of the various parameters. We have explicitly evaluated hydrodynamic forces and torques up to octupole order in the multipole expansion. The full expressions are complicated and will not be given here. By retaining only the leading terms for each contribution and dropping numerical coefficients of order one†, we obtain The hydrodynamic force between two swimmers is directed along the radius joining the hydrodynamic centers of the swimmers. The hydrodynamic force is nonzero for both shakers (v_{0} = 0) and movers (v_{0}≠0) and decays as 1/r_{12}^{2}. The torque consists of two terms. The first term, proportional to fᾱ/r_{12}^{3}, is nonzero even for shakers. This term is invariant for v̄_{1} → −v̄_{1} and v̂_{2} → −v̂_{2} and aligns swimmers regardless of their polarity. The second term, proportional to f(Δa/ᾱ)^{2}, vanishes for symmetric swimmers and tends to align swimmers of the same polarity. The force exerted by a puller (pusher) is attractive (repulsive) along the direction of its swimming axis, and repulsive (attractive) in the orthogonal direction. The torque exerted by a puller tends to align other swimmers that are located along its axis and to misalign swimmers in the orthogonal directions. The converse applies to pushers. These differences have important consequences in controlling the details of the instabilities.
Hydrodynamic Equations
The collective dynamics of many swimmers on length scales large as compared with their mean separation and time scales long as compared with the duration of the stroke of an individual swimmer is well described in terms of conserved quantities and broken symmetry variables. The only conserved quantity in our model is the density of swimmers‡, c(r,t), defined as where the brackets denote an average over the microscopic degrees of freedom. There are two broken symmetry variables, corresponding to the possibility of polar and nematic order of the swimmers, defined as We have used standard methods of nonequilibrium statistical mechanics to coarse grain the microscopic dynamics described by Eqs. 7 and 8 and derive continuum equations for these fields. The continuum equations are nonlinear and nonlocal. Their general form is given in the supplementary material. In the rest of the section, we will focus on some special cases.
Homogeneous States.
One of the outcomes of our analysis is that pairwise, additive, hydrodynamic interactions in the Stokes regime considered here do not yield a homogeneous ordered state in bulk. This result follows because the kernels governing the nonlocal hydrodynamic interaction have an isotropic angular dependence and vanish in mean field. If the only interactions are farfield hydrodynamic ones, the only uniform steady state of a bulk suspension of swimmers is an isotropic state, with c = c_{0}, P = 0, and Q = 0. Of course, at short distances steric repulsion becomes important. Due to the rodlike shape of the swimmers, these will yield a uniform nematic state (c = c_{0}, P = 0 and Q≠0) above a critical concentration. Excluded volume effects are not, however, sufficient to generate a homogeneous polar state (c = c_{0}, P≠0; hence Q≠0) (7). The identification of a physical mechanism, if any, capable of generating a macroscopic polar state in a bulk system remains an issue to be examined, one which is beyond the scope of this paper. Further investigation may require contact interactions that capture higherorder chemical processes (such as the action of motors modeled in ref. 19) or external symmetrybreaking through a chemotactic gradient or boundaries. In States with Orientational Order, we assume the existence of such a putative state and study its stability.
Isotropic State.
To study the stability of the isotropic state, we consider the dynamics of fluctuations δy_{α} = y_{α} − y_{α}^{0} of the hydrodynamic fields y_{α} = {c,P,Q} about their homogeneous values, y_{α}^{0} = {c_{0},0,0}. We introduce a Fourier representation δỹ_{α}(k) = ∫_{r}e^{ik·r}δy_{α}(r) and retain terms up to quadratic order in k in the equations by expanding the nonlocal hydrodynamic couplings. The three coupled fields that control the stability of the system are the density fluctuations δc̃, the longitudinal polarization fluctuations δP_{∥} = k̂·δP̃, and the “bend” δQ_{∥⊥} = k̂·Q̂·(δ−k̂k̂) and “splay” δQ_{∥∥} = k̂·Q̃·k̂ components of the fluctuations in the alignment tensor. The coupled linearized equations for these four scalar fields are where D, D_{sp}, and D_{P} are diffusion constants that can be evaluated in terms of microscopic parameters for the specific model considered here. At low density, they are of order k_{B}T/ζ̄, with additive corrections ∼ V_{act}c_{0} from activity. The implications of these equations depend on the contractile or tensile nature of the swimmers.
For contractile (f < 0), swimmers ᾱ_{1} ∼ ᾱ_{2} ∼ fᾱℓc_{0}/ζ̄ < 0. Hence, splay fluctuations δQ_{∥⊥} are stable and overdamped and can be neglected. On hydrodynamic time scales (large as compared with D_{R}^{−1}), we can neglect the lefthand side of Eq. 16 and eliminate δQ_{∥∥} from Eq. 15 in terms of density fluctuations to obtain ∂_{t}δc̃ = ikv_{0}δP_{∥} − D(1−V_{act}c_{0})k^{2}δc̃, with V_{act} ∼ ℓᾱ(ℓPe) the active volume of a swimmer. When there is at least one neighbor within the active volume of a given swimmer or shaker, i.e., V_{act}c_{0} > 1, activity exceeds diffusion and density fluctuations grow without bound. This excess defines a critical concentration c_{pull} ∼ (ℓ^{2}ᾱPe)^{−1} ∼ 1/f above which a homogeneous isotropic suspension of pullers (swimmers or shakers) is unstable. For swimmers, the coupling of density to longitudinal polarization turns the unstable mode into one that propagates at the selfpropulsion velocity, as expected from the fact that in these systems the isotropic state can support soundlike density waves (7). This instability has been discussed before for mixtures of cytoskeletal filaments and motor proteins (17, 24), where it was referred to as a “bundling” instability, because in one dimension it drives the formation of dense bundles of filaments. The instability arises from the suppression of the longitudinal diffusion constant of anisotropic particles due to activity. For cytoskeletal filaments, the suppression arises from shortrange interaction because of active crosslinkers (17, 24). For swimmers in a fluid, this suppression originates from longrange hydrodynamic interactions, which are attractive at the head and tail of contractile swimmers as illustrated in Fig. 2. This suppression is absent in pushers, as in this case the hydrodynamic interaction enhances longitudinal diffusion.
For pushers, such as E.coli, the dynamics are controlled by splay fluctuations (Eq. 17). Because f > 0, ᾱ_{2} > 0, splay fluctuations are unstable on all scales for ᾱ_{2}/4D_{R} > 1 and c_{0} > c_{push} ∼ (ℓ^{2}ᾱPe)^{−1}. The instability that occurs in pushers is scalefree, i.e., orientational correlations build up on all scales. This instability has been identified in ref. 28, and is responsible for the enhanced orientational correlations observed in simulations (29). Our analysis shows that this instability arises from the nematic components of the hydrodynamic torques.
States with Orientational Order.
In this section, we seek to characterize the nature of fluctuations in an ordered suspension, leaving aside the conditions under which such a homogeneous ordered state may exist. For compactness, we will discuss in a unified manner the stability of both polar and nematic states. In both cases, orientational order is characterized by a finite value of the magnitude of the orientational order parameter, with P = Pn̂ in a polar state and Q_{ij} = S(n̂_{i}n̂_{j} −
Generic instability.
All terms on the second line of Eq. 20 are of order k^{0}. They arise from longrange hydrodynamic flows and always destabilize the homogeneous state. A homogeneous ordered state of pullers (ᾱ_{2} < 0) is destabilized by the growth of splay fluctuations in the director, whereas a homogeneous ordered state of pushers (ᾱ_{2} > 0) is destabilized by bend fluctuations, as predicted in ref. 12 on the basis of a phenomenological theory. The present formulation allows us to identify the origin of this instability in the nematic part of the hydrodynamic torque. The instability is “generic” and occurs on all scales, precisely because of the longrange form of the hydrodynamic interactions.
Suppressing the generic instability.
An important outcome of our formulation is that it allows us to identify the physical mechanisms that can suppress the generic instability. The instability will be eliminated by any physical mechanism capable of cutting off or screening the 1/r^{2} decay of the flow field induced by active swimmers. Possible mechanisms include an elastic or viscoelastic component of the response of the medium and the presence of boundaries. Also, on length scales long as compared with the screening length induced by a dissipative medium, the hydrodynamic equations obtained here reduce to those for selfpropelled particles on an inert substrate (32–34) that do not exhibit the generic instability. Finally, it has been noted that for swimmers that move via a stroke invariant under the combined operations of timereversal and parity, the dipole order term in the induced flow, responsible for the 1/r^{2} decay, vanishes (11). A collection of such swimmers will not exhibit the generic instability.
Density instabilities.
The same physics that lead to the unstable growth of density or orientational fluctuations in the isotropic state is present in ordered states, but is preempted by the generic instability.
Discussion
Our work provides a unified treatment of the physics of active suspensions. We start with a microscopic model that encompasses as special cases swimmers, shakers, pullers, and pushers and derive the coarsegrained hydrodynamics of the system. Fluctuations play a crucial role in active suspensions as they often make the putative homogeneous states unstable. The role and nature of fluctuations is summarized in the “phase diagram” of Fig. 3. At low densities, a homogeneous isotropic state of either pushers or pullers (both swimmers and shakers) is unstable above a threshold value of the active force f. The nature of the instability is different for pushers (unstable growth of largescale density fluctuations) and pullers (unstable growth of orientational fluctuations on all scales). The interplay between instabilities driven by orientational fluctuations and density fluctuations should lead to qualitatively different patterns in suspensions of pullers and pushers and provides a rich parameter space yet to be explored. Finally, the decay of fluctuations in the concentration of swimmers (v_{0}≠0) in the isotropic state is controlled by propagating (as opposed to diffusive) soundlike waves above a threshold value of f, as predicted in ref. 7 for active particles on a substrate. The threshold value of f is independent of density and is solely determined by the competition between selfpropulsion and diffusion. The highdensity ordered states of bacterial suspensions are always unstable.
Some of the phenomena described here have been predicted by other authors with different starting points. One important result of our work is that all instabilities of active systems can be understood in a unified manner as arising from the longranged nature of the hydrodynamic interactions. Such instabilities are suppressed by any mechanism capable of truncating the longrange interactions. This suppression occurs, for instance, when the swimmer has a higher symmetry (e.g., a stroke that is invariant under the combined operations of time reversal and parity, such as that of the organism Spirullum Volutans), or when the medium is elastic on short time scales. In such cases, however, shortrange physical interactions may provide other mechanisms with which to destabilize the homogeneous states and drive pattern formation (7, 24).
Our work is universal in that we have mapped out the consequences of the active hydrodynamic interactions on the properties of suspensions of swimmers and shakers. Any additional intrinsic interaction in these systems is shortranged and can be included additively to the theory developed here. The exotic fluctuations characterized here will lead to pattern formation when boundaries are taken into account. For instance, the interplay between selfpropulsion and diffusion that leads to propagating modes in swimmers can be shown to lead to polarization oscillations in a confined system (35). Hence, a rich parameter space remains to be explored to characterize and classify pattern formation in active systems and the relevance of such patterns to questions of biological importance. Our work constitutes an initial in this direction.
Finally, our formulation is not straightforwardly generalized to an active suspension in an externally imposed flow, u_{0}. To treat this case, the Stokes equation must be solved subject to the boundary condition u = u_{0} far from the swimmers, which will give a modification of the Oseen tensor and hence alter the hydrodynamic interactions. In the presence of an externally imposed flow, it may be simpler to directly coarsegrain the Stokes equation (see SI Appendix) and obtain hydrodynamic equations of the form given in ref. 12 that explicitly couple to the fluid flow.
Acknowledgments
We thank M. Bowick, J. Dufty, T. Liverpool, K. MuellerNedebock, and S. Ramaswamy for illuminating discussions and Arvind Baskaran for help with the figures. This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grants DMR0705105 and DMR0806511.
Footnotes
 ^{1}To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: abaskara{at}physics.syr.edu

Author contributions: A.B. and M.C.M. designed research, performed research, and wrote the paper.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0906586106/DCSupplemental.

↵* A more realistic strokeaveraged swimmer may correspond to a force dipole directed at an angle to the long axis of the swimmer, yielding both a net force and a net torque on the swimmer. Torques could also arise from random forces generated upon stroke averaging a noisy swimmer. The study of these effects is left for future work.

↵† Here we display a simplified form of the hydrodynamic forces and torques. The full expressions can be found in the supplementary material.

↵‡ The momentum of the suspension is also conserved. In our formulation the fluid has been recast in the form of hydrodynamic forces and torques among the swimmers and momentum conservation, although implemented, does not appear explicitly.

↵§ These equations agree with those given in ref. 30 once the flow velocity is eliminated in favor of the other hydrodynamic fields.
References
 ↵
 ↵
 Childress S
 ↵
 ↵
 Igoshin OA,
 Welch R,
 Kaiser D,
 Oster G
 ↵
 Riedel IH,
 Kruse K,
 Howard J
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 Narayanan V,
 Ramaswamy S,
 Menon N
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 Aranson IS,
 Tsimring LS
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 Lighthill MJ
 ↵
 Happel J,
 Brenner H
 ↵
 de Gennes PG,
 Prost J
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
Citation Manager Formats
More Articles of This Classification
Physical Sciences
Physics
Biological Sciences
Biophysics and Computational Biology
Related Content
 No related articles found.
Cited by...
 Cell polarity: having and making sense of directionon the evolutionary significance of the primary cilium/centrosome organ in Metazoa
 From flagellar undulations to collective motion: predicting the dynamics of sperm suspensions
 Rheological signatures in limit cycle behaviour of dilute, active, polar liquid crystalline polymers in steady shear
 Hydrodynamic persistence within very dilute twodimensional suspensions of squirmers
 Gait synchronization in Caenorhabditis elegans
 Topological defects and density fluctuations in collectively moving systems
 Three Mutations in Escherichia coli That Generate Transformable Functional Flagella
 Mesoscale turbulence in living fluids
 Spontaneous symmetry breaking in active droplets provides a generic route to motility
 Phase separation and rotor selfassembly in active particle suspensions
 Emergence of coherent structures and largescale flows in motile suspensions
 Frozen steady states in active systems
 Levy fluctuations and mixing in dilute suspensions of algae and bacteria
 Capillarybased static selfassembly in higher organisms
 Fluid dynamics and noise in bacterial cellcell and cellsurface scattering
 Collective motion and density fluctuations in bacterial colonies
 Arrested phase separation in reproducing bacteria creates a generic route to pattern formation