Proxy inconsistency and other problems in millennial paleoclimate reconstructions

  1. Stephen McIntyrea,1 and
  2. Ross McKitrickb
  1. aClimateAudit.org, 25 Playter Boulevard, Toronto, ON, Canada M4K 2W1; and
  2. bDepartment of Economics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1

Mann et al. (1) present two paleoclimate reconstruction methods [“error-in-variables” (EIV) and “composite plus scale” (CPS)], claiming statistically significant skill for both. Their figure 3 reveals that from approximately 750 to 1100, the CPS 95% confidence interval excludes the EIV 95% confidence interval and vice versa. This is evidence not of skill, but of inconsistency.

Contrary to …

11To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: stephen.mcintyre{at}utoronto.ca

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents