• Explore more than 100 years of PNAS content!
  • Science Sessions: The PNAS Podcast Program

Magnetically sensitive light-induced reactions in cryptochrome are consistent with its proposed role as a magnetoreceptor

  1. P. J. Horeb,2
  1. aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Centre for Advanced Electron Spin Resonance, Inorganic Chemistry Laboratory, Oxford OX1 3QR, United Kingdom;
  2. bDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, Oxford OX1 3QZ, United Kingdom;
  3. cUniversité Paris VI, 4 Place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France;
  4. dPennsylvania State University, Media, PA 19063; and
  5. eInstitute of Physical Chemistry, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany

  1. Edited by* Nicholas J. Turro, Columbia University, New York, NY, and approved January 27, 2012 (received for review November 17, 2011)

  1. Fig. 1.
    View larger version:
    Fig. 1.

    The electron transfer pathway leading from the protein surface to the FAD cofactor buried within the protein. Shown are the relative positions of the FAD cofactor and the Trp-triad (WA, WB, WC) in AtCry [blue, PDB entry 1U3D (37)] and EcPL [red, PDB entry 1DNP (48)]. The proposed magnetically sensitive species comprises a radical derived from the FAD and one from the terminal tryptophan residue, WC (Trp-324 in AtCry; Trp306 in EcPL). The center-to-center distance between the tricyclic isoalloxazine ring system of FAD and the indole group of WC is 1.90 nm in AtCry (37).

  2. Fig. 2.
    View larger version:
    Fig. 2.

    Transient absorption spectra and magnetic-field action spectra of AtCry and EcPL. Transient absorption spectra, ΔA(0), of (A) AtCry and (C) EcPL. ΔA(0) is the difference between signals recorded with and without a 460 nm, 5 ns pump light pulse in the absence of an applied magnetic field. The spectra were integrated over 1 μs periods centered at the indicated times after the pump pulse. Each spectrum is the average of two transients. The laser repetition rate was kept low (0.05 Hz) to minimize protein photodegradation. The 1.5 μs signal in (C) at 460 nm is distorted by a transient effect of the laser pulse on the photomultiplier detector. Experimental conditions: AtCry, 250 K, 60% (v/v) glycerol solution; EcPL, 250 K, 50% (v/v) glycerol solution. (B) and (D) Magnetic-field action spectra of AtCry and EcPL, respectively, recorded under the same conditions as (A) and (C), presented as ΔΔA = ΔA(28 mT) - ΔA(0). Two transients were recorded with the magnetic field and two without. At each wavelength the double-difference kinetic time profiles were smoothed with a 2 μs boxcar function and the mean and standard deviation calculated over the indicated time intervals. At each wavelength the mean ± standard deviation is plotted. The minor differences between the data shown in (C) and (D) and the data reported by Henbest et al. (23) are attributed to the different experimental conditions of the latter: 278 K, 20% (v/v) glycerol, 5 mM potassium ferricyanide.

  3. Fig. 3.
    View larger version:
    Fig. 3.

    Magnetic-field effects on the photochemical kinetics of AtCry and EcPL. Transient absorption kinetic time profiles of (A) AtCry and (C) EcPL both recorded at 510 nm with and without a 28 mT applied magnetic field. (B) and (D) Differences between the two signals shown in (A) and in (C), respectively: ΔΔA = ΔA(28 mT) - ΔA(0). 200 ns boxcar smoothing was used to produce (B) and (D); no smoothing was used for (A) and (C). Experimental conditions: AtCry, 270 K in 60% (v/v) glycerol solution; EcPL, 250 K in 50% (v/v) glycerol solution. Similar traces for both proteins were observed at temperatures between 240 K and 275 K and glycerol contents between 25% and 65% (SI Appendix).

  4. Fig. 4.
    View larger version:
    Fig. 4.

    Proposed photochemical reaction schemes for AtCry and EcPL. The black arrows and species are common to both proteins; the blue and red features refer to AtCry and EcPL, respectively. kb and kf are first-order rate constants for electron–hole recombination of RP1 and formation of RP2 from RP1, respectively. Although RP2 in AtCry is here drawn as [FADH•Trp•], the protonation state of the Trp radical is not certain. The curved green arrows indicate the coherent, magnetic field-dependent interconversion of the singlet and triplet states of RP1.

  5. Fig. 5.
    View larger version:
    Fig. 5.

    Correlation between the magnetic-field effect on the yield of RP2 and the lifetime of RP1 in EcPL. (A) Transient absorption kinetic time profiles of EcPL in 50% (v/v) glycerol solution in the absence of an applied magnetic field at the temperatures indicated. Recorded at 600 nm, these signals reflect the kinetics of the reactions: TrpH•+ → Trp• + H+ and 1[FAD•-TrpH•+] → FAD + TrpH (Fig. 4). Lifetimes were extracted from such data by fitting to a monoexponential decay with a constant offset. (B) Effect of a 28 mT magnetic field on the yield of RP2 (recorded at 510 nm) plotted against the lifetime of RP1 (measured at 600 nm) over a range of temperatures and glycerol concentrations, as indicated. The vertical axis is the absolute value of the fractional magnetic-field effect (MFE): |ΔA(28 mT) - ΔA(0)|/ΔA(0). The data plotted here are given in the SI Appendix.

  6. Fig. 6.
    View larger version:
    Fig. 6.

    Magnetic field-dependence of the yield of RP2 in AtCry and EcPL. The percentage change in the yield of RP2 (measured at 510 nm) as a function of the strength of the applied magnetic field for (A) AtCry and (B) EcPL. Experimental conditions: (A) AtCry, 60% glycerol, 270 K; (B) EcPL, 50% glycerol, 260 K. The red lines are the best-fit simulations obtained using the singlet-triplet dephasing model described in the text, with kf = 2.5 × 105 s-1 and (A) kb = 4.9 × 105 s-1,kSTD = 1.1 × 107 s-1; (B) kb = 1.2 × 105 s-1,kSTD = 2.7 × 107 s-1. The other lines are simulations with the same values of kf and kb but (A) kSTD/s-1 = 0 (green), 5 × 106 (yellow), 5 × 107 (blue); (B) kSTD/s-1 = 0 (green), 1 × 107 (yellow), 1 × 108 (blue). The two larger insets show expanded views of the simulations in the low field region. The irregularities visible in some of these curves arise from energy-level anticrossings. The smaller inset in (B) shows, on an expanded scale, the best-fit simulation together with 8 measurements in the range 0.7–2.2 mT that were averaged to obtain the (black) point plotted at B = 1.5 mT in this inset and in the main panel. The error bars associated with this data point represent ± one standard deviation of the eight measurements. Each data point in the main panels is the average of (A) 10 and (B) 40 (> 3 mT) or 80 (< 3 mT) transients. At each applied magnetic-field strength B, the double-difference kinetic time profiles ΔA(B) - ΔA(0) were smoothed with (A) 5 μs and (B) 0.5 μs boxcar functions. The mean ± standard deviation (calculated over the time intervals: (A) 2–170 μs and (B) 7–15 μs is plotted for each datum.

Online Impact