## New Research In

### Physical Sciences

### Social Sciences

#### Featured Portals

#### Articles by Topic

### Biological Sciences

#### Featured Portals

#### Articles by Topic

- Agricultural Sciences
- Anthropology
- Applied Biological Sciences
- Biochemistry
- Biophysics and Computational Biology
- Cell Biology
- Developmental Biology
- Ecology
- Environmental Sciences
- Evolution
- Genetics
- Immunology and Inflammation
- Medical Sciences
- Microbiology
- Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
- Physiology
- Plant Biology
- Population Biology
- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
- Sustainability Science
- Systems Biology

# Switching processes in financial markets

Contributed by H. Eugene Stanley, December 30, 2010 (sent for review October 24, 2010)

## Abstract

For an intriguing variety of switching processes in nature, the underlying complex system abruptly changes from one state to another in a highly discontinuous fashion. Financial market fluctuations are characterized by many abrupt switchings creating upward trends and downward trends, on time scales ranging from macroscopic trends persisting for hundreds of days to microscopic trends persisting for a few minutes. The question arises whether these ubiquitous switching processes have quantifiable features independent of the time horizon studied. We find striking scale-free behavior of the transaction volume after each switching. Our findings can be interpreted as being consistent with time-dependent collective behavior of financial market participants. We test the possible universality of our result by performing a parallel analysis of fluctuations in time intervals between transactions. We suggest that the well known catastrophic bubbles that occur on large time scales—such as the most recent financial crisis—may not be outliers but single dramatic representatives caused by the formation of increasing and decreasing trends on time scales varying over nine orders of magnitude from very large down to very small.

The study of dramatic crash events is limited by the fortunately rare number of such events. However, there is a truly gargantuan amount of preexisting precise financial market data already collected, many orders of magnitude more than for other complex systems. Accordingly, financial markets are becoming a paradigm of complex systems (1, 2), and increasing numbers of scientists are analyzing market data (3–18) and modeling financial markets (19–29). The probability distribution function and the time autocorrelation function reveal interesting features, such as long-range power-law correlations in volatility (30) and fat tails in the price change probability distribution function (31, 32).

Increasingly, one seeks to understand the current financial crisis by comparisons with the depression of the 1930s. Here we ask if the smaller financial crises also provide information of relevance to large crises. If such “microbubbles” are relevant, then the larger abundance of data on smaller crises should provide quantifiable statistical laws for bubble formation and financial collapse on various scales.

## Data Analyzed

To answer this question, we perform parallel analyses of trend switching on two quite different time scales: (*i*) from ≈10 ms to ≈10^{6} ms, and (*ii*) from ≈10^{8} ms to ≈10^{10} ms.

German market: For the first analysis, we use a price time series of the German DAX Future (

*FDAX*) traded at*EUREX*, which is one of the world’s largest derivatives exchanges. The time series comprises*T*_{1}= 13,991,275 trades of three disjoint three-month periods (March 16, 2007—June 15, 2007; June 20, 2008—September 19, 2008; and September 19, 2008— December 19, 2008). The data base contains the transaction prices, the volumes, and the corresponding time stamps (33–36), with a large liquidity and intertrade times—time intervals between consecutive transactions—down to 10 ms, which allows us to perform an analysis of microtrends (Fig. 1*A*).US market: For the second analysis, which focuses on macrotrends, we use price time series of daily closing prices of all stocks of the

*S&P500 index*. The time series comprises overall*T*_{2}= 2,592,531 closing prices. Our oldest closing prices date back to January 2, 1962. Latest closing prices were recorded on June 16, 2009. The data base of closing prices we analyze contains the daily closing prices and the daily cumulative trading volumes.

In addition, we perform a parallel analysis of the 30 assets contributing to the *Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA)**. The time series stem from the *Trade and Quote* (*TAQ*)^{†} data base and cover 2,623,445,866 transactions.

## Renormalization Method

To analyze switching processes of financial fluctuations, we first propose how a switching process can be quantitatively analyzed. Let *p*(*t*) be the transaction price of trade *t*, which is a discrete variable *t* = 1,…,*T*. A transaction price *p*(*t*) is defined to be a *local maximum* of order Δ*t* if there is no higher transaction price in the interval *t* - Δ*t* ≤ *t* ≤ *t* + Δ*t*, and is defined to be a *local minimum* of order Δ*t* if there is no lower transaction price in this interval (Fig. 1*B*).

Here, we perform an analysis of the volume fluctuations *v*(*t*) from one price extremum to the next. The volume is the number of contracts traded in each individual transaction in case of microtrends for the German market and the number of traded stocks per day in case of macrotrends for the US market. For the analysis, we introduce a renormalized time scale *ε* between successive extrema (37). Thus, *ε* = 0 corresponds to the beginning of a trend and *ε* = 1 indicates the end of a trend (Fig. 1*C*). We analyze a range of ε for the interval 0 ≤ *ε* ≤ 2, so we can analyze trend switching processes both before as well as after the critical value *ε* = 1 (Fig. 1). The renormalization is essential to assure that trends of various lengths can be aggregated and that all switching points have a common position in the renormalized time.

## Results of Analysis

Fig. 2*A* provides the volume *v*^{∗}(*ε*) averaged over all increasing and decreasing microtrends in the full time series of *T*_{1} = 13,991,275 records, and is normalized by the average volume of all microtrends studied. In order to remove outliers, e.g., overnight gaps, only these microtrends are collected in which the time intervals between successive trades *τ*(*t*) (38) are not longer than 1 min, which is roughly 60 times longer than the average intertrade time (≈0.94 s). Furthermore, transaction volumes have not to be larger than 100 contracts (the average transaction volume is 2.55 contracts). As expected, new price extrema are linked with peaks in the volume time series. In Fig. 2*D*, we show the averaged volume *v*^{∗}(*ε*) vs. |*ε* - 1| as a log—log histogram. Surprisingly, the averaged volume falls on straight lines and thus indicates a power-law scaling behavior of the form [1]with scaling parameters (*t*-test, *p*-value < 2 × 10^{-16}) before, and (*t*-test, *p*-value = 9.2 × 10^{-16}) after a price extremum. Such an extraction of slopes by performing least-squares linear regressions is not sufficient for the claim that the averaged volume is drawn from a power-law distribution. However, additional performed statistical tests (see *SI Appendix* ) enable us to conclude that our observations are indeed consistent with the hypothesis that *v*^{∗} is drawn from a power-law distribution.

Next we test the possible universality of our result by performing a parallel analysis for trends on long time scales using the daily closing price data base of S&P500 stocks. Note that for our parallel analysis on macroscopic time scales the order of a extremum Δ*t* is measured in units of days, and that *v*^{∗}(*ε*) is averaged over all trends and all closing price time series of all S&P500 components. In order to avoid biased contributions for the rescaled averaging caused by inflation based drifts over more than 47 y, the analyzed price time series *p*(*t*) contains the logarithm of the daily closing prices. A log—log histogram of our parallel analysis for the US market on large time scales (Fig. 2 *B* and *E*) provides evidence for a similar behavior with scaling parameters (*t*-test, *p*-value = 1.7 × 10^{-9}) before, and (*t*-test, *p*-value < 2 × 10^{-16}) after a price extremum. Statistical tests confirm the consistency with a power-law distribution.

In order to verify a possible universality, we analyze the behavior of the intertrade times *τ*(*t*) of the German market during the short time interval from one price extremum to the next. The cross-correlation function between price changes and intertrade times exhibits no reasonable correlation values as well. Thus, one can conjecture that the tendency to decreased intertrade times for the end of positive microtrends is counteracted by the tendency to decreased intertrade times for the end of negative microtrends. The crucial issue is to distinguish between positive and negative microtrends realized by the renormalized time *ε* between successive extrema. In Fig. 2*C*, the averaged intertrade times *τ*^{∗}(*ε*) reflects the link between intertrade times and price extrema. Fig. 2*F* shows *τ*^{∗}(*ε*) vs. |*ε* - 1| as a log—log histogram supporting a power-law behavior of the form [2]with scaling parameters (*t*-test, *p*-value = 1.8 × 10^{-15}) before, and (*t*-test, *p*-value < 2 × 10^{-16}) after a price extremum. Statistical tests confirm the consistency with a power-law distribution as well.

The straight lines in Fig. 2 *D*–*F* offer insight into financial market fluctuations: (*i*) a clear connection between volumes, intertrade times, and price fluctuations on the path from one extremum to the next extremum, and (*ii*) the underlying law, which describes the volumes and intertrade times around extrema varying over nine orders of magnitude starting from the smallest possible time scale, is a power-law with scaling parameters which quantitatively characterizes the region around the trend switching point. As a direct consequence of the consistency with power-law distributions, the behavior does not depend on the scale. Thus, we find identical behavior for other subintervals of 50 ≤ Δ*t* ≤ 1,000. These findings can contribute to the understanding of mechanisms causing catastrophic events. However, one should be aware of that our findings cannot be used for predicting individual transaction sequences due to their level of noise.

## Confirmation Based on 2,623,445,866 Transactions

We perform a parallel analysis of the 30 assets contributing to the *Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA)*. The time series stem from the *Trade and Quote* (*TAQ*) database and cover 2,623,445,866 transactions, roughly 200 times the length of the *FDAX* time series analyzed before.

The TAQ database makes it possible to study the switching phenomenon of transaction volume on an intraday time scale for all 30 stocks individually^{‡}. For the sake of clarity and presentation, results for all stocks considered can be found in *SI Appendix*. For each stock, we document the development of the stock price, the aggregated volume as a function of *ε*, and *v*^{∗}(*ε*) vs. |*ε* - 1| as a log—log histogram with two power-law fits. The fitting exponents are reported in the upper right corner. Each fitting range is based on statistical tests identical to those applied in the previous analyses: The shaded intervals mark the region in which the empirical data are consistent with a power-law behavior. The left border of the shaded regions is given by the first measuring point closest to the switching point. The right borders stem from statistical tests of the power-law hypothesis.

As is evident in the presented results, the *DJIA* components confirm our previous findings and provide evidence for power-law exponents between and before the switching point *ε* = 1 and between and after the switching point *ε* = 1.

## Parallels to a Phase Transition in Physics

The straight lines in Fig. 2 *D*–*F* offer insight into the nature of financial market fluctuations: (*i*) We uncover a clear relationship between transaction volumes and price fluctuations on the path from one extremum to the next extremum. In addition, the analysis of intertrade times provides confirmation for our finding. However, it is noteworthy that transaction volumes and intertrade times are not directly linked to each other. The transaction volume per individual transaction increases dramatically before an extreme price value is reached. Parallelly, time intervals between individual transactions decreases dramatically before an extreme price value is reached. (*ii*) We find the underlying law—a power-law—, which describes transaction volumes and intertrade times around price extrema varying over nine orders of magnitude starting from the smallest possible time scale of individual transactions. This power-law with unique exponents quantitatively characterizes the region around the trend switching point. At this point a positive trend ends and a negative trend starts or a negative trend ends and a positive trend starts. As a direct consequence of the existence of power-law behavior, the phenomenon does not depend on the scale. Thus, we find an identical behavior for other subintervals of 50 ≤ Δ*t* ≤ 1,000. With a decreasing value of Δ*t*, the number of local minima and maxima increases in the price time series, around which we find the same scale-free behavior. The finding of a power-law behavior of transaction volumes and intertrade times in the time domain of individual transactions supports the hypothesis that a fluctuating price time series passes through a sequence of transitions similar to phase transitions in physics.

Based on our findings we may ask what kind of transition could the end of a trend—a microtrend on scales of 10 ms or a macrotrend on scales of 100 d—correspond to, or is the end of a trend an altogether different kind of phase transition that resembles all phase transitions by displaying a regime of scale-free behavior characterized by a critical exponent? It may be premature to speculate on possible analogies, so we will limit ourselves to describing here what seems to be a promising candidate. Consider a simple Ising magnet characterized by one-dimensional spins that can point North or South. Each spin interacts with some (or even with all) of its neighbors with positive interaction strength *J*, such that, when *J* is positive neighboring spins lower their energy by being parallel. The entire system is bathed in a magnetic field that interacts with all the spins equally with a strength parametrized by *H*, such that when *H* is positive, the field points North and when *H* is negative the field points South. Thus, when *H* is positive, the system lowers its energy by each spin pointing North. Thus, there are two competing control parameters *J* and *H*. If, e.g., the system is prepared in a state with the majority of spins pointing North yet the field *H* points South, the competition will be between the relative effects of *J* and *H*: the *J* interaction motivates the spins to point North but the *H* interaction motivates the spin to point South. Such a system is termed *metastable* because, if each North-pointing spin suddenly flips its state to point South, the system can achieve a lower total energy. This flipping will occur in time in a fashion not unlike the trading frequency near the end of a trend: first, one or two spins will randomly switch their state, then more, and suddenly, after in an “avalanche” of switches, the majority of spins will point South. The phase transition is termed a spinodal singularity, characterized by its own set of exponents.

Why should the end of microtrends or macrotrends have a parallel with such a metastable physical system? Presumably, near the end of a positive trend, all the market participants watching the market begin to sense that the market is metastable and that, if they do not sell soon, it could be too late to make any profit, because the price will drop. First, a few traders sell, pushing the market imperceptibly lower. Then, additional traders, sensing this microscopic downturn, may decide that now is the time to sell and they sell too. Then an “avalanche” of selling begins, with traders all hoping to protect their profits by selling before the market drops. Thus, the set of *N* market participants holding their position are in this sense analogous to the set of *N* mostly North-pointing spins, bathed in a South-pointing magnetic field.

Perhaps, the above analogy is not yet the best. It will be a future challenge to find a coherent, convincing explanation for why the end of a microtrend or macrotrend displays such striking parallels to a phase transition. In any case, a set of interacting spins appears to be analogous to a set of interacting traders. The end of the negative microtrend or macrotrend follows the same mechanism, but with everything reversed. The *N* Ising spins point mostly South, the magnetic field points North, and the spins flip from South to North one by one, ending with an avalanche corresponding to the spinodal singularity. Analogously, the *N* traders begin to suspect that the market is becoming metastable, so that they start to buy one by one. But as the traders witness the price increasing, they jump into buy mode before the price becomes too high.

## Summary

In summary, we have seen that each trend—microtrend and macrotrend—in a financial market starts and ends with a unique switching process, and each extremum shares properties of macroscopic cooperative behavior (39–42). We have seen that the switching mechanism has no scale, for time scales varying over nine orders of magnitude down to the smallest possible time scale—the scale of single transactions measured in units of 10 ms. Thus, the well known catastrophic bubbles occurring on large time scales—such as the most recent financial crisis—may not be outliers but in fact single dramatic events caused by the inherent, scale-free behavior related to the formation of increasing and decreasing trends on time scales from the very large down to the very small. The larger abundance of data on smaller crises can provide quantifiable statistical laws for bubble formation and financial collapse on various scales.

## Materials and Methods

### Test of the Power-Law Hypothesis.

Description of the statistical test confirming consistency with power-law distributions. Details are given in *SI Appendix*.

### Switching Process Analysis for *DJIA* Components.

Parallel analysis of the 30 assets contributing to the *Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA)*. Details are given in *SI Appendix*.

## Acknowledgments

The authors thank K. Binder, S. V. Buldyrev, C. De Grandi, S. Havlin, D. Helbing, U. Krey, H.-G. Matuttis, M. G. Mazza, I. Morgenstern, W. Paul, R. H. R. Stanley, T. Vicsek, G. M. Viswanathan, and L. Yelash for discussions. T.P. also thanks the Gutenberg Academy for financial support. This work was partially supported by the German Research Foundation Grants SCHN 1073/1-1 (to J.J.S.) and PR 1305/1-1 (to T.P.) and by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and Office of Naval Research (ONR), and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA).

## Footnotes

^{1}To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: mail{at}tobiaspreis.de or hes{at}bu.edu.

Author contributions: T.P., J.J.S., and H.E.S. designed research; T.P., J.J.S., and H.E.S. performed research; T.P., J.J.S., and H.E.S. analyzed data; and T.P., J.J.S., and H.E.S. wrote the paper.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1019484108/-/DCSupplemental.

↵

^{*}We analyze all US stocks which were included in the*DJIA*in March 2010. This data base covers the time period from January 4, 1993 to December 31, 2009.↵

^{†}The New York Stock Exchange’s*TAQ*database contains data on all trades and quotes for stocks from The New York Stock Exchange (*NYSE*), The American Stock Exchange (*AMEX*) and The National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation (*NASDAQ*).↵

^{‡}The quality of the time stamp is not comparable to that of the*FDAX*time series. Thus, only volume is studied.

## References

- ↵
- Axtell RL

- ↵
- ↵
- Gabaix X,
- Gopikrishnan P,
- Plerou V,
- Stanley HE

- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Cont R,
- Bouchaud JP

- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Takayasu H

- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- O’Hara M

- ↵
- ↵
- Hommes CH

- ↵
- ↵
- Shaw WT

- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Jones CM,
- Kaul G,
- Lipson ML

- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Krugman P

- ↵
- Shleifer A

- ↵
- ↵
- Bunde A,
- Schellnhuber HJ,
- Kropp J

## Citation Manager Formats

### More Articles of This Classification

### Physical Sciences

### Related Content

- No related articles found.

### Cited by...

- Evolutionary dynamics of the cryptocurrency market
- To slow or not? Challenges in subsecond networks
- Harvesting entropy and quantifying the transition from noise to chaos in a photon-counting feedback loop
- Synchronization in human musical rhythms and mutually interacting complex systems
- Quantifying the semantics of search behavior before stock market moves